ooski zo 6!

ooski zo 6! — CS2 Stats

AU76561198886310609[U:1:926044881]Steam profile ↗✓ No bans

576Tracked matches57%Win rate2023Tracked since
899Hours in CS15Hrs last 2 wks
CSDB Rating6.4 SolidPositional Player
FaceitLevel 9 · 1,679 ELOTop 20.7% of ranked FACEIT players
Ladder ranks via Leetify

What changed since last observed

CSDB last observed this profile on 23 Sep 2026 (32 days ago). Ranks are recorded once per day this page is viewed.

0Faceit ELO · 1,679 → 1,679
+35Tracked matches · now 576
+16.7ppWin rate · 40.0% → 56.7%

Rating over time

Premier CS Rating: 18,763 +1,665 11 May – 10 Jun · 7 days played
16,99818,763peak 18,76311 May10 Jun
Faceit ELO: 1,679 +0 20 Sept – 23 Sept · 2 observations
1,6791,679peak 1,67920 Sept23 Sept
18,763Peak Premier in tracked matches
1,679Highest Faceit ELO seen on CSDB
58Days played since 2026-02-15

Faceit ELO

  • At peak — 1,679
  • Next: Level 9 at 1,751 — 72 to go
  • Reached: Level 8 · Level 7 · Level 6 · Level 5
  • Level 8 first seen 2026-09-20
  • Level 7 first seen 2026-09-20

Premier comes from this profile’s tracked match history, so it reaches back as far as those matches do. Faceit ELO is CSDB’s own observation — no feed exposes ELO per match, so that line only has the days the profile was viewed and cannot be backfilled.

Compare periods

Last 30 days vs previous 30

MetricLast 30Previous 30Change
Matches43——
Win rate37%——
K/D1.01——
Headshot %58%——

Measured 23 Sep 2026 → 25 Oct 2026; no observation near 60 days ago, so there is no previous window yet.

Differences between Valve's lifetime totals on the days CSDB observed this profile — every mode Valve counts, not only ranked. A window appears only when an observation sits within a few days of each end.

How this compares with the same rank

Median values for Level 9 among CSDB-tracked players (n=15,119), from Valve's own lifetime stats. Aim, positioning and utility scores are deliberately not benchmarked here — those are a third-party provider's derived metrics, which CSDB does not store.

MetricThis playerLevel 9 medianLevel 10 medianvs Level 10
Headshot rate50.4%48.2%50.9%meets
Shot accuracy2.7%13.2%13.7%11.0% short
Kill/death ratio0.991.071.090.10 short
Match win rate44.9%46.9%48.4%3.5% short

This profile matches the typical Level 10 player on 1 of 4 comparable metrics.

Widest gap: Shot accuracy. That is the metric furthest from the Level 10 median in relative terms — not necessarily the one holding a rank back, which no statistic here can establish.

Share this profile

CSDB.GGooski zo 6!FACEITLevel 9 · 1,679 ELOSTANDINGTop 20.7% of rankedPEAK ELO1,679csdb.gg/stats

The image is a snapshot; the link keeps updating. Nothing here is published anywhere — it is generated in your browser when you click.

Performance scores

Aim72
Positioning76
Utility49

0–100 skill scores via Leetify.

Recent form

HOT43–55–2Last 10043%Win rateWLWWLWWLWW

Last 10 vs previous 10: +30pp win rate · +0.01 avg rating · +1.1pp headshot accuracy · +25ms reaction

Win rate up 30pp across the last 10 against the 10 before — more than a 10-match window's normal noise (±20pp).

Last 5 · 10 · 20 matches

Last 5

  • 3–2 · 60% win rate
  • Avg rating 0.01
  • Avg headshot accuracy 22%
  • Avg reaction 689ms

Last 10

  • 7–3 · 70% win rate
  • Avg rating 0.01
  • Avg headshot accuracy 20%
  • Avg reaction 670ms

Last 20

  • 11–9 · 55% win rate
  • Avg rating 0.01
  • Avg headshot accuracy 20%
  • Avg reaction 657ms

Newest first, from the last 100 tracked matches. Each block is its own sample — one result moves a 5-match win rate by 20 points.

Player DNA

Primary style: Positional Player — Positioning stands above the rest of this profile (+2.7 against its own average).

Aim7.2
Utility4.9
Positioning7.6
Opening Duels3.8
Clutch3.2

Style profile from tracked-match aggregates — how this player plays, not how good they are. Classification rules are deterministic and documented in code.

What this cannot see yet: which weapons you use — so CSDB cannot identify an AWPer, and no style here implies a rifle or a sniper. It also cannot see how often you take opening duels, only how often you win them, nor where you hold, so roles that depend on those (entry, lurk, anchor) are deliberately absent rather than guessed. All of it needs round-by-round demo data, which is the next thing being built.

Your pro match

jL

Plays most like jL 81% playstyle similarity

Most alike: positioning profile, utility contribution.

Where you differ: lower aim profile; lower opening-duel success.

Similarity of playstyle shape across shared dimensions — it says how you play, not that you play at their level. Full comparison →

Strengths & areas to improve

Areas to improve

Reaction time. 630ms from enemy-visible to first shot leaves fights decided before they start — warmup routines move this number more than anything else.

Generated by fixed rules over this profile's own numbers — no model, no guessing; silent when the sample is too small to support a claim.

CSDB Rating breakdown

Aim7.2
Positioning7.6
Utility4.9
Mechanics7.0
Opening Duels5.3
Win Impact7.2

Composite 6.4/10 (Solid), a weighted mean of the bars with a small opposition adjustment (×0.95 for this rank band). Formula versioned (v1) and documented in code.

Trends

Match rating0.01−0.01
first ⅓ avg 0.01 → last ⅓ avg 0.01
Reaction time627ms−52ms
first ⅓ avg 679ms → last ⅓ avg 627ms
Headshot accuracy20.5%+2.9%
first ⅓ avg 17.6% → last ⅓ avg 20.5%

Rolling 5-match average across the last 100 tracked matches, oldest to newest. The delta compares the first third of the window with the last.

Personal bests

0.22Best match rating · 13–4 · nuke, 4 Jul →
42%Best headshot accuracy · 13–4 · nuke, 4 Jul →
391msFastest reaction time · 0–13 · mirage, 12 Aug →
13–1Biggest win · ancient, 13 Sept →

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Highlights

3Longest win streak
8–10In matches decided by ≤2 rounds
10Overtime games

Map breakdown

nukeBest map · 50% over 6dust2Weakest map · 43% over 28
MapGradePlayedRecordWin rateAvg rating
mirageC3917–2244%0.01
dust2C2812–1643%0.01
ancientB178–947%0.01
nukeB63–350%0.05
anubis—31–233%-0.01
inferno—31–233%0.03
office—20–20%-0.02
warden—10–10%-0.11
overpass—11–0100%0.02

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Dust 2 is currently your weakest sufficiently-sampled map (43% over 28). Start with the 6 essential Dust 2 lineups, review the callouts, then spin up a practice server.

Lifetime stats

23,575Lifetime kills
0.99K/D
1,017Matches
44.9%Match win rate
50.4%Headshot % · Top 50% of Level 9 players
2.7%Shot accuracy
2,477MVPs
1,589Hours (in match)
516Bombs planted
207Bombs defused

Most-used weapons

Lifetime map wins

2,160dust2
850inferno
410nuke
154vertigo
145train
45office
18lake
3italy

Lifetime totals via Steam — visible because this profile's game details are public. Spans CS:GO and CS2.

Faceit stats

Combat

528Matches
52%Win rate
1.23Avg K/D
93.8ADR
50%Headshot %

Clutches & streaks

36%1v1 clutch win
24%1v2 clutch win
12Longest win streak

Recent Faceit resultsWWLLW

MapMatchesWin rateAvg K/DAvg kills
Mirage23754%1.2518.7
Dust212851%1.2918.8
Ancient10352%1.2018.7
Anubis3060%1.1217.9
Inferno1040%0.8613.1
Nuke944%1.2118.7
Overpass850%1.3017.4
Cache20%0.9316.5

Faceit-match stats via the FACEIT Data API — a separate match pool from the sections above.

Skill profile

Aggregate performance across tracked matches — stats via Leetify. Percentile context against other CSDB-tracked players arrives as our own benchmark data accumulates.

20.5%Headshot accuracy
35.7%Accuracy (enemy spotted)
40.2%Spray accuracy
81.3%Counter-strafing
10.3°Preaim
630msReaction time
56.9%T opening success
45.8%CT opening success
0.56Enemies flashed / flash
9.7%Flash assists
5.69HE damage / grenade
6.14Flashes / match

Recommended for you

Spend your practice time on Dust 2

Map knowledge compounds faster than mechanics — lineups and callouts you learn once keep paying out every time the map comes up.

43% win rate across 28 tracked games — your weakest map with enough games to be worth reading into.

Dust 2 callouts & strategy →Dust 2 grenade lineups →

Recent matches

MapScoreRatingHS%Date
dust213–60.0221%25 Oct →
anubis20–22-0.0024%13 Oct →
ancient13–110.0616%5 Oct →
mirage13–70.0112%5 Oct →
dust29–13-0.0139%30 Sept →
mirage13–40.0217%28 Sept →
nuke19–17-0.0525%27 Sept →
inferno6–130.0014%26 Sept →
mirage13–110.0619%26 Sept →
mirage22–180.0117%26 Sept →
mirage8–13-0.0618%25 Sept →
mirage13–110.0217%25 Sept →
mirage7–13-0.0126%25 Sept →
mirage13–6-0.0219%25 Sept →
ancient9–13-0.0120%21 Sept →
ancient8–13-0.0119%21 Sept →
nuke13–100.0219%15 Sept →
dust24–130.0215%13 Sept →
ancient13–10.1422%13 Sept →
dust214–16-0.0418%7 Sept →
mirage13–70.0522%6 Sept →
ancient13–11-0.0412%6 Sept →
mirage13–50.0229%30 Aug →
ancient5–13-0.0237%30 Aug →
mirage9–13-0.0623%30 Aug →
dust211–130.0322%29 Aug →
mirage7–13-0.0219%28 Aug →
dust213–90.0119%25 Aug →
dust213–100.0615%25 Aug →
mirage16–140.0217%22 Aug →
ancient11–130.0017%21 Aug →
ancient8–130.0020%19 Aug →
inferno13–80.0827%18 Aug →
mirage2–13-0.0133%15 Aug →
dust26–13-0.0024%15 Aug →
dust21–13-0.0230%12 Aug →
mirage0–13-0.0420%12 Aug →
mirage9–130.0112%10 Aug →
ancient13–100.0516%6 Aug →
ancient16–120.0621%2 Aug →
dust24–13-0.0611%27 Jul →
ancient25–230.0117%27 Jul →
mirage13–16-0.0414%27 Jul →
mirage6–130.0719%27 Jul →
mirage8–90.0311%9 Jul →
office5–13-0.0728%9 Jul →
nuke12–120.0716%4 Jul →
dust211–130.0425%4 Jul →
nuke13–40.2242%4 Jul →
ancient13–50.0312%25 Jun →
mirage6–13-0.0323%21 Jun →
mirage10–13-0.0133%21 Jun →
anubis13–90.0323%10 Jun →
mirage8–130.0426%10 Jun →
mirage13–60.0027%10 Jun →
dust213–80.0328%9 Jun →
ancient7–130.0110%9 Jun →
mirage11–130.0325%7 Jun →
dust29–13-0.0322%7 Jun →
mirage13–90.0326%7 Jun →
dust213–10-0.0217%28 May →
ancient6–13-0.0512%28 May →
mirage7–13-0.0221%28 May →
mirage13–80.0615%27 May →
inferno8–130.0117%23 May →
nuke15–150.0018%22 May →
dust26–13-0.0713%22 May →
dust213–10-0.0116%22 May →
mirage13–110.0717%20 May →
office8–130.0239%13 May →
dust213–30.1218%12 May →
dust23–13-0.1015%12 May →
ancient13–70.0117%11 May →
dust213–100.0815%11 May →
mirage13–3-0.0019%11 May →
mirage9–130.0014%6 May →
warden3–13-0.1113%5 May →
mirage13–5-0.0125%19 Apr →
mirage13–70.0723%9 Apr →
mirage3–5-0.020%5 Apr →
mirage8–130.0212%5 Apr →
mirage10–130.1221%26 Mar →
dust210–13-0.0020%26 Mar →
dust23–13-0.0116%16 Mar →
overpass5–10.026%16 Mar →
dust213–80.0219%8 Mar →
mirage10–13-0.0228%4 Mar →
mirage9–130.0532%4 Mar →
dust213–90.0923%2 Mar →
mirage7–130.0321%2 Mar →
anubis5–13-0.0617%26 Feb →
ancient10–13-0.0120%26 Feb →
dust213–60.1121%24 Feb →
nuke11–130.0113%22 Feb →
dust27–130.0117%22 Feb →
dust23–13-0.0413%21 Feb →
ancient0–13-0.0511%21 Feb →
mirage13–30.0516%21 Feb →
dust213–5-0.0113%20 Feb →
dust214–160.0315%15 Feb →

Match data via Leetify.

Recent teammates

Milestones

500 Matches
Compare this player with someone →Inventory value for this account →Where does this rating sit? Premier rank tiers →

This profile is built from public Steam data. If it is yours, you can remove it, or delete your CSDB account.