elle

elle — CS2 Stats

FI76561198872561502[U:1:912295774]Steam profile ↗✓ No bans

1,894Tracked matches35%Win rate2020Tracked since
2,358Hours in CS46Hrs last 2 wks
CSDB Rating4.6 DevelopingSupport
FaceitLevel 5 · 1,083 ELOTop 67.6% of ranked FACEIT players
WingmanMaster Guardian Elite
Ladder ranks via Leetify

What changed since last observed

CSDB last observed this profile on 27 Sep 2026 (14 days ago). Ranks are recorded once per day this page is viewed.

0Faceit ELO · 1,083 → 1,083
+39Tracked matches · now 1,894
−8.2ppWin rate · 42.9% → 34.6%

Rating over time

Faceit ELO: 1,083 +0 5 Sept – 27 Sept · 3 observations
1,0831,083peak 1,0835 Sept27 Sept
1,083Highest Faceit ELO seen on CSDB
24Days played since 2026-09-05

Faceit ELO

  • At peak — 1,083
  • Next: Level 6 at 1,201 — 118 to go
  • Reached: Level 5 · Level 4 · Level 3 · Level 2
  • Level 5 first seen 2026-09-05
  • Level 4 first seen 2026-09-05

Premier is CSDB’s own observation — it builds from the day a profile is first viewed and cannot be backfilled. Faceit ELO is CSDB’s own observation — no feed exposes ELO per match, so that line only has the days the profile was viewed and cannot be backfilled.

Compare periods

Last 30 days vs previous 30

MetricLast 30Previous 30Change
Matches177——
Win rate39%——
K/D0.94——
Headshot %58%——

Measured 12 Sep 2026 → 11 Oct 2026; no observation near 60 days ago, so there is no previous window yet.

Differences between Valve's lifetime totals on the days CSDB observed this profile — every mode Valve counts, not only ranked. A window appears only when an observation sits within a few days of each end.

How this compares with the same rank

Median values for Level 5 among CSDB-tracked players (n=13,649), from Valve's own lifetime stats. Aim, positioning and utility scores are deliberately not benchmarked here — those are a third-party provider's derived metrics, which CSDB does not store.

MetricThis playerLevel 5 medianLevel 6 medianvs Level 6
Headshot rate67.5%43.7%44.8%above
Shot accuracy7.3%12.0%12.4%5.2% short
Kill/death ratio1.131.021.03above
Match win rate43.8%44.7%45.2%1.4% short

This profile matches the typical Level 6 player on 2 of 4 comparable metrics.

Widest gap: Shot accuracy. That is the metric furthest from the Level 6 median in relative terms — not necessarily the one holding a rank back, which no statistic here can establish.

Share this profile

CSDB.GGelleFACEITLevel 5 · 1,083 ELOSTANDINGTop 67.6% of rankedPEAK ELO1,083csdb.gg/stats

The image is a snapshot; the link keeps updating. Nothing here is published anywhere — it is generated in your browser when you click.

Performance scores

Aim69
Positioning42
Utility51

0–100 skill scores via Leetify.

Recent form

COLD37–50–13Last 10037%Win rateLWTLLTWLLT

Last 10 vs previous 10: −10pp win rate · +0.08 avg rating · −5.5pp headshot accuracy · −80ms reaction

Win rate −10pp across the last 10 against the 10 before — within the normal variation of a 10-match window (±20pp), so no real shift yet.

Last 5 · 10 · 20 matches

Last 5

  • 1–3–1 · 20% win rate
  • Avg rating -0.03
  • Avg headshot accuracy 23%
  • Avg reaction 658ms

Last 10

  • 2–5–3 · 20% win rate
  • Avg rating -0.00
  • Avg headshot accuracy 20%
  • Avg reaction 611ms

Last 20

  • 5–11–4 · 25% win rate
  • Avg rating -0.04
  • Avg headshot accuracy 23%
  • Avg reaction 651ms

Newest first, from the last 100 tracked matches. Each block is its own sample — one result moves a 5-match win rate by 20 points.

Player DNA

Primary style: Support — Utility contribution stands above the rest of this profile (+2.4 against its own average).

Aim6.9
Utility5.1
Positioning4.2
Opening Duels0.0
Clutch1.4

Strong T-side opener

Style profile from tracked-match aggregates — how this player plays, not how good they are. Classification rules are deterministic and documented in code.

What this cannot see yet: which weapons you use — so CSDB cannot identify an AWPer, and no style here implies a rifle or a sniper. It also cannot see how often you take opening duels, only how often you win them, nor where you hold, so roles that depend on those (entry, lurk, anchor) are deliberately absent rather than guessed. All of it needs round-by-round demo data, which is the next thing being built.

Your pro match

Twistzz

Plays most like Twistzz 88% playstyle similarity

Most alike: positioning profile, utility contribution.

Where you differ: lower aim profile; lower opening-duel success.

Similarity of playstyle shape across shared dimensions — it says how you play, not that you play at their level. Full comparison →

Strengths & areas to improve

Areas to improve

CT openings. Opening success drops from 54% on T to 18% on CT — first contacts on the defending side are being lost.

Reaction time. 644ms from enemy-visible to first shot leaves fights decided before they start — warmup routines move this number more than anything else.

Generated by fixed rules over this profile's own numbers — no model, no guessing; silent when the sample is too small to support a claim.

CSDB Rating breakdown

Aim6.9
Positioning4.2
Utility5.1
Mechanics7.6
Opening Duels3.0
Win Impact0.0

Composite 4.6/10 (Developing), a weighted mean of the bars with a small opposition adjustment (×0.90 for this rank band). Formula versioned (v1) and documented in code.

Trends

Match rating-0.04−0.01
first ⅓ avg -0.03 → last ⅓ avg -0.04
Reaction time657ms+15ms
first ⅓ avg 642ms → last ⅓ avg 657ms
Headshot accuracy21.1%+1.8%
first ⅓ avg 19.4% → last ⅓ avg 21.1%

Rolling 5-match average across the last 100 tracked matches, oldest to newest. The delta compares the first third of the window with the last.

Personal bests

0.13Best match rating · 9–6 · vertigo, 25 Sept →
83%Best headshot accuracy · 3–13 · ancient, 2 Oct →
469msFastest reaction time · 12–12 · cache, 28 Sept →
13–0Biggest win · nuke, 16 Sept →

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Highlights

4Longest win streak
5–6In matches decided by ≤2 rounds

Map breakdown

anubisBest map · 80% over 5ancientWeakest map · 22% over 9
MapGradePlayedRecordWin rateAvg rating
mirageC167–944%-0.03
nukeB147–750%-0.00
dust2D124–833%-0.04
infernoD103–730%-0.05
ancientD92–722%-0.03
vertigoD93–633%0.00
trainD82–625%-0.05
cacheD72–529%-0.02
overpassD62–433%0.02
anubisS54–180%0.01
office—31–233%-0.07
rush_001—10–10%-0.29

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Ancient is currently your weakest sufficiently-sampled map (22% over 9). Start with the 6 essential Ancient lineups, review the callouts, then spin up a practice server.

Lifetime stats

68,372Lifetime kills
1.13K/D · Top 50% of Level 5 players
3,642Matches
43.8%Match win rate
67.5%Headshot % · Top 5% of Level 5 players
7.3%Shot accuracy
5,717MVPs
1,159Hours (in match)
1,615Bombs planted
736Bombs defused

Most-used weapons

AK-4735,574
FAMAS2,332
MP71,461
MP91,083
AWP1,051

Lifetime map wins

3,011inferno
2,724dust2
2,218vertigo
2,147nuke
2,134train
593lake
432office
157italy

Lifetime totals via Steam — visible because this profile's game details are public. Spans CS:GO and CS2.

Faceit stats

Combat

59Matches
47%Win rate
0.73Avg K/D
67.8ADR
54%Headshot %

Clutches & streaks

27%1v1 clutch win
50%1v2 clutch win
11Longest win streak

Recent Faceit resultsLLLWW

MapMatchesWin rateAvg K/DAvg kills
Mirage1839%0.9211.0
Anubis1060%0.8011.6
Inferno875%0.6911.3
Ancient667%0.548.0
Nuke333%0.628.7
Vertigo10%0.071.0
Overpass10%0.5610.0
Dust210%0.508.0

Faceit-match stats via the FACEIT Data API — a separate match pool from the sections above.

Skill profile

Aggregate performance across tracked matches — stats via Leetify. Percentile context against other CSDB-tracked players arrives as our own benchmark data accumulates.

20.4%Headshot accuracy
36.8%Accuracy (enemy spotted)
36.3%Spray accuracy
84.1%Counter-strafing
11.1°Preaim
644msReaction time
54.2%T opening success
17.6%CT opening success
0.60Enemies flashed / flash
4.3%Flash assists
9.09HE damage / grenade
8.39Flashes / match

Recommended for you

Chosen by comparing your tracked metrics against the thresholds we flag — the measurement behind each one is shown, so you can disagree with it.

  1. Advanced Mechanics

    Losing the first CT duel repeatedly usually means holding angles that favour the peeker.

    CT opening duels 17.6312% — below the 40% mark we flag

Spend your practice time on Ancient

Map knowledge compounds faster than mechanics — lineups and callouts you learn once keep paying out every time the map comes up.

22% win rate across 9 tracked games — your weakest map with enough games to be worth reading into.

Ancient callouts & strategy →Ancient grenade lineups →

Recent matches

MapScoreRatingHS%Date
mirage3–13-0.0126%11 Oct →
overpass13–30.0227%10 Oct →
nuke12–12-0.0413%10 Oct →
train7–13-0.0923%10 Oct →
ancient8–13-0.0324%10 Oct →
inferno12–120.0217%10 Oct →
mirage13–30.0211%10 Oct →
overpass8–130.0417%8 Oct →
vertigo11–130.0117%7 Oct →
ancient12–120.0423%5 Oct →
dust213–11-0.0318%5 Oct →
cache13–90.0714%3 Oct →
rush_0010–4-0.2933%3 Oct →
inferno3–13-0.170%3 Oct →
dust22–13-0.1224%2 Oct →
ancient3–13-0.0783%2 Oct →
vertigo12–12-0.0723%2 Oct →
dust20–13-0.0921%2 Oct →
office10–13-0.0720%2 Oct →
nuke13–6-0.0319%2 Oct →
train9–13-0.0917%2 Oct →
mirage1–13-0.1019%2 Oct →
anubis13–10-0.0119%2 Oct →
dust211–13-0.0616%2 Oct →
mirage13–100.0522%1 Oct →
cache7–13-0.0716%1 Oct →
nuke2–13-0.009%30 Sept →
anubis8–13-0.0121%30 Sept →
train6–13-0.0216%29 Sept →
nuke13–6-0.0026%29 Sept →
mirage13–20.0417%29 Sept →
cache12–12-0.0518%28 Sept →
mirage6–13-0.1027%28 Sept →
office13–10-0.0513%28 Sept →
inferno13–5-0.0516%28 Sept →
vertigo13–50.0312%28 Sept →
anubis13–100.0121%28 Sept →
overpass12–120.0724%28 Sept →
nuke12–10.0419%28 Sept →
anubis13–50.0119%27 Sept →
train11–130.0315%27 Sept →
dust213–10.1019%27 Sept →
cache7–130.0334%27 Sept →
overpass8–130.0029%27 Sept →
inferno12–120.0727%27 Sept →
mirage7–13-0.1119%27 Sept →
cache6–13-0.0929%25 Sept →
nuke13–10-0.0413%25 Sept →
dust213–9-0.0122%25 Sept →
train10–13-0.0518%25 Sept →
mirage13–7-0.0617%25 Sept →
vertigo9–60.1329%25 Sept →
inferno9–13-0.0022%25 Sept →
dust210–13-0.0216%25 Sept →
nuke4–130.0124%25 Sept →
inferno3–13-0.1023%24 Sept →
nuke9–130.0331%24 Sept →
train13–110.0126%24 Sept →
vertigo13–5-0.0216%23 Sept →
mirage13–6-0.0719%22 Sept →
overpass9–13-0.009%21 Sept →
nuke8–13-0.0629%21 Sept →
ancient13–80.0210%21 Sept →
mirage10–130.0122%21 Sept →
dust29–13-0.0828%20 Sept →
nuke13–110.0015%20 Sept →
vertigo12–120.0321%20 Sept →
ancient11–13-0.0811%20 Sept →
inferno13–9-0.0821%20 Sept →
ancient13–11-0.0414%19 Sept →
dust211–13-0.1019%19 Sept →
mirage13–9-0.0221%19 Sept →
nuke12–120.0112%19 Sept →
ancient12–120.0121%19 Sept →
dust210–13-0.0619%19 Sept →
cache12–12-0.0623%19 Sept →
train2–13-0.0930%18 Sept →
office4–13-0.095%18 Sept →
mirage6–13-0.0828%18 Sept →
nuke4–13-0.0413%18 Sept →
dust213–90.0212%18 Sept →
inferno13–8-0.0618%18 Sept →
overpass13–4-0.0020%16 Sept →
vertigo5–13-0.0121%16 Sept →
inferno12–12-0.0615%16 Sept →
nuke13–00.0730%16 Sept →
mirage9–13-0.0418%16 Sept →
vertigo5–13-0.0116%16 Sept →
train9–5-0.0615%15 Sept →
cache13–10.0417%15 Sept →
inferno12–12-0.0519%15 Sept →
ancient4–13-0.0519%15 Sept →
mirage8–13-0.0124%15 Sept →
nuke13–110.0125%15 Sept →
vertigo8–13-0.0623%13 Sept →
anubis13–50.0616%13 Sept →
dust211–130.0222%13 Sept →
mirage13–00.0622%13 Sept →
ancient7–13-0.0821%12 Sept →
mirage4–13-0.0828%12 Sept →

Match data via Leetify.

Recent teammates

Milestones

1,000 Matches
Compare this player with someone →Inventory value for this account →Where does this rating sit? Premier rank tiers →

This profile is built from public Steam data. If it is yours, you can remove it, or delete your CSDB account.