Cpt. Higgerson

Cpt. Higgerson — CS2 Stats

US76561198956894522[U:1:996628794]Steam profile ↗✓ No bans

365Tracked matches38%Win rate2022Tracked since
887Hours in CS18Hrs last 2 wks
CSDB Rating3.5 LearningPositional Player
Premier CS Rating6,641Light Blue band · top ~71% of ranked players (population est.)
FaceitLevel 4Top 81.0% of ranked FACEIT players
WingmanMaster Guardian I
Ladder ranks via Leetify

What changed since last observed

CSDB last observed this profile on 2 Nov 2026 (2 days ago). Ranks are recorded once per day this page is viewed.

−762Premier CS Rating · 7,403 → 6,641

Rating over time

Premier CS Rating: 6,641 +252 27 Oct – 4 Nov · 5 days played
6,3897,671peak 7,67127 Oct4 Nov
7,671Peak Premier in tracked matches
34Days played since 2026-07-09

Premier CS Rating

  • 1,030 below peak (7,671)
  • Next: Blue band at 10,000 — 3,359 to go
  • Reached: Light Blue band

Premier comes from this profile’s tracked match history, so it reaches back as far as those matches do.

How this compares with the same rank

Median values for Level 4 among CSDB-tracked players (n=14,630), from Valve's own lifetime stats. Aim, positioning and utility scores are deliberately not benchmarked here — those are a third-party provider's derived metrics, which CSDB does not store.

MetricThis playerLevel 4 medianLevel 5 medianvs Level 5
Headshot rate44.9%42.7%43.8%above
Shot accuracy4.4%11.2%12.0%7.6% short
Kill/death ratio0.890.991.020.12 short
Match win rate37.6%43.9%44.7%7.1% short

This profile matches the typical Level 5 player on 1 of 4 comparable metrics.

Widest gap: Shot accuracy. That is the metric furthest from the Level 5 median in relative terms — not necessarily the one holding a rank back, which no statistic here can establish.

Share this profile

CSDB.GGCpt. HiggersonFACEITLevel 4STANDINGTop 81.0% of rankedPREMIER6,641 · Light Blue bandcsdb.gg/stats

The image is a snapshot; the link keeps updating. Nothing here is published anywhere — it is generated in your browser when you click.

Performance scores

Aim31
Positioning56
Utility53

0–100 skill scores via Leetify.

Recent form

COLD44–48–8Last 10044%Win rateLLLWWLLWLL

Last 10 vs previous 10: −20pp win rate · +0.00 avg rating · −0.4pp headshot accuracy · −31ms reaction

Win rate down 20pp across the last 10 against the 10 before — more than a 10-match window's normal noise (±20pp). Average match rating moved the other way (+0.00), so results shifted more than performance did.

Last 5 · 10 · 20 matches

Last 5

  • 2–3 · 40% win rate
  • Avg rating 0.05
  • Avg headshot accuracy 17%
  • Avg reaction 653ms

Last 10

  • 3–7 · 30% win rate
  • Avg rating 0.01
  • Avg headshot accuracy 15%
  • Avg reaction 636ms

Last 20

  • 8–12 · 40% win rate
  • Avg rating 0.01
  • Avg headshot accuracy 15%
  • Avg reaction 652ms

Newest first, from the last 100 tracked matches. Each block is its own sample — one result moves a 5-match win rate by 20 points.

Player DNA

Primary style: Positional Player — Positioning stands above the rest of this profile (+2.2 against its own average).

Aim3.1
Utility5.3
Positioning5.6
Opening Duels2.8
Clutch0.0

Style profile from tracked-match aggregates — how this player plays, not how good they are. Classification rules are deterministic and documented in code.

What this cannot see yet: which weapons you use — so CSDB cannot identify an AWPer, and no style here implies a rifle or a sniper. It also cannot see how often you take opening duels, only how often you win them, nor where you hold, so roles that depend on those (entry, lurk, anchor) are deliberately absent rather than guessed. All of it needs round-by-round demo data, which is the next thing being built.

Your pro match

m0NESY

Plays most like m0NESY 58% playstyle similarity

Most alike: utility contribution, positioning profile.

Where you differ: lower opening-duel success; lower aim profile.

Similarity of playstyle shape across shared dimensions — it says how you play, not that you play at their level. Full comparison →

Strengths & areas to improve

Strengths

T openings. 62% T opening-duel success — entries that actually open the round.

Areas to improve

CT openings. Opening success drops from 62% on T to 46% on CT — first contacts on the defending side are being lost.

Reaction time. 678ms from enemy-visible to first shot leaves fights decided before they start — warmup routines move this number more than anything else.

Counter-strafing. Only 61% of shots are taken properly stopped — moving-shot inaccuracy is quietly taxing every duel.

Generated by fixed rules over this profile's own numbers — no model, no guessing; silent when the sample is too small to support a claim.

CSDB Rating breakdown

Aim3.1
Positioning5.6
Utility5.3
Mechanics2.5
Opening Duels6.1
Win Impact1.0

Composite 3.5/10 (Learning), a weighted mean of the bars with a small opposition adjustment (×0.90 for this rank band). Formula versioned (v1) and documented in code.

Trends

Match rating0.01−0.03
first ⅓ avg 0.04 → last ⅓ avg 0.01
Reaction time647ms−21ms
first ⅓ avg 669ms → last ⅓ avg 647ms
Headshot accuracy17.4%−2.5%
first ⅓ avg 19.9% → last ⅓ avg 17.4%

Rolling 5-match average across the last 100 tracked matches, oldest to newest. The delta compares the first third of the window with the last.

Personal bests

0.40Best match rating · 9–0 · debris, 22 Jul →
43%Best headshot accuracy · 5–9 · vertigo, 13 Sept →
461msFastest reaction time · 5–9 · overpass, 3 Nov →
13–3Biggest win · anubis, 27 Oct →

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Highlights

4Longest win streak
L3Current streak
9–6In matches decided by ≤2 rounds
5Overtime games

Map breakdown

overpassBest map · 62% over 13dust2Weakest map · 14% over 7
MapGradePlayedRecordWin rateAvg rating
debrisB2714–1352%0.05
nukeA148–657%-0.01
overpassA138–562%0.06
vertigoD113–827%0.03
infernoA95–456%0.00
dust2D71–614%-0.00
anubisA74–357%-0.01
mirageD61–517%-0.01
poseidon—30–30%-0.07
ancient—20–20%-0.07
cache—10–10%0.06

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Dust 2 is currently your weakest sufficiently-sampled map (14% over 7). Start with the 6 essential Dust 2 lineups, review the callouts, then spin up a practice server.

Lifetime stats

25,354Lifetime kills
0.89K/D
1,742Matches
37.6%Match win rate
44.9%Headshot % · Top 50% of Level 4 players
4.4%Shot accuracy
5,017MVPs
485Hours (in match)
1,107Bombs planted
270Bombs defused

Most-used weapons

Lifetime map wins

1,868vertigo
1,624nuke
1,378inferno
674dust2
238lake
105train
20office
13cbble

Lifetime totals via Steam — visible because this profile's game details are public. Spans CS:GO and CS2.

Faceit stats

Combat

3Matches
0%Win rate
0.80Avg K/D
86.2ADR
57%Headshot %

Clutches & streaks

0%1v1 clutch win
0%1v2 clutch win
0Longest win streak

Recent Faceit resultsLLLLL

MapMatchesWin rateAvg K/DAvg kills
Mirage20%0.608.5
Anubis10%1.1820.0

Faceit-match stats via the FACEIT Data API — a separate match pool from the sections above.

Skill profile

Aggregate performance across tracked matches — stats via Leetify. Percentile context against other CSDB-tracked players arrives as our own benchmark data accumulates.

17.1%Headshot accuracy
30.5%Accuracy (enemy spotted)
34.9%Spray accuracy
61.3%Counter-strafing
11.9°Preaim
678msReaction time
62.3%T opening success
46.2%CT opening success
0.57Enemies flashed / flash
3.7%Flash assists
8.07HE damage / grenade
9.18Flashes / match

Recommended for you

Spend your practice time on Dust 2

Map knowledge compounds faster than mechanics — lineups and callouts you learn once keep paying out every time the map comes up.

14% win rate across 7 tracked games — your weakest map with enough games to be worth reading into.

Dust 2 callouts & strategy →Dust 2 grenade lineups →

Recent matches

MapScoreRatingHS%Date
mirage13–16-0.0319%4 Nov →
dust27–13-0.0115%4 Nov →
overpass7–90.0612%4 Nov →
debris9–30.1418%3 Nov →
debris9–60.0623%3 Nov →
overpass5–9-0.127%3 Nov →
dust28–130.0115%2 Nov →
mirage13–50.1013%1 Nov →
anubis2–13-0.083%1 Nov →
debris4–9-0.0524%1 Nov →
debris3–9-0.128%1 Nov →
mirage10–13-0.0312%31 Oct →
anubis3–13-0.0118%31 Oct →
dust213–90.0318%31 Oct →
anubis13–110.0014%31 Oct →
nuke13–70.0615%31 Oct →
ancient4–13-0.0510%27 Oct →
anubis13–100.0425%27 Oct →
anubis13–30.0120%27 Oct →
debris6–90.1214%27 Oct →
debris9–00.2727%27 Oct →
debris9–30.0729%27 Oct →
debris1–9-0.2415%27 Oct →
inferno13–9-0.0125%25 Oct →
nuke5–13-0.0323%25 Oct →
nuke9–13-0.0516%17 Oct →
overpass10–130.0313%17 Oct →
vertigo7–13-0.019%17 Oct →
dust23–13-0.0624%17 Oct →
poseidon8–80.0130%17 Oct →
debris9–50.1023%17 Oct →
debris9–50.1426%17 Oct →
vertigo9–60.0114%17 Oct →
overpass9–20.1431%17 Oct →
cache15–150.0613%15 Oct →
dust29–130.0110%15 Oct →
dust28–100.0124%13 Oct →
inferno3–9-0.1018%3 Oct →
overpass6–90.0731%3 Oct →
anubis3–13-0.0632%25 Sept →
nuke3–13-0.0119%25 Sept →
ancient10–13-0.0819%21 Sept →
mirage2–13-0.0919%20 Sept →
nuke13–80.0416%20 Sept →
inferno16–140.0118%20 Sept →
inferno13–30.0621%20 Sept →
overpass9–6-0.0433%19 Sept →
overpass8–8-0.026%18 Sept →
overpass9–40.1023%18 Sept →
inferno16–130.0019%16 Sept →
nuke5–9-0.1227%16 Sept →
overpass9–40.1132%16 Sept →
overpass9–60.0824%14 Sept →
dust214–16-0.0018%13 Sept →
mirage10–130.0223%13 Sept →
nuke6–13-0.0414%13 Sept →
inferno13–11-0.019%13 Sept →
vertigo5–9-0.0643%13 Sept →
nuke13–11-0.0115%9 Sept →
anubis13–60.0221%8 Sept →
nuke13–11-0.019%8 Sept →
mirage9–13-0.0513%6 Sept →
debris7–9-0.0318%10 Aug →
vertigo8–80.0633%31 Jul →
debris8–80.0914%31 Jul →
debris6–90.0033%30 Jul →
debris9–10.1931%30 Jul →
vertigo7–90.1224%29 Jul →
vertigo5–9-0.0717%28 Jul →
debris8–80.0333%28 Jul →
vertigo9–30.2018%28 Jul →
vertigo5–9-0.1117%22 Jul →
nuke9–60.0210%22 Jul →
debris9–00.4031%22 Jul →
debris5–9-0.0510%19 Jul →
debris9–70.0630%19 Jul →
inferno5–13-0.0523%16 Jul →
poseidon6–9-0.0714%16 Jul →
vertigo8–80.0710%16 Jul →
debris6–9-0.008%16 Jul →
debris9–50.1813%16 Jul →
debris4–9-0.1410%16 Jul →
debris9–30.2020%16 Jul →
poseidon1–9-0.1525%15 Jul →
overpass9–60.0916%15 Jul →
debris3–9-0.0925%15 Jul →
nuke1–9-0.1912%15 Jul →
nuke9–70.0322%15 Jul →
debris9–70.1019%15 Jul →
inferno8–80.1034%11 Jul →
nuke9–50.0919%11 Jul →
overpass9–50.1015%11 Jul →
vertigo9–10.1522%11 Jul →
vertigo2–9-0.0811%10 Jul →
debris9–70.0140%10 Jul →
nuke9–50.0516%10 Jul →
inferno7–90.0322%10 Jul →
overpass9–20.2315%10 Jul →
debris4–9-0.0332%9 Jul →
debris9–60.0625%9 Jul →

Match data via Leetify.

Recent teammates

Milestones

100 Matches
Compare this player with someone →Inventory value for this account →Where does this rating sit? Premier rank tiers →

This profile is built from public Steam data. If it is yours, you can remove it, or delete your CSDB account.