DesdeN

DesdeN — CS2 Stats

AD76561198889262959[U:1:928997231]Steam profile ↗✓ No bans

2,043Tracked matches43%Win rate2020Tracked since
3,961Hours in CS1Hrs last 2 wks
CSDB Rating4.0 DevelopingPositional Player
FaceitLevel 4 · 1,043 ELOTop 81.0% of ranked FACEIT players
WingmanMaster Guardian II
Ladder ranks via Leetify

What changed since last observed

CSDB last observed this profile on 9 Sep 2026 (9 days ago). Ranks are recorded once per day this page is viewed.

No change since then — still 2,043 tracked matches. Play, then come back: the next observation lands here.

Track this profile

CSDB reads this profile's Premier rating from its tracked match history, and records Faceit ELO once on every day the page is viewed. 44 days played since 27 Jan 2026. Come back after the next session and the change shows above.

Is this you? Sign in with Steam to claim it and connect match tracking →

Rating over time

Premier CS Rating: 14,482 -937 27 Jan3 Apr · 38 days played
13,66616,749peak 16,74927 Jan3 Apr
16,749Peak Premier in tracked matches
1,043Highest Faceit ELO seen on CSDB
44Days played since 2026-01-27

Faceit ELO

  • At peak — 1,043
  • Next: Level 5 at 1,051 8 to go
  • Reached: Level 4 · Level 3 · Level 2
  • Level 4 first seen 2026-09-09
  • Level 3 first seen 2026-09-09

Premier comes from this profile’s tracked match history, so it reaches back as far as those matches do. Faceit ELO is CSDB’s own observation — no feed exposes ELO per match, so that line only has the days the profile was viewed and cannot be backfilled.

Compare periods

Last 7 days vs previous 7

No matches recorded between 9 Sep 2026 and 18 Sep 2026.

Measured 9 Sep 202618 Sep 2026; no observation near 14 days ago, so there is no previous window yet.

Differences between Valve's lifetime totals on the days CSDB observed this profile — every mode Valve counts, not only ranked. A window appears only when an observation sits within a few days of each end.

How this compares with the same rank

Median values for Level 4 among CSDB-tracked players (n=12,413), from Valve's own lifetime stats. Aim, positioning and utility scores are deliberately not benchmarked here — those are a third-party provider's derived metrics, which CSDB does not store.

MetricThis playerLevel 4 medianLevel 5 medianvs Level 5
Headshot rate42.3%42.7%43.8%1.5% short
Shot accuracy13.6%11.2%12.0%above
Kill/death ratio1.031.001.02meets
Match win rate44.6%43.9%44.7%meets

This profile matches the typical Level 5 player on 3 of 4 comparable metrics.

Widest gap: Headshot rate. That is the metric furthest from the Level 5 median in relative terms — not necessarily the one holding a rank back, which no statistic here can establish.

Share this profile

CSDB.GGDesdeNFACEITLevel 4 · 1,043 ELOSTANDINGTop 81.0% of rankedPEAK ELO1,043csdb.gg/stats

The image is a snapshot; the link keeps updating. Nothing here is published anywhere — it is generated in your browser when you click.

Performance scores

Aim41
Positioning54
Utility50

0–100 skill scores via Leetify.

Recent form

STEADY48493Last 10048%Win rateWLLLWLLTWW

Last 10 vs previous 10: −20pp win rate · −0.00 avg rating · +4.7pp headshot accuracy · +40ms reaction

Win rate down 20pp across the last 10 against the 10 before — more than a 10-match window's normal noise (±20pp).

Last 5 · 10 · 20 matches

Last 5

  • 23 · 40% win rate
  • Avg rating -0.00
  • Avg headshot accuracy 19%
  • Avg reaction 733ms

Last 10

  • 451 · 40% win rate
  • Avg rating -0.01
  • Avg headshot accuracy 22%
  • Avg reaction 713ms

Last 20

  • 1091 · 50% win rate
  • Avg rating -0.00
  • Avg headshot accuracy 20%
  • Avg reaction 692ms

Newest first, from the last 100 tracked matches. Each block is its own sample — one result moves a 5-match win rate by 20 points.

Player DNA

Primary style: Positional PlayerPositioning stands above the rest of this profile (+1.4 against its own average).

Aim4.1
Utility5.0
Positioning5.4
Opening Duels4.1
Clutch1.6

Style profile from tracked-match aggregates — how this player plays, not how good they are. Classification rules are deterministic and documented in code.

What this cannot see yet: which weapons you use — so CSDB cannot identify an AWPer, and no style here implies a rifle or a sniper. It also cannot see how often you take opening duels, only how often you win them, nor where you hold, so roles that depend on those (entry, lurk, anchor) are deliberately absent rather than guessed. All of it needs round-by-round demo data, which is the next thing being built.

Your pro match

ZywOo

Plays most like ZywOo 68% playstyle similarity

Most alike: utility contribution, positioning profile.

Where you differ: lower opening-duel success; lower aim profile.

Similarity of playstyle shape across shared dimensions — it says how you play, not that you play at their level. Full comparison →

Strengths & areas to improve

Areas to improve

Reaction time. 698ms from enemy-visible to first shot leaves fights decided before they start — warmup routines move this number more than anything else.

Generated by fixed rules over this profile's own numbers — no model, no guessing; silent when the sample is too small to support a claim.

CSDB Rating breakdown

Aim4.1
Positioning5.4
Utility5.0
Mechanics5.5
Opening Duels3.0
Win Impact2.6

Composite 4.0/10 (Developing), a weighted mean of the bars with a small opposition adjustment (×0.90 for this rank band). Formula versioned (v1) and documented in code.

Trends

Match rating-0.01−0.02
first ⅓ avg 0.01 → last ⅓ avg -0.01
Reaction time691ms+37ms
first ⅓ avg 654ms → last ⅓ avg 691ms
Headshot accuracy19.9%−0.4%
first ⅓ avg 20.3% → last ⅓ avg 19.9%

Rolling 5-match average across the last 100 tracked matches, oldest to newest. The delta compares the first third of the window with the last.

Personal bests

0.14Best match rating · 9–2 · inferno, 29 Mar
53%Best headshot accuracy · 4–9 · inferno, 2 Feb
469msFastest reaction time · 6–9 · inferno, 15 Feb
13–2Biggest win · dust2, 13 Feb

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Highlights

4Longest win streak
26In matches decided by ≤2 rounds
10Overtime games

Map breakdown

mirageBest map · 67% over 9nukeWeakest map · 25% over 12
MapGradePlayedRecordWin rateAvg rating
infernoB45232251%0.01
nukeD123925%-0.02
overpassC114736%-0.01
mirageS96367%-0.01
ancientA85363%-0.01
dust2A53260%-0.00
anubis42250%-0.03
cache31233%-0.01
poseidon31233%-0.05

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Nuke is currently your weakest sufficiently-sampled map (25% over 12). Start with the 6 essential Nuke lineups, review the callouts, then spin up a practice server.

Lifetime stats

84,384Lifetime kills
1.03K/D · Top 50% of Level 4 players
4,678Matches
44.6%Match win rate · Top 50% of Level 4 players
42.3%Headshot %
13.6%Shot accuracy · Top 50% of Level 4 players
13,702MVPs
1,898Hours (in match)
3,339Bombs planted
1,407Bombs defused

Most-used weapons

AK-4723,122
AWP13,514
MP94,095
MAC-103,173
P2501,403
SSG 081,225

Lifetime map wins

20,403inferno
2,612vertigo
1,968dust2
1,359nuke
907train
443cbble
153lake
76office

Lifetime totals via Steam — visible because this profile's game details are public. Spans CS:GO and CS2.

Faceit stats

Combat

254Matches
48%Win rate
0.97Avg K/D
69.2ADR
39%Headshot %

Clutches & streaks

28%1v1 clutch win
12%1v2 clutch win
6Longest win streak

Recent Faceit resultsLLLLL

MapMatchesWin rateAvg K/DAvg kills
Inferno5052%0.9313.8
Mirage2646%1.1514.9
Anubis2446%0.8211.5
Vertigo2148%0.9113.7
Ancient1547%1.1314.9
Nuke862%1.0114.6
Dust2540%0.7311.6
Train367%0.7510.7

Faceit-match stats via the FACEIT Data API — a separate match pool from the sections above.

Skill profile

Aggregate performance across tracked matches — stats via Leetify. Percentile context against other CSDB-tracked players arrives as our own benchmark data accumulates.

20.1%Headshot accuracy
29.7%Accuracy (enemy spotted)
33.7%Spray accuracy
74.6%Counter-strafing
12.1°Preaim
698msReaction time
37.0%T opening success
47.3%CT opening success
0.45Enemies flashed / flash
6.4%Flash assists
7.30HE damage / grenade
10.48Flashes / match

Recommended for you

Chosen by comparing your tracked metrics against the thresholds we flag — the measurement behind each one is shown, so you can disagree with it.

  1. Advanced Mechanics

    Your crosshair sits further from where enemies appear than it needs to. Crosshair placement is the cheapest accuracy you can buy.

    Preaim 12.0756° — above the 12° mark we flag

    Aim Training
  2. Grenades & Utility

    Most of your flashes are blinding nobody. A handful of reliable pop-flash lineups fixes this faster than anything else.

    Enemies flashed per flash 0.4462 — below the 0.5 mark we flag

    Grenade Lineups
Spend your practice time on Nuke

Map knowledge compounds faster than mechanics — lineups and callouts you learn once keep paying out every time the map comes up.

25% win rate across 12 tracked games — your weakest map with enough games to be worth reading into.

Nuke callouts & strategyNuke grenade lineups

Recent matches

MapScoreRatingHS%Date
mirage13–30.0416%26 Jul
inferno8–13-0.0125%26 Jul
cache2–13-0.0421%26 Jul
inferno1–13-0.0323%26 Jul
cache13–40.0311%25 Jul
anubis7–13-0.1217%25 Jul
cache8–13-0.0223%3 May
mirage15–15-0.0220%3 Apr
inferno16–12-0.0438%29 Mar
inferno9–20.1424%29 Mar
inferno3–9-0.0919%29 Mar
ancient13–30.0621%28 Mar
nuke13–40.0621%22 Mar
ancient13–10-0.0513%19 Mar
overpass8–13-0.0612%18 Mar
inferno13–40.0215%18 Mar
mirage10–13-0.0218%18 Mar
inferno7–13-0.0315%18 Mar
inferno9–00.1210%17 Mar
inferno13–10-0.0428%17 Mar
overpass13–10-0.0132%14 Mar
inferno7–9-0.1229%14 Mar
overpass2–13-0.0220%11 Mar
anubis7–13-0.0325%8 Mar
inferno8–13-0.0010%8 Mar
inferno11–130.0320%8 Mar
nuke9–13-0.0314%7 Mar
inferno7–13-0.0018%7 Mar
overpass13–40.0423%7 Mar
inferno8–13-0.0618%5 Mar
mirage13–40.0011%4 Mar
overpass15–15-0.0422%4 Mar
inferno9–00.1424%4 Mar
nuke9–13-0.0322%26 Feb
nuke13–9-0.0419%26 Feb
inferno13–90.0224%25 Feb
inferno9–50.0347%24 Feb
inferno6–9-0.0019%24 Feb
overpass5–13-0.0819%24 Feb
nuke11–13-0.0611%23 Feb
inferno9–60.0516%22 Feb
inferno6–9-0.0124%21 Feb
inferno9–50.1340%21 Feb
inferno16–13-0.0310%20 Feb
overpass14–16-0.0219%19 Feb
inferno7–9-0.0530%19 Feb
ancient13–9-0.0445%18 Feb
inferno13–100.0333%18 Feb
inferno13–60.0124%18 Feb
inferno3–13-0.1218%18 Feb
mirage13–30.0038%17 Feb
inferno13–80.0024%16 Feb
inferno6–9-0.0445%15 Feb
inferno8–80.1238%15 Feb
dust213–5-0.0126%14 Feb
dust213–20.0119%13 Feb
inferno5–9-0.009%13 Feb
mirage12–16-0.0217%12 Feb
inferno13–160.0115%11 Feb
ancient2–8-0.0416%11 Feb
overpass13–16-0.0517%9 Feb
overpass13–30.0823%8 Feb
inferno14–16-0.0217%8 Feb
dust22–13-0.0737%8 Feb
anubis13–3-0.0222%8 Feb
dust213–5-0.0212%8 Feb
mirage8–2-0.0018%8 Feb
mirage13–90.0027%8 Feb
nuke2–13-0.0817%6 Feb
inferno13–90.0320%5 Feb
ancient4–13-0.0512%5 Feb
ancient7–130.0218%4 Feb
mirage13–4-0.0414%4 Feb
nuke13–11-0.0233%4 Feb
nuke8–130.0311%4 Feb
nuke9–130.0210%3 Feb
inferno13–160.0123%3 Feb
ancient13–60.015%3 Feb
dust29–130.0810%3 Feb
nuke10–13-0.0513%3 Feb
ancient13–90.0421%3 Feb
nuke4–13-0.0433%2 Feb
inferno9–70.0317%2 Feb
inferno4–9-0.0053%2 Feb
inferno13–60.0122%1 Feb
overpass8–13-0.048%1 Feb
inferno7–00.0827%1 Feb
inferno13–80.0533%30 Jan
inferno13–70.0614%30 Jan
inferno9–60.0916%30 Jan
poseidon6–9-0.1127%30 Jan
anubis13–30.0424%29 Jan
poseidon9–10.0625%29 Jan
poseidon2–9-0.1113%29 Jan
inferno8–13-0.0518%28 Jan
inferno10–130.0513%28 Jan
nuke4–130.0226%27 Jan
inferno13–90.0117%27 Jan
overpass13–60.0922%27 Jan
inferno13–80.1024%27 Jan

Match data via Leetify.

Recent teammates

Milestones

1,000 Matches
Compare this player with someone →Inventory value for this account →Where does this rating sit? Premier rank tiers →