Polish pusher business

Polish pusher business — CS2 Stats

76561198970038169[U:1:1009772441]Steam profile ↗✓ No bans

795Tracked matches41%Win rate2021Tracked since
2,256Hours in CS9Hrs last 2 wks
CSDB Rating6.0 SolidPositional Player
Premier CS Rating16,588Purple band · top ~22.1% of ranked players (population est.)
FaceitLevel 7Top 42.3% of ranked FACEIT players
WingmanMaster Guardian II
Ladder ranks via Leetify

What changed since last observed

CSDB last observed this profile on 28 Oct 2026 (4 days ago). Ranks are recorded once per day this page is viewed.

No change since then. Play, then come back: the next observation lands here.

Rating over time

Premier CS Rating: 16,588 -712 20 Aug – 28 Oct · 34 days played
15,00018,175peak 18,17520 Aug28 Oct
18,281Peak Premier in tracked matches
31Days played since 2026-08-20

Premier CS Rating

  • 1,587 below peak (18,175)
  • -355 over 30 days · steady
  • Next: Pink band at 20,000 — 3,412 to go
  • Reached: Purple band · Blue band · Light Blue band
  • Purple band first seen 2026-08-28
  • Blue band first seen 2026-08-28

Premier comes from this profile’s tracked match history, so it reaches back as far as those matches do.

How this compares with the same rank

Median values for Level 7 among CSDB-tracked players (n=14,595), from Valve's own lifetime stats. Aim, positioning and utility scores are deliberately not benchmarked here — those are a third-party provider's derived metrics, which CSDB does not store.

MetricThis playerLevel 7 medianLevel 8 medianvs Level 8
Headshot rate41.9%45.7%46.8%4.9% short
Shot accuracy11.5%12.7%13.0%1.5% short
Kill/death ratio1.041.051.060.03 short
Match win rate49.0%45.7%46.3%above

This profile matches the typical Level 8 player on 1 of 4 comparable metrics.

Widest gap: Shot accuracy. That is the metric furthest from the Level 8 median in relative terms — not necessarily the one holding a rank back, which no statistic here can establish.

Share this profile

CSDB.GGPolish pusher businessFACEITLevel 7STANDINGTop 42.3% of rankedPREMIER16,588 · Purple bandcsdb.gg/stats

The image is a snapshot; the link keeps updating. Nothing here is published anywhere — it is generated in your browser when you click.

Performance scores

Aim76
Positioning66
Utility53

0–100 skill scores via Leetify.

Recent form

STEADY43–52–5Last 10043%Win rateWWLWLLLLWL

Last 10 vs previous 10: 0pp win rate · −0.02 avg rating · +1.1pp headshot accuracy · +40ms reaction

Win rate 0pp across the last 10 against the 10 before — within the normal variation of a 10-match window (±20pp), so no real shift yet.

Last 5 · 10 · 20 matches

Last 5

  • 3–2 · 60% win rate
  • Avg rating 0.02
  • Avg headshot accuracy 20%
  • Avg reaction 603ms

Last 10

  • 4–6 · 40% win rate
  • Avg rating 0.01
  • Avg headshot accuracy 21%
  • Avg reaction 563ms

Last 20

  • 8–11–1 · 40% win rate
  • Avg rating 0.02
  • Avg headshot accuracy 20%
  • Avg reaction 543ms

Newest first, from the last 100 tracked matches. Each block is its own sample — one result moves a 5-match win rate by 20 points.

Player DNA

Primary style: Positional Player — Positioning stands above the rest of this profile (+2.2 against its own average).

Aim7.6
Utility5.3
Positioning6.6
Opening Duels3.0
Clutch2.8

Style profile from tracked-match aggregates — how this player plays, not how good they are. Classification rules are deterministic and documented in code.

What this cannot see yet: which weapons you use — so CSDB cannot identify an AWPer, and no style here implies a rifle or a sniper. It also cannot see how often you take opening duels, only how often you win them, nor where you hold, so roles that depend on those (entry, lurk, anchor) are deliberately absent rather than guessed. All of it needs round-by-round demo data, which is the next thing being built.

Your pro match

iM

Plays most like iM 92% playstyle similarity

Most alike: positioning profile, utility contribution.

Similarity of playstyle shape across shared dimensions — it says how you play, not that you play at their level. Full comparison →

Strengths & areas to improve

Areas to improve

Reaction time. 558ms from enemy-visible to first shot leaves fights decided before they start — warmup routines move this number more than anything else.

Generated by fixed rules over this profile's own numbers — no model, no guessing; silent when the sample is too small to support a claim.

CSDB Rating breakdown

Aim7.6
Positioning6.6
Utility5.3
Mechanics6.5
Opening Duels4.6
Win Impact2.1

Composite 6.0/10 (Solid), a weighted mean of the bars with a small opposition adjustment (×1.00 for this rank band). Formula versioned (v1) and documented in code.

Trends

Match rating0.02+0.01
first ⅓ avg 0.01 → last ⅓ avg 0.02
Reaction time553ms+9ms
first ⅓ avg 544ms → last ⅓ avg 553ms
Headshot accuracy20.0%−1.0%
first ⅓ avg 21.0% → last ⅓ avg 20.0%

Rolling 5-match average across the last 100 tracked matches, oldest to newest. The delta compares the first third of the window with the last.

Personal bests

0.23Best match rating · 13–1 · ancient, 6 Sept →
43%Best headshot accuracy · 3–13 · nuke, 2 Sept →
422msFastest reaction time · 6–13 · ancient, 11 Sept →
13–1Biggest win · ancient, 6 Sept →

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Highlights

5Longest win streak
W2Current streak
11–7In matches decided by ≤2 rounds
10Overtime games

Map breakdown

mirageBest map · 55% over 20infernoWeakest map · 18% over 11
MapGradePlayedRecordWin rateAvg rating
mirageA2011–955%0.03
ancientB2010–1050%0.02
nukeB1910–953%0.04
cacheC125–742%0.02
infernoD112–918%0.01
dust2D93–633%0.01
anubisD82–625%-0.02
poseidon—10–10%0.01

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Inferno is currently your weakest sufficiently-sampled map (18% over 11). Start with the 6 essential Inferno lineups, review the callouts, then spin up a practice server.

Lifetime stats

54,726Lifetime kills
1.04K/D
3,066Matches
49.0%Match win rate · Top 25% of Level 7 players
41.9%Headshot %
11.5%Shot accuracy
8,655MVPs
1,132Hours (in match)
1,749Bombs planted
1,294Bombs defused

Most-used weapons

AK-4715,695
AWP5,165
MAC-102,595
MP91,768
FAMAS1,320

Lifetime map wins

4,759nuke
3,700vertigo
3,675inferno
2,253dust2
1,047lake
1,041train
210cbble
64office

Lifetime totals via Steam — visible because this profile's game details are public. Spans CS:GO and CS2.

Faceit stats

Combat

123Matches
56%Win rate
1.09Avg K/D
80.0ADR
40%Headshot %

Clutches & streaks

34%1v1 clutch win
17%1v2 clutch win
5Longest win streak

Recent Faceit resultsLLLWW

MapMatchesWin rateAvg K/DAvg kills
Mirage3043%1.0214.7
Ancient3070%1.0514.2
Nuke1759%1.1919.5
Cache1155%1.1716.4
Dust21145%1.2019.4
Inferno1040%1.0315.5
Anubis862%1.0612.1
Vertigo475%1.0716.5

Faceit-match stats via the FACEIT Data API — a separate match pool from the sections above.

Skill profile

Aggregate performance across tracked matches — stats via Leetify. Percentile context against other CSDB-tracked players arrives as our own benchmark data accumulates.

19.4%Headshot accuracy
35.2%Accuracy (enemy spotted)
33.5%Spray accuracy
79.2%Counter-strafing
8.2°Preaim
558msReaction time
50.6%T opening success
45.8%CT opening success
0.52Enemies flashed / flash
4.5%Flash assists
10.61HE damage / grenade
10.69Flashes / match

Recommended for you

Spend your practice time on Inferno

Map knowledge compounds faster than mechanics — lineups and callouts you learn once keep paying out every time the map comes up.

18% win rate across 11 tracked games — your weakest map with enough games to be worth reading into.

Inferno callouts & strategy →Inferno grenade lineups →

Recent matches

MapScoreRatingHS%Date
nuke4–10.0421%28 Oct →
mirage13–90.0422%18 Oct →
dust211–13-0.0416%18 Oct →
nuke13–110.0617%7 Oct →
cache12–160.0023%7 Oct →
cache8–130.0213%3 Oct →
mirage5–130.0125%30 Sept →
nuke13–160.0223%30 Sept →
ancient13–80.0328%27 Sept →
cache6–13-0.0419%22 Sept →
anubis3–13-0.0932%21 Sept →
ancient13–110.1219%21 Sept →
inferno12–160.0513%21 Sept →
nuke13–60.0823%21 Sept →
mirage9–130.0226%20 Sept →
cache13–70.0711%20 Sept →
ancient13–80.0914%19 Sept →
inferno7–9-0.0320%19 Sept →
cache15–150.0320%18 Sept →
ancient2–13-0.0120%18 Sept →
cache1–13-0.1032%18 Sept →
dust26–13-0.0520%17 Sept →
mirage13–8-0.0118%17 Sept →
inferno4–130.004%16 Sept →
ancient10–13-0.0416%16 Sept →
ancient16–130.0515%16 Sept →
inferno4–9-0.066%16 Sept →
ancient13–11-0.0232%15 Sept →
nuke13–90.0514%13 Sept →
mirage13–160.0214%12 Sept →
dust28–130.0519%12 Sept →
nuke8–80.1130%12 Sept →
inferno5–90.0934%12 Sept →
ancient6–130.0322%11 Sept →
cache13–50.1516%11 Sept →
inferno7–13-0.0525%11 Sept →
mirage13–110.0411%11 Sept →
dust212–16-0.0020%11 Sept →
mirage13–110.0118%11 Sept →
mirage13–110.0310%10 Sept →
ancient13–11-0.069%10 Sept →
mirage13–5-0.0111%10 Sept →
nuke13–80.0222%10 Sept →
nuke8–80.0220%10 Sept →
mirage5–13-0.0323%10 Sept →
cache13–40.0117%10 Sept →
nuke13–40.0616%10 Sept →
anubis13–80.0217%9 Sept →
dust213–90.0418%9 Sept →
inferno8–130.0730%9 Sept →
mirage8–130.0319%9 Sept →
mirage13–90.0618%8 Sept →
ancient13–4-0.017%8 Sept →
dust28–130.0816%8 Sept →
mirage13–80.0811%7 Sept →
cache13–8-0.0516%7 Sept →
poseidon8–80.0135%7 Sept →
nuke7–130.0213%7 Sept →
inferno13–7-0.0310%7 Sept →
anubis5–13-0.0315%7 Sept →
dust213–50.0014%7 Sept →
nuke11–130.0620%6 Sept →
ancient13–10.2319%6 Sept →
inferno11–13-0.0327%6 Sept →
cache13–90.1029%6 Sept →
anubis2–13-0.0511%5 Sept →
inferno13–60.0924%5 Sept →
anubis9–13-0.0232%4 Sept →
mirage13–11-0.0117%4 Sept →
nuke6–13-0.0132%4 Sept →
mirage7–13-0.0325%4 Sept →
ancient4–13-0.0214%4 Sept →
mirage3–130.0322%4 Sept →
nuke13–110.0318%3 Sept →
ancient15–15-0.0035%3 Sept →
ancient13–30.0515%3 Sept →
ancient13–11-0.0315%3 Sept →
ancient10–13-0.0121%3 Sept →
mirage13–80.0113%3 Sept →
mirage11–130.1119%3 Sept →
anubis10–13-0.0528%3 Sept →
mirage3–130.0942%2 Sept →
nuke13–50.0220%2 Sept →
inferno4–13-0.0415%2 Sept →
nuke3–13-0.0143%2 Sept →
cache6–130.0118%2 Sept →
dust213–90.0517%1 Sept →
mirage13–110.0810%23 Aug →
ancient5–130.0117%23 Aug →
nuke10–13-0.0028%23 Aug →
ancient14–16-0.0419%22 Aug →
ancient13–16-0.0219%22 Aug →
nuke13–60.1520%22 Aug →
nuke13–9-0.0214%21 Aug →
dust25–13-0.028%21 Aug →
nuke11–130.0122%21 Aug →
ancient7–13-0.0112%20 Aug →
anubis13–6-0.0024%20 Aug →
anubis6–130.0218%20 Aug →
cache8–130.0619%20 Aug →

Match data via Leetify.

Recent teammates

Milestones

500 Matches
Compare this player with someone →Inventory value for this account →Where does this rating sit? Premier rank tiers →

This profile is built from public Steam data. If it is yours, you can remove it, or delete your CSDB account.