Ytte

Ytte — CS2 Stats

FI76561198971408945[U:1:1011143217]Steam profile ↗✓ No bans

457Tracked matches56%Win rate2022Tracked since
322Hours in CS
CSDB Rating4.6 DevelopingPositional Player
FaceitLevel 5Top 67.6% of ranked FACEIT players
WingmanGold Nova II
Ladder ranks via Leetify

What changed since last observed

CSDB last observed this profile on 13 Sep 2026 (7 days ago). Ranks are recorded once per day this page is viewed.

No change since then — still 457 tracked matches. Play, then come back: the next observation lands here.

Track this profile

CSDB reads this profile's Premier rating from its tracked match history, and records Faceit ELO once on every day the page is viewed. 31 days played since 4 Nov 2025. Come back after the next session and the change shows above.

Is this you? Sign in with Steam to claim it and connect match tracking →

Rating over time

31Days played since 2025-11-04

Premier is CSDB’s own observation — it builds from the day a profile is first viewed and cannot be backfilled.

Compare periods

Last 7 days vs previous 7

No matches recorded between 13 Sep 2026 and 20 Sep 2026.

Measured 13 Sep 202620 Sep 2026; no observation near 14 days ago, so there is no previous window yet.

Differences between Valve's lifetime totals on the days CSDB observed this profile — every mode Valve counts, not only ranked. A window appears only when an observation sits within a few days of each end.

How this compares with the same rank

Median values for Level 5 among CSDB-tracked players (n=12,417), from Valve's own lifetime stats. Aim, positioning and utility scores are deliberately not benchmarked here — those are a third-party provider's derived metrics, which CSDB does not store.

MetricThis playerLevel 5 medianLevel 6 medianvs Level 6
Headshot rate39.9%43.8%44.8%4.9% short
Shot accuracy3.7%12.0%12.4%8.8% short
Kill/death ratio0.771.021.040.27 short
Match win rate40.1%44.7%45.2%5.1% short

This profile sits below the typical Level 6 player on every metric we can compare.

Widest gap: Shot accuracy. That is the metric furthest from the Level 6 median in relative terms — not necessarily the one holding a rank back, which no statistic here can establish.

Share this profile

CSDB.GGYtteFACEITLevel 5STANDINGTop 67.6% of rankedcsdb.gg/stats

The image is a snapshot; the link keeps updating. Nothing here is published anywhere — it is generated in your browser when you click.

Performance scores

Aim50
Positioning41
Utility31

0–100 skill scores via Leetify.

Recent form

STEADY404416Last 10040%Win rateWLWWLWLLLW

Last 10 vs previous 10: 0pp win rate · +0.01 avg rating · −1.0pp headshot accuracy · −49ms reaction

Win rate 0pp across the last 10 against the 10 before — within the normal variation of a 10-match window (±20pp), so no real shift yet.

Last 5 · 10 · 20 matches

Last 5

  • 32 · 60% win rate
  • Avg rating -0.01
  • Avg headshot accuracy 13%
  • Avg reaction 581ms

Last 10

  • 55 · 50% win rate
  • Avg rating -0.01
  • Avg headshot accuracy 15%
  • Avg reaction 594ms

Last 20

  • 1091 · 50% win rate
  • Avg rating -0.02
  • Avg headshot accuracy 15%
  • Avg reaction 618ms

Newest first, from the last 100 tracked matches. Each block is its own sample — one result moves a 5-match win rate by 20 points.

Player DNA

Primary style: Positional PlayerPositioning stands above the rest of this profile (+2.2 against its own average).

Aim5.0
Utility3.1
Positioning4.1
Opening Duels0.6
Clutch0.0

Limited utility dependence

Style profile from tracked-match aggregates — how this player plays, not how good they are. Classification rules are deterministic and documented in code.

What this cannot see yet: which weapons you use — so CSDB cannot identify an AWPer, and no style here implies a rifle or a sniper. It also cannot see how often you take opening duels, only how often you win them, nor where you hold, so roles that depend on those (entry, lurk, anchor) are deliberately absent rather than guessed. All of it needs round-by-round demo data, which is the next thing being built.

Your pro match

NiKo

Plays most like NiKo 86% playstyle similarity

Most alike: positioning profile, utility contribution.

Where you differ: lower opening-duel success; lower aim profile.

Similarity of playstyle shape across shared dimensions — it says how you play, not that you play at their level. Full comparison →

Strengths & areas to improve

Areas to improve

T-side openings. Opening success drops from 39% on CT to 24% on T — the same duels are being taken with worse setups on the attacking side.

Reaction time. 633ms from enemy-visible to first shot leaves fights decided before they start — warmup routines move this number more than anything else.

Generated by fixed rules over this profile's own numbers — no model, no guessing; silent when the sample is too small to support a claim.

CSDB Rating breakdown

Aim5.0
Positioning4.1
Utility3.1
Mechanics6.4
Opening Duels1.2
Win Impact6.9

Composite 4.6/10 (Developing), a weighted mean of the bars with a small opposition adjustment (×1.00 for this rank band). Formula versioned (v1) and documented in code.

Trends

Match rating-0.02+0.01
first ⅓ avg -0.03 → last ⅓ avg -0.02
Reaction time632ms+38ms
first ⅓ avg 594ms → last ⅓ avg 632ms
Headshot accuracy14.5%+0.5%
first ⅓ avg 14.0% → last ⅓ avg 14.5%

Rolling 5-match average across the last 100 tracked matches, oldest to newest. The delta compares the first third of the window with the last.

Personal bests

0.10Best match rating · 13–2 · train, 25 Nov
30%Best headshot accuracy · 1–13 · anubis, 11 Nov
453msFastest reaction time · 13–2 · ancient, 8 Dec
13–0Biggest win · anubis, 9 Aug

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Highlights

5Longest win streak
35In matches decided by ≤2 rounds

Map breakdown

nukeBest map · 50% over 8mirageWeakest map · 33% over 21
MapGradePlayedRecordWin rateAvg rating
anubisC28121643%-0.01
ancientC2181338%-0.03
mirageD2171433%-0.02
dust2D93633%-0.05
nukeB84450%-0.01
infernoB63350%-0.01
train330100%0.03
vertigo2020%-0.04
cache1010%-0.01
golden1010%-0.12

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Mirage is currently your weakest sufficiently-sampled map (33% over 21). Start with the 6 essential Mirage lineups, review the callouts, then spin up a practice server.

Lifetime stats

13,435Lifetime kills
0.77K/D
907Matches
40.1%Match win rate
39.9%Headshot %
3.7%Shot accuracy
1,721MVPs
322Hours (in match)
654Bombs planted
478Bombs defused

Most-used weapons

Lifetime map wins

850dust2
779inferno
531nuke
359train
81vertigo
65office
43italy
13cbble

Lifetime totals via Steam — visible because this profile's game details are public. Spans CS:GO and CS2.

Faceit stats

Combat

17Matches
59%Win rate
0.85Avg K/D
62.9ADR
30%Headshot %

Clutches & streaks

0%1v1 clutch win
17%1v2 clutch win
8Longest win streak

Recent Faceit resultsLLWWL

MapMatchesWin rateAvg K/DAvg kills
Mirage633%0.559.3
Anubis560%1.0215.8
Ancient475%1.0313.5
Nuke1100%1.0017.0
Inferno1100%0.909.0

Faceit-match stats via the FACEIT Data API — a separate match pool from the sections above.

Skill profile

Aggregate performance across tracked matches — stats via Leetify. Percentile context against other CSDB-tracked players arrives as our own benchmark data accumulates.

14.2%Headshot accuracy
32.9%Accuracy (enemy spotted)
33.9%Spray accuracy
78.9%Counter-strafing
11.3°Preaim
633msReaction time
24.0%T opening success
39.3%CT opening success
0.39Enemies flashed / flash
2.7%Flash assists
5.98HE damage / grenade
2.66Flashes / match

Recommended for you

Chosen by comparing your tracked metrics against the thresholds we flag — the measurement behind each one is shown, so you can disagree with it.

  1. Best CS2 Crosshair

    Your shots are landing on bodies more often than heads — usually a crosshair-height and placement habit rather than raw aim.

    Headshot accuracy 14.1739% — below the 15% mark we flag

    Aim Training
  2. Grenades & Utility

    Most of your flashes are blinding nobody. A handful of reliable pop-flash lineups fixes this faster than anything else.

    Enemies flashed per flash 0.3879 — below the 0.5 mark we flag

    Grenade Lineups
  3. Advanced Mechanics

    You are losing most of the first duels you take on T side, which is usually a peeking and spacing problem, not aim.

    T opening duels 24.0071% — below the 40% mark we flag

Spend your practice time on Mirage

Map knowledge compounds faster than mechanics — lineups and callouts you learn once keep paying out every time the map comes up.

33% win rate across 21 tracked games — your weakest map with enough games to be worth reading into.

Mirage callouts & strategyMirage grenade lineups

Recent matches

MapScoreRatingHS%Date
anubis13–00.0820%9 Aug
cache1–13-0.0113%9 Aug
anubis13–8-0.0413%9 Aug
nuke13–4-0.0112%9 Aug
ancient6–13-0.068%8 Aug
anubis13–100.0312%8 Aug
ancient10–13-0.059%8 Feb
ancient10–13-0.0311%13 Jan
anubis5–13-0.0429%12 Jan
anubis13–60.0319%12 Jan
nuke13–40.0210%6 Jan
anubis9–130.0113%6 Jan
mirage12–12-0.0313%6 Jan
ancient1–13-0.087%6 Jan
inferno8–13-0.0414%4 Jan
mirage4–13-0.0314%4 Jan
ancient13–50.0023%29 Dec
dust213–8-0.1323%29 Dec
anubis13–8-0.0416%13 Dec
ancient13–60.0526%13 Dec
nuke13–5-0.0317%11 Dec
mirage8–13-0.0116%11 Dec
anubis9–130.0212%11 Dec
mirage13–90.0316%10 Dec
inferno13–80.024%9 Dec
nuke12–12-0.0426%9 Dec
mirage13–11-0.058%8 Dec
mirage8–13-0.067%8 Dec
anubis12–12-0.069%8 Dec
ancient13–20.0310%8 Dec
nuke9–40.0313%8 Dec
train13–6-0.0530%1 Dec
dust213–3-0.027%1 Dec
ancient11–13-0.0714%1 Dec
mirage12–12-0.0715%1 Dec
train13–100.0221%25 Nov
train13–20.1019%25 Nov
dust212–12-0.029%23 Nov
anubis12–12-0.0510%23 Nov
ancient13–40.0110%23 Nov
ancient7–13-0.110%22 Nov
dust26–13-0.0626%22 Nov
mirage8–13-0.0714%22 Nov
mirage13–70.0121%21 Nov
anubis8–130.0517%19 Nov
vertigo4–13-0.048%19 Nov
mirage11–13-0.038%19 Nov
inferno8–13-0.105%19 Nov
ancient13–7-0.004%19 Nov
anubis4–130.0121%19 Nov
nuke12–120.0314%18 Nov
ancient5–13-0.0610%18 Nov
anubis13–40.0111%18 Nov
dust28–13-0.0024%16 Nov
ancient5–13-0.0220%16 Nov
mirage12–12-0.0425%16 Nov
vertigo12–12-0.0516%16 Nov
nuke5–13-0.0013%16 Nov
ancient13–6-0.012%16 Nov
mirage13–5-0.0123%16 Nov
anubis13–10.0215%16 Nov
inferno13–110.0515%15 Nov
mirage13–8-0.0315%15 Nov
ancient8–13-0.068%15 Nov
dust213–8-0.0017%15 Nov
dust211–13-0.0810%14 Nov
anubis11–13-0.0015%14 Nov
ancient13–8-0.0213%14 Nov
mirage8–13-0.0611%14 Nov
mirage12–12-0.0118%13 Nov
anubis13–20.0824%13 Nov
ancient12–120.0017%13 Nov
inferno12–12-0.016%13 Nov
anubis4–13-0.0716%13 Nov
mirage13–3-0.0311%13 Nov
anubis12–12-0.005%12 Nov
dust26–13-0.089%12 Nov
anubis10–13-0.0612%11 Nov
anubis1–13-0.1130%11 Nov
anubis3–13-0.0215%11 Nov
mirage8–13-0.0215%11 Nov
ancient9–13-0.1212%11 Nov
anubis13–90.0617%10 Nov
inferno13–30.0114%10 Nov
nuke4–13-0.109%10 Nov
anubis13–70.0012%10 Nov
ancient13–60.0811%10 Nov
golden4–13-0.123%10 Nov
anubis13–11-0.039%10 Nov
mirage13–80.0713%10 Nov
mirage7–13-0.0610%9 Nov
anubis12–12-0.0620%9 Nov
anubis13–30.0319%9 Nov
ancient3–13-0.0320%6 Nov
dust211–13-0.0515%6 Nov
anubis12–12-0.0910%6 Nov
mirage10–130.0317%6 Nov
ancient12–12-0.047%6 Nov
anubis1–13-0.0821%5 Nov
mirage3–13-0.0723%4 Nov

Match data via Leetify.

Recent teammates

Milestones

100 Matches
Compare this player with someone →Inventory value for this account →Where does this rating sit? Premier rank tiers →