kal(j)amies

kal(j)amies — CS2 Stats

FI76561198998033509[U:1:1037767781]Steam profile ↗✓ No bans

1,110Tracked matches43%Win rate2021Tracked since
CSDB Rating5.6 SolidSupport
FaceitLevel 8 · 1,395 ELOTop 31.2% of ranked FACEIT players
WingmanSupreme Master First Class
Ladder ranks via Leetify

What changed since last observed

CSDB last observed this profile on 18 Sep 2026 (4 days ago). Ranks are recorded once per day this page is viewed.

No change since then — still 1,110 tracked matches. Play, then come back: the next observation lands here.

Track this profile

CSDB reads this profile's Premier rating from its tracked match history, and records Faceit ELO once on every day the page is viewed. 40 days played since 2 Mar 2026. Come back after the next session and the change shows above.

Is this you? Sign in with Steam to claim it and connect match tracking →

Rating over time

Premier CS Rating: 25,416 -1,069 3 Mar1 Sept · 26 days played
25,23327,177peak 27,1773 Mar1 Sept
Faceit ELO: 1,395 +0 1 Sept18 Sept · 2 observations
1,3951,395peak 1,3951 Sept18 Sept
27,224Peak Premier in tracked matches
1,395Highest Faceit ELO seen on CSDB
40Days played since 2026-03-02

Faceit ELO

  • At peak — 1,395
  • Next: Level 8 at 1,531 136 to go
  • Reached: Level 7 · Level 6 · Level 5 · Level 4
  • Level 7 first seen 2026-09-01
  • Level 6 first seen 2026-09-01

Premier comes from this profile’s tracked match history, so it reaches back as far as those matches do. Faceit ELO is CSDB’s own observation — no feed exposes ELO per match, so that line only has the days the profile was viewed and cannot be backfilled.

Share this profile

CSDB.GGkal(j)amiesFACEITLevel 8 · 1,395 ELOSTANDINGTop 31.2% of rankedPEAK ELO1,395csdb.gg/stats

The image is a snapshot; the link keeps updating. Nothing here is published anywhere — it is generated in your browser when you click.

Performance scores

Aim70
Positioning60
Utility71

0–100 skill scores via Leetify.

Recent form

STEADY5050Last 10050%Win rateLWLLWWLWWL

Last 10 vs previous 10: 0pp win rate · +0.03 avg rating · −0.4pp headshot accuracy · +20ms reaction

Win rate 0pp across the last 10 against the 10 before — within the normal variation of a 10-match window (±20pp), so no real shift yet.

Last 5 · 10 · 20 matches

Last 5

  • 23 · 40% win rate
  • Avg rating 0.00
  • Avg headshot accuracy 20%
  • Avg reaction 656ms

Last 10

  • 55 · 50% win rate
  • Avg rating 0.02
  • Avg headshot accuracy 18%
  • Avg reaction 584ms

Last 20

  • 1010 · 50% win rate
  • Avg rating 0.01
  • Avg headshot accuracy 18%
  • Avg reaction 574ms

Newest first, from the last 100 tracked matches. Each block is its own sample — one result moves a 5-match win rate by 20 points.

Player DNA

Primary style: SupportUtility contribution stands above the rest of this profile (+1.8 against its own average).

Aim7.0
Utility7.1
Positioning6.0
Opening Duels3.9
Clutch4.4

Strong CT-side openerEffective flashes

Style profile from tracked-match aggregates — how this player plays, not how good they are. Classification rules are deterministic and documented in code.

What this cannot see yet: which weapons you use — so CSDB cannot identify an AWPer, and no style here implies a rifle or a sniper. It also cannot see how often you take opening duels, only how often you win them, nor where you hold, so roles that depend on those (entry, lurk, anchor) are deliberately absent rather than guessed. All of it needs round-by-round demo data, which is the next thing being built.

Your pro match

NiKo

Plays most like NiKo 82% playstyle similarity

Most alike: utility contribution, positioning profile.

Where you differ: lower aim profile.

Similarity of playstyle shape across shared dimensions — it says how you play, not that you play at their level. Full comparison →

Strengths & areas to improve

Areas to improve

T-side openings. Opening success drops from 54% on CT to 37% on T — the same duels are being taken with worse setups on the attacking side.

Reaction time. 555ms from enemy-visible to first shot leaves fights decided before they start — warmup routines move this number more than anything else.

Generated by fixed rules over this profile's own numbers — no model, no guessing; silent when the sample is too small to support a claim.

CSDB Rating breakdown

Aim7.0
Positioning6.0
Utility7.1
Mechanics7.6
Opening Duels3.9
Win Impact2.8

Composite 5.6/10 (Solid), a weighted mean of the bars with a small opposition adjustment (×0.90 for this rank band). Formula versioned (v1) and documented in code.

Trends

Match rating0.00−0.01
first ⅓ avg 0.01 → last ⅓ avg 0.00
Reaction time564ms−44ms
first ⅓ avg 608ms → last ⅓ avg 564ms
Headshot accuracy19.6%−2.8%
first ⅓ avg 22.4% → last ⅓ avg 19.6%

Rolling 5-match average across the last 100 tracked matches, oldest to newest. The delta compares the first third of the window with the last.

Personal bests

0.18Best match rating · 13–5 · ancient, 9 Sept
52%Best headshot accuracy · 13–10 · dust2, 8 Apr
406msFastest reaction time · 10–13 · inferno, 20 Aug
13–0Biggest win · dust2, 1 Apr

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Highlights

4Longest win streak
512In matches decided by ≤2 rounds
14Overtime games

Map breakdown

nukeBest map · 87% over 15anubisWeakest map · 20% over 5
MapGradePlayedRecordWin rateAvg rating
dust2C27101737%-0.00
infernoB168850%-0.00
ancientC1661038%-0.00
nukeS1513287%0.02
mirageA149564%0.00
anubisD51420%-0.03
cacheA53260%0.00
overpass2020%0.03

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Anubis is currently your weakest sufficiently-sampled map (20% over 5). Start with the 6 essential Anubis lineups, review the callouts, then spin up a practice server.

Faceit stats

Combat

156Matches
57%Win rate
1.10Avg K/D
78.8ADR
50%Headshot %

Clutches & streaks

42%1v1 clutch win
22%1v2 clutch win
8Longest win streak

Recent Faceit resultsWLWWL

MapMatchesWin rateAvg K/DAvg kills
Mirage3656%1.0816.2
Inferno2759%1.0915.6
Ancient2264%1.0214.9
Nuke1872%1.2015.9
Dust21644%1.0316.8
Anubis1145%1.3015.8
Cache540%1.0315.2
Overpass367%0.9716.3

Faceit-match stats via the FACEIT Data API — a separate match pool from the sections above.

Skill profile

Aggregate performance across tracked matches — stats via Leetify. Percentile context against other CSDB-tracked players arrives as our own benchmark data accumulates.

19.5%Headshot accuracy
31.2%Accuracy (enemy spotted)
33.0%Spray accuracy
84.2%Counter-strafing
9.6°Preaim
555msReaction time
36.5%T opening success
54.5%CT opening success
0.72Enemies flashed / flash
8.6%Flash assists
10.48HE damage / grenade
15.37Flashes / match

Recommended for you

Chosen by comparing your tracked metrics against the thresholds we flag — the measurement behind each one is shown, so you can disagree with it.

  1. Advanced Mechanics

    You are losing most of the first duels you take on T side, which is usually a peeking and spacing problem, not aim.

    T opening duels 36.5338% — below the 40% mark we flag

Spend your practice time on Anubis

Map knowledge compounds faster than mechanics — lineups and callouts you learn once keep paying out every time the map comes up.

20% win rate across 5 tracked games — your weakest map with enough games to be worth reading into.

Anubis callouts & strategyAnubis grenade lineups

Recent matches

MapScoreRatingHS%Date
inferno11–13-0.0313%11 Sept
dust213–80.0124%11 Sept
mirage6–130.0123%11 Sept
ancient7–130.0115%11 Sept
dust222–190.0127%10 Sept
mirage13–6-0.049%10 Sept
dust213–160.0418%9 Sept
ancient13–50.1816%9 Sept
ancient16–140.0212%8 Sept
dust29–130.0123%8 Sept
inferno22–25-0.0119%7 Sept
dust213–8-0.0315%6 Sept
mirage13–70.0321%4 Sept
nuke13–40.0718%22 Aug
dust213–16-0.0525%22 Aug
anubis13–160.0110%21 Aug
ancient14–16-0.0512%21 Aug
nuke16–13-0.0314%21 Aug
cache13–110.0316%21 Aug
ancient2–13-0.0334%21 Aug
inferno13–110.0014%21 Aug
mirage13–3-0.049%21 Aug
inferno10–130.0127%20 Aug
inferno13–10-0.0227%17 Aug
ancient11–130.0229%17 Aug
dust210–13-0.0117%17 Aug
dust28–13-0.0227%8 May
dust212–16-0.0226%7 May
inferno11–13-0.0721%7 May
dust26–13-0.0224%7 May
dust213–20.0522%5 May
mirage5–13-0.0619%5 May
ancient13–100.0419%3 May
nuke13–40.0935%3 May
nuke13–60.0330%3 May
mirage11–13-0.0115%3 May
dust28–130.0225%3 May
mirage9–13-0.0136%1 May
cache13–7-0.0322%1 May
ancient11–13-0.0219%30 Apr
nuke13–7-0.0327%30 Apr
cache13–70.0820%30 Apr
ancient13–110.0027%29 Apr
anubis13–7-0.0222%29 Apr
cache10–13-0.0030%29 Apr
cache3–13-0.0624%28 Apr
mirage13–50.0424%24 Apr
nuke13–50.1025%23 Apr
ancient13–100.0016%23 Apr
dust25–13-0.0931%23 Apr
inferno6–13-0.0214%23 Apr
inferno10–13-0.0245%21 Apr
dust210–130.0015%21 Apr
nuke11–13-0.0124%20 Apr
dust211–13-0.0228%20 Apr
ancient7–13-0.0321%19 Apr
mirage13–50.0624%19 Apr
inferno13–60.0631%19 Apr
inferno9–13-0.0526%8 Apr
dust213–100.0252%8 Apr
inferno13–10-0.0124%7 Apr
inferno7–13-0.0137%7 Apr
dust21–13-0.0733%3 Apr
dust24–13-0.0435%2 Apr
mirage13–9-0.0324%2 Apr
ancient7–13-0.0627%2 Apr
inferno13–10-0.0028%2 Apr
overpass8–130.0834%2 Apr
anubis8–13-0.0513%2 Apr
dust213–00.1028%1 Apr
dust22–13-0.1217%31 Mar
nuke13–9-0.0427%31 Mar
ancient13–10-0.0122%31 Mar
mirage7–13-0.0618%31 Mar
nuke13–5-0.0221%19 Mar
inferno13–40.0250%19 Mar
mirage13–100.0628%18 Mar
dust211–130.0426%18 Mar
inferno13–70.0721%17 Mar
dust216–12-0.0123%16 Mar
nuke13–70.0530%16 Mar
ancient11–13-0.0614%16 Mar
anubis7–13-0.0825%15 Mar
mirage16–120.1019%15 Mar
nuke16–130.0018%14 Mar
dust29–130.0123%14 Mar
nuke13–50.0429%14 Mar
ancient8–13-0.058%14 Mar
dust211–60.0619%14 Mar
dust216–130.0025%13 Mar
nuke3–13-0.0123%13 Mar
ancient9–13-0.0239%13 Mar
inferno13–90.0413%5 Mar
nuke13–110.0120%5 Mar
nuke13–30.0318%5 Mar
anubis13–16-0.0222%5 Mar
dust211–13-0.0116%5 Mar
dust213–70.0917%3 Mar
mirage13–90.0015%3 Mar
overpass11–13-0.0217%2 Mar

Match data via Leetify.

Recent teammates

Milestones

1,000 Matches
Compare this player with someone →Inventory value for this account →Where does this rating sit? Premier rank tiers →