xFiqq

xFiqq — CS2 Stats

MY76561198865497582[U:1:905231854]Steam profile ↗✓ No bans

370Tracked matches57%Win rate2020Tracked since
12,530Hours in CS24Hrs last 2 wks
CSDB Rating6.6 SolidPositional Player
Premier CS Rating22,131Top 50% of 204,412 CSDB-tracked playersPink band · top ~6.2% of ranked players (population est.)
CSDB Leaderboard#52567 of 251469 tracked
FaceitLevel 7Top 42.3% of ranked FACEIT players
Ladder ranks via Leetify

What changed since last observed

CSDB last observed this profile on 7 Oct 2026 (7 days ago). Ranks are recorded once per day this page is viewed.

No change since then. Play, then come back: the next observation lands here.

Rating over time

Premier CS Rating: 22,131 +13,540 26 Mar – 7 Oct · 30 days played
8,59123,296peak 23,29626 Mar7 Oct
23,807Peak Premier in tracked matches
35Days played since 2026-03-26

Premier CS Rating

  • 1,165 below peak (23,296)
  • +2,017 over 30 days · improving
  • Next: Red band at 25,000 — 2,869 to go
  • Reached: Pink band · Purple band · Blue band · Light Blue band

Premier comes from this profile’s tracked match history, so it reaches back as far as those matches do.

How this compares with the same rank

Median values for Level 7 among CSDB-tracked players (n=14,138), from Valve's own lifetime stats. Aim, positioning and utility scores are deliberately not benchmarked here — those are a third-party provider's derived metrics, which CSDB does not store.

MetricThis playerLevel 7 medianLevel 8 medianvs Level 8
Headshot rate33.7%45.7%46.8%13.1% short
Shot accuracy12.4%12.7%13.0%0.6% short
Kill/death ratio1.311.051.06above
Match win rate48.9%45.7%46.3%above

This profile matches the typical Level 8 player on 2 of 4 comparable metrics.

Widest gap: Headshot rate. That is the metric furthest from the Level 8 median in relative terms — not necessarily the one holding a rank back, which no statistic here can establish.

Share this profile

CSDB.GGxFiqqFACEITLevel 7STANDINGTop 42.3% of rankedPREMIER22,131 · Pink bandcsdb.gg/stats

The image is a snapshot; the link keeps updating. Nothing here is published anywhere — it is generated in your browser when you click.

Performance scores

Aim70
Positioning71
Utility58

0–100 skill scores via Leetify.

Recent form

COLD68–30–2Last 10068%Win rateLLWLLWLWLL

Last 10 vs previous 10: −20pp win rate · −0.03 avg rating · −0.0pp headshot accuracy · −37ms reaction

Win rate down 20pp across the last 10 against the 10 before — more than a 10-match window's normal noise (±20pp).

Last 5 · 10 · 20 matches

Last 5

  • 1–4 · 20% win rate
  • Avg rating -0.01
  • Avg headshot accuracy 20%
  • Avg reaction 505ms

Last 10

  • 3–7 · 30% win rate
  • Avg rating -0.01
  • Avg headshot accuracy 19%
  • Avg reaction 498ms

Last 20

  • 8–12 · 40% win rate
  • Avg rating 0.01
  • Avg headshot accuracy 19%
  • Avg reaction 517ms

Newest first, from the last 100 tracked matches. Each block is its own sample — one result moves a 5-match win rate by 20 points.

Player DNA

Primary style: Positional Player — Positioning stands above the rest of this profile (+1.2 against its own average).

Aim7.0
Utility5.8
Positioning7.1
Opening Duels6.6
Clutch4.2

Style profile from tracked-match aggregates — how this player plays, not how good they are. Classification rules are deterministic and documented in code.

What this cannot see yet: which weapons you use — so CSDB cannot identify an AWPer, and no style here implies a rifle or a sniper. It also cannot see how often you take opening duels, only how often you win them, nor where you hold, so roles that depend on those (entry, lurk, anchor) are deliberately absent rather than guessed. All of it needs round-by-round demo data, which is the next thing being built.

Your pro match

m0NESY

Plays most like m0NESY 82% playstyle similarity

Most alike: positioning profile, utility contribution.

Where you differ: lower aim profile.

Similarity of playstyle shape across shared dimensions — it says how you play, not that you play at their level. Full comparison →

Strengths & areas to improve

Areas to improve

Reaction time. 551ms from enemy-visible to first shot leaves fights decided before they start — warmup routines move this number more than anything else.

Generated by fixed rules over this profile's own numbers — no model, no guessing; silent when the sample is too small to support a claim.

CSDB Rating breakdown

Aim7.0
Positioning7.1
Utility5.8
Mechanics4.6
Opening Duels7.1
Win Impact7.2

Composite 6.6/10 (Solid), a weighted mean of the bars with a small opposition adjustment (×1.02 for this rank band). Formula versioned (v1) and documented in code.

Trends

Match rating0.02−0.08
first ⅓ avg 0.09 → last ⅓ avg 0.02
Reaction time545ms+47ms
first ⅓ avg 498ms → last ⅓ avg 545ms
Headshot accuracy17.8%−3.8%
first ⅓ avg 21.6% → last ⅓ avg 17.8%

Rolling 5-match average across the last 100 tracked matches, oldest to newest. The delta compares the first third of the window with the last.

Personal bests

0.22Best match rating · 13–7 · dust2, 4 Apr →
75%Best headshot accuracy · 13–1 · dust2, 20 Aug →
344msFastest reaction time · 1–4 · mirage, 17 Sept →
13–1Biggest win · dust2, 2 Oct →

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Highlights

14Longest win streak
L2Current streak
7–7In matches decided by ≤2 rounds
7Overtime games

Map breakdown

infernoBest map · 88% over 8ancientWeakest map · 56% over 18
MapGradePlayedRecordWin rateAvg rating
mirageS4329–1467%0.04
ancientA1810–856%0.02
dust2S1512–380%0.06
infernoS87–188%0.06
nuke—42–250%0.08
anubis—43–175%0.07
cache—33–0100%0.04
overpass—32–167%0.04
train—20–20%-0.06

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Ancient is currently your weakest sufficiently-sampled map (56% over 18). Start with the 6 essential Ancient lineups, review the callouts, then spin up a practice server.

Lifetime stats

45,565Lifetime kills
1.31K/D · Top 25% of Level 7 players
1,847Matches
48.9%Match win rate · Top 25% of Level 7 players
33.7%Headshot %
12.4%Shot accuracy
6,123MVPs
677Hours (in match)
720Bombs planted
611Bombs defused

Most-used weapons

Lifetime map wins

2,284dust2
1,830inferno
688vertigo
502nuke
438train
176office
101italy
100aztec

Lifetime totals via Steam — visible because this profile's game details are public. Spans CS:GO and CS2.

Faceit stats

Combat

101Matches
58%Win rate
1.31Avg K/D
98.0ADR
37%Headshot %

Clutches & streaks

41%1v1 clutch win
24%1v2 clutch win
10Longest win streak

Recent Faceit resultsWLWWW

MapMatchesWin rateAvg K/DAvg kills
Mirage2070%1.7920.9
Dust21567%1.3517.6
Ancient1267%1.2719.3
Anubis1164%1.0016.0
Nuke667%1.3926.8
Inferno560%1.3220.0
Cache367%1.1723.3

Faceit-match stats via the FACEIT Data API — a separate match pool from the sections above.

Skill profile

Aggregate performance across tracked matches — stats via Leetify. Percentile context against other CSDB-tracked players arrives as our own benchmark data accumulates.

18.1%Headshot accuracy
34.2%Accuracy (enemy spotted)
39.5%Spray accuracy
70.9%Counter-strafing
9.1°Preaim
551msReaction time
57.5%T opening success
59.7%CT opening success
0.58Enemies flashed / flash
7.9%Flash assists
6.88HE damage / grenade
11.94Flashes / match

Recent matches

MapScoreRatingHS%Date
nuke10–13-0.0316%12 Oct →
dust26–13-0.0921%7 Oct →
dust213–10.0423%2 Oct →
ancient8–13-0.0313%2 Oct →
dust28–130.0726%25 Sept →
mirage19–160.0113%19 Sept →
mirage7–130.0313%19 Sept →
dust216–140.0123%18 Sept →
mirage10–13-0.0330%18 Sept →
mirage11–13-0.0417%18 Sept →
mirage2–13-0.0816%17 Sept →
ancient10–130.0614%17 Sept →
ancient13–9-0.0216%17 Sept →
dust213–4-0.0262%17 Sept →
ancient13–110.0115%17 Sept →
mirage11–130.0515%17 Sept →
dust213–50.0619%17 Sept →
mirage1–4-0.027%17 Sept →
ancient8–130.1012%17 Sept →
mirage13–20.0619%15 Sept →
ancient13–3-0.0217%15 Sept →
cache13–70.0624%15 Sept →
cache13–5-0.0118%15 Sept →
anubis13–80.0817%15 Sept →
mirage13–70.025%10 Sept →
mirage2–13-0.096%10 Sept →
dust213–60.0422%10 Sept →
mirage13–40.1517%9 Sept →
ancient13–7-0.048%8 Sept →
mirage13–30.0420%6 Sept →
anubis13–160.0115%5 Sept →
nuke13–100.0718%5 Sept →
mirage13–60.0614%5 Sept →
mirage13–50.0213%5 Sept →
mirage13–110.0424%5 Sept →
ancient11–130.0430%5 Sept →
dust213–110.0515%4 Sept →
ancient15–15-0.0112%4 Sept →
cache13–90.0610%2 Sept →
mirage13–110.0918%26 Aug →
ancient13–80.038%26 Aug →
anubis13–100.1512%24 Aug →
mirage13–100.0914%23 Aug →
mirage13–110.0621%20 Aug →
ancient13–70.0413%20 Aug →
dust213–10.0975%20 Aug →
mirage14–16-0.018%19 Aug →
ancient11–130.0516%19 Aug →
ancient6–130.0321%17 Aug →
mirage9–13-0.0216%17 Aug →
train12–12-0.0417%17 Aug →
ancient13–100.0815%13 Aug →
train3–13-0.0814%13 Aug →
mirage13–4-0.049%19 Apr →
overpass9–13-0.0319%18 Apr →
mirage6–13-0.0814%18 Apr →
dust213–40.0437%14 Apr →
overpass13–50.0715%14 Apr →
mirage13–5-0.0720%14 Apr →
mirage11–13-0.0615%13 Apr →
dust213–20.0819%13 Apr →
ancient5–13-0.0342%13 Apr →
mirage8–130.0216%13 Apr →
ancient16–12-0.0112%13 Apr →
mirage9–13-0.0030%13 Apr →
inferno13–40.0115%6 Apr →
inferno13–30.0818%6 Apr →
mirage13–30.0124%6 Apr →
nuke7–130.1032%6 Apr →
dust213–50.1021%5 Apr →
mirage13–80.0823%5 Apr →
dust211–130.0720%4 Apr →
mirage13–90.1316%4 Apr →
mirage13–90.0722%4 Apr →
inferno13–90.1014%4 Apr →
dust213–70.2235%4 Apr →
overpass13–50.0720%4 Apr →
mirage13–70.1515%4 Apr →
mirage11–10.1321%4 Apr →
mirage13–100.0413%3 Apr →
ancient13–11-0.0415%3 Apr →
mirage13–20.0623%3 Apr →
inferno13–80.0514%3 Apr →
mirage13–30.0714%2 Apr →
mirage13–80.1021%2 Apr →
ancient13–90.1621%2 Apr →
mirage8–130.1238%2 Apr →
dust213–70.1826%2 Apr →
nuke16–130.1922%2 Apr →
mirage13–10.1729%1 Apr →
inferno8–130.0622%1 Apr →
anubis13–80.0319%1 Apr →
inferno13–50.0320%28 Mar →
mirage13–40.0922%27 Mar →
mirage13–30.0525%27 Mar →
mirage13–70.0430%27 Mar →
mirage13–60.1917%27 Mar →
mirage13–60.0626%27 Mar →
inferno13–50.0818%27 Mar →
inferno13–90.0919%26 Mar →

Match data via Leetify.

Recent teammates

Milestones

100 Matches14-Win Streak
Compare this player with someone →Inventory value for this account →Where does this rating sit? Premier rank tiers →

This profile is built from public Steam data. If it is yours, you can remove it, or delete your CSDB account.