Denny 2.0

Denny 2.0 — CS2 Stats

SO76561198874503789[U:1:914238061]Steam profile ↗✓ No bans

795Tracked matches69%Win rate2020Tracked since
1,152Hours in CS0Hrs last 2 wks
CSDB Rating7.3 StrongPositional Player
Premier CS Rating21,781Top 50% of 215,386 CSDB-tracked playersPink band · top ~6.5% of ranked players (population est.)
CSDB Leaderboard#59830 of 261512 tracked
WingmanMaster Guardian I
Ladder ranks via Leetify

What changed since last observed

CSDB last observed this profile on 23 Oct 2026 (22 days ago). Ranks are recorded once per day this page is viewed.

No change since then — still 795 tracked matches. Play, then come back: the next observation lands here.

Rating over time

Premier CS Rating: 21,781 +158 7 Feb – 23 Oct · 30 days played
17,51723,583peak 23,5837 Feb23 Oct
23,583Peak Premier in tracked matches
47Days played since 2026-01-25

Premier CS Rating

  • 1,802 below peak (23,583)
  • +1,120 over 30 days · improving
  • Next: Red band at 25,000 — 3,219 to go
  • Reached: Pink band · Purple band · Blue band · Light Blue band
  • Pink band first seen 2026-08-28
  • Purple band first seen 2026-08-28

Premier comes from this profile’s tracked match history, so it reaches back as far as those matches do.

How this compares with the same rank

Median values for Pink band among CSDB-tracked players (n=38,294), from Valve's own lifetime stats. Aim, positioning and utility scores are deliberately not benchmarked here — those are a third-party provider's derived metrics, which CSDB does not store.

MetricThis playerPink band medianRed band medianvs Red band
Headshot rate52.0%46.9%49.3%above
Shot accuracy12.5%13.0%13.4%0.9% short
Kill/death ratio0.981.081.120.14 short
Match win rate45.0%46.7%48.5%3.5% short

This profile matches the typical Red band player on 1 of 4 comparable metrics.

Widest gap: Kill/death ratio. That is the metric furthest from the Red band median in relative terms — not necessarily the one holding a rank back, which no statistic here can establish.

Share this profile

CSDB.GGDenny 2.0PREMIER21,781 · Pink bandcsdb.gg/stats

The image is a snapshot; the link keeps updating. Nothing here is published anywhere — it is generated in your browser when you click.

Performance scores

Aim90
Positioning69
Utility52

0–100 skill scores via Leetify.

Recent form

STEADY55–42–3Last 10055%Win rateWWWLWLLWLW

Last 10 vs previous 10: −20pp win rate · −0.02 avg rating · −0.5pp headshot accuracy · −1ms reaction

Win rate down 20pp across the last 10 against the 10 before — more than a 10-match window's normal noise (±20pp).

Last 5 · 10 · 20 matches

Last 5

  • 4–1 · 80% win rate
  • Avg rating 0.04
  • Avg headshot accuracy 23%
  • Avg reaction 347ms

Last 10

  • 6–4 · 60% win rate
  • Avg rating 0.06
  • Avg headshot accuracy 21%
  • Avg reaction 352ms

Last 20

  • 14–6 · 70% win rate
  • Avg rating 0.07
  • Avg headshot accuracy 21%
  • Avg reaction 352ms

Newest first, from the last 100 tracked matches. Each block is its own sample — one result moves a 5-match win rate by 20 points.

Player DNA

Primary style: Positional Player — Positioning stands above the rest of this profile (+1.1 against its own average).

Aim9.0
Utility5.2
Positioning6.9
Opening Duels5.2

Sharp aimer

Style profile from tracked-match aggregates — how this player plays, not how good they are. Classification rules are deterministic and documented in code.

What this cannot see yet: which weapons you use — so CSDB cannot identify an AWPer, and no style here implies a rifle or a sniper. It also cannot see how often you take opening duels, only how often you win them, nor where you hold, so roles that depend on those (entry, lurk, anchor) are deliberately absent rather than guessed. All of it needs round-by-round demo data, which is the next thing being built.

Your pro match

donk

Plays most like donk 94% playstyle similarity

Most alike: utility contribution, aim profile.

Similarity of playstyle shape across shared dimensions — it says how you play, not that you play at their level. Full comparison →

Strengths & areas to improve

Strengths

Aim. Aim score of 90 — the mechanical foundation is a clear strength.

Areas to improve

Utility. Utility contribution runs far behind the mechanical game — the cheapest rating gain on this profile is thrown, not aimed.

T-side openings. Opening success drops from 58% on CT to 42% on T — the same duels are being taken with worse setups on the attacking side.

Generated by fixed rules over this profile's own numbers — no model, no guessing; silent when the sample is too small to support a claim.

CSDB Rating breakdown

Aim9.0
Positioning6.9
Utility5.2
Mechanics5.4
Opening Duels4.9
Win Impact10.0

Composite 7.3/10 (Strong), a weighted mean of the bars with a small opposition adjustment (×1.02 for this rank band). Formula versioned (v1) and documented in code.

Trends

Match rating0.04−0.01
first ⅓ avg 0.05 → last ⅓ avg 0.04
Reaction time449ms−34ms
first ⅓ avg 483ms → last ⅓ avg 449ms
Headshot accuracy21.5%+2.1%
first ⅓ avg 19.3% → last ⅓ avg 21.5%

Rolling 5-match average across the last 100 tracked matches, oldest to newest. The delta compares the first third of the window with the last.

Personal bests

0.19Best match rating · 13–8 · inferno, 19 Feb →
42%Best headshot accuracy · 3–13 · cache, 8 Jun →
281msFastest reaction time · 11–13 · dust2, 26 Aug →
13–2Biggest win · office, 15 Jun →

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Highlights

9Longest win streak
W3Current streak
8–7In matches decided by ≤2 rounds
8Overtime games

Map breakdown

nukeBest map · 73% over 11ancientWeakest map · 14% over 7
MapGradePlayedRecordWin rateAvg rating
dust2B2311–1248%0.01
mirageA1810–856%0.02
cacheB158–753%0.03
nukeS118–373%0.04
infernoA116–555%0.05
ancientD71–614%0.02
officeS64–267%-0.02
anubis—44–0100%0.04
overpass—32–167%0.11
train—21–150%-0.02

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Ancient is currently your weakest sufficiently-sampled map (14% over 7). Start with the 6 essential Ancient lineups, review the callouts, then spin up a practice server.

Lifetime stats

26,631Lifetime kills
0.98K/D
1,557Matches
45.0%Match win rate
52.0%Headshot % · Top 50% of Pink band
12.5%Shot accuracy
3,219MVPs
630Hours (in match)
934Bombs planted
397Bombs defused

Most-used weapons

Lifetime map wins

2,605inferno
1,418dust2
1,237nuke
912vertigo
824office
615train
30cbble
14italy

Lifetime totals via Steam — visible because this profile's game details are public. Spans CS:GO and CS2.

Skill profile

Aggregate performance across tracked matches — stats via Leetify. Percentile context against other CSDB-tracked players arrives as our own benchmark data accumulates.

22.6%Headshot accuracy
36.3%Accuracy (enemy spotted)
36.8%Spray accuracy
74.3%Counter-strafing
7.1°Preaim
423msReaction time
41.7%T opening success
57.6%CT opening success
0.58Enemies flashed / flash
3.4%Flash assists
9.81HE damage / grenade
11.68Flashes / match

Recommended for you

Spend your practice time on Ancient

Map knowledge compounds faster than mechanics — lineups and callouts you learn once keep paying out every time the map comes up.

14% win rate across 7 tracked games — your weakest map with enough games to be worth reading into.

Ancient callouts & strategy →Ancient grenade lineups →

Recent matches

MapScoreRatingHS%Date
nuke13–100.0839%7 Oct →
mirage13–90.0521%29 Sept →
cache13–110.0213%25 Sept →
dust28–130.0317%25 Sept →
nuke16–130.0424%24 Sept →
cache13–160.0527%22 Sept →
mirage4–130.0718%31 Aug →
nuke13–90.1619%30 Aug →
ancient11–130.059%30 Aug →
anubis13–110.0719%28 Aug →
mirage16–14-0.0419%28 Aug →
dust211–130.0320%26 Aug →
anubis13–50.0620%26 Aug →
ancient5–130.1014%24 Aug →
cache13–110.1525%24 Aug →
anubis16–130.0724%24 Aug →
dust213–100.1222%23 Aug →
dust213–110.0922%23 Aug →
mirage13–110.0627%22 Aug →
nuke13–110.1419%21 Aug →
cache6–0-0.030%21 Aug →
cache13–70.1119%11 Aug →
nuke13–10-0.0419%11 Aug →
inferno11–13-0.0520%9 Aug →
mirage6–130.0240%6 Aug →
dust215–15-0.0133%31 Jul →
dust213–90.0533%31 Jul →
nuke13–4-0.0616%31 Jul →
cache13–100.0322%22 Jul →
ancient7–13-0.0336%22 Jul →
dust216–12-0.0819%22 Jul →
cache13–100.0227%18 Jul →
mirage10–13-0.026%18 Jul →
mirage0–2-0.130%18 Jul →
dust213–10-0.1017%18 Jul →
dust213–9-0.0327%13 Jul →
mirage13–60.1127%11 Jul →
mirage9–13-0.0421%11 Jul →
ancient9–13-0.0217%11 Jul →
dust211–130.0330%10 Jul →
mirage4–13-0.0612%10 Jul →
mirage13–80.1520%7 Jul →
cache10–130.1122%7 Jul →
inferno13–80.0529%7 Jul →
cache7–13-0.0432%7 Jul →
dust210–20.0328%25 Jun →
dust213–7-0.1011%25 Jun →
mirage6–13-0.0324%25 Jun →
cache4–13-0.0035%21 Jun →
overpass13–100.0516%21 Jun →
inferno9–13-0.0926%21 Jun →
dust29–13-0.0121%20 Jun →
nuke3–13-0.0237%20 Jun →
dust20–2-0.020%20 Jun →
cache13–90.0119%15 Jun →
office13–20.0910%15 Jun →
cache12–120.0624%8 Jun →
cache3–130.0142%8 Jun →
cache2–13-0.0815%8 Jun →
cache13–50.0913%8 Jun →
mirage13–10-0.0823%8 Jun →
inferno4–130.0126%7 Jun →
office7–13-0.0927%7 Jun →
ancient6–13-0.0413%27 May →
mirage13–70.0216%27 May →
ancient13–60.0210%4 Mar →
nuke7–13-0.0313%2 Mar →
train6–13-0.0410%1 Mar →
train13–5-0.0120%1 Mar →
dust21–13-0.120%27 Feb →
anubis13–6-0.0411%20 Feb →
office13–80.0421%19 Feb →
mirage13–30.0417%19 Feb →
inferno13–80.1917%19 Feb →
office13–4-0.0315%13 Feb →
office3–13-0.0726%13 Feb →
dust25–13-0.0838%13 Feb →
nuke10–130.0210%10 Feb →
inferno13–90.1029%8 Feb →
ancient10–130.0916%8 Feb →
overpass13–70.1631%8 Feb →
nuke13–60.0930%7 Feb →
dust213–100.1319%7 Feb →
office13–10-0.0618%5 Feb →
mirage13–100.1813%4 Feb →
nuke13–70.0917%4 Feb →
dust215–150.0820%30 Jan →
dust213–60.1017%30 Jan →
dust27–130.1327%30 Jan →
inferno13–60.1119%30 Jan →
dust214–16-0.0216%28 Jan →
inferno10–130.0123%27 Jan →
overpass6–130.1025%26 Jan →
inferno13–50.0821%26 Jan →
mirage13–70.0124%26 Jan →
inferno9–130.1118%26 Jan →
dust21–130.0414%26 Jan →
mirage7–13-0.0119%26 Jan →
dust213–110.0416%26 Jan →
inferno13–70.0420%25 Jan →

Match data via Leetify.

Recent teammates

Milestones

500 Matches
Compare this player with someone →Inventory value for this account →Where does this rating sit? Premier rank tiers →

This profile is built from public Steam data. If it is yours, you can remove it, or delete your CSDB account.