oNeShOT

oNeShOT — CS2 Stats

76561198977519269[U:1:1017253541]Steam profile ↗✓ No bans

630Tracked matches37%Win rate2021Tracked since
512Hours in CS
CSDB Rating4.4 DevelopingPositional Player
FaceitLevel 4 · 933 ELOTop 81.0% of ranked FACEIT players
Ladder ranks via Leetify

What changed since last observed

CSDB last observed this profile on 20 Sep 2026 (4 days ago). Ranks are recorded once per day this page is viewed.

No change since then — still 630 tracked matches. Play, then come back: the next observation lands here.

Track this profile

CSDB reads this profile's Premier rating from its tracked match history, and records Faceit ELO once on every day the page is viewed. 44 days played since 24 Mar 2026. Come back after the next session and the change shows above.

Is this you? Sign in with Steam to claim it and connect match tracking →

Rating over time

Premier CS Rating: 15,964 -1,637 29 Mar5 Jun · 35 days played
15,25418,671peak 18,67129 Mar5 Jun
Faceit ELO: 933 +0 30 Aug20 Sept · 2 observations
933933peak 93330 Aug20 Sept
18,671Peak Premier in tracked matches
933Highest Faceit ELO seen on CSDB
44Days played since 2026-03-24

Faceit ELO

  • At peak — 933
  • Next: Level 5 at 1,051 118 to go
  • Reached: Level 4 · Level 3 · Level 2
  • Level 4 first seen 2026-08-30
  • Level 3 first seen 2026-08-30

Premier comes from this profile’s tracked match history, so it reaches back as far as those matches do. Faceit ELO is CSDB’s own observation — no feed exposes ELO per match, so that line only has the days the profile was viewed and cannot be backfilled.

Compare periods

Last 30 days vs previous 30

No matches recorded between 30 Aug 2026 and 24 Sep 2026.

Measured 30 Aug 202624 Sep 2026; no observation near 60 days ago, so there is no previous window yet.

Differences between Valve's lifetime totals on the days CSDB observed this profile — every mode Valve counts, not only ranked. A window appears only when an observation sits within a few days of each end.

How this compares with the same rank

Median values for Level 4 among CSDB-tracked players (n=13,407), from Valve's own lifetime stats. Aim, positioning and utility scores are deliberately not benchmarked here — those are a third-party provider's derived metrics, which CSDB does not store.

MetricThis playerLevel 4 medianLevel 5 medianvs Level 5
Headshot rate51.0%42.7%43.8%above
Shot accuracy6.3%11.3%12.0%5.7% short
Kill/death ratio0.910.991.020.10 short
Match win rate48.2%43.9%44.7%above

This profile matches the typical Level 5 player on 2 of 4 comparable metrics.

Widest gap: Shot accuracy. That is the metric furthest from the Level 5 median in relative terms — not necessarily the one holding a rank back, which no statistic here can establish.

Share this profile

CSDB.GGoNeShOTFACEITLevel 4 · 933 ELOSTANDINGTop 81.0% of rankedPEAK ELO933csdb.gg/stats

The image is a snapshot; the link keeps updating. Nothing here is published anywhere — it is generated in your browser when you click.

Performance scores

Aim72
Positioning49
Utility21

0–100 skill scores via Leetify.

Recent form

COLD47494Last 10047%Win rateWTLLLTWLWL

Last 10 vs previous 10: 0pp win rate · −0.00 avg rating · −4.7pp headshot accuracy · −8ms reaction

Win rate 0pp across the last 10 against the 10 before — within the normal variation of a 10-match window (±20pp), so no real shift yet.

Last 5 · 10 · 20 matches

Last 5

  • 131 · 20% win rate
  • Avg rating -0.03
  • Avg headshot accuracy 19%
  • Avg reaction 617ms

Last 10

  • 352 · 30% win rate
  • Avg rating -0.02
  • Avg headshot accuracy 23%
  • Avg reaction 621ms

Last 20

  • 6113 · 30% win rate
  • Avg rating -0.02
  • Avg headshot accuracy 26%
  • Avg reaction 625ms

Newest first, from the last 100 tracked matches. Each block is its own sample — one result moves a 5-match win rate by 20 points.

Player DNA

Primary style: Positional PlayerPositioning stands above the rest of this profile (+2 against its own average).

Aim7.2
Utility2.1
Positioning4.9
Opening Duels3.6
Clutch1.0

Limited utility dependence

Style profile from tracked-match aggregates — how this player plays, not how good they are. Classification rules are deterministic and documented in code.

What this cannot see yet: which weapons you use — so CSDB cannot identify an AWPer, and no style here implies a rifle or a sniper. It also cannot see how often you take opening duels, only how often you win them, nor where you hold, so roles that depend on those (entry, lurk, anchor) are deliberately absent rather than guessed. All of it needs round-by-round demo data, which is the next thing being built.

Your pro match

s1mple

Plays most like s1mple 93% playstyle similarity

Most alike: aim profile, positioning profile.

Where you differ: lower utility contribution; lower opening-duel success.

Similarity of playstyle shape across shared dimensions — it says how you play, not that you play at their level. Full comparison →

Strengths & areas to improve

Areas to improve

Utility. Utility contribution runs far behind the mechanical game — the cheapest rating gain on this profile is thrown, not aimed.

Reaction time. 629ms from enemy-visible to first shot leaves fights decided before they start — warmup routines move this number more than anything else.

Generated by fixed rules over this profile's own numbers — no model, no guessing; silent when the sample is too small to support a claim.

CSDB Rating breakdown

Aim7.2
Positioning4.9
Utility2.1
Mechanics7.2
Opening Duels2.7
Win Impact0.7

Composite 4.4/10 (Developing), a weighted mean of the bars with a small opposition adjustment (×0.90 for this rank band). Formula versioned (v1) and documented in code.

Trends

Match rating-0.01−0.02
first ⅓ avg 0.01 → last ⅓ avg -0.01
Reaction time631ms−18ms
first ⅓ avg 649ms → last ⅓ avg 631ms
Headshot accuracy24.5%+1.0%
first ⅓ avg 23.5% → last ⅓ avg 24.5%

Rolling 5-match average across the last 100 tracked matches, oldest to newest. The delta compares the first third of the window with the last.

Personal bests

0.10Best match rating · 13–9 · mirage, 8 Apr
48%Best headshot accuracy · 1–13 · dust2, 31 Mar
406msFastest reaction time · 13–11 · mirage, 29 May
13–2Biggest win · mirage, 20 Apr

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Highlights

6Longest win streak
313In matches decided by ≤2 rounds
12Overtime games

Map breakdown

mirageBest map · 50% over 32anubisWeakest map · 42% over 19
MapGradePlayedRecordWin rateAvg rating
mirageB32161650%-0.01
dust2B2091145%0.00
anubisC1981142%-0.02
ancientB126650%0.01
infernoB115645%-0.00
nukeB63350%0.01

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Anubis is currently your weakest sufficiently-sampled map (42% over 19). Start with the 6 essential Anubis lineups, review the callouts, then spin up a practice server.

Lifetime stats

22,458Lifetime kills
0.91K/D
1,242Matches
48.2%Match win rate · Top 25% of Level 4 players
51.0%Headshot % · Top 25% of Level 4 players
6.3%Shot accuracy
3,356MVPs
512Hours (in match)
827Bombs planted
241Bombs defused

Most-used weapons

Lifetime map wins

3,191dust2
2,123inferno
1,220nuke
58train
49vertigo
45lake
25office
6ar_shoots

Lifetime totals via Steam — visible because this profile's game details are public. Spans CS:GO and CS2.

Faceit stats

Combat

213Matches
49%Win rate
0.93Avg K/D
75.7ADR
52%Headshot %

Clutches & streaks

25%1v1 clutch win
23%1v2 clutch win
10Longest win streak

Recent Faceit resultsLLLLW

MapMatchesWin rateAvg K/DAvg kills
Mirage7054%0.8614.0
Dust26247%0.9615.6
Inferno2945%0.9114.6
Nuke1932%0.8814.7
Anubis1354%1.0114.7
Ancient1250%0.9514.8
Overpass3100%1.9917.3
Cache333%0.7614.3

Faceit-match stats via the FACEIT Data API — a separate match pool from the sections above.

Skill profile

Aggregate performance across tracked matches — stats via Leetify. Percentile context against other CSDB-tracked players arrives as our own benchmark data accumulates.

25.0%Headshot accuracy
31.3%Accuracy (enemy spotted)
31.3%Spray accuracy
82.4%Counter-strafing
8.5°Preaim
629msReaction time
37.9%T opening success
43.3%CT opening success
0.39Enemies flashed / flash
0.6%Flash assists
8.35HE damage / grenade
1.87Flashes / match

Recommended for you

Chosen by comparing your tracked metrics against the thresholds we flag — the measurement behind each one is shown, so you can disagree with it.

  1. Grenades & Utility

    Most of your flashes are blinding nobody. A handful of reliable pop-flash lineups fixes this faster than anything else.

    Enemies flashed per flash 0.3887 — below the 0.5 mark we flag

    Grenade Lineups
  2. Advanced Mechanics

    You are losing most of the first duels you take on T side, which is usually a peeking and spacing problem, not aim.

    T opening duels 37.9376% — below the 40% mark we flag

Spend your practice time on Anubis

Map knowledge compounds faster than mechanics — lineups and callouts you learn once keep paying out every time the map comes up.

42% win rate across 19 tracked games — your weakest map with enough games to be worth reading into.

Anubis callouts & strategyAnubis grenade lineups

Recent matches

MapScoreRatingHS%Date
dust213–70.0033%29 Jul
dust215–150.0419%26 Jul
inferno12–16-0.0518%23 Jul
ancient9–13-0.0612%21 Jul
mirage3–13-0.0813%20 Jul
dust212–120.0128%13 Jul
dust213–60.0033%5 Jun
mirage8–13-0.0123%31 May
mirage13–11-0.0224%29 May
mirage9–13-0.0829%25 May
ancient13–90.0821%15 May
mirage0–13-0.124%15 May
ancient11–13-0.0244%11 May
mirage13–9-0.0430%11 May
anubis15–15-0.0715%9 May
anubis13–9-0.0137%9 May
dust27–13-0.0335%8 May
mirage10–130.0447%7 May
mirage2–130.0226%4 May
dust211–13-0.0621%28 Apr
inferno7–13-0.0031%28 Apr
mirage13–80.0120%27 Apr
ancient9–130.0123%26 Apr
anubis11–130.0218%26 Apr
mirage5–13-0.0420%25 Apr
anubis10–13-0.0423%25 Apr
dust29–130.0633%25 Apr
mirage13–8-0.0222%24 Apr
inferno16–130.0024%24 Apr
anubis13–8-0.0223%24 Apr
mirage13–80.0116%24 Apr
ancient13–90.0128%24 Apr
mirage16–140.0217%24 Apr
inferno2–13-0.0321%24 Apr
mirage13–100.0119%23 Apr
inferno13–50.0225%23 Apr
mirage14–16-0.0510%22 Apr
dust213–70.0315%22 Apr
mirage2–13-0.0328%21 Apr
mirage13–8-0.0313%21 Apr
dust24–13-0.0527%21 Apr
nuke5–13-0.0819%21 Apr
mirage11–13-0.0425%20 Apr
mirage13–2-0.1227%20 Apr
ancient13–60.0119%20 Apr
dust214–16-0.0324%20 Apr
inferno2–13-0.0621%18 Apr
anubis13–11-0.0629%18 Apr
anubis13–9-0.0626%17 Apr
mirage13–5-0.0126%17 Apr
dust213–9-0.0129%17 Apr
anubis13–50.0716%17 Apr
inferno7–13-0.0318%17 Apr
mirage11–130.0519%17 Apr
inferno13–100.0533%16 Apr
anubis5–13-0.1015%15 Apr
mirage13–60.0131%14 Apr
anubis9–13-0.0417%13 Apr
inferno13–100.0324%13 Apr
anubis13–50.0526%12 Apr
anubis16–13-0.0019%12 Apr
dust213–50.0318%12 Apr
ancient13–70.0729%12 Apr
mirage11–13-0.0327%12 Apr
anubis11–13-0.0818%11 Apr
mirage10–130.0012%11 Apr
nuke13–20.0431%11 Apr
dust213–100.0417%11 Apr
inferno13–100.0927%10 Apr
dust24–13-0.0619%10 Apr
inferno1–13-0.0622%10 Apr
ancient11–13-0.0028%9 Apr
nuke2–130.0114%9 Apr
anubis6–130.0120%9 Apr
nuke5–13-0.0129%9 Apr
mirage13–40.0114%9 Apr
mirage13–90.1031%8 Apr
anubis11–13-0.0726%7 Apr
anubis13–16-0.0616%7 Apr
mirage8–13-0.0230%6 Apr
ancient7–13-0.0221%6 Apr
mirage13–100.0226%6 Apr
nuke13–70.0824%6 Apr
mirage13–16-0.0125%5 Apr
mirage13–80.0336%5 Apr
mirage15–15-0.0029%3 Apr
mirage13–9-0.0117%3 Apr
ancient6–13-0.0522%3 Apr
dust26–13-0.0718%3 Apr
anubis13–100.0719%3 Apr
ancient13–80.0426%31 Mar
dust213–5-0.0127%31 Mar
dust21–130.0048%31 Mar
anubis14–16-0.0118%31 Mar
ancient13–60.0322%30 Mar
dust213–40.0622%30 Mar
dust211–130.0223%29 Mar
anubis2–13-0.0520%29 Mar
dust213–30.0819%29 Mar
nuke13–60.0020%24 Mar

Match data via Leetify.

Recent teammates

Milestones

500 Matches
Compare this player with someone →Inventory value for this account →Where does this rating sit? Premier rank tiers →