bard-

bard- — CS2 Stats

PL76561198981552350[U:1:1021286622]Steam profile ↗✓ No bans

2,047Tracked matches72%Win rate2020Tracked since
5,074Hours in CS1Hrs last 2 wks
CSDB Rating6.8 SolidPositional Player
Premier CS Rating28,870Top 1% of 215,386 CSDB-tracked playersRed band · top ~1.1% of ranked players (population est.)
CSDB Leaderboard#1731 of 261504 tracked
FaceitLevel 9 · 2,049 ELOTop 20.7% of ranked FACEIT players
Ladder ranks via Leetify

What changed since last observed

CSDB last observed this profile on 17 Oct 2026 (28 days ago). Ranks are recorded once per day this page is viewed.

No change since then — still 2,047 tracked matches. Play, then come back: the next observation lands here.

Rating over time

Premier CS Rating: 28,870 +1,842 12 May – 17 Oct · 21 days played
26,81028,870peak 28,87012 May17 Oct
Faceit ELO: 2,049 +0 2 Sept – 17 Oct · 8 observations
2,0492,049peak 2,0492 Sept17 Oct
28,870Peak Premier in tracked matches
2,049Highest Faceit ELO seen on CSDB
26Days played since 2026-05-12

Faceit ELO

  • At peak — 2,049
  • 0 over 30 days · steady
  • Next: 2,500 ELO at 2,500 — 451 to go
  • Reached: Level 10 · Level 9 · Level 8 · Level 7
  • Level 10 first seen 2026-09-02
  • Level 9 first seen 2026-09-02

Premier CS Rating

  • At peak — 28,870
  • 0 over 30 days · steady
  • Next: Gold band at 30,000 — 1,130 to go
  • Reached: Red band · Pink band · Purple band · Blue band
  • Red band first seen 2026-09-02
  • Pink band first seen 2026-09-02

Premier comes from this profile’s tracked match history, so it reaches back as far as those matches do. Faceit ELO is CSDB’s own observation — no feed exposes ELO per match, so that line only has the days the profile was viewed and cannot be backfilled.

Compare periods

Last 30 days vs previous 30

No matches recorded between 17 Oct 2026 and 14 Nov 2026.

Measured 17 Oct 2026 → 14 Nov 2026; previous 16 Sep 2026 → 17 Oct 2026.

Differences between Valve's lifetime totals on the days CSDB observed this profile — every mode Valve counts, not only ranked. A window appears only when an observation sits within a few days of each end.

How this compares with the same rank

Median values for Level 9 among CSDB-tracked players (n=15,132), from Valve's own lifetime stats. Aim, positioning and utility scores are deliberately not benchmarked here — those are a third-party provider's derived metrics, which CSDB does not store.

MetricThis playerLevel 9 medianLevel 10 medianvs Level 10
Headshot rate60.4%48.2%50.9%above
Shot accuracy14.7%13.2%13.7%above
Kill/death ratio1.271.071.09above
Match win rate47.9%46.9%48.4%meets

Across every metric we can compare, this profile already matches the typical Level 10 player. Rank still comes from winning matches — this is a performance comparison, not a prediction.

Share this profile

CSDB.GGbard-FACEITLevel 9 · 2,049 ELOSTANDINGTop 20.7% of rankedPREMIER28,870 · Red band30 DAYS0 ELOPEAK ELO2,049csdb.gg/stats

The image is a snapshot; the link keeps updating. Nothing here is published anywhere — it is generated in your browser when you click.

Performance scores

Aim68
Positioning66
Utility58

0–100 skill scores via Leetify.

Recent form

HOT63–31–6Last 10063%Win rateLWLWWWWWWW

Last 10 vs previous 10: +10pp win rate · +0.04 avg rating · +1.9pp headshot accuracy · −73ms reaction

Win rate +10pp across the last 10 against the 10 before — within the normal variation of a 10-match window (±20pp), so no real shift yet.

Last 5 · 10 · 20 matches

Last 5

  • 3–2 · 60% win rate
  • Avg rating 0.02
  • Avg headshot accuracy 17%
  • Avg reaction 545ms

Last 10

  • 8–2 · 80% win rate
  • Avg rating 0.06
  • Avg headshot accuracy 21%
  • Avg reaction 563ms

Last 20

  • 15–4–1 · 75% win rate
  • Avg rating 0.04
  • Avg headshot accuracy 20%
  • Avg reaction 599ms

Newest first, from the last 100 tracked matches. Each block is its own sample — one result moves a 5-match win rate by 20 points.

Player DNA

Primary style: Positional Player — Positioning stands above the rest of this profile (+1.3 against its own average).

Aim6.8
Utility5.8
Positioning6.6
Opening Duels4.2
Clutch4.8

Style profile from tracked-match aggregates — how this player plays, not how good they are. Classification rules are deterministic and documented in code.

What this cannot see yet: which weapons you use — so CSDB cannot identify an AWPer, and no style here implies a rifle or a sniper. It also cannot see how often you take opening duels, only how often you win them, nor where you hold, so roles that depend on those (entry, lurk, anchor) are deliberately absent rather than guessed. All of it needs round-by-round demo data, which is the next thing being built.

Your pro match

ZywOo

Plays most like ZywOo 82% playstyle similarity

Most alike: positioning profile, utility contribution.

Where you differ: lower opening-duel success; lower aim profile.

Similarity of playstyle shape across shared dimensions — it says how you play, not that you play at their level. Full comparison →

Strengths & areas to improve

Areas to improve

T-side openings. Opening success drops from 54% on CT to 35% on T — the same duels are being taken with worse setups on the attacking side.

Reaction time. 577ms from enemy-visible to first shot leaves fights decided before they start — warmup routines move this number more than anything else.

Generated by fixed rules over this profile's own numbers — no model, no guessing; silent when the sample is too small to support a claim.

CSDB Rating breakdown

Aim6.8
Positioning6.6
Utility5.8
Mechanics5.9
Opening Duels3.6
Win Impact10.0

Composite 6.8/10 (Solid), a weighted mean of the bars with a small opposition adjustment (×1.05 for this rank band). Formula versioned (v1) and documented in code.

Trends

Match rating0.03+0.02
first ⅓ avg 0.01 → last ⅓ avg 0.03
Reaction time592ms+6ms
first ⅓ avg 586ms → last ⅓ avg 592ms
Headshot accuracy21.2%−0.9%
first ⅓ avg 22.1% → last ⅓ avg 21.2%

Rolling 5-match average across the last 100 tracked matches, oldest to newest. The delta compares the first third of the window with the last.

Personal bests

0.26Best match rating · 13–6 · anubis, 7 Jun →
42%Best headshot accuracy · 16–14 · mirage, 4 Jun →
383msFastest reaction time · 12–12 · office, 27 May →
13–1Biggest win · vertigo, 30 Jun →

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Highlights

11Longest win streak
9–4In matches decided by ≤2 rounds
4Overtime games

Map breakdown

ancientBest map · 83% over 6officeWeakest map · 40% over 5
MapGradePlayedRecordWin rateAvg rating
nukeB189–950%-0.01
mirageS1511–473%0.02
anubisA106–460%0.06
vertigoS107–370%0.05
infernoA95–456%0.03
dust2S96–367%0.04
overpassA74–357%-0.01
cacheS64–267%0.09
ancientS65–183%0.02
officeC52–340%0.04
train—33–0100%0.07
italy—10–10%0.05
warden—11–0100%0.13

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Lifetime stats

150,283Lifetime kills
1.27K/D · Top 25% of Level 9 players
4,622Matches
47.9%Match win rate · Top 50% of Level 9 players
60.4%Headshot % · Top 10% of Level 9 players
14.7%Shot accuracy · Top 50% of Level 9 players
21,684MVPs
2,845Hours (in match)
4,085Bombs planted
5,169Bombs defused

Most-used weapons

AK-4771,982
AWP9,636
MP93,713
MAC-102,341
FAMAS2,330

Lifetime map wins

10,367inferno
5,568nuke
5,121vertigo
4,564dust2
2,179train
140cbble
72office
70lake

Lifetime totals via Steam — visible because this profile's game details are public. Spans CS:GO and CS2.

Faceit stats

Combat

661Matches
51%Win rate
1.06Avg K/D
80.2ADR
48%Headshot %

Clutches & streaks

44%1v1 clutch win
22%1v2 clutch win
7Longest win streak

Recent Faceit resultsLLLLL

MapMatchesWin rateAvg K/DAvg kills
Mirage8551%1.0715.2
Ancient5954%1.0716.5
Anubis5654%1.1116.4
Dust25547%0.9715.4
Nuke4257%1.0615.7
Inferno4032%0.9014.1
Train1729%1.0014.8
Overpass1464%1.0417.4

Faceit-match stats via the FACEIT Data API — a separate match pool from the sections above.

Skill profile

Aggregate performance across tracked matches — stats via Leetify. Percentile context against other CSDB-tracked players arrives as our own benchmark data accumulates.

21.3%Headshot accuracy
35.0%Accuracy (enemy spotted)
39.1%Spray accuracy
76.6%Counter-strafing
11.9°Preaim
577msReaction time
34.9%T opening success
53.7%CT opening success
0.51Enemies flashed / flash
6.4%Flash assists
8.97HE damage / grenade
8.58Flashes / match

Recommended for you

Chosen by comparing your tracked metrics against the thresholds we flag — the measurement behind each one is shown, so you can disagree with it.

  1. Advanced Mechanics

    You are losing most of the first duels you take on T side, which is usually a peeking and spacing problem, not aim.

    T opening duels 34.9228% — below the 40% mark we flag

Recent matches

MapScoreRatingHS%Date
anubis11–13-0.0415%30 Jun →
vertigo13–10.0313%30 Jun →
cache6–130.0221%30 Jun →
office13–90.0319%22 Jun →
vertigo13–80.0817%21 Jun →
anubis13–10.1129%21 Jun →
train13–30.1130%21 Jun →
inferno13–110.0514%21 Jun →
vertigo13–50.2125%21 Jun →
nuke13–90.0128%15 Jun →
ancient13–60.0115%15 Jun →
overpass13–5-0.0613%15 Jun →
inferno13–1-0.018%15 Jun →
anubis13–60.0229%15 Jun →
anubis12–120.0428%12 Jun →
cache8–130.0923%12 Jun →
mirage13–10-0.0019%12 Jun →
ancient3–13-0.0520%12 Jun →
dust213–40.0918%12 Jun →
office13–100.0520%12 Jun →
nuke16–14-0.0134%12 Jun →
ancient13–9-0.0120%12 Jun →
nuke10–13-0.0627%11 Jun →
anubis13–5-0.0621%11 Jun →
ancient13–20.0211%11 Jun →
cache13–110.1526%11 Jun →
italy11–130.0512%11 Jun →
nuke9–130.0331%10 Jun →
inferno9–13-0.0119%10 Jun →
cache13–70.1023%8 Jun →
mirage7–130.0411%8 Jun →
office12–120.0432%8 Jun →
nuke7–130.0529%7 Jun →
anubis13–60.2624%7 Jun →
mirage12–120.0118%6 Jun →
dust213–90.0325%6 Jun →
inferno13–40.0722%5 Jun →
vertigo8–130.0519%5 Jun →
office5–130.1436%5 Jun →
dust213–40.0825%5 Jun →
anubis13–6-0.0319%4 Jun →
warden13–80.1337%4 Jun →
mirage9–10.0329%4 Jun →
vertigo2–13-0.0727%4 Jun →
vertigo5–90.0018%4 Jun →
nuke13–100.1431%4 Jun →
overpass13–50.0522%4 Jun →
vertigo13–90.0717%4 Jun →
mirage9–130.1026%4 Jun →
nuke1–13-0.1114%4 Jun →
mirage16–14-0.0142%4 Jun →
inferno5–130.0324%1 Jun →
dust213–90.1022%1 Jun →
vertigo13–30.0036%1 Jun →
nuke13–100.0234%30 May →
train13–100.0823%30 May →
overpass9–13-0.0516%30 May →
mirage13–10-0.0315%30 May →
nuke13–110.0125%30 May →
overpass12–120.0720%29 May →
mirage13–50.0136%29 May →
inferno13–40.0234%29 May →
vertigo13–60.1130%27 May →
office12–12-0.070%27 May →
anubis13–60.2226%27 May →
train13–100.0229%27 May →
mirage8–130.0118%27 May →
nuke13–110.0533%24 May →
ancient13–50.0717%24 May →
inferno13–30.0626%24 May →
dust213–10-0.0112%24 May →
nuke13–40.0329%23 May →
cache13–110.0927%23 May →
nuke13–1-0.0821%23 May →
mirage13–9-0.0125%23 May →
inferno11–130.1133%22 May →
mirage13–8-0.0413%22 May →
dust214–16-0.0517%22 May →
nuke10–130.0125%21 May →
overpass13–11-0.0117%20 May →
nuke5–13-0.0727%20 May →
vertigo13–60.0332%19 May →
overpass6–13-0.1016%19 May →
anubis10–130.1429%19 May →
dust213–30.0930%19 May →
ancient13–110.0521%19 May →
dust212–120.0527%19 May →
mirage13–70.0320%19 May →
mirage13–70.0530%19 May →
mirage13–80.1123%19 May →
dust25–13-0.0332%18 May →
nuke7–13-0.100%14 May →
mirage13–100.0322%14 May →
cache13–20.1112%13 May →
nuke5–13-0.0915%13 May →
inferno1–13-0.0418%13 May →
anubis13–16-0.0215%13 May →
nuke0–13-0.0833%12 May →
overpass13–50.0517%12 May →
nuke13–70.0218%12 May →

Match data via Leetify.

Recent teammates

Milestones

2K ELO1,000 Matches11-Win Streak
Compare this player with someone →Inventory value for this account →Where does this rating sit? Premier rank tiers →

This profile is built from public Steam data. If it is yours, you can remove it, or delete your CSDB account.