ed5n

ed5n — CS2 Stats

GB76561198952636023[U:1:992370295]Steam profile ↗✓ No bans

562Tracked matches57%Win rate2020Tracked since
1,665Hours in CS8Hrs last 2 wks
CSDB Rating5.1 DevelopingSupport
Premier CS Rating12,877Blue band · top ~39.6% of ranked players (population est.)
FaceitLevel 2Top 97.9% of ranked FACEIT players
Ladder ranks via Leetify

What changed since last observed

CSDB last observed this profile on 11 Nov 2026 (4 days ago). Ranks are recorded once per day this page is viewed.

No change since then. Play, then come back: the next observation lands here.

Rating over time

Premier CS Rating: 12,877 +450 13 Jun – 11 Nov · 26 days played
12,20414,708peak 14,70813 Jun11 Nov
14,708Peak Premier in tracked matches
35Days played since 2026-06-13

Premier CS Rating

  • 1,831 below peak (14,708)
  • +301 over 30 days · steady
  • -237 over 90 days
  • Next: Purple band at 15,000 — 2,123 to go
  • Reached: Blue band · Light Blue band

Premier comes from this profile’s tracked match history, so it reaches back as far as those matches do.

How this compares with the same rank

Median values for Level 2 among CSDB-tracked players (n=6,128), from Valve's own lifetime stats. Aim, positioning and utility scores are deliberately not benchmarked here — those are a third-party provider's derived metrics, which CSDB does not store.

MetricThis playerLevel 2 medianLevel 3 medianvs Level 3
Headshot rate34.9%41.3%41.8%6.9% short
Shot accuracy16.3%12.7%12.2%above
Kill/death ratio1.100.950.98above
Match win rate40.7%42.6%43.3%2.6% short

This profile matches the typical Level 3 player on 2 of 4 comparable metrics.

Widest gap: Headshot rate. That is the metric furthest from the Level 3 median in relative terms — not necessarily the one holding a rank back, which no statistic here can establish.

Share this profile

CSDB.GGed5nFACEITLevel 2STANDINGTop 97.9% of rankedPREMIER12,877 · Blue bandcsdb.gg/stats

The image is a snapshot; the link keeps updating. Nothing here is published anywhere — it is generated in your browser when you click.

Performance scores

Aim46
Positioning55
Utility62

0–100 skill scores via Leetify.

Recent form

STEADY52–44–4Last 10052%Win rateLLLLWWLLWW

Last 10 vs previous 10: −30pp win rate · −0.04 avg rating · −0.9pp headshot accuracy · −18ms reaction

Win rate down 30pp across the last 10 against the 10 before — more than a 10-match window's normal noise (±20pp).

Last 5 · 10 · 20 matches

Last 5

  • 1–4 · 20% win rate
  • Avg rating -0.06
  • Avg headshot accuracy 17%
  • Avg reaction 634ms

Last 10

  • 4–6 · 40% win rate
  • Avg rating -0.03
  • Avg headshot accuracy 16%
  • Avg reaction 648ms

Last 20

  • 11–9 · 55% win rate
  • Avg rating -0.02
  • Avg headshot accuracy 17%
  • Avg reaction 657ms

Newest first, from the last 100 tracked matches. Each block is its own sample — one result moves a 5-match win rate by 20 points.

Player DNA

Primary style: Support — Utility contribution stands above the rest of this profile (+1.7 against its own average).

Aim4.6
Utility6.2
Positioning5.5
Opening Duels3.0
Clutch3.4

Style profile from tracked-match aggregates — how this player plays, not how good they are. Classification rules are deterministic and documented in code.

What this cannot see yet: which weapons you use — so CSDB cannot identify an AWPer, and no style here implies a rifle or a sniper. It also cannot see how often you take opening duels, only how often you win them, nor where you hold, so roles that depend on those (entry, lurk, anchor) are deliberately absent rather than guessed. All of it needs round-by-round demo data, which is the next thing being built.

Your pro match

ZywOo

Plays most like ZywOo 66% playstyle similarity

Most alike: utility contribution, positioning profile.

Where you differ: lower opening-duel success; lower aim profile.

Similarity of playstyle shape across shared dimensions — it says how you play, not that you play at their level. Full comparison →

Strengths & areas to improve

Strengths

T openings. 62% T opening-duel success — entries that actually open the round.

Areas to improve

CT openings. Opening success drops from 62% on T to 37% on CT — first contacts on the defending side are being lost.

Reaction time. 650ms from enemy-visible to first shot leaves fights decided before they start — warmup routines move this number more than anything else.

Generated by fixed rules over this profile's own numbers — no model, no guessing; silent when the sample is too small to support a claim.

CSDB Rating breakdown

Aim4.6
Positioning5.5
Utility6.2
Mechanics5.1
Opening Duels4.9
Win Impact7.2

Composite 5.1/10 (Developing), a weighted mean of the bars with a small opposition adjustment (×0.95 for this rank band). Formula versioned (v1) and documented in code.

Trends

Match rating-0.01−0.03
first ⅓ avg 0.02 → last ⅓ avg -0.01
Reaction time656ms+0ms
first ⅓ avg 656ms → last ⅓ avg 656ms
Headshot accuracy17.1%+2.5%
first ⅓ avg 14.6% → last ⅓ avg 17.1%

Rolling 5-match average across the last 100 tracked matches, oldest to newest. The delta compares the first third of the window with the last.

Personal bests

0.27Best match rating · 9–3 · vertigo, 13 Jul →
50%Best headshot accuracy · 5–3 · anubis, 9 Oct →
484msFastest reaction time · 13–6 · anubis, 28 Oct →
13–1Biggest win · ancient, 18 Aug →

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Highlights

5Longest win streak
L4Current streak
14–7In matches decided by ≤2 rounds
17Overtime games

Map breakdown

anubisBest map · 77% over 13nukeWeakest map · 36% over 14
MapGradePlayedRecordWin rateAvg rating
infernoC188–1044%0.01
mirageA1610–663%0.02
nukeC145–936%0.02
anubisS1310–377%0.00
ancientB136–746%0.01
dust2B115–645%-0.00
cacheA116–555%-0.02
vertigo—32–167%0.09
overpass—10–10%-0.01

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Nuke is currently your weakest sufficiently-sampled map (36% over 14). Start with the 6 essential Nuke lineups, review the callouts, then spin up a practice server.

Lifetime stats

50,004Lifetime kills
1.10K/D · Top 25% of Level 2 players
2,737Matches
40.7%Match win rate
34.9%Headshot %
16.3%Shot accuracy · Top 25% of Level 2 players
6,200MVPs
1,009Hours (in match)
2,718Bombs planted
903Bombs defused

Most-used weapons

Lifetime map wins

3,118vertigo
2,994inferno
2,184dust2
1,778nuke
555lake
401train
147cbble
35office

Lifetime totals via Steam — visible because this profile's game details are public. Spans CS:GO and CS2.

Faceit stats

Combat

86Matches
45%Win rate
1.25Avg K/D
73.8ADR
32%Headshot %

Clutches & streaks

37%1v1 clutch win
33%1v2 clutch win
5Longest win streak

Recent Faceit resultsLWLWW

MapMatchesWin rateAvg K/DAvg kills
Mirage956%1.3616.1
Inferno450%1.5619.5
Dust240%0.6813.5
Anubis3100%3.2326.0
Cache2100%1.0813.5
Ancient250%1.3111.5
Nuke1100%1.2117.0
Vertigo10%1.3619.0

Faceit-match stats via the FACEIT Data API — a separate match pool from the sections above.

Skill profile

Aggregate performance across tracked matches — stats via Leetify. Percentile context against other CSDB-tracked players arrives as our own benchmark data accumulates.

16.1%Headshot accuracy
32.8%Accuracy (enemy spotted)
35.3%Spray accuracy
72.9%Counter-strafing
11.7°Preaim
650msReaction time
62.1%T opening success
37.0%CT opening success
0.50Enemies flashed / flash
8.9%Flash assists
10.37HE damage / grenade
17.32Flashes / match

Recommended for you

Chosen by comparing your tracked metrics against the thresholds we flag — the measurement behind each one is shown, so you can disagree with it.

  1. Advanced Mechanics

    Losing the first CT duel repeatedly usually means holding angles that favour the peeker.

    CT opening duels 37.0056% — below the 40% mark we flag

Spend your practice time on Nuke

Map knowledge compounds faster than mechanics — lineups and callouts you learn once keep paying out every time the map comes up.

36% win rate across 14 tracked games — your weakest map with enough games to be worth reading into.

Nuke callouts & strategy →Nuke grenade lineups →

Recent matches

MapScoreRatingHS%Date
dust21–13-0.1030%11 Nov →
anubis8–13-0.0812%11 Nov →
ancient10–13-0.079%11 Nov →
cache9–130.0017%11 Nov →
cache16–14-0.0519%11 Nov →
ancient13–10-0.043%11 Nov →
mirage5–13-0.006%4 Nov →
cache10–13-0.0530%4 Nov →
ancient13–70.069%31 Oct →
mirage13–11-0.0126%31 Oct →
cache13–80.0117%30 Oct →
mirage6–13-0.0313%30 Oct →
cache13–80.0120%30 Oct →
inferno7–13-0.0319%28 Oct →
anubis13–6-0.0210%28 Oct →
dust213–30.0411%28 Oct →
dust216–13-0.0015%28 Oct →
anubis13–110.0126%28 Oct →
nuke13–8-0.0021%24 Oct →
nuke7–90.0620%18 Oct →
mirage13–100.0820%18 Oct →
anubis22–20-0.0011%12 Oct →
ancient14–16-0.0414%12 Oct →
mirage13–90.0713%10 Oct →
cache8–13-0.0613%9 Oct →
anubis5–3-0.0750%9 Oct →
ancient2–13-0.0015%9 Oct →
anubis13–40.069%8 Oct →
cache8–13-0.0432%8 Oct →
mirage4–13-0.0310%8 Oct →
ancient13–30.063%2 Oct →
dust218–220.0128%2 Oct →
inferno8–130.0315%2 Oct →
inferno13–160.0219%27 Sept →
inferno13–60.0314%27 Sept →
dust213–11-0.0326%27 Sept →
dust27–130.0423%27 Sept →
mirage13–90.0117%23 Sept →
nuke6–20.127%23 Sept →
inferno4–130.0350%23 Sept →
inferno12–160.0311%23 Sept →
inferno13–90.0020%20 Sept →
cache13–8-0.0112%20 Sept →
mirage13–16-0.0024%20 Sept →
mirage13–60.0618%20 Sept →
nuke13–110.0110%20 Sept →
mirage13–20.1627%20 Sept →
inferno8–13-0.0611%15 Sept →
nuke10–13-0.0617%15 Sept →
mirage13–50.0617%15 Sept →
ancient15–150.0919%15 Sept →
dust27–130.0020%13 Sept →
dust211–13-0.0418%13 Sept →
mirage13–11-0.0125%13 Sept →
ancient4–13-0.0633%13 Sept →
inferno6–13-0.0418%6 Sept →
anubis16–140.0519%6 Sept →
cache6–13-0.0322%6 Sept →
nuke11–130.0115%6 Sept →
nuke11–130.0717%29 Aug →
ancient10–13-0.0416%28 Aug →
anubis13–6-0.019%28 Aug →
inferno14–16-0.0519%21 Aug →
mirage13–7-0.038%19 Aug →
ancient13–70.0422%18 Aug →
ancient13–10.0722%18 Aug →
cache13–11-0.0212%17 Aug →
nuke7–13-0.0110%17 Aug →
nuke13–70.0916%14 Aug →
inferno13–90.0112%12 Aug →
dust213–90.0315%12 Aug →
nuke12–160.0213%12 Aug →
inferno15–150.0017%12 Aug →
anubis13–100.0319%11 Aug →
inferno13–40.0412%11 Aug →
anubis13–60.0711%11 Aug →
mirage10–130.0328%10 Aug →
overpass9–9-0.0110%10 Aug →
nuke8–13-0.0418%10 Aug →
inferno13–10-0.078%8 Aug →
dust29–13-0.0418%8 Aug →
cache13–9-0.0016%6 Aug →
anubis13–90.0315%6 Aug →
dust213–110.059%6 Aug →
ancient13–110.0911%5 Aug →
inferno16–140.016%5 Aug →
nuke8–13-0.0413%5 Aug →
inferno9–20.2341%5 Aug →
mirage3–13-0.0512%5 Aug →
inferno15–150.0213%4 Aug →
anubis15–150.0011%4 Aug →
nuke6–130.0412%4 Aug →
anubis6–13-0.0611%3 Aug →
nuke13–60.0114%13 Jul →
vertigo9–40.1515%13 Jul →
vertigo2–9-0.147%13 Jul →
vertigo9–30.275%13 Jul →
mirage13–100.0111%13 Jul →
inferno16–140.0024%13 Jun →
ancient8–13-0.0029%13 Jun →

Match data via Leetify.

Recent teammates

Milestones

500 Matches
Compare this player with someone →Inventory value for this account →Where does this rating sit? Premier rank tiers →

This profile is built from public Steam data. If it is yours, you can remove it, or delete your CSDB account.