ice

ice — CS2 Stats

GB76561198860865048[U:1:900599320]Steam profile ↗✓ No bans

1,942Tracked matches50%Win rate2021Tracked since
1,756Hours in CS23Hrs last 2 wks
CSDB Rating5.2 DevelopingPositional Player
Premier CS Rating15,509Purple band · top ~26.4% of ranked players (population est.)
FaceitLevel 4 · 949 ELOTop 81.0% of ranked FACEIT players
Ladder ranks via Leetify

What changed since last observed

CSDB last observed this profile on 30 Sep 2026 (yesterday). Ranks are recorded once per day this page is viewed.

No change since then. Play, then come back: the next observation lands here.

Rating over time

Premier CS Rating: 15,509 -697 15 Aug – 30 Sept · 28 days played
14,85317,038peak 17,03815 Aug30 Sept
17,423Peak Premier in tracked matches
949Highest Faceit ELO seen on CSDB
29Days played since 2026-08-15

Faceit ELO

  • At peak — 949
  • Next: Level 5 at 1,051 — 102 to go
  • Reached: Level 4 · Level 3 · Level 2

Premier CS Rating

  • 1,529 below peak (17,038)
  • -1,172 over 30 days · declining
  • Next: Pink band at 20,000 — 4,491 to go
  • Reached: Purple band · Blue band · Light Blue band

Premier comes from this profile’s tracked match history, so it reaches back as far as those matches do.

Compare periods

Last 30 days vs previous 30

MetricLast 30Previous 30Change
Matches89——
Win rate45%——
K/D0.82——
Headshot %51%——

Measured 2 Sep 2026 → 1 Oct 2026; no observation near 60 days ago, so there is no previous window yet.

Differences between Valve's lifetime totals on the days CSDB observed this profile — every mode Valve counts, not only ranked. A window appears only when an observation sits within a few days of each end.

How this compares with the same rank

Median values for Level 4 among CSDB-tracked players (n=13,989), from Valve's own lifetime stats. Aim, positioning and utility scores are deliberately not benchmarked here — those are a third-party provider's derived metrics, which CSDB does not store.

MetricThis playerLevel 4 medianLevel 5 medianvs Level 5
Headshot rate56.7%42.7%43.8%above
Shot accuracy2.5%11.3%12.0%9.6% short
Kill/death ratio0.840.991.020.18 short
Match win rate41.7%43.9%44.7%3.0% short

This profile matches the typical Level 5 player on 1 of 4 comparable metrics.

Widest gap: Shot accuracy. That is the metric furthest from the Level 5 median in relative terms — not necessarily the one holding a rank back, which no statistic here can establish.

Share this profile

CSDB.GGiceFACEITLevel 4 · 949 ELOSTANDINGTop 81.0% of rankedPREMIER15,509 · Purple bandPEAK ELO949csdb.gg/stats

The image is a snapshot; the link keeps updating. Nothing here is published anywhere — it is generated in your browser when you click.

Performance scores

Aim56
Positioning50
Utility47

0–100 skill scores via Leetify.

Recent form

HOT44–51–5Last 10044%Win rateLWWWLLWWWW

Last 10 vs previous 10: +50pp win rate · +0.00 avg rating · +1.2pp headshot accuracy · −38ms reaction

Win rate up 50pp across the last 10 against the 10 before — more than a 10-match window's normal noise (±20pp).

Last 5 · 10 · 20 matches

Last 5

  • 3–2 · 60% win rate
  • Avg rating -0.04
  • Avg headshot accuracy 16%
  • Avg reaction 524ms

Last 10

  • 7–3 · 70% win rate
  • Avg rating -0.03
  • Avg headshot accuracy 17%
  • Avg reaction 565ms

Last 20

  • 9–11 · 45% win rate
  • Avg rating -0.04
  • Avg headshot accuracy 17%
  • Avg reaction 584ms

Newest first, from the last 100 tracked matches. Each block is its own sample — one result moves a 5-match win rate by 20 points.

Player DNA

Primary style: Positional Player — Positioning stands above the rest of this profile (+1.8 against its own average).

Aim5.6
Utility4.7
Positioning5.0
Opening Duels1.7
Clutch1.6

Style profile from tracked-match aggregates — how this player plays, not how good they are. Classification rules are deterministic and documented in code.

What this cannot see yet: which weapons you use — so CSDB cannot identify an AWPer, and no style here implies a rifle or a sniper. It also cannot see how often you take opening duels, only how often you win them, nor where you hold, so roles that depend on those (entry, lurk, anchor) are deliberately absent rather than guessed. All of it needs round-by-round demo data, which is the next thing being built.

Your pro match

NiKo

Plays most like NiKo 81% playstyle similarity

Most alike: positioning profile, utility contribution.

Where you differ: lower opening-duel success; lower aim profile.

Similarity of playstyle shape across shared dimensions — it says how you play, not that you play at their level. Full comparison →

Strengths & areas to improve

Areas to improve

Reaction time. 607ms from enemy-visible to first shot leaves fights decided before they start — warmup routines move this number more than anything else.

Generated by fixed rules over this profile's own numbers — no model, no guessing; silent when the sample is too small to support a claim.

CSDB Rating breakdown

Aim5.6
Positioning5.0
Utility4.7
Mechanics6.9
Opening Duels2.4
Win Impact5.0

Composite 5.2/10 (Developing), a weighted mean of the bars with a small opposition adjustment (×1.00 for this rank band). Formula versioned (v1) and documented in code.

Trends

Match rating-0.03+0.00
first ⅓ avg -0.03 → last ⅓ avg -0.03
Reaction time596ms+36ms
first ⅓ avg 561ms → last ⅓ avg 596ms
Headshot accuracy16.5%−3.2%
first ⅓ avg 19.7% → last ⅓ avg 16.5%

Rolling 5-match average across the last 100 tracked matches, oldest to newest. The delta compares the first third of the window with the last.

Personal bests

0.09Best match rating · 13–2 · mirage, 15 Sept →
50%Best headshot accuracy · 0–7 · nuke, 20 Aug →
297msFastest reaction time · 0–7 · nuke, 20 Aug →
13–1Biggest win · mirage, 13 Sept →

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Highlights

4Longest win streak
6–10In matches decided by ≤2 rounds
7Overtime games

Map breakdown

cacheBest map · 67% over 9dust2Weakest map · 10% over 10
MapGradePlayedRecordWin rateAvg rating
mirageB4923–2647%-0.01
dust2D101–910%-0.05
nukeB105–550%-0.03
infernoD103–730%-0.05
cacheS96–367%-0.00
ancientC83–538%-0.03
anubis—43–175%-0.04

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Dust 2 is currently your weakest sufficiently-sampled map (10% over 10). Start with the 6 essential Dust 2 lineups, review the callouts, then spin up a practice server.

Lifetime stats

33,421Lifetime kills
0.84K/D
2,181Matches
41.7%Match win rate
56.7%Headshot % · Top 10% of Level 4 players
2.5%Shot accuracy
3,392MVPs
815Hours (in match)
1,460Bombs planted
357Bombs defused

Most-used weapons

Lifetime map wins

2,427inferno
1,694nuke
1,685dust2
947vertigo
156train
38cbble
29office
3ar_baggage

Lifetime totals via Steam — visible because this profile's game details are public. Spans CS:GO and CS2.

Faceit stats

Combat

274Matches
49%Win rate
0.83Avg K/D
68.3ADR
51%Headshot %

Clutches & streaks

28%1v1 clutch win
20%1v2 clutch win
7Longest win streak

Recent Faceit resultsWWWLL

MapMatchesWin rateAvg K/DAvg kills
Mirage9248%0.7912.5
Anubis3855%0.9213.8
Ancient3554%0.8813.5
Inferno3139%0.6711.4
Dust23152%0.9411.5
Nuke1644%0.6512.2
Overpass1457%0.9612.7
Vertigo838%0.6810.5

Faceit-match stats via the FACEIT Data API — a separate match pool from the sections above.

Skill profile

Aggregate performance across tracked matches — stats via Leetify. Percentile context against other CSDB-tracked players arrives as our own benchmark data accumulates.

16.7%Headshot accuracy
32.1%Accuracy (enemy spotted)
30.6%Spray accuracy
80.8%Counter-strafing
10.4°Preaim
607msReaction time
42.4%T opening success
36.7%CT opening success
0.70Enemies flashed / flash
7.2%Flash assists
5.46HE damage / grenade
7.57Flashes / match

Recommended for you

Chosen by comparing your tracked metrics against the thresholds we flag — the measurement behind each one is shown, so you can disagree with it.

  1. Advanced Mechanics

    Losing the first CT duel repeatedly usually means holding angles that favour the peeker.

    CT opening duels 36.7183% — below the 40% mark we flag

Spend your practice time on Dust 2

Map knowledge compounds faster than mechanics — lineups and callouts you learn once keep paying out every time the map comes up.

10% win rate across 10 tracked games — your weakest map with enough games to be worth reading into.

Dust 2 callouts & strategy →Dust 2 grenade lineups →

Recent matches

MapScoreRatingHS%Date
dust26–13-0.0911%30 Sept →
cache13–10-0.0418%30 Sept →
nuke13–6-0.0421%30 Sept →
mirage7–10.0817%29 Sept →
dust27–13-0.0914%28 Sept →
dust210–13-0.0311%25 Sept →
mirage13–9-0.0521%25 Sept →
mirage13–6-0.0218%25 Sept →
anubis13–9-0.0619%24 Sept →
mirage16–130.0120%24 Sept →
dust211–13-0.0225%24 Sept →
inferno14–16-0.0615%24 Sept →
nuke8–13-0.0117%23 Sept →
cache7–13-0.0110%23 Sept →
inferno5–13-0.119%23 Sept →
inferno4–13-0.0117%22 Sept →
ancient13–10-0.0320%22 Sept →
mirage8–13-0.0417%22 Sept →
mirage13–10-0.0313%21 Sept →
mirage7–13-0.0518%21 Sept →
nuke9–13-0.0821%21 Sept →
anubis13–4-0.028%21 Sept →
mirage13–4-0.0414%18 Sept →
mirage11–13-0.0316%18 Sept →
mirage13–11-0.0319%18 Sept →
cache13–10-0.0017%18 Sept →
cache10–130.0414%17 Sept →
mirage12–16-0.0316%17 Sept →
cache13–9-0.0229%17 Sept →
mirage13–11-0.019%17 Sept →
mirage13–11-0.0126%17 Sept →
cache13–110.0314%17 Sept →
mirage15–150.0110%17 Sept →
dust211–13-0.078%16 Sept →
mirage10–13-0.0213%16 Sept →
ancient2–13-0.0114%16 Sept →
ancient13–50.0013%16 Sept →
mirage9–130.0617%16 Sept →
mirage4–13-0.0623%16 Sept →
mirage13–11-0.0018%15 Sept →
ancient13–80.0812%15 Sept →
cache16–12-0.0419%15 Sept →
mirage11–13-0.0113%15 Sept →
mirage8–13-0.0113%15 Sept →
dust23–13-0.0432%15 Sept →
mirage13–20.0924%15 Sept →
mirage11–13-0.0321%13 Sept →
mirage12–12-0.0212%13 Sept →
mirage13–100.0013%13 Sept →
mirage12–12-0.0717%13 Sept →
mirage6–130.0414%13 Sept →
mirage13–10.0523%13 Sept →
mirage12–12-0.0029%13 Sept →
mirage8–13-0.0715%12 Sept →
anubis13–2-0.0227%12 Sept →
dust213–100.0024%12 Sept →
mirage13–10-0.048%12 Sept →
mirage11–13-0.0033%12 Sept →
mirage13–8-0.0026%12 Sept →
mirage13–40.0026%12 Sept →
mirage11–13-0.0623%11 Sept →
inferno10–13-0.0813%11 Sept →
dust210–13-0.0820%11 Sept →
mirage7–130.0322%11 Sept →
ancient3–13-0.0326%10 Sept →
nuke9–130.0322%9 Sept →
anubis8–13-0.0512%9 Sept →
mirage13–100.0418%9 Sept →
mirage5–13-0.0714%8 Sept →
nuke11–130.0019%8 Sept →
mirage2–90.0113%8 Sept →
mirage13–50.0329%8 Sept →
dust20–8-0.1213%8 Sept →
cache1–70.010%6 Sept →
mirage9–13-0.0318%3 Sept →
mirage13–10-0.0125%2 Sept →
nuke13–11-0.0512%30 Aug →
dust28–130.0120%29 Aug →
mirage5–13-0.0224%28 Aug →
inferno10–13-0.0718%28 Aug →
nuke13–8-0.0623%28 Aug →
cache13–100.0130%28 Aug →
inferno13–7-0.0131%28 Aug →
ancient5–13-0.069%28 Aug →
mirage10–20.014%27 Aug →
nuke13–90.0038%27 Aug →
inferno11–130.0119%27 Aug →
mirage13–7-0.0323%27 Aug →
inferno13–9-0.0422%27 Aug →
nuke13–90.0428%26 Aug →
inferno13–10-0.0516%21 Aug →
inferno15–15-0.068%21 Aug →
mirage7–13-0.0728%21 Aug →
nuke0–7-0.0950%20 Aug →
ancient2–13-0.148%20 Aug →
mirage13–50.0433%20 Aug →
ancient3–13-0.0922%20 Aug →
mirage16–13-0.0119%15 Aug →
mirage8–13-0.0917%15 Aug →
mirage4–13-0.073%15 Aug →

Match data via Leetify.

Recent teammates

Milestones

1,000 Matches
Compare this player with someone →Inventory value for this account →Where does this rating sit? Premier rank tiers →

This profile is built from public Steam data. If it is yours, you can remove it, or delete your CSDB account.