BOT Pocoyo

BOT Pocoyo — CS2 Stats

MM76561198936451087[U:1:976185359]Steam profile ↗✓ No bans

624Tracked matches50%Win rate2020Tracked since
1,279Hours in CS5Hrs last 2 wks
CSDB Rating5.2 DevelopingClutch Specialist
Premier CS Rating21,157Top 50% of 185,711 CSDB-tracked playersPink band · top ~7.2% of ranked players (population est.)
CSDB Leaderboard#61760 of 233323 tracked
WingmanMaster Guardian Elite
Ladder ranks via Leetify

What changed since last observed

CSDB last observed this profile on 13 Sep 2026 (8 days ago). Ranks are recorded once per day this page is viewed.

No change since then. Play, then come back: the next observation lands here.

Track this profile

CSDB reads this profile's Premier rating from its tracked match history, and records Faceit ELO once on every day the page is viewed. 54 days played since 17 Dec 2025. Come back after the next session and the change shows above.

Is this you? Sign in with Steam to claim it and connect match tracking →

Rating over time

Premier CS Rating: 21,157 -1,814 17 Dec13 Sept · 27 days played
17,53422,971peak 22,97117 Dec13 Sept
22,971Peak Premier in tracked matches
54Days played since 2025-12-17

Premier CS Rating

  • 1,814 below peak (22,971)
  • +3,623 over 90 days
  • Next: Red band at 25,000 3,843 to go
  • Reached: Pink band · Purple band · Blue band · Light Blue band

Premier comes from this profile’s tracked match history, so it reaches back as far as those matches do.

How this compares with the same rank

Median values for Pink band among CSDB-tracked players (n=36,987), from Valve's own lifetime stats. Aim, positioning and utility scores are deliberately not benchmarked here — those are a third-party provider's derived metrics, which CSDB does not store.

MetricThis playerPink band medianRed band medianvs Red band
Headshot rate42.2%46.9%49.2%7.0% short
Shot accuracy10.2%13.0%13.4%3.2% short
Kill/death ratio1.241.081.12above
Match win rate46.1%46.7%48.5%2.4% short

This profile matches the typical Red band player on 1 of 4 comparable metrics.

Widest gap: Shot accuracy. That is the metric furthest from the Red band median in relative terms — not necessarily the one holding a rank back, which no statistic here can establish.

Share this profile

CSDB.GGBOT PocoyoPREMIER21,157 · Pink bandcsdb.gg/stats

The image is a snapshot; the link keeps updating. Nothing here is published anywhere — it is generated in your browser when you click.

Performance scores

Aim64
Positioning50
Utility36

0–100 skill scores via Leetify.

Recent form

COLD50473Last 10050%Win rateLLWLWLLLWL

Last 10 vs previous 10: −20pp win rate · +0.03 avg rating · −3.3pp headshot accuracy · −51ms reaction

Win rate down 20pp across the last 10 against the 10 before — more than a 10-match window's normal noise (±20pp). Average match rating moved the other way (+0.03), so results shifted more than performance did.

Last 5 · 10 · 20 matches

Last 5

  • 23 · 40% win rate
  • Avg rating 0.03
  • Avg headshot accuracy 17%
  • Avg reaction 469ms

Last 10

  • 37 · 30% win rate
  • Avg rating 0.04
  • Avg headshot accuracy 17%
  • Avg reaction 527ms

Last 20

  • 8111 · 40% win rate
  • Avg rating 0.02
  • Avg headshot accuracy 19%
  • Avg reaction 552ms

Newest first, from the last 100 tracked matches. Each block is its own sample — one result moves a 5-match win rate by 20 points.

Player DNA

Primary style: Clutch SpecialistLate-round 1vX conversion stands above the rest of this profile (+1.1 against its own average).

Aim6.4
Utility3.6
Positioning5.0
Opening Duels3.7
Clutch5.6

Limited utility dependence

Style profile from tracked-match aggregates — how this player plays, not how good they are. Classification rules are deterministic and documented in code.

What this cannot see yet: which weapons you use — so CSDB cannot identify an AWPer, and no style here implies a rifle or a sniper. It also cannot see how often you take opening duels, only how often you win them, nor where you hold, so roles that depend on those (entry, lurk, anchor) are deliberately absent rather than guessed. All of it needs round-by-round demo data, which is the next thing being built.

Your pro match

ZywOo

Plays most like ZywOo 89% playstyle similarity

Most alike: positioning profile, opening-duel success.

Where you differ: lower utility contribution; lower aim profile.

Similarity of playstyle shape across shared dimensions — it says how you play, not that you play at their level. Full comparison →

Strengths & areas to improve

Areas to improve

T-side openings. Opening success drops from 52% on CT to 32% on T — the same duels are being taken with worse setups on the attacking side.

Reaction time. 570ms from enemy-visible to first shot leaves fights decided before they start — warmup routines move this number more than anything else.

Generated by fixed rules over this profile's own numbers — no model, no guessing; silent when the sample is too small to support a claim.

CSDB Rating breakdown

Aim6.4
Positioning5.0
Utility3.6
Mechanics5.5
Opening Duels3.1
Win Impact5.0

Composite 5.2/10 (Developing), a weighted mean of the bars with a small opposition adjustment (×1.02 for this rank band). Formula versioned (v1) and documented in code.

Trends

Match rating0.03−0.01
first ⅓ avg 0.03 → last ⅓ avg 0.03
Reaction time575ms−48ms
first ⅓ avg 623ms → last ⅓ avg 575ms
Headshot accuracy18.6%+4.1%
first ⅓ avg 14.5% → last ⅓ avg 18.6%

Rolling 5-match average across the last 100 tracked matches, oldest to newest. The delta compares the first third of the window with the last.

Personal bests

0.18Best match rating · 13–2 · mirage, 18 Mar
41%Best headshot accuracy · 9–13 · inferno, 1 Apr
313msFastest reaction time · 2–13 · inferno, 12 Aug
13–0Biggest win · nuke, 11 Aug

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Highlights

7Longest win streak
L2Current streak
76In matches decided by ≤2 rounds
4Overtime games

Map breakdown

nukeBest map · 71% over 24anubisWeakest map · 25% over 8
MapGradePlayedRecordWin rateAvg rating
nukeS2417771%0.03
ancientB168850%0.03
infernoD1541127%0.05
mirageA148657%0.04
dust2B115645%0.00
anubisD82625%0.02
overpassB63350%0.03
cache21150%0.11
vertigo21150%0.09
train21150%0.05

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Anubis is currently your weakest sufficiently-sampled map (25% over 8). Start with the 6 essential Anubis lineups, review the callouts, then spin up a practice server.

Lifetime stats

35,578Lifetime kills
1.24K/D · Top 25% of Pink band
1,797Matches
46.1%Match win rate
42.2%Headshot %
10.2%Shot accuracy
4,447MVPs
795Hours (in match)
1,557Bombs planted
568Bombs defused

Most-used weapons

Lifetime map wins

3,180nuke
1,571train
1,528inferno
1,370dust2
1,161vertigo
81lake
22office
9cbble

Lifetime totals via Steam — visible because this profile's game details are public. Spans CS:GO and CS2.

Faceit stats

Combat

43Matches
58%Win rate
1.64Avg K/D
98.8ADR
41%Headshot %

Clutches & streaks

48%1v1 clutch win
34%1v2 clutch win
5Longest win streak

Recent Faceit resultsLWWWL

MapMatchesWin rateAvg K/DAvg kills
Ancient956%1.5318.3
Mirage875%1.4820.5
Anubis667%3.3815.5
Nuke650%1.2821.3
Inferno367%1.4011.0
Overpass3100%1.7025.7
Dust2250%1.4620.5
Vertigo10%0.8113.0

Faceit-match stats via the FACEIT Data API — a separate match pool from the sections above.

Skill profile

Aggregate performance across tracked matches — stats via Leetify. Percentile context against other CSDB-tracked players arrives as our own benchmark data accumulates.

17.9%Headshot accuracy
33.9%Accuracy (enemy spotted)
36.7%Spray accuracy
74.8%Counter-strafing
10.3°Preaim
570msReaction time
32.2%T opening success
52.3%CT opening success
0.52Enemies flashed / flash
2.0%Flash assists
7.06HE damage / grenade
3.10Flashes / match

Recommended for you

Chosen by comparing your tracked metrics against the thresholds we flag — the measurement behind each one is shown, so you can disagree with it.

  1. Grenades & Utility

    You are buying and holding utility rather than using it. Unthrown flashes are wasted money every round.

    Flashes per match 3.1011 — below the 4 mark we flag

    Grenade Lineups
  2. Advanced Mechanics

    You are losing most of the first duels you take on T side, which is usually a peeking and spacing problem, not aim.

    T opening duels 32.157% — below the 40% mark we flag

Spend your practice time on Anubis

Map knowledge compounds faster than mechanics — lineups and callouts you learn once keep paying out every time the map comes up.

25% win rate across 8 tracked games — your weakest map with enough games to be worth reading into.

Anubis callouts & strategyAnubis grenade lineups

Recent matches

MapScoreRatingHS%Date
dust20–7-0.0127%13 Sept
ancient6–130.0415%10 Sept
inferno13–30.0813%10 Sept
dust24–130.036%8 Sept
nuke13–80.0323%8 Sept
nuke8–130.1115%6 Sept
mirage3–80.018%1 Sept
inferno13–160.0132%1 Sept
nuke13–60.0819%31 Aug
inferno7–130.0413%31 Aug
ancient13–11-0.019%31 Aug
cache13–20.1026%31 Aug
anubis2–7-0.0511%27 Aug
inferno13–50.088%27 Aug
dust26–13-0.0421%27 Aug
anubis4–13-0.0116%27 Aug
mirage13–11-0.0413%26 Aug
inferno8–80.1139%26 Aug
inferno2–13-0.0332%12 Aug
dust213–8-0.0430%12 Aug
nuke13–60.0117%12 Aug
mirage13–4-0.0819%11 Aug
nuke13–0-0.0115%11 Aug
dust213–50.0228%11 Aug
mirage13–7-0.0115%10 Aug
nuke16–13-0.0517%10 Aug
nuke11–130.039%9 Aug
inferno5–130.0933%15 Jun
ancient13–70.0820%12 Jun
nuke8–130.0018%12 Jun
ancient10–13-0.029%21 May
nuke13–50.1716%20 May
inferno13–80.0923%18 May
ancient8–130.0010%18 May
dust26–130.0314%4 May
dust29–130.0633%30 Apr
anubis13–110.0617%29 Apr
cache8–130.1118%28 Apr
inferno11–13-0.0112%27 Apr
ancient10–130.058%27 Apr
dust216–13-0.0521%23 Apr
nuke13–50.0226%20 Apr
inferno5–13-0.0413%19 Apr
dust213–70.0416%19 Apr
nuke13–50.1510%12 Apr
overpass13–110.0316%12 Apr
inferno8–8-0.0018%11 Apr
anubis13–50.0816%11 Apr
inferno8–130.1515%11 Apr
anubis2–130.0523%11 Apr
inferno9–60.0823%10 Apr
overpass3–130.049%6 Apr
anubis9–130.0115%6 Apr
ancient13–110.0318%6 Apr
nuke13–70.1213%1 Apr
inferno9–13-0.0141%1 Apr
ancient13–11-0.026%31 Mar
nuke13–70.0222%31 Mar
nuke13–4-0.0015%31 Mar
overpass7–130.0315%30 Mar
nuke13–10-0.0511%30 Mar
mirage13–90.0620%30 Mar
ancient13–90.0710%30 Mar
nuke13–100.0414%19 Mar
mirage11–130.0414%18 Mar
mirage13–20.186%18 Mar
overpass13–100.037%16 Mar
ancient13–60.0512%16 Mar
mirage5–130.0116%9 Mar
anubis11–130.0611%9 Mar
mirage10–130.0416%5 Mar
vertigo13–20.0815%20 Feb
nuke9–130.0526%14 Feb
overpass13–90.0518%14 Feb
anubis6–13-0.0330%10 Feb
mirage13–100.0514%6 Feb
ancient9–130.0114%5 Feb
overpass11–130.0114%4 Feb
ancient13–160.049%31 Jan
vertigo11–130.1013%27 Jan
nuke13–60.027%27 Jan
mirage13–30.105%24 Jan
mirage12–120.0911%23 Jan
nuke9–13-0.058%19 Jan
ancient13–10-0.0020%19 Jan
dust213–100.0313%16 Jan
mirage13–80.074%16 Jan
ancient5–130.0310%12 Jan
nuke13–60.0310%7 Jan
dust26–13-0.0318%7 Jan
nuke13–80.0615%6 Jan
train10–130.0314%5 Jan
nuke6–13-0.0323%5 Jan
ancient8–130.0316%5 Jan
nuke8–130.0121%5 Jan
mirage6–13-0.0012%5 Jan
nuke13–50.077%17 Dec
train13–30.0719%17 Dec
ancient13–110.0219%17 Dec
inferno7–130.0416%17 Dec

Match data via Leetify.

Recent teammates

Milestones

500 Matches
Compare this player with someone →Inventory value for this account →Where does this rating sit? Premier rank tiers →