Sany

Sany — CS2 Stats

CZ76561198969907179[U:1:1009641451]Steam profile ↗✓ No bans

6,514Tracked matches60%Win rate2020Tracked since
8,581Hours in CS
CSDB Rating5.2 DevelopingAll-Rounder
FaceitLevel 8 · 1,748 ELOTop 31.2% of ranked FACEIT players
Ladder ranks via Leetify

What changed since last observed

CSDB last observed this profile on 6 Sep 2026 (14 days ago). Ranks are recorded once per day this page is viewed.

0Faceit ELO · 1,748 → 1,748
+53Tracked matches · now 6,514
+16.7ppWin rate · 43.3% → 60.0%
Track this profile

CSDB reads this profile's Premier rating from its tracked match history, and records Faceit ELO once on every day the page is viewed. 51 days played since 31 May 2026. Come back after the next session and the change shows above.

Is this you? Sign in with Steam to claim it and connect match tracking →

Rating over time

Premier CS Rating: 23,399 -182 4 Jun2 Jul · 4 days played
23,39924,010peak 24,0104 Jun2 Jul
Faceit ELO: 1,748 +0 31 Aug6 Sept · 4 observations
1,7481,748peak 1,74831 Aug6 Sept
24,010Peak Premier in tracked matches
1,748Highest Faceit ELO seen on CSDB
51Days played since 2026-05-31

Faceit ELO

  • At peak — 1,748
  • Next: Level 9 at 1,751 3 to go
  • Reached: Level 8 · Level 7 · Level 6 · Level 5
  • Level 8 first seen 2026-08-31
  • Level 7 first seen 2026-08-31

Premier comes from this profile’s tracked match history, so it reaches back as far as those matches do. Faceit ELO is CSDB’s own observation — no feed exposes ELO per match, so that line only has the days the profile was viewed and cannot be backfilled.

How this compares with the same rank

Median values for Level 8 among CSDB-tracked players (n=13,483), from Valve's own lifetime stats. Aim, positioning and utility scores are deliberately not benchmarked here — those are a third-party provider's derived metrics, which CSDB does not store.

MetricThis playerLevel 8 medianLevel 9 medianvs Level 9
Headshot rate31.8%46.8%48.3%16.5% short
Shot accuracy12.9%13.0%13.2%0.3% short
Kill/death ratio0.911.061.070.16 short
Match win rate46.6%46.3%46.9%meets

This profile matches the typical Level 9 player on 1 of 4 comparable metrics.

Widest gap: Headshot rate. That is the metric furthest from the Level 9 median in relative terms — not necessarily the one holding a rank back, which no statistic here can establish.

Share this profile

CSDB.GGSanyFACEITLevel 8 · 1,748 ELOSTANDINGTop 31.2% of rankedPEAK ELO1,748csdb.gg/stats

The image is a snapshot; the link keeps updating. Nothing here is published anywhere — it is generated in your browser when you click.

Performance scores

Aim66
Positioning45
Utility46

0–100 skill scores via Leetify.

Recent form

HOT5050Last 10050%Win rateLWWWWWWLWW

Last 10 vs previous 10: +40pp win rate · +0.02 avg rating · +2.6pp headshot accuracy · −8ms reaction

Win rate up 40pp across the last 10 against the 10 before — more than a 10-match window's normal noise (±20pp).

Last 5 · 10 · 20 matches

Last 5

  • 41 · 80% win rate
  • Avg rating 0.01
  • Avg headshot accuracy 21%
  • Avg reaction 549ms

Last 10

  • 82 · 80% win rate
  • Avg rating 0.01
  • Avg headshot accuracy 18%
  • Avg reaction 552ms

Last 20

  • 128 · 60% win rate
  • Avg rating 0.00
  • Avg headshot accuracy 17%
  • Avg reaction 556ms

Newest first, from the last 100 tracked matches. Each block is its own sample — one result moves a 5-match win rate by 20 points.

Player DNA

Primary style: All-RounderNo style dimension stands clear of the others in this profile.

Aim6.6
Utility4.6
Positioning4.5
Opening Duels2.4
Clutch3.8

Limited utility dependence

Style profile from tracked-match aggregates — how this player plays, not how good they are. Classification rules are deterministic and documented in code.

What this cannot see yet: which weapons you use — so CSDB cannot identify an AWPer, and no style here implies a rifle or a sniper. It also cannot see how often you take opening duels, only how often you win them, nor where you hold, so roles that depend on those (entry, lurk, anchor) are deliberately absent rather than guessed. All of it needs round-by-round demo data, which is the next thing being built.

Your pro match

NiKo

Plays most like NiKo 95% playstyle similarity

Most alike: utility contribution, positioning profile.

Where you differ: lower opening-duel success; lower aim profile.

Similarity of playstyle shape across shared dimensions — it says how you play, not that you play at their level. Full comparison →

Strengths & areas to improve

Areas to improve

Reaction time. 561ms from enemy-visible to first shot leaves fights decided before they start — warmup routines move this number more than anything else.

Generated by fixed rules over this profile's own numbers — no model, no guessing; silent when the sample is too small to support a claim.

CSDB Rating breakdown

Aim6.6
Positioning4.5
Utility4.6
Mechanics5.5
Opening Duels2.7
Win Impact8.3

Composite 5.2/10 (Developing), a weighted mean of the bars with a small opposition adjustment (×0.95 for this rank band). Formula versioned (v1) and documented in code.

Trends

Match rating-0.00+0.00
first ⅓ avg -0.00 → last ⅓ avg -0.00
Reaction time563ms−67ms
first ⅓ avg 630ms → last ⅓ avg 563ms
Headshot accuracy17.1%+1.3%
first ⅓ avg 15.8% → last ⅓ avg 17.1%

Rolling 5-match average across the last 100 tracked matches, oldest to newest. The delta compares the first third of the window with the last.

Personal bests

0.09Best match rating · 13–6 · ancient, 27 Aug
47%Best headshot accuracy · 3–13 · dust2, 26 Jul
406msFastest reaction time · 8–13 · mirage, 12 Aug
13–3Biggest win · ancient, 19 Jul

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Highlights

6Longest win streak
55In matches decided by ≤2 rounds
15Overtime games

Map breakdown

ancientBest map · 71% over 17mirageWeakest map · 40% over 25
MapGradePlayedRecordWin rateAvg rating
mirageC25101540%-0.01
anubisB22101245%-0.01
ancientS1712571%0.01
infernoA159660%-0.00
dust2B137654%-0.02
nukeC52340%-0.01
overpass2020%-0.00
cache1010%-0.05

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Mirage is currently your weakest sufficiently-sampled map (40% over 25). Start with the 6 essential Mirage lineups, review the callouts, then spin up a practice server.

Lifetime stats

330,650Lifetime kills
0.91K/D
16,950Matches
46.6%Match win rate · Top 50% of Level 8 players
31.8%Headshot %
12.9%Shot accuracy
38,883MVPs
8,581Hours (in match)
19,477Bombs planted
4,912Bombs defused

Most-used weapons

AK-47100,626
AWP91,567
MP910,551
Glock-1810,011
Knife8,382
MAC-108,223
P904,229

Lifetime map wins

40,046inferno
20,286dust2
10,884vertigo
7,034nuke
2,923train
994office
468cbble
162lake

Lifetime totals via Steam — visible because this profile's game details are public. Spans CS:GO and CS2.

Faceit stats

Combat

8,806Matches
50%Win rate
0.99Avg K/D
70.6ADR
39%Headshot %

Clutches & streaks

39%1v1 clutch win
19%1v2 clutch win
11Longest win streak

Recent Faceit resultsLWWWL

MapMatchesWin rateAvg K/DAvg kills
Mirage115950%1.0314.7
Inferno113653%1.0214.7
Anubis97852%1.0615.2
Ancient72447%1.0015.1
Dust248045%0.9614.2
Vertigo35448%1.0315.7
Nuke26446%0.9714.1
Overpass18556%0.9914.9

Faceit-match stats via the FACEIT Data API — a separate match pool from the sections above.

Skill profile

Aggregate performance across tracked matches — stats via Leetify. Percentile context against other CSDB-tracked players arrives as our own benchmark data accumulates.

17.4%Headshot accuracy
34.3%Accuracy (enemy spotted)
42.1%Spray accuracy
74.6%Counter-strafing
11.3°Preaim
561msReaction time
42.6%T opening success
39.3%CT opening success
0.55Enemies flashed / flash
6.1%Flash assists
8.59HE damage / grenade
3.12Flashes / match

Recommended for you

Chosen by comparing your tracked metrics against the thresholds we flag — the measurement behind each one is shown, so you can disagree with it.

  1. Grenades & Utility

    You are buying and holding utility rather than using it. Unthrown flashes are wasted money every round.

    Flashes per match 3.118 — below the 4 mark we flag

    Grenade Lineups
  2. Advanced Mechanics

    Losing the first CT duel repeatedly usually means holding angles that favour the peeker.

    CT opening duels 39.2588% — below the 40% mark we flag

Spend your practice time on Mirage

Map knowledge compounds faster than mechanics — lineups and callouts you learn once keep paying out every time the map comes up.

40% win rate across 25 tracked games — your weakest map with enough games to be worth reading into.

Mirage callouts & strategyMirage grenade lineups

Recent matches

MapScoreRatingHS%Date
inferno11–130.0124%20 Sept
inferno13–4-0.0213%20 Sept
dust213–110.0020%20 Sept
ancient13–90.0221%20 Sept
anubis13–90.0426%15 Sept
anubis16–130.0211%15 Sept
mirage13–90.0023%15 Sept
anubis9–13-0.0713%13 Sept
nuke13–90.0713%13 Sept
anubis13–100.0518%12 Sept
anubis13–80.0111%12 Sept
mirage5–13-0.0418%12 Sept
anubis3–13-0.049%11 Sept
mirage5–13-0.0621%1 Sept
anubis13–9-0.0114%27 Aug
ancient13–60.0911%27 Aug
inferno8–13-0.0118%27 Aug
inferno11–130.0210%26 Aug
anubis16–13-0.0217%19 Aug
mirage7–13-0.0426%18 Aug
anubis9–13-0.0420%17 Aug
ancient5–130.0119%17 Aug
inferno13–9-0.0222%17 Aug
inferno13–11-0.0424%17 Aug
mirage16–19-0.0217%16 Aug
anubis13–60.0215%13 Aug
mirage8–130.054%12 Aug
mirage13–90.0324%9 Aug
inferno13–10-0.0421%7 Aug
ancient13–70.0317%7 Aug
nuke4–13-0.0620%31 Jul
ancient13–50.0319%30 Jul
ancient13–50.007%29 Jul
nuke6–13-0.0818%28 Jul
nuke8–13-0.0213%28 Jul
anubis9–13-0.0220%28 Jul
anubis16–190.0014%27 Jul
dust23–13-0.0347%26 Jul
anubis14–16-0.0119%25 Jul
ancient3–13-0.0816%20 Jul
ancient13–30.0016%19 Jul
anubis10–13-0.0013%19 Jul
cache2–13-0.0524%19 Jul
anubis13–7-0.0418%18 Jul
ancient4–130.0124%16 Jul
mirage2–13-0.0732%16 Jul
ancient13–40.0333%16 Jul
mirage8–130.0314%15 Jul
dust213–11-0.0716%14 Jul
anubis13–16-0.0513%13 Jul
anubis8–130.0824%12 Jul
dust213–80.0528%11 Jul
anubis19–220.0210%11 Jul
ancient2–13-0.0615%10 Jul
dust213–16-0.085%9 Jul
mirage13–10-0.0322%9 Jul
dust213–90.0217%9 Jul
dust213–60.0215%9 Jul
mirage13–8-0.0012%8 Jul
anubis7–13-0.0514%6 Jul
inferno5–130.0038%2 Jul
ancient5–13-0.1020%2 Jul
mirage9–130.0416%2 Jul
ancient19–160.0120%30 Jun
nuke13–70.0527%27 Jun
mirage6–130.0612%27 Jun
mirage13–7-0.0111%23 Jun
ancient13–60.0212%23 Jun
inferno13–100.049%23 Jun
mirage13–160.0513%23 Jun
inferno7–13-0.018%23 Jun
inferno15–19-0.0111%22 Jun
dust213–10-0.0121%22 Jun
overpass8–130.0121%22 Jun
mirage5–130.0224%22 Jun
mirage7–13-0.0219%22 Jun
mirage16–130.0219%22 Jun
anubis6–13-0.0513%16 Jun
inferno13–110.0516%13 Jun
mirage8–13-0.0313%12 Jun
dust211–13-0.045%12 Jun
overpass13–16-0.0122%9 Jun
dust213–100.0113%9 Jun
inferno13–90.0220%9 Jun
mirage10–130.0613%9 Jun
mirage13–50.0016%8 Jun
mirage13–7-0.0418%8 Jun
mirage9–13-0.0510%5 Jun
inferno16–120.0120%5 Jun
mirage13–6-0.0518%4 Jun
inferno16–14-0.0116%4 Jun
mirage13–9-0.0322%3 Jun
ancient13–40.0711%3 Jun
anubis13–8-0.0219%3 Jun
dust210–13-0.0310%3 Jun
ancient13–40.015%3 Jun
ancient13–80.0218%3 Jun
dust211–130.0421%1 Jun
anubis13–3-0.0711%1 Jun
dust21–11-0.1033%31 May

Match data via Leetify.

Recent teammates

Milestones

1,000 Matches
Compare this player with someone →Inventory value for this account →Where does this rating sit? Premier rank tiers →