R1zzer

R1zzer — CS2 Stats

US76561198987916406[U:1:1027650678]Steam profile ↗✓ No bans

3,626Tracked matches58%Win rate2020Tracked since
4,966Hours in CS2Hrs last 2 wks
CSDB Rating5.5 SolidPositional Player
Premier CS Rating18,026Purple band · top ~16.4% of ranked players (population est.)
WingmanGold Nova Master
Ladder ranks via Leetify

What changed since last observed

CSDB last observed this profile on 16 Oct 2026 (11 days ago). Ranks are recorded once per day this page is viewed.

No change since then. Play, then come back: the next observation lands here.

Rating over time

Premier CS Rating: 18,026 +1,003 2 Apr – 16 Oct · 21 days played
15,57819,684peak 19,6842 Apr16 Oct
Faceit ELO: 1,469 +0 28 Aug – 26 Sept · 3 observations
1,4691,469peak 1,46928 Aug26 Sept
19,684Peak Premier in tracked matches
1,469Highest Faceit ELO seen on CSDB
28Days played since 2026-04-02

Faceit ELO

  • At peak — 1,469
  • 0 over 30 days · steady
  • Next: Level 8 at 1,531 — 62 to go
  • Reached: Level 7 · Level 6 · Level 5 · Level 4
  • Level 7 first seen 2026-08-28
  • Level 6 first seen 2026-08-28

Premier CS Rating

  • 1,658 below peak (19,684)
  • +1,191 over 30 days · improving
  • -1,658 over 90 days
  • Next: Pink band at 20,000 — 1,974 to go
  • Reached: Purple band · Blue band · Light Blue band
  • Purple band first seen 2026-09-02
  • Blue band first seen 2026-09-02

Premier comes from this profile’s tracked match history, so it reaches back as far as those matches do. Faceit ELO is CSDB’s own observation — no feed exposes ELO per match, so that line only has the days the profile was viewed and cannot be backfilled.

Compare periods

Last 30 days vs previous 30

MetricLast 30Previous 30Change
Matches1820−2
Win rate50%50%0pp
K/D1.121.03+0.09
Headshot %41%48%−7pp

Measured 26 Sep 2026 → 27 Oct 2026; previous 28 Aug 2026 → 26 Sep 2026.

Differences between Valve's lifetime totals on the days CSDB observed this profile — every mode Valve counts, not only ranked. A window appears only when an observation sits within a few days of each end.

How this compares with the same rank

Median values for Purple band among CSDB-tracked players (n=37,767), from Valve's own lifetime stats. Aim, positioning and utility scores are deliberately not benchmarked here — those are a third-party provider's derived metrics, which CSDB does not store.

MetricThis playerPurple band medianPink band medianvs Pink band
Headshot rate38.6%44.4%46.9%8.3% short
Shot accuracy11.2%11.9%13.0%1.8% short
Kill/death ratio1.101.031.08above
Match win rate47.6%45.2%46.7%meets

This profile matches the typical Pink band player on 2 of 4 comparable metrics.

Widest gap: Headshot rate. That is the metric furthest from the Pink band median in relative terms — not necessarily the one holding a rank back, which no statistic here can establish.

Share this profile

CSDB.GGR1zzerPREMIER18,026 · Purple band30 DAYS0 ELOPEAK ELO1,469csdb.gg/stats

The image is a snapshot; the link keeps updating. Nothing here is published anywhere — it is generated in your browser when you click.

Performance scores

Aim78
Positioning51
Utility34

0–100 skill scores via Leetify.

Recent form

STEADY56–39–5Last 10056%Win rateLLTWLWWWWL

Last 10 vs previous 10: 0pp win rate · +0.01 avg rating · −4.7pp headshot accuracy · +5ms reaction

Win rate 0pp across the last 10 against the 10 before — within the normal variation of a 10-match window (±20pp), so no real shift yet.

Last 5 · 10 · 20 matches

Last 5

  • 1–3–1 · 20% win rate
  • Avg rating -0.00
  • Avg headshot accuracy 17%
  • Avg reaction 494ms

Last 10

  • 5–4–1 · 50% win rate
  • Avg rating 0.02
  • Avg headshot accuracy 18%
  • Avg reaction 510ms

Last 20

  • 10–8–2 · 50% win rate
  • Avg rating 0.02
  • Avg headshot accuracy 21%
  • Avg reaction 508ms

Newest first, from the last 100 tracked matches. Each block is its own sample — one result moves a 5-match win rate by 20 points.

Player DNA

Primary style: Positional Player — Positioning stands above the rest of this profile (+1.8 against its own average).

Aim7.8
Utility3.4
Positioning5.1
Opening Duels1.4
Clutch3.2

Strong CT-side openerLimited utility dependence

Style profile from tracked-match aggregates — how this player plays, not how good they are. Classification rules are deterministic and documented in code.

What this cannot see yet: which weapons you use — so CSDB cannot identify an AWPer, and no style here implies a rifle or a sniper. It also cannot see how often you take opening duels, only how often you win them, nor where you hold, so roles that depend on those (entry, lurk, anchor) are deliberately absent rather than guessed. All of it needs round-by-round demo data, which is the next thing being built.

Your pro match

ropz

Plays most like ropz 94% playstyle similarity

Most alike: positioning profile, aim profile.

Where you differ: lower utility contribution; lower opening-duel success.

Similarity of playstyle shape across shared dimensions — it says how you play, not that you play at their level. Full comparison →

Strengths & areas to improve

Areas to improve

Utility. Utility contribution runs far behind the mechanical game — the cheapest rating gain on this profile is thrown, not aimed.

T-side openings. Opening success drops from 50% on CT to 23% on T — the same duels are being taken with worse setups on the attacking side.

Counter-strafing. Only 69% of shots are taken properly stopped — moving-shot inaccuracy is quietly taxing every duel.

Generated by fixed rules over this profile's own numbers — no model, no guessing; silent when the sample is too small to support a claim.

CSDB Rating breakdown

Aim7.8
Positioning5.1
Utility3.4
Mechanics4.1
Opening Duels2.5
Win Impact7.6

Composite 5.5/10 (Solid), a weighted mean of the bars with a small opposition adjustment (×1.00 for this rank band). Formula versioned (v1) and documented in code.

Trends

Match rating0.02+0.01
first ⅓ avg 0.01 → last ⅓ avg 0.02
Reaction time505ms−46ms
first ⅓ avg 552ms → last ⅓ avg 505ms
Headshot accuracy17.9%+1.4%
first ⅓ avg 16.4% → last ⅓ avg 17.9%

Rolling 5-match average across the last 100 tracked matches, oldest to newest. The delta compares the first third of the window with the last.

Personal bests

0.18Best match rating · 7–1 · cache, 8 May →
42%Best headshot accuracy · 13–4 · inferno, 9 Oct →
344msFastest reaction time · 13–1 · nuke, 29 Aug →
13–1Biggest win · nuke, 9 Oct →

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Highlights

8Longest win streak
L2Current streak
9–5In matches decided by ≤2 rounds
10Overtime games

Map breakdown

ancientBest map · 64% over 14dust2Weakest map · 38% over 8
MapGradePlayedRecordWin rateAvg rating
nukeA2012–860%0.02
infernoA1610–663%0.03
ancientA149–564%0.01
cacheA148–657%0.02
mirageA95–456%-0.01
dust2C83–538%0.03
anubisC83–538%-0.02
overpassB63–350%0.01
italy—10–10%-0.05
boulder—10–10%-0.11
train—11–0100%0.03
warden—11–0100%-0.02
vertigo—11–0100%-0.09

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Dust 2 is currently your weakest sufficiently-sampled map (38% over 8). Start with the 6 essential Dust 2 lineups, review the callouts, then spin up a practice server.

Lifetime stats

116,453Lifetime kills
1.10K/D · Top 50% of Purple band
5,873Matches
47.6%Match win rate · Top 50% of Purple band
38.6%Headshot %
11.2%Shot accuracy
13,391MVPs
2,895Hours (in match)
10,704Bombs planted
2,103Bombs defused

Most-used weapons

AK-4727,348
AWP24,889
MAC-103,053
SSG 082,963
Knife2,308
MP91,947

Lifetime map wins

12,733nuke
11,365inferno
7,285dust2
5,135train
4,462vertigo
63office
28italy
21ar_shoots

Lifetime totals via Steam — visible because this profile's game details are public. Spans CS:GO and CS2.

Faceit stats

Combat

2,846Matches
50%Win rate
1.19Avg K/D
74.2ADR
34%Headshot %

Clutches & streaks

36%1v1 clutch win
14%1v2 clutch win
12Longest win streak

Recent Faceit resultsWWLLL

MapMatchesWin rateAvg K/DAvg kills
Nuke8345%1.3917.4
Ancient7449%1.1016.2
Anubis6850%1.2616.6
Inferno6151%1.2315.9
Vertigo5456%1.2917.4
Dust24448%1.2115.5
Mirage3060%1.1015.1
Overpass1856%1.4914.1

Faceit-match stats via the FACEIT Data API — a separate match pool from the sections above.

Skill profile

Aggregate performance across tracked matches — stats via Leetify. Percentile context against other CSDB-tracked players arrives as our own benchmark data accumulates.

17.7%Headshot accuracy
35.6%Accuracy (enemy spotted)
40.6%Spray accuracy
68.6%Counter-strafing
7.7°Preaim
502msReaction time
23.2%T opening success
49.8%CT opening success
0.52Enemies flashed / flash
0.3%Flash assists
5.55HE damage / grenade
4.17Flashes / match

Recommended for you

Chosen by comparing your tracked metrics against the thresholds we flag — the measurement behind each one is shown, so you can disagree with it.

  1. Advanced Mechanics

    You are losing most of the first duels you take on T side, which is usually a peeking and spacing problem, not aim.

    T opening duels 23.2% — below the 40% mark we flag

Spend your practice time on Dust 2

Map knowledge compounds faster than mechanics — lineups and callouts you learn once keep paying out every time the map comes up.

38% win rate across 8 tracked games — your weakest map with enough games to be worth reading into.

Dust 2 callouts & strategy →Dust 2 grenade lineups →

Recent matches

MapScoreRatingHS%Date
ancient10–130.0214%16 Oct →
inferno6–13-0.0027%16 Oct →
nuke15–15-0.0510%16 Oct →
ancient13–90.0118%10 Oct →
dust24–130.0119%10 Oct →
dust213–50.0417%10 Oct →
nuke13–10.054%9 Oct →
inferno13–40.0942%9 Oct →
inferno13–100.0117%25 Sept →
nuke9–130.0314%25 Sept →
cache13–60.0616%25 Sept →
dust210–13-0.0235%25 Sept →
nuke13–80.0422%25 Sept →
anubis15–15-0.0626%25 Sept →
nuke13–30.0411%25 Sept →
ancient7–13-0.0031%25 Sept →
mirage5–13-0.0422%25 Sept →
nuke1–70.0129%12 Sept →
inferno13–50.1026%12 Sept →
mirage16–14-0.0112%12 Sept →
anubis13–30.017%12 Sept →
inferno13–50.0313%29 Aug →
mirage15–15-0.0211%29 Aug →
nuke13–10.0814%29 Aug →
italy12–12-0.0510%29 Aug →
nuke8–130.0419%22 Aug →
anubis10–13-0.0420%22 Aug →
cache4–13-0.067%22 Aug →
ancient13–11-0.0515%21 Aug →
nuke16–140.0413%19 Aug →
cache13–70.068%19 Aug →
nuke13–80.1020%19 Aug →
inferno13–70.0821%18 Aug →
cache11–130.0727%18 Aug →
cache13–90.0617%18 Aug →
ancient10–130.0011%18 Aug →
inferno5–13-0.060%18 Aug →
dust215–15-0.018%18 Aug →
cache8–130.0212%10 Jul →
boulder6–13-0.113%10 Jul →
dust28–130.0723%9 Jul →
inferno11–130.0111%9 Jul →
cache0–13-0.0717%9 Jul →
cache16–140.0317%8 Jul →
mirage13–6-0.0119%4 Jul →
ancient13–10-0.0415%3 Jul →
inferno13–100.0315%3 Jul →
dust213–30.0620%3 Jul →
anubis4–13-0.0513%18 Jun →
nuke13–7-0.0018%18 Jun →
ancient13–30.028%18 Jun →
inferno9–130.0225%17 Jun →
overpass13–20.0132%17 Jun →
nuke13–10-0.0613%17 Jun →
overpass9–13-0.0113%17 Jun →
ancient13–3-0.058%17 Jun →
inferno16–130.045%17 Jun →
nuke13–110.0316%17 Jun →
nuke13–80.0512%7 Jun →
anubis13–20.0010%31 May →
dust213–90.0717%31 May →
inferno13–10-0.0324%29 May →
cache16–14-0.048%29 May →
anubis8–130.017%29 May →
cache7–130.018%29 May →
cache4–13-0.0340%15 May →
ancient13–110.0723%15 May →
cache7–10.1825%8 May →
mirage13–5-0.0412%8 May →
ancient13–90.0618%8 May →
overpass6–130.0314%8 May →
cache13–70.0116%8 May →
anubis9–13-0.0717%8 May →
mirage6–13-0.0633%8 May →
inferno13–50.0610%8 May →
ancient13–100.0412%8 May →
nuke13–60.0410%8 May →
nuke9–13-0.0112%1 May →
cache13–11-0.0221%1 May →
nuke14–16-0.0616%28 Apr →
overpass11–130.0616%28 Apr →
nuke13–60.029%27 Apr →
mirage13–70.0516%27 Apr →
mirage13–100.0013%27 Apr →
nuke5–130.0012%27 Apr →
inferno6–130.0029%27 Apr →
overpass7–1-0.0513%27 Apr →
inferno10–130.0527%17 Apr →
ancient8–13-0.058%17 Apr →
ancient13–50.0618%17 Apr →
mirage7–130.0113%17 Apr →
train13–100.0312%7 Apr →
anubis13–50.0411%7 Apr →
warden7–2-0.0212%7 Apr →
vertigo13–11-0.0917%7 Apr →
nuke11–13-0.0110%7 Apr →
ancient4–13-0.029%7 Apr →
dust27–130.0238%2 Apr →
inferno13–70.0227%2 Apr →
overpass13–60.0113%2 Apr →

Match data via Leetify.

Recent teammates

Milestones

1,000 Matches
Compare this player with someone →Inventory value for this account →Where does this rating sit? Premier rank tiers →

This profile is built from public Steam data. If it is yours, you can remove it, or delete your CSDB account.