ICarryYouNoob

ICarryYouNoob — CS2 Stats

FI76561198989869537[U:1:1029603809]Steam profile ↗✓ No bans

1,075Tracked matches40%Win rate2024Tracked since
1,643Hours in CS40Hrs last 2 wks
CSDB Rating5.4 DevelopingPositional Player
Premier CS Rating8,416Light Blue band · top ~62.5% of ranked players (population est.)
FaceitLevel 5 · 891 ELOTop 67.6% of ranked FACEIT players
Ladder ranks via Leetify

What changed since last observed

CSDB last observed this profile on 3 Nov 2026 (2 days ago). Ranks are recorded once per day this page is viewed.

No change since then. Play, then come back: the next observation lands here.

Rating over time

Premier CS Rating: 8,416 -1,872 25 Aug – 3 Nov · 37 days played
8,41611,762peak 11,76225 Aug3 Nov
12,011Peak Premier in tracked matches
891Highest Faceit ELO seen on CSDB
42Days played since 2026-08-25

Faceit ELO

  • At peak — 891
  • Next: Level 4 at 901 — 10 to go
  • Reached: Level 3 · Level 2

Premier CS Rating

  • 3,346 below peak (11,762)
  • -1,583 over 30 days · declining
  • Next: Blue band at 10,000 — 1,584 to go
  • Reached: Blue band · Light Blue band

Premier comes from this profile’s tracked match history, so it reaches back as far as those matches do.

How this compares with the same rank

Median values for Level 5 among CSDB-tracked players (n=14,283), from Valve's own lifetime stats. Aim, positioning and utility scores are deliberately not benchmarked here — those are a third-party provider's derived metrics, which CSDB does not store.

MetricThis playerLevel 5 medianLevel 6 medianvs Level 6
Headshot rate44.4%43.8%44.8%meets
Shot accuracy1.3%12.0%12.4%11.1% short
Kill/death ratio0.841.021.030.20 short
Match win rate40.8%44.7%45.2%4.4% short

This profile matches the typical Level 6 player on 1 of 4 comparable metrics.

Widest gap: Shot accuracy. That is the metric furthest from the Level 6 median in relative terms — not necessarily the one holding a rank back, which no statistic here can establish.

Share this profile

CSDB.GGICarryYouNoobFACEITLevel 5 · 891 ELOSTANDINGTop 67.6% of rankedPREMIER8,416 · Light Blue bandPEAK ELO891csdb.gg/stats

The image is a snapshot; the link keeps updating. Nothing here is published anywhere — it is generated in your browser when you click.

Performance scores

Aim64
Positioning71
Utility66

0–100 skill scores via Leetify.

Recent form

STEADY47–52–1Last 10047%Win rateLLLWLWLWWL

Last 10 vs previous 10: +10pp win rate · +0.03 avg rating · +2.4pp headshot accuracy · −28ms reaction

Win rate +10pp across the last 10 against the 10 before — within the normal variation of a 10-match window (±20pp), so no real shift yet.

Last 5 · 10 · 20 matches

Last 5

  • 1–4 · 20% win rate
  • Avg rating 0.00
  • Avg headshot accuracy 17%
  • Avg reaction 581ms

Last 10

  • 4–6 · 40% win rate
  • Avg rating 0.01
  • Avg headshot accuracy 19%
  • Avg reaction 556ms

Last 20

  • 7–13 · 35% win rate
  • Avg rating -0.00
  • Avg headshot accuracy 17%
  • Avg reaction 570ms

Newest first, from the last 100 tracked matches. Each block is its own sample — one result moves a 5-match win rate by 20 points.

Player DNA

Primary style: Positional Player — Positioning stands above the rest of this profile (+1.4 against its own average).

Aim6.4
Utility6.6
Positioning7.1
Opening Duels6.8
Clutch2.2

Style profile from tracked-match aggregates — how this player plays, not how good they are. Classification rules are deterministic and documented in code.

What this cannot see yet: which weapons you use — so CSDB cannot identify an AWPer, and no style here implies a rifle or a sniper. It also cannot see how often you take opening duels, only how often you win them, nor where you hold, so roles that depend on those (entry, lurk, anchor) are deliberately absent rather than guessed. All of it needs round-by-round demo data, which is the next thing being built.

Your pro match

device

Plays most like device 79% playstyle similarity

Most alike: positioning profile, utility contribution.

Where you differ: lower opening-duel success; lower aim profile.

Similarity of playstyle shape across shared dimensions — it says how you play, not that you play at their level. Full comparison →

Strengths & areas to improve

Strengths

T openings. 70% T opening-duel success — entries that actually open the round.

Areas to improve

Reaction time. 579ms from enemy-visible to first shot leaves fights decided before they start — warmup routines move this number more than anything else.

Counter-strafing. Only 68% of shots are taken properly stopped — moving-shot inaccuracy is quietly taxing every duel.

Generated by fixed rules over this profile's own numbers — no model, no guessing; silent when the sample is too small to support a claim.

CSDB Rating breakdown

Aim6.4
Positioning7.1
Utility6.6
Mechanics3.9
Opening Duels8.7
Win Impact1.7

Composite 5.4/10 (Developing), a weighted mean of the bars with a small opposition adjustment (×0.90 for this rank band). Formula versioned (v1) and documented in code.

Trends

Match rating-0.00−0.02
first ⅓ avg 0.01 → last ⅓ avg -0.00
Reaction time565ms−42ms
first ⅓ avg 608ms → last ⅓ avg 565ms
Headshot accuracy17.3%−0.8%
first ⅓ avg 18.0% → last ⅓ avg 17.3%

Rolling 5-match average across the last 100 tracked matches, oldest to newest. The delta compares the first third of the window with the last.

Personal bests

0.19Best match rating · 13–1 · inferno, 11 Sept →
42%Best headshot accuracy · 13–3 · dust2, 15 Sept →
391msFastest reaction time · 11–13 · mirage, 29 Aug →
13–1Biggest win · inferno, 11 Sept →

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Highlights

5Longest win streak
L3Current streak
9–10In matches decided by ≤2 rounds
10Overtime games

Map breakdown

nukeBest map · 70% over 10cacheWeakest map · 36% over 11
MapGradePlayedRecordWin rateAvg rating
ancientC2510–1540%-0.00
mirageB209–1145%-0.00
dust2B179–853%-0.00
cacheC114–736%0.00
infernoC104–640%0.05
nukeS107–370%0.02
anubisA74–357%0.01

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Lifetime stats

33,278Lifetime kills
0.84K/D
2,490Matches
40.8%Match win rate
44.4%Headshot % · Top 50% of Level 5 players
1.3%Shot accuracy
5,009MVPs
785Hours (in match)
2,574Bombs planted
554Bombs defused

Most-used weapons

Lifetime map wins

4,573nuke
4,183inferno
1,418dust2
725train
551vertigo
68cbble
58lake
44office

Lifetime totals via Steam — visible because this profile's game details are public. Spans CS:GO and CS2.

Faceit stats

Combat

246Matches
50%Win rate
0.93Avg K/D
73.7ADR
46%Headshot %

Clutches & streaks

31%1v1 clutch win
20%1v2 clutch win
5Longest win streak

Recent Faceit resultsLLLWL

MapMatchesWin rateAvg K/DAvg kills
Mirage6546%0.9313.6
Ancient4951%0.9213.2
Nuke4652%0.9114.2
Dust22450%0.9012.8
Inferno2045%0.8513.3
Anubis2045%0.9712.4
Cache1250%0.9815.3
Overpass862%1.2215.1

Faceit-match stats via the FACEIT Data API — a separate match pool from the sections above.

Skill profile

Aggregate performance across tracked matches — stats via Leetify. Percentile context against other CSDB-tracked players arrives as our own benchmark data accumulates.

17.0%Headshot accuracy
32.6%Accuracy (enemy spotted)
38.6%Spray accuracy
67.7%Counter-strafing
8.1°Preaim
579msReaction time
69.7%T opening success
59.6%CT opening success
0.64Enemies flashed / flash
5.6%Flash assists
9.10HE damage / grenade
15.54Flashes / match

Recommended for you

Spend your practice time on Cache

Map knowledge compounds faster than mechanics — lineups and callouts you learn once keep paying out every time the map comes up.

36% win rate across 11 tracked games — your weakest map with enough games to be worth reading into.

Cache callouts & strategy →

Recent matches

MapScoreRatingHS%Date
ancient8–130.0116%3 Nov →
inferno6–130.0421%3 Nov →
dust29–130.0215%2 Nov →
mirage13–100.0125%1 Nov →
ancient9–13-0.069%29 Oct →
dust213–90.0124%29 Oct →
nuke3–13-0.0326%28 Oct →
dust213–40.0317%28 Oct →
nuke13–80.0718%26 Oct →
inferno8–130.0514%25 Oct →
inferno9–13-0.0220%24 Oct →
mirage9–13-0.0315%24 Oct →
mirage9–130.0230%24 Oct →
mirage5–130.0111%24 Oct →
mirage10–130.0215%24 Oct →
mirage13–9-0.0011%23 Oct →
dust210–13-0.1026%23 Oct →
mirage13–4-0.065%22 Oct →
ancient13–30.0211%22 Oct →
mirage10–130.0019%21 Oct →
cache20–22-0.0415%21 Oct →
mirage11–130.0615%19 Oct →
dust23–13-0.1018%19 Oct →
anubis13–30.0618%19 Oct →
anubis4–13-0.0316%19 Oct →
dust213–7-0.0224%19 Oct →
mirage22–190.0419%18 Oct →
ancient13–3-0.0310%16 Oct →
ancient13–50.049%15 Oct →
cache10–130.0616%15 Oct →
mirage11–4-0.0736%15 Oct →
cache11–13-0.0722%15 Oct →
mirage16–120.036%14 Oct →
dust213–60.0327%14 Oct →
mirage19–17-0.060%10 Oct →
dust213–50.0820%8 Oct →
anubis13–70.0421%8 Oct →
nuke8–13-0.0126%4 Oct →
mirage13–100.0113%4 Oct →
ancient9–13-0.0717%1 Oct →
cache13–110.0236%1 Oct →
inferno13–30.1313%30 Sept →
dust211–13-0.0515%28 Sept →
ancient13–5-0.0320%28 Sept →
cache13–11-0.0119%28 Sept →
ancient8–13-0.0312%24 Sept →
ancient11–130.0418%24 Sept →
dust211–130.0518%24 Sept →
ancient16–14-0.0513%22 Sept →
ancient7–13-0.0112%22 Sept →
mirage13–160.0016%22 Sept →
ancient2–13-0.096%18 Sept →
ancient7–13-0.0714%18 Sept →
cache4–130.0125%17 Sept →
mirage15–15-0.0117%17 Sept →
nuke13–20.1216%17 Sept →
ancient5–13-0.0619%17 Sept →
inferno13–70.0415%16 Sept →
dust213–30.1042%15 Sept →
mirage6–13-0.0125%15 Sept →
mirage13–11-0.0628%15 Sept →
ancient13–80.1314%15 Sept →
inferno9–130.0520%14 Sept →
ancient13–60.0412%14 Sept →
mirage2–130.0019%14 Sept →
dust24–13-0.0816%13 Sept →
inferno13–8-0.0122%13 Sept →
ancient13–100.029%13 Sept →
anubis13–110.0418%12 Sept →
inferno13–10.1926%11 Sept →
ancient7–130.0728%11 Sept →
cache10–130.1024%10 Sept →
nuke13–80.0725%10 Sept →
dust213–70.0417%10 Sept →
cache5–13-0.0121%10 Sept →
ancient8–130.0324%7 Sept →
ancient16–140.0811%7 Sept →
anubis14–160.0018%5 Sept →
ancient9–13-0.0111%4 Sept →
cache13–10-0.0117%4 Sept →
ancient9–130.0716%3 Sept →
ancient11–13-0.018%1 Sept →
dust24–13-0.0312%29 Aug →
mirage11–130.0123%29 Aug →
inferno11–130.0012%29 Aug →
dust210–13-0.0118%29 Aug →
cache13–80.0118%29 Aug →
anubis1–13-0.0717%27 Aug →
ancient10–13-0.0421%27 Aug →
cache9–13-0.0424%27 Aug →
ancient13–10-0.0320%27 Aug →
nuke13–60.0315%26 Aug →
nuke13–11-0.0726%26 Aug →
anubis13–70.0323%26 Aug →
dust213–80.0123%26 Aug →
inferno12–16-0.0121%25 Aug →
nuke8–13-0.057%25 Aug →
dust213–11-0.0524%25 Aug →
nuke13–9-0.038%25 Aug →
nuke13–40.1411%25 Aug →

Match data via Leetify.

Recent teammates

Milestones

1,000 Matches
Compare this player with someone →Inventory value for this account →Where does this rating sit? Premier rank tiers →

This profile is built from public Steam data. If it is yours, you can remove it, or delete your CSDB account.