GutRippah

GutRippah — CS2 Stats

CA76561198859975831[U:1:899710103]Steam profile ↗✓ No bans

1,464Tracked matches43%Win rate2021Tracked since
812Hours in CS
CSDB Rating5.2 DevelopingPositional Player
FaceitLevel 4Top 81.0% of ranked FACEIT players
Ladder ranks via Leetify

What changed since last observed

CSDB last observed this profile on 6 Sep 2026 (14 days ago). Ranks are recorded once per day this page is viewed.

No change since then — still 1,464 tracked matches. Play, then come back: the next observation lands here.

Track this profile

CSDB reads this profile's Premier rating from its tracked match history, and records Faceit ELO once on every day the page is viewed. 47 days played since 22 Mar 2026. Come back after the next session and the change shows above.

Is this you? Sign in with Steam to claim it and connect match tracking →

Rating over time

Premier CS Rating: 18,412 -276 22 Mar6 Jul · 26 days played
16,46719,999peak 19,99922 Mar6 Jul
19,999Peak Premier in tracked matches
47Days played since 2026-03-22

Premier comes from this profile’s tracked match history, so it reaches back as far as those matches do.

How this compares with the same rank

Median values for Level 4 among CSDB-tracked players (n=12,847), from Valve's own lifetime stats. Aim, positioning and utility scores are deliberately not benchmarked here — those are a third-party provider's derived metrics, which CSDB does not store.

MetricThis playerLevel 4 medianLevel 5 medianvs Level 5
Headshot rate41.1%42.7%43.8%2.7% short
Shot accuracy4.7%11.3%12.0%7.4% short
Kill/death ratio1.120.991.02above
Match win rate43.3%43.9%44.7%1.4% short

This profile matches the typical Level 5 player on 1 of 4 comparable metrics.

Widest gap: Shot accuracy. That is the metric furthest from the Level 5 median in relative terms — not necessarily the one holding a rank back, which no statistic here can establish.

Share this profile

CSDB.GGGutRippahFACEITLevel 4STANDINGTop 81.0% of rankedcsdb.gg/stats

The image is a snapshot; the link keeps updating. Nothing here is published anywhere — it is generated in your browser when you click.

Performance scores

Aim61
Positioning55
Utility50

0–100 skill scores via Leetify.

Recent form

COLD47467Last 10047%Win rateLWLLWTLLLL

Last 10 vs previous 10: −10pp win rate · −0.02 avg rating · −0.3pp headshot accuracy · −5ms reaction

Win rate −10pp across the last 10 against the 10 before — within the normal variation of a 10-match window (±20pp), so no real shift yet.

Last 5 · 10 · 20 matches

Last 5

  • 23 · 40% win rate
  • Avg rating -0.02
  • Avg headshot accuracy 18%
  • Avg reaction 528ms

Last 10

  • 271 · 20% win rate
  • Avg rating -0.02
  • Avg headshot accuracy 16%
  • Avg reaction 559ms

Last 20

  • 5132 · 25% win rate
  • Avg rating -0.01
  • Avg headshot accuracy 17%
  • Avg reaction 561ms

Newest first, from the last 100 tracked matches. Each block is its own sample — one result moves a 5-match win rate by 20 points.

Player DNA

Primary style: Positional PlayerPositioning stands above the rest of this profile (+1 against its own average).

Aim6.1
Utility5.0
Positioning5.5
Opening Duels4.0
Clutch3.6

Strong CT-side opener

Style profile from tracked-match aggregates — how this player plays, not how good they are. Classification rules are deterministic and documented in code.

What this cannot see yet: which weapons you use — so CSDB cannot identify an AWPer, and no style here implies a rifle or a sniper. It also cannot see how often you take opening duels, only how often you win them, nor where you hold, so roles that depend on those (entry, lurk, anchor) are deliberately absent rather than guessed. All of it needs round-by-round demo data, which is the next thing being built.

Your pro match

jL

Plays most like jL 84% playstyle similarity

Most alike: opening-duel success, positioning profile.

Where you differ: lower utility contribution; lower aim profile.

Similarity of playstyle shape across shared dimensions — it says how you play, not that you play at their level. Full comparison →

Strengths & areas to improve

Areas to improve

T-side openings. Opening success drops from 55% on CT to 29% on T — the same duels are being taken with worse setups on the attacking side.

Reaction time. 569ms from enemy-visible to first shot leaves fights decided before they start — warmup routines move this number more than anything else.

Generated by fixed rules over this profile's own numbers — no model, no guessing; silent when the sample is too small to support a claim.

CSDB Rating breakdown

Aim6.1
Positioning5.5
Utility5.0
Mechanics6.3
Opening Duels3.1
Win Impact2.6

Composite 5.2/10 (Developing), a weighted mean of the bars with a small opposition adjustment (×1.00 for this rank band). Formula versioned (v1) and documented in code.

Trends

Match rating-0.02+0.01
first ⅓ avg -0.03 → last ⅓ avg -0.02
Reaction time564ms−54ms
first ⅓ avg 618ms → last ⅓ avg 564ms
Headshot accuracy16.0%+2.8%
first ⅓ avg 13.3% → last ⅓ avg 16.0%

Rolling 5-match average across the last 100 tracked matches, oldest to newest. The delta compares the first third of the window with the last.

Personal bests

0.10Best match rating · 13–7 · ancient, 12 Jun
36%Best headshot accuracy · 13–3 · mirage, 3 May
375msFastest reaction time · 0–3 · mirage, 6 Jul
13–3Biggest win · ancient, 5 Sept

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Highlights

6Longest win streak
414In matches decided by ≤2 rounds
7Overtime games

Map breakdown

infernoBest map · 70% over 10dust2Weakest map · 33% over 6
MapGradePlayedRecordWin rateAvg rating
cacheD29101934%-0.01
mirageB20101050%-0.02
nukeC1771041%-0.02
infernoS107370%-0.03
ancientS96367%-0.00
dust2D62433%0.01
overpass43175%-0.05
anubis3030%-0.05
vertigo110100%0.02
office110100%-0.05

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Dust 2 is currently your weakest sufficiently-sampled map (33% over 6). Start with the 6 essential Dust 2 lineups, review the callouts, then spin up a practice server.

Lifetime stats

42,314Lifetime kills
1.12K/D · Top 25% of Level 4 players
2,353Matches
43.3%Match win rate
41.1%Headshot %
4.7%Shot accuracy
3,987MVPs
812Hours (in match)
2,612Bombs planted
480Bombs defused

Most-used weapons

Lifetime map wins

3,790dust2
2,964nuke
2,686inferno
1,127vertigo
699train
190office
92cbble
54italy

Lifetime totals via Steam — visible because this profile's game details are public. Spans CS:GO and CS2.

Faceit stats

Combat

12Matches
42%Win rate
0.60Avg K/D
55.6ADR
37%Headshot %

Clutches & streaks

38%1v1 clutch win
0%1v2 clutch win
2Longest win streak

Recent Faceit resultsLWLLL

MapMatchesWin rateAvg K/DAvg kills
Mirage729%0.557.9
Nuke333%0.6412.3
Ancient2100%0.739.5

Faceit-match stats via the FACEIT Data API — a separate match pool from the sections above.

Skill profile

Aggregate performance across tracked matches — stats via Leetify. Percentile context against other CSDB-tracked players arrives as our own benchmark data accumulates.

15.5%Headshot accuracy
32.0%Accuracy (enemy spotted)
32.2%Spray accuracy
78.5%Counter-strafing
9.4°Preaim
569msReaction time
28.9%T opening success
55.0%CT opening success
0.66Enemies flashed / flash
5.9%Flash assists
6.72HE damage / grenade
8.46Flashes / match

Recommended for you

Chosen by comparing your tracked metrics against the thresholds we flag — the measurement behind each one is shown, so you can disagree with it.

  1. Advanced Mechanics

    You are losing most of the first duels you take on T side, which is usually a peeking and spacing problem, not aim.

    T opening duels 28.9394% — below the 40% mark we flag

Spend your practice time on Dust 2

Map knowledge compounds faster than mechanics — lineups and callouts you learn once keep paying out every time the map comes up.

33% win rate across 6 tracked games — your weakest map with enough games to be worth reading into.

Dust 2 callouts & strategyDust 2 grenade lineups

Recent matches

MapScoreRatingHS%Date
cache11–13-0.0816%5 Sept
ancient13–30.0221%5 Sept
cache9–13-0.0413%30 Aug
ancient11–13-0.0712%30 Aug
nuke13–70.0526%23 Aug
dust215–15-0.0522%23 Aug
nuke5–130.0110%20 Aug
nuke13–16-0.0616%13 Aug
cache9–13-0.0013%8 Aug
nuke9–13-0.0115%28 Jul
cache13–110.0411%17 Jul
dust27–130.0413%16 Jul
nuke13–6-0.0614%7 Jul
mirage0–3-0.0033%6 Jul
nuke9–13-0.0218%5 Jul
inferno13–70.0129%5 Jul
ancient15–150.0015%5 Jul
mirage10–13-0.009%5 Jul
mirage3–130.0215%21 Jun
nuke9–13-0.0610%20 Jun
inferno5–13-0.0915%19 Jun
nuke5–13-0.0813%19 Jun
overpass13–9-0.0716%18 Jun
mirage13–6-0.0815%18 Jun
nuke13–10-0.0811%18 Jun
cache13–5-0.0013%18 Jun
inferno16–130.0214%14 Jun
dust213–60.0026%14 Jun
cache10–130.0610%14 Jun
dust213–70.0416%14 Jun
mirage13–7-0.0724%13 Jun
cache11–130.0213%13 Jun
ancient13–70.1011%12 Jun
nuke13–6-0.0113%12 Jun
mirage13–6-0.0213%12 Jun
vertigo13–70.0214%10 Jun
ancient13–80.0310%10 Jun
nuke10–130.0115%4 Jun
mirage11–13-0.103%4 Jun
mirage8–13-0.0215%29 May
inferno13–70.0015%26 May
overpass13–6-0.0314%26 May
dust28–130.0413%24 May
mirage13–50.0417%24 May
cache13–110.0515%24 May
cache13–110.0615%24 May
cache12–120.0313%23 May
overpass5–8-0.0722%20 May
cache7–13-0.0315%20 May
office13–4-0.0529%17 May
nuke13–16-0.0220%17 May
cache12–12-0.029%13 May
inferno13–10-0.0619%13 May
mirage13–8-0.0521%13 May
cache13–4-0.028%13 May
cache2–8-0.1114%9 May
cache13–8-0.066%9 May
cache11–130.0715%8 May
cache11–130.0619%5 May
mirage13–30.0036%3 May
cache13–9-0.038%3 May
cache11–13-0.056%1 May
cache13–80.0213%1 May
cache7–3-0.0214%1 May
cache12–12-0.0614%1 May
cache3–130.018%1 May
cache12–120.0118%1 May
cache3–13-0.0913%30 Apr
cache12–12-0.0417%30 Apr
cache10–13-0.0817%29 Apr
cache13–70.054%29 Apr
cache11–13-0.0212%29 Apr
anubis6–13-0.1010%26 Apr
anubis11–130.0117%25 Apr
inferno13–70.018%25 Apr
mirage13–10-0.0311%25 Apr
mirage13–5-0.007%20 Apr
inferno14–16-0.0419%19 Apr
nuke13–8-0.0017%19 Apr
mirage10–13-0.0713%19 Apr
ancient13–100.0114%18 Apr
nuke13–60.0611%11 Apr
anubis5–13-0.0518%11 Apr
mirage13–16-0.0012%11 Apr
mirage11–13-0.034%8 Apr
ancient5–13-0.0615%8 Apr
mirage11–13-0.0119%4 Apr
inferno13–7-0.038%4 Apr
ancient13–5-0.0621%4 Apr
dust22–13-0.0414%4 Apr
nuke11–130.0113%4 Apr
nuke4–13-0.0511%30 Mar
mirage11–13-0.0416%29 Mar
nuke13–9-0.0110%29 Mar
inferno2–13-0.0911%26 Mar
mirage13–100.0016%22 Mar
inferno13–110.0214%22 Mar
overpass13–7-0.0416%22 Mar
mirage13–10-0.0322%22 Mar
ancient13–70.019%22 Mar

Match data via Leetify.

Recent teammates

Milestones

1,000 Matches
Compare this player with someone →Inventory value for this account →Where does this rating sit? Premier rank tiers →