CuMaTrU LoW DiFF

CuMaTrU LoW DiFF — CS2 Stats

AE76561198882174967[U:1:921909239]Steam profile ↗✓ No bans

807Tracked matches55%Win rate2021Tracked since
2,650Hours in CS9Hrs last 2 wks
CSDB Rating5.5 SolidSupport
Premier CS Rating17,388Purple band · top ~18.9% of ranked players (population est.)
FaceitLevel 4Top 81.0% of ranked FACEIT players
Ladder ranks via Leetify

What changed since last observed

CSDB last observed this profile on 13 Oct 2026 (yesterday). Ranks are recorded once per day this page is viewed.

No change since then. Play, then come back: the next observation lands here.

Rating over time

Premier CS Rating: 17,388 +831 18 Sept – 13 Oct · 9 days played
16,21618,223peak 18,22318 Sept13 Oct
18,223Peak Premier in tracked matches
46Days played since 2026-02-20

Premier CS Rating

  • 835 below peak (18,223)
  • +831 over 30 days · improving
  • Next: Pink band at 20,000 — 2,612 to go
  • Reached: Purple band · Blue band · Light Blue band

Premier comes from this profile’s tracked match history, so it reaches back as far as those matches do.

How this compares with the same rank

Median values for Level 4 among CSDB-tracked players (n=13,998), from Valve's own lifetime stats. Aim, positioning and utility scores are deliberately not benchmarked here — those are a third-party provider's derived metrics, which CSDB does not store.

MetricThis playerLevel 4 medianLevel 5 medianvs Level 5
Headshot rate38.0%42.7%43.7%5.7% short
Shot accuracy11.8%11.3%12.0%0.3% short
Kill/death ratio0.970.991.020.05 short
Match win rate42.9%43.9%44.7%1.9% short

This profile sits below the typical Level 5 player on every metric we can compare.

Widest gap: Headshot rate. That is the metric furthest from the Level 5 median in relative terms — not necessarily the one holding a rank back, which no statistic here can establish.

Share this profile

CSDB.GGCuMaTrU LoW DiFFFACEITLevel 4STANDINGTop 81.0% of rankedPREMIER17,388 · Purple bandcsdb.gg/stats

The image is a snapshot; the link keeps updating. Nothing here is published anywhere — it is generated in your browser when you click.

Performance scores

Aim67
Positioning42
Utility70

0–100 skill scores via Leetify.

Recent form

STEADY47–46–7Last 10047%Win rateLWLWLLWWLW

Last 10 vs previous 10: −10pp win rate · +0.00 avg rating · −1.9pp headshot accuracy · −9ms reaction

Win rate −10pp across the last 10 against the 10 before — within the normal variation of a 10-match window (±20pp), so no real shift yet.

Last 5 · 10 · 20 matches

Last 5

  • 2–3 · 40% win rate
  • Avg rating -0.02
  • Avg headshot accuracy 15%
  • Avg reaction 538ms

Last 10

  • 5–5 · 50% win rate
  • Avg rating -0.00
  • Avg headshot accuracy 16%
  • Avg reaction 543ms

Last 20

  • 11–9 · 55% win rate
  • Avg rating -0.00
  • Avg headshot accuracy 17%
  • Avg reaction 548ms

Newest first, from the last 100 tracked matches. Each block is its own sample — one result moves a 5-match win rate by 20 points.

Player DNA

Primary style: Support — Utility contribution stands above the rest of this profile (+4 against its own average).

Aim6.7
Utility7.0
Positioning4.2
Opening Duels0.3
Clutch0.4

Strong CT-side opener

Style profile from tracked-match aggregates — how this player plays, not how good they are. Classification rules are deterministic and documented in code.

What this cannot see yet: which weapons you use — so CSDB cannot identify an AWPer, and no style here implies a rifle or a sniper. It also cannot see how often you take opening duels, only how often you win them, nor where you hold, so roles that depend on those (entry, lurk, anchor) are deliberately absent rather than guessed. All of it needs round-by-round demo data, which is the next thing being built.

Your pro match

Twistzz

Plays most like Twistzz 79% playstyle similarity

Most alike: utility contribution, positioning profile.

Where you differ: lower aim profile; lower opening-duel success.

Similarity of playstyle shape across shared dimensions — it says how you play, not that you play at their level. Full comparison →

CSDB Rating breakdown

Aim6.7
Positioning4.2
Utility7.0
Mechanics5.6
Opening Duels1.3
Win Impact6.7

Composite 5.5/10 (Solid), a weighted mean of the bars with a small opposition adjustment (×1.00 for this rank band). Formula versioned (v1) and documented in code.

Trends

Match rating-0.01−0.00
first ⅓ avg -0.00 → last ⅓ avg -0.01
Reaction time538ms−47ms
first ⅓ avg 585ms → last ⅓ avg 538ms
Headshot accuracy16.4%−3.3%
first ⅓ avg 19.7% → last ⅓ avg 16.4%

Rolling 5-match average across the last 100 tracked matches, oldest to newest. The delta compares the first third of the window with the last.

Personal bests

0.11Best match rating · 10–6 · inferno, 21 May →
39%Best headshot accuracy · 13–4 · inferno, 25 May →
391msFastest reaction time · 13–6 · mirage, 9 Sept →
13–1Biggest win · ancient, 7 Oct →

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Highlights

5Longest win streak
9–7In matches decided by ≤2 rounds
5Overtime games

Map breakdown

ancientBest map · 60% over 10infernoWeakest map · 43% over 21
MapGradePlayedRecordWin rateAvg rating
mirageB2813–1546%-0.01
infernoC219–1243%-0.01
dust2B209–1145%-0.01
ancientA106–460%-0.01
anubisB105–550%0.00
nukeC94–544%-0.01
overpass—10–10%-0.01
cache—11–0100%-0.01

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Inferno is currently your weakest sufficiently-sampled map (43% over 21). Start with the 6 essential Inferno lineups, review the callouts, then spin up a practice server.

Lifetime stats

72,029Lifetime kills
0.97K/D
4,183Matches
42.9%Match win rate
38.0%Headshot %
11.8%Shot accuracy · Top 50% of Level 4 players
7,825MVPs
1,537Hours (in match)
3,426Bombs planted
911Bombs defused

Most-used weapons

AK-4710,490
AWP8,743
P908,241
MP92,911
MP72,905
MAC-102,831
AUG2,405

Lifetime map wins

7,898inferno
5,140dust2
1,093nuke
730vertigo
683train
169office
99italy
81cbble

Lifetime totals via Steam — visible because this profile's game details are public. Spans CS:GO and CS2.

Faceit stats

Combat

315Matches
50%Win rate
1.01Avg K/D
74.6ADR
39%Headshot %

Clutches & streaks

22%1v1 clutch win
24%1v2 clutch win
8Longest win streak

Recent Faceit resultsWWWLW

MapMatchesWin rateAvg K/DAvg kills
Mirage10455%1.0513.3
Inferno3560%1.1316.0
Anubis3050%1.0713.8
Ancient2948%1.2115.6
Dust21953%0.9914.2
Train1100%1.3619.0
Vandal10%0.5610.0
Nuke1100%0.6015.0

Faceit-match stats via the FACEIT Data API — a separate match pool from the sections above.

Skill profile

Aggregate performance across tracked matches — stats via Leetify. Percentile context against other CSDB-tracked players arrives as our own benchmark data accumulates.

16.4%Headshot accuracy
32.0%Accuracy (enemy spotted)
36.4%Spray accuracy
75.4%Counter-strafing
9.0°Preaim
542msReaction time
27.8%T opening success
40.2%CT opening success
0.67Enemies flashed / flash
4.1%Flash assists
8.19HE damage / grenade
16.77Flashes / match

Recommended for you

Chosen by comparing your tracked metrics against the thresholds we flag — the measurement behind each one is shown, so you can disagree with it.

  1. Advanced Mechanics

    You are losing most of the first duels you take on T side, which is usually a peeking and spacing problem, not aim.

    T opening duels 27.8041% — below the 40% mark we flag

Spend your practice time on Inferno

Map knowledge compounds faster than mechanics — lineups and callouts you learn once keep paying out every time the map comes up.

43% win rate across 21 tracked games — your weakest map with enough games to be worth reading into.

Inferno callouts & strategy →Inferno grenade lineups →

Recent matches

MapScoreRatingHS%Date
mirage9–13-0.0516%13 Oct →
nuke13–70.0715%13 Oct →
nuke4–13-0.0413%13 Oct →
dust213–4-0.0116%13 Oct →
inferno3–13-0.0617%12 Oct →
ancient9–13-0.0711%12 Oct →
ancient13–10.1015%7 Oct →
nuke13–50.0825%7 Oct →
mirage9–130.0514%7 Oct →
nuke16–14-0.0920%7 Oct →
anubis8–13-0.0422%4 Oct →
nuke7–13-0.0420%4 Oct →
nuke13–9-0.0110%4 Oct →
ancient13–8-0.018%27 Sept →
anubis13–30.0413%25 Sept →
mirage13–30.0413%25 Sept →
inferno7–9-0.0316%24 Sept →
inferno7–90.0217%24 Sept →
mirage13–11-0.0337%23 Sept →
inferno13–110.0025%23 Sept →
dust28–13-0.0123%20 Sept →
nuke10–13-0.0314%20 Sept →
mirage11–130.0312%19 Sept →
inferno2–13-0.0118%19 Sept →
anubis9–13-0.0314%18 Sept →
mirage16–140.0111%18 Sept →
anubis15–150.0112%13 Sept →
mirage13–8-0.0826%13 Sept →
mirage9–13-0.0416%13 Sept →
mirage13–6-0.009%9 Sept →
mirage13–11-0.0410%9 Sept →
mirage13–7-0.0316%6 Sept →
inferno13–110.0518%6 Sept →
dust213–4-0.019%6 Sept →
mirage6–13-0.0720%2 Sept →
mirage10–13-0.0511%2 Sept →
dust213–8-0.0113%2 Sept →
ancient11–13-0.0221%30 Aug →
anubis12–16-0.0713%30 Aug →
mirage5–13-0.0213%30 Aug →
inferno13–20.0627%30 Aug →
anubis13–30.018%16 Aug →
inferno5–130.0018%15 Aug →
ancient13–9-0.008%2 Aug →
mirage3–13-0.0510%19 Jul →
ancient13–8-0.0215%19 Jul →
inferno13–80.0212%19 Jul →
dust213–20.0625%19 Jul →
mirage10–130.018%19 Jul →
inferno5–9-0.0918%28 Jun →
dust23–130.0827%7 Jun →
inferno7–0-0.0311%6 Jun →
mirage8–13-0.0418%6 Jun →
dust213–9-0.0316%6 Jun →
overpass12–12-0.0123%4 Jun →
dust213–5-0.0521%4 Jun →
mirage13–4-0.0622%25 May →
inferno13–4-0.0039%25 May →
inferno13–11-0.0417%25 May →
ancient15–15-0.0313%24 May →
mirage13–50.0517%24 May →
anubis13–100.0225%24 May →
anubis6–13-0.0515%21 May →
inferno10–60.1120%21 May →
mirage4–13-0.0115%16 May →
cache13–4-0.0121%9 May →
ancient4–13-0.0521%9 May →
dust213–11-0.0519%9 May →
mirage13–70.0822%9 May →
inferno12–12-0.0519%30 Apr →
dust27–13-0.0423%30 Apr →
dust20–13-0.0620%30 Apr →
inferno12–12-0.0422%26 Apr →
dust212–120.0419%26 Apr →
dust28–130.0316%24 Apr →
inferno11–13-0.0422%24 Apr →
anubis13–30.097%23 Apr →
nuke9–13-0.0530%23 Apr →
dust23–13-0.0622%23 Apr →
dust20–130.0125%23 Apr →
mirage13–90.0120%23 Apr →
mirage13–50.0915%10 Apr →
dust210–130.0225%10 Apr →
ancient13–1-0.0018%9 Apr →
mirage10–130.0523%6 Apr →
inferno9–13-0.0321%1 Apr →
inferno13–10-0.0314%31 Mar →
inferno9–13-0.0118%30 Mar →
dust211–60.0220%30 Mar →
ancient13–11-0.0118%19 Mar →
dust213–70.0017%18 Mar →
nuke9–13-0.0122%16 Mar →
anubis13–60.0522%16 Mar →
dust212–12-0.1219%14 Mar →
mirage13–30.0112%14 Mar →
inferno10–13-0.0127%14 Mar →
dust211–130.0519%25 Feb →
mirage4–13-0.0612%25 Feb →
mirage11–13-0.0010%21 Feb →
mirage9–130.0433%20 Feb →

Match data via Leetify.

Recent teammates

Milestones

500 Matches
Compare this player with someone →Inventory value for this account →Where does this rating sit? Premier rank tiers →

This profile is built from public Steam data. If it is yours, you can remove it, or delete your CSDB account.