MD

MD — CS2 Stats

SE76561198894737158[U:1:934471430]Steam profile ↗✓ No bans

1,786Tracked matches47%Win rate2020Tracked since
2,640Hours in CS
CSDB Rating5.5 SolidPositional Player
WingmanGold Nova Master
Ladder ranks via Leetify

Compare periods

Last 30 days vs previous 30

MetricLast 30Previous 30Change
Matches11639+77
Win rate58%44%+14pp
K/D1.040.98+0.06
Headshot %44%46%−2pp

Measured 23 Sep 2026 → 28 Oct 2026; previous 2 Sep 2026 → 23 Sep 2026.

Differences between Valve's lifetime totals on the days CSDB observed this profile — every mode Valve counts, not only ranked. A window appears only when an observation sits within a few days of each end.

Performance scores

Aim63
Positioning72
Utility42

0–100 skill scores via Leetify.

Recent form

STEADY50–50Last 10050%Win rateLWLWLWWWLL

Last 10 vs previous 10: 0pp win rate · −0.04 avg rating · +0.9pp headshot accuracy · −1ms reaction

Win rate 0pp across the last 10 against the 10 before — within the normal variation of a 10-match window (±20pp), so no real shift yet.

Last 5 · 10 · 20 matches

Last 5

  • 2–3 · 40% win rate
  • Avg rating 0.00
  • Avg headshot accuracy 20%
  • Avg reaction 577ms

Last 10

  • 5–5 · 50% win rate
  • Avg rating -0.02
  • Avg headshot accuracy 19%
  • Avg reaction 616ms

Last 20

  • 10–10 · 50% win rate
  • Avg rating 0.00
  • Avg headshot accuracy 19%
  • Avg reaction 616ms

Newest first, from the last 100 tracked matches. Each block is its own sample — one result moves a 5-match win rate by 20 points.

Player DNA

Primary style: Positional Player — Positioning stands above the rest of this profile (+1.6 against its own average).

Aim6.3
Utility4.2
Positioning7.2
Opening Duels5.1
Clutch5.8

Strong CT-side opener

Style profile from tracked-match aggregates — how this player plays, not how good they are. Classification rules are deterministic and documented in code.

What this cannot see yet: which weapons you use — so CSDB cannot identify an AWPer, and no style here implies a rifle or a sniper. It also cannot see how often you take opening duels, only how often you win them, nor where you hold, so roles that depend on those (entry, lurk, anchor) are deliberately absent rather than guessed. All of it needs round-by-round demo data, which is the next thing being built.

Your pro match

s1mple

Plays most like s1mple 76% playstyle similarity

Most alike: positioning profile, utility contribution.

Where you differ: lower aim profile; lower opening-duel success.

Similarity of playstyle shape across shared dimensions — it says how you play, not that you play at their level. Full comparison →

Strengths & areas to improve

Areas to improve

T-side openings. Opening success drops from 59% on CT to 39% on T — the same duels are being taken with worse setups on the attacking side.

Reaction time. 597ms from enemy-visible to first shot leaves fights decided before they start — warmup routines move this number more than anything else.

Generated by fixed rules over this profile's own numbers — no model, no guessing; silent when the sample is too small to support a claim.

CSDB Rating breakdown

Aim6.3
Positioning7.2
Utility4.2
Mechanics4.6
Opening Duels4.7
Win Impact3.9

Composite 5.5/10 (Solid), a weighted mean of the bars with a small opposition adjustment (×1.00 for this rank band). Formula versioned (v1) and documented in code.

Trends

Match rating-0.00−0.00
first ⅓ avg 0.00 → last ⅓ avg -0.00
Reaction time593ms+7ms
first ⅓ avg 587ms → last ⅓ avg 593ms
Headshot accuracy18.0%+0.5%
first ⅓ avg 17.6% → last ⅓ avg 18.0%

Rolling 5-match average across the last 100 tracked matches, oldest to newest. The delta compares the first third of the window with the last.

Personal bests

0.13Best match rating · 13–6 · cache, 16 Oct →
31%Best headshot accuracy · 13–4 · dust2, 21 Oct →
383msFastest reaction time · 13–9 · vertigo, 12 Oct →
13–1Biggest win · overpass, 7 Oct →

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Highlights

4Longest win streak
7–7In matches decided by ≤2 rounds
15Overtime games

Map breakdown

dust2Best map · 67% over 12nukeWeakest map · 33% over 9
MapGradePlayedRecordWin rateAvg rating
mirageC259–1636%-0.01
cacheB158–753%0.02
vertigoB126–650%0.00
dust2S128–467%-0.00
nukeD93–633%-0.01
ancientD93–633%-0.00
anubisA53–260%-0.01
inferno—43–175%0.01
overpass—33–0100%0.02
boulder—21–150%-0.01
train—21–150%-0.01
italy—11–0100%-0.01
fachwerk—11–0100%0.02

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Nuke is currently your weakest sufficiently-sampled map (33% over 9). Start with the 6 essential Nuke lineups, review the callouts, then spin up a practice server.

Lifetime stats

140,767Lifetime kills
1.07K/D · Top 50% of tracked players
6,593Matches
48.9%Match win rate · Top 25% of tracked players
44.1%Headshot % · Top 50% of tracked players
11.3%Shot accuracy
18,670MVPs
2,640Hours (in match)
8,557Bombs planted
2,169Bombs defused

Most-used weapons

AK-4733,859
AWP14,718
MP94,004
SSG 083,520
Knife3,486

Lifetime map wins

7,291dust2
7,132vertigo
5,632inferno
4,817nuke
2,343train
1,803lake
1,686office
494cbble

Lifetime totals via Steam — visible because this profile's game details are public. Spans CS:GO and CS2.

Faceit stats

Combat

116Matches
53%Win rate
1.19Avg K/D
86.5ADR
44%Headshot %

Clutches & streaks

49%1v1 clutch win
26%1v2 clutch win
9Longest win streak

Recent Faceit resultsWWWWL

MapMatchesWin rateAvg K/DAvg kills
Mirage2148%0.9915.3
Dust21164%1.6919.7
Ancient978%1.9516.0
Anubis667%0.9613.8
Vertigo650%1.2918.8
Inferno367%0.8914.7
Nuke2100%0.9818.5
Cache1100%2.0923.0

Faceit-match stats via the FACEIT Data API — a separate match pool from the sections above.

Skill profile

Aggregate performance across tracked matches — stats via Leetify. Percentile context against other CSDB-tracked players arrives as our own benchmark data accumulates.

17.5%Headshot accuracy
34.8%Accuracy (enemy spotted)
36.0%Spray accuracy
70.7%Counter-strafing
9.3°Preaim
597msReaction time
38.6%T opening success
58.9%CT opening success
0.67Enemies flashed / flash
2.2%Flash assists
6.40HE damage / grenade
6.23Flashes / match

Recommended for you

Chosen by comparing your tracked metrics against the thresholds we flag — the measurement behind each one is shown, so you can disagree with it.

  1. Advanced Mechanics

    You are losing most of the first duels you take on T side, which is usually a peeking and spacing problem, not aim.

    T opening duels 38.6427% — below the 40% mark we flag

Spend your practice time on Nuke

Map knowledge compounds faster than mechanics — lineups and callouts you learn once keep paying out every time the map comes up.

33% win rate across 9 tracked games — your weakest map with enough games to be worth reading into.

Nuke callouts & strategy →Nuke grenade lineups →

Recent matches

MapScoreRatingHS%Date
vertigo8–13-0.0217%25 Oct →
inferno16–130.0112%25 Oct →
nuke9–13-0.0520%25 Oct →
cache13–70.0825%24 Oct →
dust210–13-0.0224%24 Oct →
anubis22–20-0.0425%24 Oct →
vertigo13–8-0.0317%23 Oct →
mirage19–160.0115%23 Oct →
nuke2–13-0.0812%22 Oct →
cache4–13-0.0526%22 Oct →
cache17–190.0112%21 Oct →
mirage13–11-0.0415%21 Oct →
dust213–40.0131%21 Oct →
mirage25–220.0011%20 Oct →
nuke13–16-0.0227%20 Oct →
cache7–130.0721%19 Oct →
ancient8–10.0917%19 Oct →
dust211–13-0.0315%19 Oct →
cache13–60.1326%16 Oct →
mirage10–13-0.0010%16 Oct →
ancient8–13-0.058%15 Oct →
italy13–7-0.0124%15 Oct →
vertigo13–110.0225%14 Oct →
dust213–70.0314%14 Oct →
mirage9–130.0115%13 Oct →
vertigo13–90.0115%12 Oct →
mirage8–13-0.0019%12 Oct →
ancient16–19-0.038%11 Oct →
vertigo10–13-0.086%11 Oct →
ancient8–13-0.0126%11 Oct →
mirage9–13-0.0422%11 Oct →
mirage14–160.0417%10 Oct →
cache13–60.0118%9 Oct →
ancient6–13-0.0210%9 Oct →
nuke2–13-0.0311%8 Oct →
inferno13–60.0114%8 Oct →
cache11–130.0319%8 Oct →
mirage7–13-0.0420%8 Oct →
cache13–100.0318%8 Oct →
overpass13–10.0024%7 Oct →
cache5–13-0.0228%6 Oct →
mirage8–13-0.056%6 Oct →
boulder13–110.0515%6 Oct →
dust216–140.0010%5 Oct →
mirage13–9-0.0113%5 Oct →
mirage7–13-0.0113%5 Oct →
dust23–13-0.0529%5 Oct →
nuke16–120.0622%5 Oct →
cache6–130.0214%5 Oct →
overpass22–190.0316%4 Oct →
dust213–60.0819%4 Oct →
nuke16–130.048%4 Oct →
mirage8–130.0219%4 Oct →
mirage13–11-0.0218%3 Oct →
anubis13–10-0.0018%3 Oct →
anubis10–130.009%30 Sept →
cache13–8-0.0216%30 Sept →
anubis7–13-0.0617%30 Sept →
cache13–80.0314%29 Sept →
vertigo13–30.1017%29 Sept →
mirage7–13-0.077%29 Sept →
ancient13–1-0.0227%28 Sept →
cache13–90.0016%28 Sept →
vertigo8–130.0125%27 Sept →
mirage8–13-0.0223%27 Sept →
cache13–30.0114%27 Sept →
dust213–10-0.0122%27 Sept →
mirage6–130.0616%26 Sept →
mirage13–7-0.0313%26 Sept →
mirage13–100.0525%26 Sept →
fachwerk13–70.028%25 Sept →
dust25–130.0125%25 Sept →
ancient10–130.0217%25 Sept →
ancient16–13-0.0222%24 Sept →
vertigo13–90.0313%24 Sept →
cache8–13-0.047%24 Sept →
inferno13–110.0310%24 Sept →
mirage13–80.1118%23 Sept →
dust216–13-0.0527%23 Sept →
dust213–8-0.067%23 Sept →
mirage10–130.0019%23 Sept →
nuke11–13-0.0513%23 Sept →
nuke13–50.0618%23 Sept →
boulder2–13-0.0713%23 Sept →
vertigo13–70.0219%23 Sept →
vertigo10–130.0021%22 Sept →
mirage11–13-0.0314%22 Sept →
inferno6–13-0.0027%21 Sept →
train13–10-0.0429%21 Sept →
vertigo9–13-0.0327%21 Sept →
mirage13–10-0.0319%21 Sept →
overpass13–80.0220%20 Sept →
mirage12–160.0119%20 Sept →
dust213–10.0719%20 Sept →
train10–130.0220%20 Sept →
vertigo11–13-0.0116%19 Sept →
nuke7–13-0.0311%19 Sept →
ancient10–130.0216%19 Sept →
anubis13–80.0327%19 Sept →
mirage1–13-0.074%19 Sept →

Match data via Leetify.

Recent teammates

Milestones

1,000 Matches
Compare this player with someone →Inventory value for this account →Where does this rating sit? Premier rank tiers →

This profile is built from public Steam data. If it is yours, you can remove it, or delete your CSDB account.