ICarryYouNoob

ICarryYouNoob — CS2 Stats

FI76561198989869537[U:1:1029603809]Steam profile ↗✓ No bans

1,025Tracked matches55%Win rate2024Tracked since
1,585Hours in CS16Hrs last 2 wks
CSDB Rating5.7 SolidPositional Player
Premier CS Rating10,932Blue band · top ~50% of ranked players (population est.)
FaceitLevel 5 · 891 ELOTop 67.6% of ranked FACEIT players
Ladder ranks via Leetify

What changed since last observed

CSDB last observed this profile on 8 Oct 2026 (6 days ago). Ranks are recorded once per day this page is viewed.

+808Premier CS Rating · 10,124 → 10,932

Rating over time

Premier CS Rating: 10,932 +933 15 Aug – 14 Oct · 34 days played
9,24511,761peak 11,76115 Aug14 Oct
12,011Peak Premier in tracked matches
891Highest Faceit ELO seen on CSDB
36Days played since 2026-08-15

Faceit ELO

  • At peak — 891
  • Next: Level 4 at 901 — 10 to go
  • Reached: Level 3 · Level 2

Premier CS Rating

  • 829 below peak (11,761)
  • +887 over 30 days · improving
  • Next: Purple band at 15,000 — 4,068 to go
  • Reached: Blue band · Light Blue band

Premier comes from this profile’s tracked match history, so it reaches back as far as those matches do.

Compare periods

Last 30 days vs previous 30

MetricLast 30Previous 30Change
Matches71——
Win rate44%——
K/D1.00——
Headshot %44%——

Measured 12 Sep 2026 → 14 Oct 2026; no observation near 60 days ago, so there is no previous window yet.

Differences between Valve's lifetime totals on the days CSDB observed this profile — every mode Valve counts, not only ranked. A window appears only when an observation sits within a few days of each end.

How this compares with the same rank

Median values for Level 5 among CSDB-tracked players (n=13,888), from Valve's own lifetime stats. Aim, positioning and utility scores are deliberately not benchmarked here — those are a third-party provider's derived metrics, which CSDB does not store.

MetricThis playerLevel 5 medianLevel 6 medianvs Level 6
Headshot rate44.4%43.7%44.8%meets
Shot accuracy1.3%12.0%12.4%11.1% short
Kill/death ratio0.841.021.030.20 short
Match win rate40.9%44.7%45.2%4.3% short

This profile matches the typical Level 6 player on 1 of 4 comparable metrics.

Widest gap: Shot accuracy. That is the metric furthest from the Level 6 median in relative terms — not necessarily the one holding a rank back, which no statistic here can establish.

Share this profile

CSDB.GGICarryYouNoobFACEITLevel 5 · 891 ELOSTANDINGTop 67.6% of rankedPREMIER10,932 · Blue bandPEAK ELO891csdb.gg/stats

The image is a snapshot; the link keeps updating. Nothing here is published anywhere — it is generated in your browser when you click.

Performance scores

Aim64
Positioning64
Utility62

0–100 skill scores via Leetify.

Recent form

HOT47–50–3Last 10047%Win rateWWWWWLWLWW

Last 10 vs previous 10: +50pp win rate · +0.04 avg rating · +2.8pp headshot accuracy · −61ms reaction

Win rate up 50pp across the last 10 against the 10 before — more than a 10-match window's normal noise (±20pp).

Last 5 · 10 · 20 matches

Last 5

  • 5–0 · 100% win rate
  • Avg rating 0.02
  • Avg headshot accuracy 15%
  • Avg reaction 520ms

Last 10

  • 8–2 · 80% win rate
  • Avg rating 0.02
  • Avg headshot accuracy 18%
  • Avg reaction 557ms

Last 20

  • 11–9 · 55% win rate
  • Avg rating -0.00
  • Avg headshot accuracy 17%
  • Avg reaction 588ms

Newest first, from the last 100 tracked matches. Each block is its own sample — one result moves a 5-match win rate by 20 points.

Player DNA

Primary style: Positional Player — Positioning stands above the rest of this profile (+1.7 against its own average).

Aim6.4
Utility6.2
Positioning6.4
Opening Duels4.4
Clutch2.0

Strong CT-side opener

Style profile from tracked-match aggregates — how this player plays, not how good they are. Classification rules are deterministic and documented in code.

What this cannot see yet: which weapons you use — so CSDB cannot identify an AWPer, and no style here implies a rifle or a sniper. It also cannot see how often you take opening duels, only how often you win them, nor where you hold, so roles that depend on those (entry, lurk, anchor) are deliberately absent rather than guessed. All of it needs round-by-round demo data, which is the next thing being built.

Your pro match

donk

Plays most like donk 79% playstyle similarity

Most alike: utility contribution, positioning profile.

Where you differ: lower opening-duel success; lower aim profile.

Similarity of playstyle shape across shared dimensions — it says how you play, not that you play at their level. Full comparison →

Strengths & areas to improve

Areas to improve

Reaction time. 571ms from enemy-visible to first shot leaves fights decided before they start — warmup routines move this number more than anything else.

Counter-strafing. Only 70% of shots are taken properly stopped — moving-shot inaccuracy is quietly taxing every duel.

Generated by fixed rules over this profile's own numbers — no model, no guessing; silent when the sample is too small to support a claim.

CSDB Rating breakdown

Aim6.4
Positioning6.4
Utility6.2
Mechanics4.4
Opening Duels5.5
Win Impact6.7

Composite 5.7/10 (Solid), a weighted mean of the bars with a small opposition adjustment (×0.95 for this rank band). Formula versioned (v1) and documented in code.

Trends

Match rating0.01+0.00
first ⅓ avg 0.00 → last ⅓ avg 0.01
Reaction time569ms−32ms
first ⅓ avg 601ms → last ⅓ avg 569ms
Headshot accuracy18.1%−3.8%
first ⅓ avg 21.9% → last ⅓ avg 18.1%

Rolling 5-match average across the last 100 tracked matches, oldest to newest. The delta compares the first third of the window with the last.

Personal bests

0.19Best match rating · 13–1 · inferno, 11 Sept →
44%Best headshot accuracy · 2–3 · cache, 17 Aug →
391msFastest reaction time · 11–13 · mirage, 29 Aug →
13–0Biggest win · anubis, 25 Aug →

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Highlights

5Longest win streak
W5Current streak
11–9In matches decided by ≤2 rounds
11Overtime games

Map breakdown

anubisBest map · 78% over 9mirageWeakest map · 31% over 13
MapGradePlayedRecordWin rateAvg rating
ancientC269–1735%-0.00
nukeB189–950%0.01
mirageD134–931%-0.02
dust2A127–558%0.01
cacheC125–742%0.00
infernoA106–460%0.04
anubisS97–278%0.03

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Mirage is currently your weakest sufficiently-sampled map (31% over 13). Start with the 5 essential Mirage lineups, review the callouts, then spin up a practice server.

Lifetime stats

32,285Lifetime kills
0.84K/D
2,427Matches
40.9%Match win rate
44.4%Headshot % · Top 50% of Level 5 players
1.3%Shot accuracy
4,907MVPs
759Hours (in match)
2,509Bombs planted
537Bombs defused

Most-used weapons

Lifetime map wins

4,449nuke
4,138inferno
1,319dust2
725train
551vertigo
68cbble
58lake
44office

Lifetime totals via Steam — visible because this profile's game details are public. Spans CS:GO and CS2.

Faceit stats

Combat

212Matches
51%Win rate
0.94Avg K/D
73.8ADR
47%Headshot %

Clutches & streaks

30%1v1 clutch win
19%1v2 clutch win
5Longest win streak

Recent Faceit resultsWLWWL

MapMatchesWin rateAvg K/DAvg kills
Mirage5549%0.9513.5
Ancient4551%0.9213.3
Nuke3754%0.9214.1
Dust22148%0.9012.7
Inferno1844%0.8613.6
Anubis1650%0.9612.4
Cache1050%1.0414.6
Overpass862%1.2215.1

Faceit-match stats via the FACEIT Data API — a separate match pool from the sections above.

Skill profile

Aggregate performance across tracked matches — stats via Leetify. Percentile context against other CSDB-tracked players arrives as our own benchmark data accumulates.

17.5%Headshot accuracy
32.4%Accuracy (enemy spotted)
33.9%Spray accuracy
69.9%Counter-strafing
7.8°Preaim
571msReaction time
48.0%T opening success
55.9%CT opening success
0.53Enemies flashed / flash
4.3%Flash assists
8.67HE damage / grenade
15.04Flashes / match

Recommended for you

Spend your practice time on Mirage

Map knowledge compounds faster than mechanics — lineups and callouts you learn once keep paying out every time the map comes up.

31% win rate across 13 tracked games — your weakest map with enough games to be worth reading into.

Mirage callouts & strategy →Mirage grenade lineups →

Recent matches

MapScoreRatingHS%Date
mirage16–120.036%14 Oct →
dust213–60.0327%14 Oct →
mirage19–17-0.060%10 Oct →
dust213–50.0820%8 Oct →
anubis13–70.0421%8 Oct →
nuke8–13-0.0126%4 Oct →
mirage13–100.0113%4 Oct →
ancient9–13-0.0717%1 Oct →
cache13–110.0236%1 Oct →
inferno13–30.1313%30 Sept →
dust211–13-0.0515%28 Sept →
ancient13–5-0.0320%28 Sept →
cache13–11-0.0119%28 Sept →
ancient8–13-0.0312%24 Sept →
ancient11–130.0418%24 Sept →
dust211–130.0518%24 Sept →
ancient16–14-0.0513%22 Sept →
ancient7–13-0.0112%22 Sept →
mirage13–160.0016%22 Sept →
ancient2–13-0.096%18 Sept →
ancient7–13-0.0714%18 Sept →
cache4–130.0125%17 Sept →
mirage15–15-0.0117%17 Sept →
nuke13–20.1216%17 Sept →
ancient5–13-0.0619%17 Sept →
inferno13–70.0415%16 Sept →
dust213–30.1042%15 Sept →
mirage6–13-0.0125%15 Sept →
mirage13–11-0.0628%15 Sept →
ancient13–80.1314%15 Sept →
inferno9–130.0520%14 Sept →
ancient13–60.0412%14 Sept →
mirage2–130.0019%14 Sept →
dust24–13-0.0816%13 Sept →
inferno13–8-0.0122%13 Sept →
ancient13–100.029%13 Sept →
anubis13–110.0418%12 Sept →
inferno13–10.1926%11 Sept →
ancient7–130.0728%11 Sept →
cache10–130.1024%10 Sept →
nuke13–80.0725%10 Sept →
dust213–70.0417%10 Sept →
cache5–13-0.0121%10 Sept →
ancient8–130.0324%7 Sept →
ancient16–140.0811%7 Sept →
anubis14–160.0018%5 Sept →
ancient9–13-0.0111%4 Sept →
cache13–10-0.0117%4 Sept →
ancient9–130.0716%3 Sept →
ancient11–13-0.018%1 Sept →
dust24–13-0.0312%29 Aug →
mirage11–130.0123%29 Aug →
inferno11–130.0012%29 Aug →
dust210–13-0.0118%29 Aug →
cache13–80.0118%29 Aug →
anubis1–13-0.0717%27 Aug →
ancient10–13-0.0421%27 Aug →
cache9–13-0.0424%27 Aug →
ancient13–10-0.0320%27 Aug →
nuke13–60.0315%26 Aug →
nuke13–11-0.0726%26 Aug →
anubis13–70.0323%26 Aug →
dust213–80.0123%26 Aug →
inferno12–16-0.0121%25 Aug →
nuke8–13-0.057%25 Aug →
dust213–11-0.0524%25 Aug →
nuke13–9-0.038%25 Aug →
nuke13–40.1411%25 Aug →
anubis13–00.0643%25 Aug →
mirage8–130.0227%24 Aug →
mirage10–13-0.0631%23 Aug →
nuke13–11-0.0220%23 Aug →
inferno13–8-0.0128%23 Aug →
dust213–60.0217%23 Aug →
nuke4–13-0.0713%23 Aug →
cache13–9-0.0419%21 Aug →
nuke14–160.0415%21 Aug →
ancient7–13-0.0210%20 Aug →
nuke5–13-0.0715%20 Aug →
nuke15–150.0624%20 Aug →
ancient13–4-0.0321%19 Aug →
ancient13–60.0523%19 Aug →
ancient7–13-0.0211%19 Aug →
cache8–130.0118%18 Aug →
inferno2–13-0.1227%18 Aug →
nuke3–13-0.0633%18 Aug →
nuke9–130.0426%17 Aug →
cache2–30.0144%17 Aug →
mirage5–13-0.0223%16 Aug →
nuke15–150.0321%16 Aug →
anubis13–11-0.0226%16 Aug →
nuke13–30.0513%16 Aug →
ancient6–130.0115%16 Aug →
inferno13–10.1228%16 Aug →
anubis13–80.1122%16 Aug →
ancient8–130.0120%16 Aug →
nuke13–8-0.0120%15 Aug →
mirage7–13-0.1221%15 Aug →
cache9–13-0.0314%15 Aug →
anubis13–30.0923%15 Aug →

Match data via Leetify.

Recent teammates

Milestones

1,000 Matches
Compare this player with someone →Inventory value for this account →Where does this rating sit? Premier rank tiers →

This profile is built from public Steam data. If it is yours, you can remove it, or delete your CSDB account.