Jupska

Jupska — CS2 Stats

FI76561198870094085[U:1:909828357]Steam profile ↗✓ No bans

821Tracked matches55%Win rate2020Tracked since
2,055Hours in CS50Hrs last 2 wks
CSDB Rating6.2 SolidPositional Player
Premier CS Rating18,530Purple band · top ~14.3% of ranked players (population est.)
CSDB Leaderboard#91202 of 220716 tracked
FaceitLevel 5Top 67.6% of ranked FACEIT players
WingmanMaster Guardian I
Ladder ranks via Leetify

What changed since last observed

CSDB last observed this profile on 13 Sep 2026 (4 days ago). Ranks are recorded once per day this page is viewed.

No change since then. Play, then come back: the next observation lands here.

Track this profile

CSDB reads this profile's Premier rating from its tracked match history, and records Faceit ELO once on every day the page is viewed. 32 days played since 15 Mar 2026. Come back after the next session and the change shows above.

Is this you? Sign in with Steam to claim it and connect match tracking →

Rating over time

Premier CS Rating: 18,530 +1,623 15 Mar13 Sept · 16 days played
16,08721,138peak 21,13815 Mar13 Sept
21,606Peak Premier in tracked matches
32Days played since 2026-03-15

Premier CS Rating

  • 2,608 below peak (21,138)
  • -1,470 over 30 days · declining
  • Next: Pink band at 20,000 1,470 to go
  • Reached: Pink band · Purple band · Blue band · Light Blue band

Premier comes from this profile’s tracked match history, so it reaches back as far as those matches do. Faceit ELO is CSDB’s own observation — no feed exposes ELO per match, so that line only has the days the profile was viewed and cannot be backfilled.

Compare periods

Last 7 days vs previous 7

MetricLast 7Previous 7Change
Matches46
Win rate50%
K/D0.95
Headshot %47%

Measured 8 Sep 202617 Sep 2026; no observation near 14 days ago, so there is no previous window yet.

Differences between Valve's lifetime totals on the days CSDB observed this profile — every mode Valve counts, not only ranked. A window appears only when an observation sits within a few days of each end.

How this compares with the same rank

Median values for Level 5 among CSDB-tracked players (n=11,606), from Valve's own lifetime stats. Aim, positioning and utility scores are deliberately not benchmarked here — those are a third-party provider's derived metrics, which CSDB does not store.

MetricThis playerLevel 5 medianLevel 6 medianvs Level 6
Headshot rate39.8%43.8%44.9%5.1% short
Shot accuracy13.4%12.0%12.4%above
Kill/death ratio1.021.021.04meets
Match win rate43.6%44.7%45.3%1.7% short

This profile matches the typical Level 6 player on 2 of 4 comparable metrics.

Widest gap: Headshot rate. That is the metric furthest from the Level 6 median in relative terms — not necessarily the one holding a rank back, which no statistic here can establish.

Share this profile

CSDB.GGJupskaFACEITLevel 5STANDINGTop 67.6% of rankedPREMIER18,530 · Purple bandcsdb.gg/stats

The image is a snapshot; the link keeps updating. Nothing here is published anywhere — it is generated in your browser when you click.

Performance scores

Aim81
Positioning59
Utility40

0–100 skill scores via Leetify.

Recent form

HOT50455Last 10050%Win rateWLWLLWWWWW

Last 10 vs previous 10: +30pp win rate · +0.05 avg rating · +1.7pp headshot accuracy · +18ms reaction

Win rate up 30pp across the last 10 against the 10 before — more than a 10-match window's normal noise (±20pp).

Last 5 · 10 · 20 matches

Last 5

  • 23 · 40% win rate
  • Avg rating -0.02
  • Avg headshot accuracy 22%
  • Avg reaction 564ms

Last 10

  • 73 · 70% win rate
  • Avg rating 0.02
  • Avg headshot accuracy 18%
  • Avg reaction 569ms

Last 20

  • 1181 · 55% win rate
  • Avg rating 0.00
  • Avg headshot accuracy 17%
  • Avg reaction 560ms

Newest first, from the last 100 tracked matches. Each block is its own sample — one result moves a 5-match win rate by 20 points.

Player DNA

Primary style: Positional PlayerPositioning stands above the rest of this profile (+2.1 against its own average).

Aim8.1
Utility4.0
Positioning5.9
Opening Duels3.1
Clutch2.2

Strong CT-side openerLimited utility dependence

Style profile from tracked-match aggregates — how this player plays, not how good they are. Classification rules are deterministic and documented in code.

What this cannot see yet: which weapons you use — so CSDB cannot identify an AWPer, and no style here implies a rifle or a sniper. It also cannot see how often you take opening duels, only how often you win them, nor where you hold, so roles that depend on those (entry, lurk, anchor) are deliberately absent rather than guessed. All of it needs round-by-round demo data, which is the next thing being built.

Your pro match

NiKo

Plays most like NiKo 86% playstyle similarity

Most alike: positioning profile, aim profile.

Where you differ: lower opening-duel success; lower utility contribution.

Similarity of playstyle shape across shared dimensions — it says how you play, not that you play at their level. Full comparison →

Strengths & areas to improve

Areas to improve

Utility. Utility contribution runs far behind the mechanical game — the cheapest rating gain on this profile is thrown, not aimed.

T-side openings. Opening success drops from 54% on CT to 35% on T — the same duels are being taken with worse setups on the attacking side.

Generated by fixed rules over this profile's own numbers — no model, no guessing; silent when the sample is too small to support a claim.

CSDB Rating breakdown

Aim8.1
Positioning5.9
Utility4.0
Mechanics6.6
Opening Duels3.6
Win Impact6.7

Composite 6.2/10 (Solid), a weighted mean of the bars with a small opposition adjustment (×1.00 for this rank band). Formula versioned (v1) and documented in code.

Trends

Match rating0.01+0.02
first ⅓ avg -0.01 → last ⅓ avg 0.01
Reaction time547ms−41ms
first ⅓ avg 588ms → last ⅓ avg 547ms
Headshot accuracy18.4%+0.6%
first ⅓ avg 17.8% → last ⅓ avg 18.4%

Rolling 5-match average across the last 100 tracked matches, oldest to newest. The delta compares the first third of the window with the last.

Personal bests

0.11Best match rating · 13–7 · mirage, 13 Sept
35%Best headshot accuracy · 12–3 · mirage, 14 Jul
336msFastest reaction time · 13–5 · mirage, 8 Sept
13–1Biggest win · nuke, 16 Sept

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Highlights

6Longest win streak
88In matches decided by ≤2 rounds
7Overtime games

Map breakdown

nukeBest map · 63% over 19dust2Weakest map · 31% over 13
MapGradePlayedRecordWin rateAvg rating
mirageB36181850%-0.00
nukeA1912763%-0.02
dust2D134931%-0.01
ancientB105550%-0.01
cacheB84450%-0.02
infernoA85363%-0.02
anubis41325%-0.04
vertigo110100%0.06
train1010%-0.08

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Dust 2 is currently your weakest sufficiently-sampled map (31% over 13). Start with the 6 essential Dust 2 lineups, review the callouts, then spin up a practice server.

Lifetime stats

63,941Lifetime kills
1.02K/D · Top 50% of Level 5 players
2,929Matches
43.6%Match win rate
39.8%Headshot %
13.4%Shot accuracy · Top 50% of Level 5 players
8,857MVPs
1,688Hours (in match)
2,709Bombs planted
1,095Bombs defused

Most-used weapons

AK-4718,976
AWP12,196
SG 5532,627
AUG2,016
SSG 081,408
FAMAS1,009

Lifetime map wins

3,706inferno
3,120nuke
1,777dust2
1,639train
1,282vertigo
131lake
117cbble
104office

Lifetime totals via Steam — visible because this profile's game details are public. Spans CS:GO and CS2.

Faceit stats

Combat

158Matches
51%Win rate
1.16Avg K/D
84.3ADR
40%Headshot %

Clutches & streaks

31%1v1 clutch win
25%1v2 clutch win
7Longest win streak

Recent Faceit resultsLWLWW

MapMatchesWin rateAvg K/DAvg kills
Mirage5058%1.2017.9
Dust22737%1.0716.4
Nuke1735%0.8515.2
Anubis1560%1.2217.1
Inferno850%1.1015.0
Ancient633%1.1118.5
Overpass10%0.9415.0
Cache10%0.9416.0

Faceit-match stats via the FACEIT Data API — a separate match pool from the sections above.

Skill profile

Aggregate performance across tracked matches — stats via Leetify. Percentile context against other CSDB-tracked players arrives as our own benchmark data accumulates.

18.0%Headshot accuracy
36.2%Accuracy (enemy spotted)
40.7%Spray accuracy
79.9%Counter-strafing
8.3°Preaim
549msReaction time
34.9%T opening success
53.9%CT opening success
0.38Enemies flashed / flash
3.0%Flash assists
12.17HE damage / grenade
4.64Flashes / match

Recommended for you

Chosen by comparing your tracked metrics against the thresholds we flag — the measurement behind each one is shown, so you can disagree with it.

  1. Grenades & Utility

    Most of your flashes are blinding nobody. A handful of reliable pop-flash lineups fixes this faster than anything else.

    Enemies flashed per flash 0.3764 — below the 0.5 mark we flag

    Grenade Lineups
  2. Advanced Mechanics

    You are losing most of the first duels you take on T side, which is usually a peeking and spacing problem, not aim.

    T opening duels 34.914% — below the 40% mark we flag

Spend your practice time on Dust 2

Map knowledge compounds faster than mechanics — lineups and callouts you learn once keep paying out every time the map comes up.

31% win rate across 13 tracked games — your weakest map with enough games to be worth reading into.

Dust 2 callouts & strategyDust 2 grenade lineups

Recent matches

MapScoreRatingHS%Date
dust213–8-0.0132%16 Sept
mirage8–13-0.0518%16 Sept
nuke13–10.0634%16 Sept
ancient11–13-0.0417%16 Sept
mirage8–13-0.046%16 Sept
mirage13–100.0218%15 Sept
mirage13–40.0215%15 Sept
nuke13–80.069%15 Sept
mirage13–70.119%13 Sept
mirage13–40.1122%13 Sept
dust213–80.0615%13 Sept
mirage3–130.0324%12 Sept
dust213–90.0025%12 Sept
dust27–13-0.0116%12 Sept
mirage3–13-0.025%12 Sept
cache6–13-0.1313%12 Sept
mirage15–15-0.0315%11 Sept
ancient5–1-0.0520%11 Sept
dust210–13-0.0718%11 Sept
ancient13–4-0.0112%11 Sept
dust28–13-0.0022%9 Sept
ancient11–130.0214%8 Sept
mirage13–50.0416%8 Sept
nuke13–70.0721%8 Sept
mirage7–130.1011%8 Sept
dust210–13-0.0133%8 Sept
cache13–110.0824%7 Sept
mirage13–6-0.0323%7 Sept
ancient8–13-0.0419%7 Sept
mirage13–9-0.0418%7 Sept
dust29–130.0923%3 Sept
cache13–5-0.0210%3 Sept
mirage13–6-0.0230%3 Sept
mirage13–110.0610%16 Aug
vertigo13–70.0614%16 Aug
dust213–50.0513%16 Aug
train0–13-0.0818%16 Aug
anubis5–13-0.079%15 Aug
inferno8–13-0.039%14 Aug
mirage10–13-0.0714%14 Aug
nuke13–8-0.0517%8 Aug
nuke13–20.0417%8 Aug
dust210–13-0.0221%1 Aug
mirage13–11-0.059%1 Aug
ancient13–7-0.0617%1 Aug
inferno6–13-0.0418%31 Jul
mirage11–13-0.0514%31 Jul
mirage10–13-0.0820%27 Jul
mirage13–110.0012%27 Jul
mirage13–5-0.0417%27 Jul
cache7–130.0117%25 Jul
anubis2–13-0.1020%25 Jul
nuke2–13-0.119%25 Jul
mirage15–15-0.0019%25 Jul
nuke11–13-0.0416%25 Jul
mirage13–50.0914%25 Jul
mirage4–00.040%25 Jul
cache13–10-0.038%25 Jul
inferno11–13-0.0510%25 Jul
dust21–13-0.0531%24 Jul
anubis13–11-0.0313%22 Jul
mirage15–15-0.018%22 Jul
mirage1–13-0.1033%22 Jul
mirage13–20.0717%22 Jul
mirage14–16-0.0713%21 Jul
inferno13–30.0111%21 Jul
inferno13–11-0.1014%21 Jul
ancient5–13-0.096%21 Jul
mirage5–13-0.0112%21 Jul
dust210–13-0.0828%16 Jul
nuke4–13-0.0226%16 Jul
ancient13–50.0828%16 Jul
cache13–110.0112%16 Jul
anubis5–130.0317%16 Jul
nuke13–8-0.0413%15 Jul
inferno13–10.0621%15 Jul
nuke7–13-0.0413%15 Jul
nuke13–4-0.0611%14 Jul
mirage13–6-0.0622%14 Jul
nuke9–13-0.0615%14 Jul
mirage12–30.0035%14 Jul
ancient13–100.0118%13 Jul
ancient12–160.0822%13 Jul
dust213–16-0.0814%4 Jul
nuke13–110.0223%4 Jul
inferno13–70.0216%4 Jul
cache9–13-0.0320%27 May
cache12–12-0.0316%2 May
mirage13–100.0214%20 Mar
nuke9–5-0.0517%20 Mar
nuke9–30.0811%20 Mar
nuke8–8-0.0510%20 Mar
nuke9–4-0.0913%20 Mar
mirage6–13-0.0217%19 Mar
nuke13–100.0517%19 Mar
mirage11–130.0433%19 Mar
inferno13–50.0013%18 Mar
nuke7–9-0.1122%18 Mar
mirage16–19-0.0114%16 Mar
mirage8–130.0120%15 Mar

Match data via Leetify.

Recent teammates

Milestones

500 Matches
Compare this player with someone →Inventory value for this account →Where does this rating sit? Premier rank tiers →