BigmantinG

BigmantinG — CS2 Stats

FI76561198955474971[U:1:995209243]Steam profile ↗✓ No bans

2,095Tracked matches45%Win rate2020Tracked since
6,242Hours in CS26Hrs last 2 wks
CSDB Rating4.0 DevelopingSupport
Premier CS Rating3,886Grey band · top ~83.5% of ranked players (population est.)
FaceitLevel 1Top 100.0% of ranked FACEIT players
Ladder ranks via Leetify

What changed since last observed

CSDB last observed this profile on 10 Oct 2026 (2 days ago). Ranks are recorded once per day this page is viewed.

No change since then. Play, then come back: the next observation lands here.

Rating over time

Premier CS Rating: 3,886 -7,590 14 Jul – 10 Oct · 47 days played
3,88611,476peak 11,47614 Jul10 Oct
11,476Peak Premier in tracked matches
47Days played since 2026-07-14

Premier CS Rating

  • 7,590 below peak (11,476)
  • -1,364 over 30 days · declining
  • -7,590 over 90 days
  • Next: Light Blue band at 5,000 — 1,114 to go
  • Reached: Blue band · Light Blue band

Premier comes from this profile’s tracked match history, so it reaches back as far as those matches do.

How this compares with the same rank

Median values for Level 1 among CSDB-tracked players (n=2,269), from Valve's own lifetime stats. Aim, positioning and utility scores are deliberately not benchmarked here — those are a third-party provider's derived metrics, which CSDB does not store.

MetricThis playerLevel 1 medianLevel 2 medianvs Level 2
Headshot rate36.7%40.9%41.3%4.6% short
Shot accuracy10.9%14.2%12.7%1.8% short
Kill/death ratio0.870.950.950.08 short
Match win rate47.0%42.1%42.6%above

This profile matches the typical Level 2 player on 1 of 4 comparable metrics.

Widest gap: Shot accuracy. That is the metric furthest from the Level 2 median in relative terms — not necessarily the one holding a rank back, which no statistic here can establish.

Share this profile

CSDB.GGBigmantinGFACEITLevel 1STANDINGTop 100.0% of rankedPREMIER3,886 · Grey bandcsdb.gg/stats

The image is a snapshot; the link keeps updating. Nothing here is published anywhere — it is generated in your browser when you click.

Performance scores

Aim43
Positioning45
Utility58

0–100 skill scores via Leetify.

Recent form

COLD51–48–1Last 10051%Win rateLLWLWLLWLL

Last 10 vs previous 10: −20pp win rate · +0.02 avg rating · +0.3pp headshot accuracy · −16ms reaction

Win rate down 20pp across the last 10 against the 10 before — more than a 10-match window's normal noise (±20pp). Average match rating moved the other way (+0.02), so results shifted more than performance did.

Last 5 · 10 · 20 matches

Last 5

  • 2–3 · 40% win rate
  • Avg rating 0.01
  • Avg headshot accuracy 9%
  • Avg reaction 660ms

Last 10

  • 3–7 · 30% win rate
  • Avg rating 0.02
  • Avg headshot accuracy 13%
  • Avg reaction 649ms

Last 20

  • 8–12 · 40% win rate
  • Avg rating 0.01
  • Avg headshot accuracy 12%
  • Avg reaction 657ms

Newest first, from the last 100 tracked matches. Each block is its own sample — one result moves a 5-match win rate by 20 points.

Player DNA

Primary style: Support — Utility contribution stands above the rest of this profile (+1.1 against its own average).

Aim4.3
Utility5.8
Positioning4.5
Opening Duels3.7

Style profile from tracked-match aggregates — how this player plays, not how good they are. Classification rules are deterministic and documented in code.

What this cannot see yet: which weapons you use — so CSDB cannot identify an AWPer, and no style here implies a rifle or a sniper. It also cannot see how often you take opening duels, only how often you win them, nor where you hold, so roles that depend on those (entry, lurk, anchor) are deliberately absent rather than guessed. All of it needs round-by-round demo data, which is the next thing being built.

Your pro match

jL

Plays most like jL 69% playstyle similarity

Most alike: utility contribution, opening-duel success.

Where you differ: lower positioning profile; lower aim profile.

Similarity of playstyle shape across shared dimensions — it says how you play, not that you play at their level. Full comparison →

Strengths & areas to improve

Areas to improve

Reaction time. 657ms from enemy-visible to first shot leaves fights decided before they start — warmup routines move this number more than anything else.

Counter-strafing. Only 70% of shots are taken properly stopped — moving-shot inaccuracy is quietly taxing every duel.

Generated by fixed rules over this profile's own numbers — no model, no guessing; silent when the sample is too small to support a claim.

CSDB Rating breakdown

Aim4.3
Positioning4.5
Utility5.8
Mechanics4.4
Opening Duels4.0
Win Impact3.3

Composite 4.0/10 (Developing), a weighted mean of the bars with a small opposition adjustment (×0.90 for this rank band). Formula versioned (v1) and documented in code.

Trends

Match rating0.01+0.01
first ⅓ avg -0.00 → last ⅓ avg 0.01
Reaction time652ms−68ms
first ⅓ avg 719ms → last ⅓ avg 652ms
Headshot accuracy12.2%+0.3%
first ⅓ avg 11.9% → last ⅓ avg 12.2%

Rolling 5-match average across the last 100 tracked matches, oldest to newest. The delta compares the first third of the window with the last.

Personal bests

0.11Best match rating · 13–9 · nuke, 1 Oct →
22%Best headshot accuracy · 13–7 · nuke, 18 Aug →
492msFastest reaction time · 11–13 · dust2, 31 Aug →
13–2Biggest win · nuke, 25 Jul →

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Highlights

6Longest win streak
L2Current streak
10–5In matches decided by ≤2 rounds
10Overtime games

Map breakdown

cacheBest map · 60% over 5anubisWeakest map · 38% over 8
MapGradePlayedRecordWin rateAvg rating
dust2C2410–1442%0.00
mirageA2112–957%0.02
nukeA169–756%0.00
infernoB168–850%-0.00
anubisC83–538%-0.00
ancientB84–450%-0.01
cacheA53–260%-0.01
train—11–0100%-0.04
boulder—11–0100%-0.07

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Anubis is currently your weakest sufficiently-sampled map (38% over 8). Start with the 6 essential Anubis lineups, review the callouts, then spin up a practice server.

Lifetime stats

144,603Lifetime kills
0.87K/D
8,669Matches
47.0%Match win rate · Top 25% of Level 1 players
36.7%Headshot %
10.9%Shot accuracy
18,119MVPs
3,720Hours (in match)
8,076Bombs planted
2,737Bombs defused

Most-used weapons

AK-4738,407
AWP17,112
MP95,846
MAC-105,376
FAMAS3,701

Lifetime map wins

15,575inferno
11,833dust2
10,987nuke
4,682vertigo
1,571train
197cbble
144lake
139office

Lifetime totals via Steam — visible because this profile's game details are public. Spans CS:GO and CS2.

Skill profile

Aggregate performance across tracked matches — stats via Leetify. Percentile context against other CSDB-tracked players arrives as our own benchmark data accumulates.

12.5%Headshot accuracy
33.8%Accuracy (enemy spotted)
34.8%Spray accuracy
69.7%Counter-strafing
10.3°Preaim
657msReaction time
42.5%T opening success
49.7%CT opening success
0.55Enemies flashed / flash
6.0%Flash assists
9.79HE damage / grenade
9.45Flashes / match

Recommended for you

Chosen by comparing your tracked metrics against the thresholds we flag — the measurement behind each one is shown, so you can disagree with it.

  1. Best CS2 Crosshair

    Your shots are landing on bodies more often than heads — usually a crosshair-height and placement habit rather than raw aim.

    Headshot accuracy 12.4893% — below the 15% mark we flag

    Aim Training →
Spend your practice time on Anubis

Map knowledge compounds faster than mechanics — lineups and callouts you learn once keep paying out every time the map comes up.

38% win rate across 8 tracked games — your weakest map with enough games to be worth reading into.

Anubis callouts & strategy →Anubis grenade lineups →

Recent matches

MapScoreRatingHS%Date
nuke13–160.0012%10 Oct →
inferno7–130.0110%10 Oct →
nuke13–50.0112%8 Oct →
anubis12–160.018%6 Oct →
nuke13–30.035%5 Oct →
inferno9–130.0218%4 Oct →
anubis8–130.0112%3 Oct →
nuke13–90.1117%1 Oct →
dust23–130.0114%1 Oct →
nuke13–160.0219%29 Sept →
cache13–100.0213%29 Sept →
inferno13–110.0616%29 Sept →
dust29–13-0.0512%29 Sept →
inferno13–5-0.013%29 Sept →
mirage7–13-0.0015%24 Sept →
dust26–13-0.0214%18 Sept →
mirage11–20.0515%16 Sept →
anubis13–100.0118%9 Sept →
dust210–130.0314%6 Sept →
ancient7–13-0.062%4 Sept →
mirage13–50.0410%1 Sept →
dust211–13-0.0517%31 Aug →
mirage13–50.0310%29 Aug →
cache13–8-0.0315%28 Aug →
dust24–7-0.0320%22 Aug →
mirage7–13-0.013%22 Aug →
inferno15–15-0.0210%21 Aug →
mirage13–40.066%21 Aug →
dust24–13-0.0320%21 Aug →
inferno13–50.0015%21 Aug →
dust213–6-0.0116%21 Aug →
ancient13–8-0.022%21 Aug →
nuke10–130.029%21 Aug →
dust213–100.0715%21 Aug →
anubis6–13-0.034%20 Aug →
mirage8–130.109%20 Aug →
nuke13–60.0316%20 Aug →
dust23–13-0.0215%20 Aug →
mirage13–110.0615%19 Aug →
dust213–90.0118%19 Aug →
inferno13–9-0.0210%19 Aug →
dust23–13-0.028%19 Aug →
dust213–110.0210%19 Aug →
nuke13–70.0422%18 Aug →
mirage6–13-0.0112%18 Aug →
nuke16–14-0.0120%18 Aug →
inferno10–13-0.0210%17 Aug →
ancient7–13-0.048%17 Aug →
train13–10-0.0413%15 Aug →
mirage5–13-0.1211%15 Aug →
mirage16–140.0214%15 Aug →
inferno8–130.0116%14 Aug →
anubis13–60.0211%14 Aug →
mirage13–70.0714%14 Aug →
inferno13–10-0.0214%14 Aug →
dust213–40.036%14 Aug →
anubis13–80.0718%13 Aug →
inferno13–6-0.0510%13 Aug →
mirage10–13-0.0112%12 Aug →
ancient13–60.0517%11 Aug →
dust22–13-0.0317%11 Aug →
inferno6–13-0.0111%11 Aug →
inferno13–110.0110%11 Aug →
nuke10–13-0.024%11 Aug →
nuke3–13-0.0611%7 Aug →
mirage13–50.0715%6 Aug →
mirage10–13-0.019%6 Aug →
nuke7–13-0.1217%3 Aug →
inferno13–80.0615%2 Aug →
ancient13–110.0211%2 Aug →
dust210–130.0011%1 Aug →
cache10–130.0114%1 Aug →
inferno8–13-0.066%1 Aug →
dust213–11-0.0112%31 Jul →
anubis6–13-0.098%31 Jul →
mirage3–13-0.0018%31 Jul →
dust213–90.0313%31 Jul →
ancient11–13-0.0011%30 Jul →
mirage13–60.0119%30 Jul →
mirage9–13-0.019%30 Jul →
boulder13–6-0.0715%29 Jul →
nuke13–5-0.036%29 Jul →
dust216–140.0312%27 Jul →
dust29–13-0.009%26 Jul →
dust28–130.015%25 Jul →
nuke13–20.027%25 Jul →
dust213–60.029%25 Jul →
ancient13–80.0316%24 Jul →
anubis11–13-0.008%23 Jul →
inferno14–16-0.0417%23 Jul →
dust29–13-0.0111%23 Jul →
mirage13–60.0316%22 Jul →
nuke13–9-0.0016%21 Jul →
dust213–90.0513%21 Jul →
cache11–13-0.0513%16 Jul →
nuke13–160.0111%16 Jul →
cache13–50.0111%16 Jul →
mirage13–110.0712%16 Jul →
ancient9–13-0.0113%15 Jul →
mirage16–13-0.056%14 Jul →

Match data via Leetify.

Milestones

1,000 Matches
Compare this player with someone →Inventory value for this account →Where does this rating sit? Premier rank tiers →

This profile is built from public Steam data. If it is yours, you can remove it, or delete your CSDB account.