P1n3

P1n3 — CS2 Stats

76561198983389109[U:1:1023123381]Steam profile ↗✓ No bans

3,995Tracked matches30%Win rate2020Tracked since
7,187Hours in CS95Hrs last 2 wks
CSDB Rating4.4 DevelopingSupport
Premier CS Rating14,021Blue band · top ~33.6% of ranked players (population est.)
FaceitLevel 7 · 1,359 ELOTop 42.3% of ranked FACEIT players
WingmanLegendary Eagle
Ladder ranks via Leetify

What changed since last observed

CSDB last observed this profile on 19 Sep 2026 (2 days ago). Ranks are recorded once per day this page is viewed.

No change since then. Play, then come back: the next observation lands here.

Track this profile

CSDB reads this profile's Premier rating from its tracked match history, and records Faceit ELO once on every day the page is viewed. 41 days played since 5 Aug 2026. Come back after the next session and the change shows above.

Is this you? Sign in with Steam to claim it and connect match tracking →

Rating over time

Premier CS Rating: 14,021 +3 10 Aug19 Sept · 19 days played
13,64216,313peak 16,31310 Aug19 Sept
Faceit ELO: 1,359 +0 28 Aug5 Sept · 3 observations
1,3591,359peak 1,35928 Aug5 Sept
16,313Peak Premier in tracked matches
1,359Highest Faceit ELO seen on CSDB
41Days played since 2026-08-05

Faceit ELO

  • At peak — 1,359
  • Next: Level 8 at 1,531 172 to go
  • Reached: Level 7 · Level 6 · Level 5 · Level 4
  • Level 7 first seen 2026-08-28
  • Level 6 first seen 2026-08-28

Premier CS Rating

  • 2,292 below peak (16,313)
  • -993 over 30 days · declining
  • Next: Purple band at 15,000 979 to go
  • Reached: Purple band · Blue band · Light Blue band
  • Purple band first seen 2026-08-28
  • Blue band first seen 2026-08-28

Premier comes from this profile’s tracked match history, so it reaches back as far as those matches do. Faceit ELO is CSDB’s own observation — no feed exposes ELO per match, so that line only has the days the profile was viewed and cannot be backfilled.

How this compares with the same rank

Median values for Level 7 among CSDB-tracked players (n=12,717), from Valve's own lifetime stats. Aim, positioning and utility scores are deliberately not benchmarked here — those are a third-party provider's derived metrics, which CSDB does not store.

MetricThis playerLevel 7 medianLevel 8 medianvs Level 8
Headshot rate52.5%45.7%46.8%above
Shot accuracy7.9%12.7%13.0%5.1% short
Kill/death ratio1.061.051.06meets
Match win rate44.8%45.7%46.3%1.5% short

This profile matches the typical Level 8 player on 2 of 4 comparable metrics.

Widest gap: Shot accuracy. That is the metric furthest from the Level 8 median in relative terms — not necessarily the one holding a rank back, which no statistic here can establish.

Share this profile

CSDB.GGP1n3FACEITLevel 7 · 1,359 ELOSTANDINGTop 42.3% of rankedPREMIER14,021 · Blue bandPEAK ELO1,359csdb.gg/stats

The image is a snapshot; the link keeps updating. Nothing here is published anywhere — it is generated in your browser when you click.

Performance scores

Aim67
Positioning43
Utility45

0–100 skill scores via Leetify.

Recent form

COLD4456Last 10044%Win rateLWLLLLLLLW

Last 10 vs previous 10: −10pp win rate · −0.02 avg rating · +3.7pp headshot accuracy · +1ms reaction

Win rate −10pp across the last 10 against the 10 before — within the normal variation of a 10-match window (±20pp), so no real shift yet.

Last 5 · 10 · 20 matches

Last 5

  • 14 · 20% win rate
  • Avg rating -0.06
  • Avg headshot accuracy 18%
  • Avg reaction 600ms

Last 10

  • 28 · 20% win rate
  • Avg rating -0.04
  • Avg headshot accuracy 19%
  • Avg reaction 595ms

Last 20

  • 515 · 25% win rate
  • Avg rating -0.03
  • Avg headshot accuracy 17%
  • Avg reaction 594ms

Newest first, from the last 100 tracked matches. Each block is its own sample — one result moves a 5-match win rate by 20 points.

Player DNA

Primary style: SupportUtility contribution stands above the rest of this profile (+0.9 against its own average).

Aim6.7
Utility4.5
Positioning4.3
Opening Duels1.8
Clutch3.6

Strong CT-side opener

Style profile from tracked-match aggregates — how this player plays, not how good they are. Classification rules are deterministic and documented in code.

What this cannot see yet: which weapons you use — so CSDB cannot identify an AWPer, and no style here implies a rifle or a sniper. It also cannot see how often you take opening duels, only how often you win them, nor where you hold, so roles that depend on those (entry, lurk, anchor) are deliberately absent rather than guessed. All of it needs round-by-round demo data, which is the next thing being built.

Your pro match

NiKo

Plays most like NiKo 94% playstyle similarity

Most alike: utility contribution, positioning profile.

Where you differ: lower aim profile; lower opening-duel success.

Similarity of playstyle shape across shared dimensions — it says how you play, not that you play at their level. Full comparison →

Strengths & areas to improve

Areas to improve

T-side openings. Opening success drops from 46% on CT to 27% on T — the same duels are being taken with worse setups on the attacking side.

Reaction time. 597ms from enemy-visible to first shot leaves fights decided before they start — warmup routines move this number more than anything else.

Generated by fixed rules over this profile's own numbers — no model, no guessing; silent when the sample is too small to support a claim.

CSDB Rating breakdown

Aim6.7
Positioning4.3
Utility4.5
Mechanics6.0
Opening Duels2.0
Win Impact0.0

Composite 4.4/10 (Developing), a weighted mean of the bars with a small opposition adjustment (×0.95 for this rank band). Formula versioned (v1) and documented in code.

Trends

Match rating-0.01−0.02
first ⅓ avg 0.01 → last ⅓ avg -0.01
Reaction time598ms−39ms
first ⅓ avg 637ms → last ⅓ avg 598ms
Headshot accuracy17.1%−2.7%
first ⅓ avg 19.8% → last ⅓ avg 17.1%

Rolling 5-match average across the last 100 tracked matches, oldest to newest. The delta compares the first third of the window with the last.

Personal bests

0.13Best match rating · 13–11 · inferno, 1 Sept
40%Best headshot accuracy · 2–13 · cache, 13 Sept
445msFastest reaction time · 2–13 · cache, 13 Sept
13–1Biggest win · anubis, 20 Aug

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Highlights

4Longest win streak
79In matches decided by ≤2 rounds
11Overtime games

Map breakdown

dust2Best map · 64% over 14anubisWeakest map · 26% over 19
MapGradePlayedRecordWin rateAvg rating
mirageC28111739%-0.01
anubisD1951426%0.00
dust2A149564%0.02
infernoA127558%0.02
ancientB105550%0.00
nukeC94544%-0.01
cache42250%0.01
vertigo31233%-0.00
train1010%-0.03

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Anubis is currently your weakest sufficiently-sampled map (26% over 19). Start with the 6 essential Anubis lineups, review the callouts, then spin up a practice server.

Lifetime stats

159,126Lifetime kills
1.06K/D · Top 50% of Level 7 players
7,082Matches
44.8%Match win rate
52.5%Headshot % · Top 25% of Level 7 players
7.9%Shot accuracy
16,942MVPs
4,180Hours (in match)
8,338Bombs planted
2,851Bombs defused

Most-used weapons

AK-4761,105
AWP19,332
MP94,993
Knife4,215
FAMAS3,686
MAC-103,656

Lifetime map wins

13,913inferno
11,726dust2
4,252nuke
2,473train
1,539vertigo
105cbble
76lake
71office

Lifetime totals via Steam — visible because this profile's game details are public. Spans CS:GO and CS2.

Faceit stats

Combat

4,472Matches
50%Win rate
0.99Avg K/D
74.0ADR
43%Headshot %

Clutches & streaks

38%1v1 clutch win
19%1v2 clutch win
10Longest win streak

Recent Faceit resultsWWLWW

MapMatchesWin rateAvg K/DAvg kills
Mirage99253%0.9814.7
Anubis51856%1.0915.8
Inferno41147%0.9715.1
Ancient40245%0.9815.7
Dust231542%0.9414.6
Nuke10939%0.8814.2
Overpass5347%0.9614.9
Cache2650%1.0517.3

Faceit-match stats via the FACEIT Data API — a separate match pool from the sections above.

Skill profile

Aggregate performance across tracked matches — stats via Leetify. Percentile context against other CSDB-tracked players arrives as our own benchmark data accumulates.

16.9%Headshot accuracy
35.0%Accuracy (enemy spotted)
39.8%Spray accuracy
77.1%Counter-strafing
10.1°Preaim
597msReaction time
26.8%T opening success
45.9%CT opening success
0.59Enemies flashed / flash
6.2%Flash assists
5.10HE damage / grenade
8.37Flashes / match

Recommended for you

Chosen by comparing your tracked metrics against the thresholds we flag — the measurement behind each one is shown, so you can disagree with it.

  1. Advanced Mechanics

    You are losing most of the first duels you take on T side, which is usually a peeking and spacing problem, not aim.

    T opening duels 26.7672% — below the 40% mark we flag

Spend your practice time on Anubis

Map knowledge compounds faster than mechanics — lineups and callouts you learn once keep paying out every time the map comes up.

26% win rate across 19 tracked games — your weakest map with enough games to be worth reading into.

Anubis callouts & strategyAnubis grenade lineups

Recent matches

MapScoreRatingHS%Date
ancient12–16-0.0513%19 Sept
mirage13–11-0.0124%18 Sept
mirage10–13-0.0618%17 Sept
mirage4–13-0.0815%16 Sept
mirage6–13-0.1119%14 Sept
cache2–13-0.0340%13 Sept
mirage9–130.0119%13 Sept
mirage6–13-0.0520%12 Sept
vertigo9–130.0010%11 Sept
mirage13–70.0314%9 Sept
anubis13–16-0.094%7 Sept
dust213–60.0122%7 Sept
inferno13–50.0818%7 Sept
nuke6–13-0.043%7 Sept
anubis13–5-0.0018%7 Sept
mirage7–13-0.0212%6 Sept
inferno5–13-0.0339%6 Sept
cache5–13-0.0416%6 Sept
ancient11–13-0.049%6 Sept
inferno6–13-0.0013%5 Sept
anubis12–160.0713%5 Sept
anubis13–5-0.0019%4 Sept
ancient3–13-0.0221%4 Sept
nuke13–80.0123%4 Sept
ancient13–90.0117%4 Sept
nuke6–13-0.0620%3 Sept
dust213–70.1125%3 Sept
train9–13-0.0316%3 Sept
ancient5–13-0.0415%3 Sept
mirage7–13-0.0711%3 Sept
ancient13–100.0214%2 Sept
inferno13–110.1312%1 Sept
mirage13–100.0515%1 Sept
mirage13–60.0222%1 Sept
nuke4–13-0.0619%1 Sept
inferno5–130.0214%1 Sept
dust213–70.0711%1 Sept
anubis14–160.038%31 Aug
nuke13–90.0410%30 Aug
anubis2–7-0.0013%29 Aug
ancient13–60.0319%29 Aug
mirage13–11-0.0116%29 Aug
mirage10–13-0.0316%29 Aug
ancient10–130.0117%28 Aug
anubis14–160.0110%28 Aug
anubis13–30.0821%28 Aug
mirage11–13-0.0112%28 Aug
mirage11–13-0.0215%28 Aug
mirage7–13-0.0113%27 Aug
mirage13–60.0911%27 Aug
inferno13–100.0210%27 Aug
mirage9–13-0.0126%27 Aug
mirage6–13-0.068%26 Aug
inferno13–100.0421%25 Aug
nuke13–70.0313%25 Aug
ancient13–40.027%25 Aug
anubis8–13-0.0822%25 Aug
dust210–13-0.0122%25 Aug
ancient13–60.0814%25 Aug
mirage6–13-0.0829%25 Aug
nuke10–13-0.0629%25 Aug
inferno13–80.0021%25 Aug
inferno13–7-0.0211%24 Aug
dust29–130.0318%23 Aug
dust27–13-0.0117%22 Aug
mirage13–90.0518%21 Aug
mirage9–130.0515%20 Aug
nuke13–90.0030%20 Aug
cache13–50.1226%20 Aug
anubis8–13-0.016%20 Aug
dust213–30.0733%20 Aug
anubis13–10.1021%20 Aug
inferno8–130.0425%19 Aug
inferno13–50.0822%19 Aug
dust213–70.0229%19 Aug
dust213–80.0026%19 Aug
anubis13–11-0.0317%19 Aug
anubis10–130.0113%19 Aug
anubis12–16-0.0215%18 Aug
mirage11–13-0.0315%17 Aug
dust213–90.0717%16 Aug
mirage13–70.0316%15 Aug
inferno3–9-0.1725%14 Aug
dust211–130.0211%14 Aug
dust28–13-0.0512%14 Aug
dust213–9-0.0319%14 Aug
vertigo13–90.0015%13 Aug
anubis8–13-0.0124%13 Aug
mirage16–13-0.0518%13 Aug
mirage8–13-0.0034%12 Aug
anubis19–220.0014%12 Aug
anubis8–13-0.0220%11 Aug
nuke14–160.0322%11 Aug
mirage13–70.0417%11 Aug
anubis6–130.0218%10 Aug
cache19–17-0.0021%9 Aug
dust213–11-0.0317%6 Aug
vertigo17–19-0.0121%6 Aug
anubis6–13-0.0219%6 Aug
mirage13–110.0316%5 Aug

Match data via Leetify.

Recent teammates

Milestones

1,000 Matches
Compare this player with someone →Inventory value for this account →Where does this rating sit? Premier rank tiers →