logic

logic — CS2 Stats

76561198866212456[U:1:905946728]Steam profile ↗✓ No bans

450Tracked matches50%Win rate2020Tracked since
1,926Hours in CS0Hrs last 2 wks
CSDB Rating4.4 DevelopingSupport
FaceitLevel 2Top 97.9% of ranked FACEIT players
Ladder ranks via Leetify

What changed since last observed

CSDB last observed this profile on 10 Sep 2026 (8 days ago). Ranks are recorded once per day this page is viewed.

No change since then — still 450 tracked matches. Play, then come back: the next observation lands here.

Track this profile

CSDB reads this profile's Premier rating from its tracked match history, and records Faceit ELO once on every day the page is viewed. 31 days played since 30 Jan 2025. Come back after the next session and the change shows above.

Is this you? Sign in with Steam to claim it and connect match tracking →

Rating over time

Premier CS Rating: 11,721 +846 5 Feb11 Jun · 18 days played
9,87512,964peak 12,9645 Feb11 Jun
12,964Peak Premier in tracked matches
31Days played since 2025-01-30

Premier comes from this profile’s tracked match history, so it reaches back as far as those matches do.

Compare periods

Last 7 days vs previous 7

No matches recorded between 10 Sep 2026 and 18 Sep 2026.

Measured 10 Sep 202618 Sep 2026; previous 4 Sep 2026 → 10 Sep 2026.

Differences between Valve's lifetime totals on the days CSDB observed this profile — every mode Valve counts, not only ranked. A window appears only when an observation sits within a few days of each end.

How this compares with the same rank

Median values for Level 2 among CSDB-tracked players (n=5,197), from Valve's own lifetime stats. Aim, positioning and utility scores are deliberately not benchmarked here — those are a third-party provider's derived metrics, which CSDB does not store.

MetricThis playerLevel 2 medianLevel 3 medianvs Level 3
Headshot rate40.3%41.3%41.9%1.6% short
Shot accuracy14.7%12.7%12.2%above
Kill/death ratio0.720.960.980.26 short
Match win rate47.3%42.5%43.3%above

This profile matches the typical Level 3 player on 2 of 4 comparable metrics.

Widest gap: Kill/death ratio. That is the metric furthest from the Level 3 median in relative terms — not necessarily the one holding a rank back, which no statistic here can establish.

Share this profile

CSDB.GGlogicFACEITLevel 2STANDINGTop 97.9% of rankedcsdb.gg/stats

The image is a snapshot; the link keeps updating. Nothing here is published anywhere — it is generated in your browser when you click.

Performance scores

Aim41
Positioning39
Utility52

0–100 skill scores via Leetify.

Recent form

STEADY56431Last 10056%Win rateLWLLWWWWLL

Last 10 vs previous 10: −10pp win rate · −0.02 avg rating · −3.8pp headshot accuracy · +29ms reaction

Win rate −10pp across the last 10 against the 10 before — within the normal variation of a 10-match window (±20pp), so no real shift yet.

Last 5 · 10 · 20 matches

Last 5

  • 23 · 40% win rate
  • Avg rating -0.07
  • Avg headshot accuracy 13%
  • Avg reaction 718ms

Last 10

  • 55 · 50% win rate
  • Avg rating -0.03
  • Avg headshot accuracy 13%
  • Avg reaction 709ms

Last 20

  • 119 · 55% win rate
  • Avg rating -0.02
  • Avg headshot accuracy 15%
  • Avg reaction 694ms

Newest first, from the last 100 tracked matches. Each block is its own sample — one result moves a 5-match win rate by 20 points.

Player DNA

Primary style: SupportUtility contribution stands above the rest of this profile (+1.7 against its own average).

Aim4.1
Utility5.2
Positioning3.9
Opening Duels1.5

Style profile from tracked-match aggregates — how this player plays, not how good they are. Classification rules are deterministic and documented in code.

What this cannot see yet: which weapons you use — so CSDB cannot identify an AWPer, and no style here implies a rifle or a sniper. It also cannot see how often you take opening duels, only how often you win them, nor where you hold, so roles that depend on those (entry, lurk, anchor) are deliberately absent rather than guessed. All of it needs round-by-round demo data, which is the next thing being built.

Your pro match

NiKo

Plays most like NiKo 74% playstyle similarity

Most alike: utility contribution, positioning profile.

Where you differ: lower opening-duel success; lower aim profile.

Similarity of playstyle shape across shared dimensions — it says how you play, not that you play at their level. Full comparison →

Strengths & areas to improve

Areas to improve

Reaction time. 701ms from enemy-visible to first shot leaves fights decided before they start — warmup routines move this number more than anything else.

Generated by fixed rules over this profile's own numbers — no model, no guessing; silent when the sample is too small to support a claim.

CSDB Rating breakdown

Aim4.1
Positioning3.9
Utility5.2
Mechanics6.5
Opening Duels1.0
Win Impact5.0

Composite 4.4/10 (Developing), a weighted mean of the bars with a small opposition adjustment (×1.00 for this rank band). Formula versioned (v1) and documented in code.

Trends

Match rating-0.03−0.02
first ⅓ avg -0.01 → last ⅓ avg -0.03
Reaction time703ms+48ms
first ⅓ avg 655ms → last ⅓ avg 703ms
Headshot accuracy14.8%+2.6%
first ⅓ avg 12.2% → last ⅓ avg 14.8%

Rolling 5-match average across the last 100 tracked matches, oldest to newest. The delta compares the first third of the window with the last.

Personal bests

0.11Best match rating · 13–3 · train, 5 Feb
28%Best headshot accuracy · 6–13 · ancient, 15 May
477msFastest reaction time · 8–13 · ancient, 8 May
13–1Biggest win · ancient, 5 Feb

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Highlights

10Longest win streak
103In matches decided by ≤2 rounds
8Overtime games

Map breakdown

nukeBest map · 81% over 16ancientWeakest map · 41% over 29
MapGradePlayedRecordWin rateAvg rating
ancientC29121741%-0.03
anubisB24121250%-0.02
nukeS1613381%-0.02
trainS108280%-0.00
dust2B84450%-0.03
mirageA53260%-0.04
inferno42250%-0.03
cache2020%-0.03
overpass110100%-0.01
grail110100%0.01

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Ancient is currently your weakest sufficiently-sampled map (41% over 29). Start with the 6 essential Ancient lineups, review the callouts, then spin up a practice server.

Lifetime stats

40,149Lifetime kills
0.72K/D
1,772Matches
47.3%Match win rate · Top 25% of Level 2 players
40.3%Headshot %
14.7%Shot accuracy · Top 50% of Level 2 players
3,558MVPs
1,204Hours (in match)
1,372Bombs planted
383Bombs defused

Most-used weapons

AK-4711,858
AWP4,170
SG 5532,427
MAC-101,287
MP91,160
P250788

Lifetime map wins

3,423inferno
3,279dust2
1,732train
1,413vertigo
660nuke
20italy
18office
11sugarcane

Lifetime totals via Steam — visible because this profile's game details are public. Spans CS:GO and CS2.

Faceit stats

Combat

385Matches
49%Win rate
0.82Avg K/D
ADR
34%Headshot %

Clutches & streaks

1v1 clutch win
1v2 clutch win
6Longest win streak

Recent Faceit resultsLWWLL

MapMatchesWin rateAvg K/DAvg kills
Anubis450%0.5110.5
Dust23100%0.8212.7
Ancient20%0.548.5
Vertigo10%0.609.0
Inferno10%0.7014.0

Faceit-match stats via the FACEIT Data API — a separate match pool from the sections above.

Skill profile

Aggregate performance across tracked matches — stats via Leetify. Percentile context against other CSDB-tracked players arrives as our own benchmark data accumulates.

14.7%Headshot accuracy
31.5%Accuracy (enemy spotted)
38.2%Spray accuracy
79.3%Counter-strafing
12.6°Preaim
701msReaction time
31.0%T opening success
36.7%CT opening success
0.59Enemies flashed / flash
4.7%Flash assists
7.06HE damage / grenade
14.50Flashes / match

Recommended for you

Chosen by comparing your tracked metrics against the thresholds we flag — the measurement behind each one is shown, so you can disagree with it.

  1. Advanced Mechanics

    Your crosshair sits further from where enemies appear than it needs to. Crosshair placement is the cheapest accuracy you can buy.

    Preaim 12.6252° — above the 12° mark we flag

    Aim Training
  2. Best CS2 Crosshair

    Your shots are landing on bodies more often than heads — usually a crosshair-height and placement habit rather than raw aim.

    Headshot accuracy 14.658% — below the 15% mark we flag

    Aim Training
  3. Best CS2 Settings

    Slow first shots are as often a setup problem as a reflex one — framerate, sensitivity and crosshair visibility all move this number.

    Reaction time 701.4675ms — above the 700ms mark we flag

    Aim Training
Spend your practice time on Ancient

Map knowledge compounds faster than mechanics — lineups and callouts you learn once keep paying out every time the map comes up.

41% win rate across 29 tracked games — your weakest map with enough games to be worth reading into.

Ancient callouts & strategyAncient grenade lineups

Recent matches

MapScoreRatingHS%Date
dust28–13-0.0718%9 Aug
inferno13–5-0.0414%9 Aug
ancient13–16-0.087%6 Aug
cache5–13-0.0716%6 Aug
mirage13–6-0.0713%6 Aug
mirage13–11-0.0113%6 Aug
nuke13–10-0.0011%5 Aug
nuke16–13-0.0115%23 Jul
anubis9–13-0.0112%23 Jul
ancient11–130.0312%22 Jul
dust213–6-0.0223%19 Jul
dust29–13-0.088%19 Jul
cache5–130.0121%19 Jul
nuke13–70.0010%12 Jul
nuke10–13-0.0411%12 Jul
anubis13–11-0.0521%12 Jul
ancient13–40.0621%12 Jul
overpass13–11-0.0117%21 Jun
ancient13–9-0.0117%21 Jun
anubis5–13-0.0419%11 Jun
ancient9–13-0.0518%2 Jun
dust213–90.0822%2 Jun
inferno13–10-0.0015%2 Jun
mirage3–13-0.0711%2 Jun
anubis6–13-0.0314%27 May
mirage2–13-0.0721%27 May
inferno5–13-0.0521%27 May
anubis16–13-0.0713%26 May
train16–14-0.068%26 May
anubis6–13-0.059%26 May
mirage13–80.0313%21 May
ancient13–70.0222%21 May
ancient2–13-0.074%21 May
ancient13–6-0.0419%15 May
train13–80.0316%15 May
ancient6–13-0.1028%15 May
anubis16–12-0.0516%15 May
ancient5–13-0.047%15 May
anubis11–13-0.0912%8 May
ancient8–13-0.0319%8 May
dust26–13-0.093%8 May
ancient15–15-0.0510%8 May
train3–13-0.075%8 May
grail13–100.019%8 May
ancient8–13-0.0416%5 May
nuke13–50.0121%5 May
ancient10–13-0.1211%5 May
anubis13–90.0111%5 May
nuke13–5-0.0515%28 Apr
nuke13–6-0.0312%28 Apr
train13–5-0.0323%28 Apr
nuke13–8-0.0116%28 Apr
anubis13–30.0013%23 Apr
dust213–10-0.0310%23 Apr
anubis10–13-0.0016%23 Apr
ancient9–13-0.0413%23 Apr
anubis13–11-0.0421%1 Apr
ancient4–13-0.0512%19 Mar
nuke13–2-0.0319%19 Mar
anubis9–13-0.0412%19 Mar
ancient13–7-0.064%24 Feb
anubis8–13-0.0510%24 Feb
anubis13–70.026%12 Feb
ancient13–5-0.003%12 Feb
anubis13–11-0.0113%12 Feb
ancient13–8-0.0111%12 Feb
nuke13–40.049%12 Feb
dust211–13-0.0316%11 Feb
nuke3–13-0.0616%11 Feb
ancient10–130.036%11 Feb
train13–10-0.056%11 Feb
anubis16–140.0316%10 Feb
anubis7–13-0.0711%10 Feb
ancient3–13-0.1011%10 Feb
train13–30.0615%10 Feb
ancient4–13-0.0218%10 Feb
ancient6–13-0.064%9 Feb
ancient6–13-0.0722%9 Feb
nuke6–3-0.0317%9 Feb
anubis10–13-0.0512%9 Feb
anubis3–13-0.0419%9 Feb
nuke13–8-0.057%6 Feb
ancient16–13-0.019%6 Feb
train13–11-0.029%6 Feb
anubis13–110.0215%5 Feb
dust24–00.0220%5 Feb
train13–30.1118%5 Feb
ancient13–10.0214%5 Feb
anubis13–90.0311%5 Feb
nuke13–5-0.007%5 Feb
train13–70.0513%4 Feb
anubis7–130.1019%4 Feb
train9–13-0.0312%4 Feb
nuke10–13-0.0310%4 Feb
ancient13–100.0411%3 Feb
ancient13–10.067%3 Feb
nuke13–6-0.040%3 Feb
inferno4–11-0.049%2 Feb
ancient13–6-0.0412%2 Feb
anubis13–110.0111%30 Jan

Match data via Leetify.

Recent teammates

Milestones

100 Matches10-Win Streak
Compare this player with someone →Inventory value for this account →Where does this rating sit? Premier rank tiers →