JakeS

JakeS — CS2 Stats

FI76561198930555853[U:1:970290125]Steam profile ↗✓ No bans

603Tracked matches57%Win rate2021Tracked since
1,065Hours in CS15Hrs last 2 wks
CSDB Rating6.7 SolidPositional Player
Premier CS Rating20,100Top 50% of 204,316 CSDB-tracked playersPink band · top ~8.4% of ranked players (population est.)
CSDB Leaderboard#79093 of 251424 tracked
FaceitLevel 8 · 1,311 ELOTop 31.2% of ranked FACEIT players
Ladder ranks via Leetify

What changed since last observed

CSDB last observed this profile on 12 Oct 2026 (yesterday). Ranks are recorded once per day this page is viewed.

No change since then. Play, then come back: the next observation lands here.

Rating over time

Premier CS Rating: 20,100 +1,642 22 Aug – 12 Oct · 11 days played
18,45820,100peak 20,10022 Aug12 Oct
20,100Peak Premier in tracked matches
1,311Highest Faceit ELO seen on CSDB
25Days played since 2026-06-08

Faceit ELO

  • At peak — 1,311
  • Next: Level 7 at 1,351 — 40 to go
  • Reached: Level 6 · Level 5 · Level 4 · Level 3
  • Level 6 first seen 2026-09-04
  • Level 5 first seen 2026-09-04

Premier CS Rating

  • At peak — 20,100
  • Next: Red band at 25,000 — 4,900 to go
  • Reached: Pink band · Purple band · Blue band · Light Blue band
  • Purple band first seen 2026-09-04
  • Blue band first seen 2026-09-04

Premier comes from this profile’s tracked match history, so it reaches back as far as those matches do. Faceit ELO is CSDB’s own observation — no feed exposes ELO per match, so that line only has the days the profile was viewed and cannot be backfilled.

Compare periods

Last 30 days vs previous 30

MetricLast 30Previous 30Change
Matches55——
Win rate53%——
K/D0.93——
Headshot %58%——

Measured 11 Sep 2026 → 13 Oct 2026; no observation near 60 days ago, so there is no previous window yet.

Differences between Valve's lifetime totals on the days CSDB observed this profile — every mode Valve counts, not only ranked. A window appears only when an observation sits within a few days of each end.

How this compares with the same rank

Median values for Level 8 among CSDB-tracked players (n=14,773), from Valve's own lifetime stats. Aim, positioning and utility scores are deliberately not benchmarked here — those are a third-party provider's derived metrics, which CSDB does not store.

MetricThis playerLevel 8 medianLevel 9 medianvs Level 9
Headshot rate56.2%46.8%48.2%above
Shot accuracy12.0%13.0%13.3%1.2% short
Kill/death ratio1.241.061.07above
Match win rate44.5%46.3%46.9%2.4% short

This profile matches the typical Level 9 player on 2 of 4 comparable metrics.

Widest gap: Shot accuracy. That is the metric furthest from the Level 9 median in relative terms — not necessarily the one holding a rank back, which no statistic here can establish.

Share this profile

CSDB.GGJakeSFACEITLevel 8 · 1,311 ELOSTANDINGTop 31.2% of rankedPREMIER20,100 · Pink bandPEAK ELO1,311csdb.gg/stats

The image is a snapshot; the link keeps updating. Nothing here is published anywhere — it is generated in your browser when you click.

Performance scores

Aim90
Positioning56
Utility45

0–100 skill scores via Leetify.

Recent form

HOT59–37–4Last 10059%Win rateWWWWLWWLWW

Last 10 vs previous 10: +30pp win rate · +0.02 avg rating · −2.2pp headshot accuracy · −27ms reaction

Win rate up 30pp across the last 10 against the 10 before — more than a 10-match window's normal noise (±20pp).

Last 5 · 10 · 20 matches

Last 5

  • 4–1 · 80% win rate
  • Avg rating -0.01
  • Avg headshot accuracy 20%
  • Avg reaction 575ms

Last 10

  • 8–2 · 80% win rate
  • Avg rating -0.00
  • Avg headshot accuracy 21%
  • Avg reaction 543ms

Last 20

  • 13–7 · 65% win rate
  • Avg rating -0.01
  • Avg headshot accuracy 22%
  • Avg reaction 557ms

Newest first, from the last 100 tracked matches. Each block is its own sample — one result moves a 5-match win rate by 20 points.

Player DNA

Primary style: Positional Player — Positioning stands above the rest of this profile (+1.9 against its own average).

Aim9.0
Utility4.5
Positioning5.6
Opening Duels1.1
Clutch3.6

Sharp aimer

Style profile from tracked-match aggregates — how this player plays, not how good they are. Classification rules are deterministic and documented in code.

What this cannot see yet: which weapons you use — so CSDB cannot identify an AWPer, and no style here implies a rifle or a sniper. It also cannot see how often you take opening duels, only how often you win them, nor where you hold, so roles that depend on those (entry, lurk, anchor) are deliberately absent rather than guessed. All of it needs round-by-round demo data, which is the next thing being built.

Your pro match

b1t

Plays most like b1t 93% playstyle similarity

Most alike: aim profile, positioning profile.

Where you differ: lower utility contribution.

Similarity of playstyle shape across shared dimensions — it says how you play, not that you play at their level. Full comparison →

Strengths & areas to improve

Strengths

Aim. Aim score of 90 — the mechanical foundation is a clear strength.

Areas to improve

Positioning. Positioning trails aim by 34 points — deaths here waste a strong aim profile.

Utility. Utility contribution runs far behind the mechanical game — the cheapest rating gain on this profile is thrown, not aimed.

Reaction time. 563ms from enemy-visible to first shot leaves fights decided before they start — warmup routines move this number more than anything else.

Generated by fixed rules over this profile's own numbers — no model, no guessing; silent when the sample is too small to support a claim.

CSDB Rating breakdown

Aim9.0
Positioning5.6
Utility4.5
Mechanics8.0
Opening Duels1.9
Win Impact7.2

Composite 6.7/10 (Solid), a weighted mean of the bars with a small opposition adjustment (×1.02 for this rank band). Formula versioned (v1) and documented in code.

Trends

Match rating-0.00−0.03
first ⅓ avg 0.03 → last ⅓ avg -0.00
Reaction time559ms−33ms
first ⅓ avg 592ms → last ⅓ avg 559ms
Headshot accuracy22.6%−1.6%
first ⅓ avg 24.2% → last ⅓ avg 22.6%

Rolling 5-match average across the last 100 tracked matches, oldest to newest. The delta compares the first third of the window with the last.

Personal bests

0.16Best match rating · 11–13 · cache, 17 Aug →
50%Best headshot accuracy · 4–13 · cache, 28 Aug →
391msFastest reaction time · 5–13 · dust2, 28 Sept →
13–0Biggest win · fachwerk, 11 Oct →

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Highlights

6Longest win streak
W4Current streak
7–9In matches decided by ≤2 rounds
8Overtime games

Map breakdown

anubisBest map · 86% over 7mirageWeakest map · 40% over 10
MapGradePlayedRecordWin rateAvg rating
cacheA2414–1058%0.01
dust2A169–756%0.01
nukeA116–555%0.00
ancientS108–280%0.02
mirageC104–640%0.00
infernoS75–271%0.01
vertigoC73–443%0.02
anubisS76–186%0.04
fachwerk—32–167%0.05
boulder—21–150%0.04
train—10–10%0.07
italy—10–10%0.06
shelter—11–0100%0.02

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Mirage is currently your weakest sufficiently-sampled map (40% over 10). Start with the 5 essential Mirage lineups, review the callouts, then spin up a practice server.

Lifetime stats

37,077Lifetime kills
1.24K/D · Top 25% of Level 8 players
1,594Matches
44.5%Match win rate
56.2%Headshot % · Top 25% of Level 8 players
12.0%Shot accuracy
3,973MVPs
617Hours (in match)
1,530Bombs planted
379Bombs defused

Most-used weapons

Lifetime map wins

1,627inferno
1,607dust2
961nuke
957vertigo
501office
489train
74lake
43cbble

Lifetime totals via Steam — visible because this profile's game details are public. Spans CS:GO and CS2.

Faceit stats

Combat

107Matches
58%Win rate
1.18Avg K/D
78.1ADR
57%Headshot %

Clutches & streaks

38%1v1 clutch win
21%1v2 clutch win
6Longest win streak

Recent Faceit resultsLWWLL

MapMatchesWin rateAvg K/DAvg kills
Dust21958%1.3419.7
Mirage1958%1.1016.2
Ancient1675%1.2417.1
Anubis1060%1.1814.9
Inferno967%1.1716.7
Cache786%0.9115.6
Vertigo633%1.2919.8
Nuke30%0.518.0

Faceit-match stats via the FACEIT Data API — a separate match pool from the sections above.

Skill profile

Aggregate performance across tracked matches — stats via Leetify. Percentile context against other CSDB-tracked players arrives as our own benchmark data accumulates.

20.8%Headshot accuracy
38.3%Accuracy (enemy spotted)
44.8%Spray accuracy
86.1%Counter-strafing
7.9°Preaim
563msReaction time
41.7%T opening success
33.8%CT opening success
0.58Enemies flashed / flash
6.6%Flash assists
7.82HE damage / grenade
6.01Flashes / match

Recommended for you

Chosen by comparing your tracked metrics against the thresholds we flag — the measurement behind each one is shown, so you can disagree with it.

  1. Advanced Mechanics

    Losing the first CT duel repeatedly usually means holding angles that favour the peeker.

    CT opening duels 33.8272% — below the 40% mark we flag

Spend your practice time on Mirage

Map knowledge compounds faster than mechanics — lineups and callouts you learn once keep paying out every time the map comes up.

40% win rate across 10 tracked games — your weakest map with enough games to be worth reading into.

Mirage callouts & strategy →Mirage grenade lineups →

Recent matches

MapScoreRatingHS%Date
ancient13–8-0.0226%13 Oct →
cache13–70.0020%13 Oct →
cache13–80.0121%12 Oct →
dust216–14-0.0222%12 Oct →
dust210–13-0.0412%12 Oct →
nuke13–8-0.0316%12 Oct →
cache13–30.049%12 Oct →
dust26–13-0.0422%12 Oct →
fachwerk13–00.1240%11 Oct →
ancient13–9-0.0320%11 Oct →
dust25–13-0.0227%11 Oct →
ancient13–80.0110%11 Oct →
cache11–13-0.0223%10 Oct →
nuke13–100.0111%10 Oct →
dust23–13-0.0044%10 Oct →
mirage13–2-0.0723%10 Oct →
cache13–8-0.0031%10 Oct →
inferno13–5-0.0022%9 Oct →
dust28–13-0.0721%9 Oct →
mirage11–13-0.0016%9 Oct →
ancient13–40.0219%9 Oct →
cache4–100.0012%28 Sept →
dust25–13-0.0531%28 Sept →
train9–130.0717%28 Sept →
cache10–130.0320%28 Sept →
cache13–40.0527%28 Sept →
nuke7–13-0.0511%28 Sept →
vertigo13–9-0.0116%17 Sept →
mirage13–110.0226%17 Sept →
boulder10–130.0122%17 Sept →
mirage0–13-0.0533%16 Sept →
inferno13–40.0530%15 Sept →
mirage11–13-0.0545%15 Sept →
fachwerk8–13-0.0214%15 Sept →
boulder13–80.0720%15 Sept →
italy10–130.0626%15 Sept →
shelter12–10.0217%15 Sept →
vertigo12–120.0421%15 Sept →
nuke11–13-0.0523%14 Sept →
nuke13–11-0.0213%14 Sept →
dust213–30.1535%14 Sept →
fachwerk13–100.0536%14 Sept →
cache13–7-0.0326%14 Sept →
anubis16–14-0.0138%4 Sept →
cache13–40.0237%4 Sept →
vertigo11–130.0322%4 Sept →
dust27–130.0026%4 Sept →
nuke8–130.0528%3 Sept →
ancient12–120.1124%3 Sept →
inferno13–20.0429%3 Sept →
mirage13–110.0211%2 Sept →
anubis13–40.1216%1 Sept →
cache6–13-0.0419%1 Sept →
dust213–90.0117%1 Sept →
ancient13–00.0720%31 Aug →
cache16–14-0.0119%31 Aug →
inferno13–16-0.0425%31 Aug →
dust25–20.0440%31 Aug →
nuke13–100.0426%29 Aug →
inferno11–130.0121%29 Aug →
ancient5–13-0.0721%29 Aug →
anubis13–7-0.0429%29 Aug →
cache12–12-0.0327%29 Aug →
cache12–12-0.0037%29 Aug →
vertigo14–16-0.0215%29 Aug →
vertigo13–40.0325%29 Aug →
cache13–10-0.0818%28 Aug →
ancient13–6-0.0027%28 Aug →
cache13–100.0217%28 Aug →
vertigo14–160.0119%28 Aug →
cache16–14-0.0229%28 Aug →
anubis13–50.069%28 Aug →
cache6–130.0342%28 Aug →
ancient13–80.0328%28 Aug →
cache4–13-0.0250%28 Aug →
ancient13–60.0412%27 Aug →
mirage13–90.0420%27 Aug →
dust213–50.1035%27 Aug →
nuke10–13-0.0134%27 Aug →
cache7–130.0912%22 Aug →
inferno4–1-0.060%22 Aug →
dust213–90.0531%22 Aug →
cache13–9-0.0018%22 Aug →
mirage9–13-0.0317%21 Aug →
anubis13–40.1331%21 Aug →
dust216–13-0.0321%21 Aug →
anubis13–9-0.0018%21 Aug →
cache13–70.0429%17 Aug →
nuke13–80.0529%17 Aug →
mirage7–130.0622%17 Aug →
inferno13–70.0521%17 Aug →
nuke13–60.0825%17 Aug →
cache11–130.1628%17 Aug →
dust213–100.0523%17 Aug →
mirage8–130.0839%14 Aug →
cache13–9-0.0235%14 Aug →
vertigo13–50.0636%30 Jul →
dust213–9-0.026%13 Jun →
nuke4–13-0.0224%13 Jun →
anubis7–13-0.0013%8 Jun →

Match data via Leetify.

Recent teammates

Milestones

500 Matches
Compare this player with someone →Inventory value for this account →Where does this rating sit? Premier rank tiers →

This profile is built from public Steam data. If it is yours, you can remove it, or delete your CSDB account.