ɓuıɥʇʎuɐ ʇıɥ ʇ ̗uɐɔ

ɓuıɥʇʎuɐ ʇıɥ ʇ ̗uɐɔ — CS2 Stats

AO76561198853359205[U:1:893093477]Steam profile ↗✓ No bans

900Tracked matches45%Win rate2021Tracked since
925Hours in CS
CSDB Rating5.4 DevelopingSupport
FaceitLevel 5Top 67.6% of ranked FACEIT players
WingmanMaster Guardian Elite
Ladder ranks via Leetify

What changed since last observed

CSDB last observed this profile on 10 Sep 2026 (7 days ago). Ranks are recorded once per day this page is viewed.

No change since then — still 900 tracked matches. Play, then come back: the next observation lands here.

Track this profile

CSDB reads this profile's Premier rating from its tracked match history, and records Faceit ELO once on every day the page is viewed. 44 days played since 13 Nov 2025. Come back after the next session and the change shows above.

Is this you? Sign in with Steam to claim it and connect match tracking →

Rating over time

Premier CS Rating: 15,158 +270 13 Nov16 Jan · 27 days played
14,16916,472peak 16,47213 Nov16 Jan
16,698Peak Premier in tracked matches
44Days played since 2025-11-13

Premier comes from this profile’s tracked match history, so it reaches back as far as those matches do. Faceit ELO is CSDB’s own observation — no feed exposes ELO per match, so that line only has the days the profile was viewed and cannot be backfilled.

Compare periods

Last 7 days vs previous 7

No matches recorded between 10 Sep 2026 and 17 Sep 2026.

Measured 10 Sep 202617 Sep 2026; no observation near 14 days ago, so there is no previous window yet.

Differences between Valve's lifetime totals on the days CSDB observed this profile — every mode Valve counts, not only ranked. A window appears only when an observation sits within a few days of each end.

How this compares with the same rank

Median values for Level 5 among CSDB-tracked players (n=11,606), from Valve's own lifetime stats. Aim, positioning and utility scores are deliberately not benchmarked here — those are a third-party provider's derived metrics, which CSDB does not store.

MetricThis playerLevel 5 medianLevel 6 medianvs Level 6
Headshot rate43.1%43.8%44.9%1.8% short
Shot accuracy16.9%12.0%12.4%above
Kill/death ratio0.861.021.040.17 short
Match win rate36.5%44.7%45.3%8.7% short

This profile matches the typical Level 6 player on 1 of 4 comparable metrics.

Widest gap: Match win rate. That is the metric furthest from the Level 6 median in relative terms — not necessarily the one holding a rank back, which no statistic here can establish.

Share this profile

CSDB.GGɓuıɥʇʎuɐ ʇıɥ ʇ ̗uɐɔFACEITLevel 5STANDINGTop 67.6% of rankedcsdb.gg/stats

The image is a snapshot; the link keeps updating. Nothing here is published anywhere — it is generated in your browser when you click.

Performance scores

Aim84
Positioning34
Utility41

0–100 skill scores via Leetify.

Recent form

STEADY46522Last 10046%Win rateWLLLLWWWLW

Last 10 vs previous 10: −10pp win rate · −0.01 avg rating · +8.3pp headshot accuracy · −35ms reaction

Win rate −10pp across the last 10 against the 10 before — within the normal variation of a 10-match window (±20pp), so no real shift yet.

Last 5 · 10 · 20 matches

Last 5

  • 14 · 20% win rate
  • Avg rating -0.04
  • Avg headshot accuracy 32%
  • Avg reaction 600ms

Last 10

  • 55 · 50% win rate
  • Avg rating -0.04
  • Avg headshot accuracy 32%
  • Avg reaction 595ms

Last 20

  • 119 · 55% win rate
  • Avg rating -0.04
  • Avg headshot accuracy 28%
  • Avg reaction 612ms

Newest first, from the last 100 tracked matches. Each block is its own sample — one result moves a 5-match win rate by 20 points.

Player DNA

Primary style: SupportUtility contribution stands above the rest of this profile (+1.2 against its own average).

Aim8.4
Utility4.1
Positioning3.4
Opening Duels1.0
Clutch3.2

Limited utility dependence

Style profile from tracked-match aggregates — how this player plays, not how good they are. Classification rules are deterministic and documented in code.

What this cannot see yet: which weapons you use — so CSDB cannot identify an AWPer, and no style here implies a rifle or a sniper. It also cannot see how often you take opening duels, only how often you win them, nor where you hold, so roles that depend on those (entry, lurk, anchor) are deliberately absent rather than guessed. All of it needs round-by-round demo data, which is the next thing being built.

Your pro match

device

Plays most like device 89% playstyle similarity

Most alike: aim profile, positioning profile.

Where you differ: lower opening-duel success; lower utility contribution.

Similarity of playstyle shape across shared dimensions — it says how you play, not that you play at their level. Full comparison →

Strengths & areas to improve

Areas to improve

Preaim. Mechanical aim is strong but the crosshair sits 11.5° off target when enemies appear — placement, not flicking, is the bigger win available.

Positioning. Positioning trails aim by 50 points — deaths here waste a strong aim profile.

Utility. Utility contribution runs far behind the mechanical game — the cheapest rating gain on this profile is thrown, not aimed.

T-side openings. Opening success drops from 37% on CT to 21% on T — the same duels are being taken with worse setups on the attacking side.

Generated by fixed rules over this profile's own numbers — no model, no guessing; silent when the sample is too small to support a claim.

CSDB Rating breakdown

Aim8.4
Positioning3.4
Utility4.1
Mechanics7.6
Opening Duels0.9
Win Impact3.3

Composite 5.4/10 (Developing), a weighted mean of the bars with a small opposition adjustment (×1.00 for this rank band). Formula versioned (v1) and documented in code.

Trends

Match rating-0.04−0.00
first ⅓ avg -0.04 → last ⅓ avg -0.04
Reaction time634ms−11ms
first ⅓ avg 644ms → last ⅓ avg 634ms
Headshot accuracy26.7%+1.4%
first ⅓ avg 25.3% → last ⅓ avg 26.7%

Rolling 5-match average across the last 100 tracked matches, oldest to newest. The delta compares the first third of the window with the last.

Personal bests

0.15Best match rating · 13–9 · anubis, 6 Jan
47%Best headshot accuracy · 13–8 · nuke, 23 Aug
430msFastest reaction time · 11–13 · anubis, 23 Aug
13–1Biggest win · inferno, 24 Nov

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Highlights

7Longest win streak
88In matches decided by ≤2 rounds
9Overtime games

Map breakdown

overpassBest map · 53% over 17dust2Weakest map · 25% over 8
MapGradePlayedRecordWin rateAvg rating
infernoB23121152%-0.04
nukeC1771041%-0.04
overpassB179853%-0.03
mirageD124833%-0.02
ancientB105550%-0.03
anubisC83538%-0.00
dust2D82625%-0.05
train32167%-0.05
cache110100%-0.06
boulder110100%-0.08

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Dust 2 is currently your weakest sufficiently-sampled map (25% over 8). Start with the 6 essential Dust 2 lineups, review the callouts, then spin up a practice server.

Lifetime stats

36,974Lifetime kills
0.86K/D
2,456Matches
36.5%Match win rate
43.1%Headshot %
16.9%Shot accuracy · Top 25% of Level 5 players
4,057MVPs
925Hours (in match)
2,132Bombs planted
446Bombs defused

Most-used weapons

Lifetime map wins

3,125inferno
2,246dust2
1,730nuke
1,094vertigo
624train
562cbble
166office
54lake

Lifetime totals via Steam — visible because this profile's game details are public. Spans CS:GO and CS2.

Faceit stats

Combat

138Matches
49%Win rate
0.80Avg K/D
61.4ADR
37%Headshot %

Clutches & streaks

36%1v1 clutch win
21%1v2 clutch win
8Longest win streak

Recent Faceit resultsWLWLL

MapMatchesWin rateAvg K/DAvg kills
Anubis967%1.0614.2
Inferno956%0.8515.6
Vertigo650%0.6911.5
Nuke450%0.5710.3
Ancient367%0.8114.7
Mirage20%0.406.0
Dust210%0.6911.0
Overpass1100%0.6114.0

Faceit-match stats via the FACEIT Data API — a separate match pool from the sections above.

Skill profile

Aggregate performance across tracked matches — stats via Leetify. Percentile context against other CSDB-tracked players arrives as our own benchmark data accumulates.

28.0%Headshot accuracy
34.9%Accuracy (enemy spotted)
49.6%Spray accuracy
84.3%Counter-strafing
11.5°Preaim
614msReaction time
20.6%T opening success
37.3%CT opening success
0.42Enemies flashed / flash
5.5%Flash assists
11.03HE damage / grenade
4.78Flashes / match

Recommended for you

Chosen by comparing your tracked metrics against the thresholds we flag — the measurement behind each one is shown, so you can disagree with it.

  1. Grenades & Utility

    Most of your flashes are blinding nobody. A handful of reliable pop-flash lineups fixes this faster than anything else.

    Enemies flashed per flash 0.4247 — below the 0.5 mark we flag

    Grenade Lineups
  2. Advanced Mechanics

    You are losing most of the first duels you take on T side, which is usually a peeking and spacing problem, not aim.

    T opening duels 20.569% — below the 40% mark we flag

Spend your practice time on Dust 2

Map knowledge compounds faster than mechanics — lineups and callouts you learn once keep paying out every time the map comes up.

25% win rate across 8 tracked games — your weakest map with enough games to be worth reading into.

Dust 2 callouts & strategyDust 2 grenade lineups

Recent matches

MapScoreRatingHS%Date
inferno13–10-0.0520%10 Sept
anubis8–13-0.0127%7 Sept
mirage8–13-0.0033%2 Sept
inferno9–13-0.1040%1 Sept
inferno6–13-0.0642%31 Aug
anubis13–9-0.0024%31 Aug
train13–7-0.0824%28 Aug
nuke13–8-0.0147%23 Aug
anubis11–13-0.0429%23 Aug
cache13–10-0.0636%23 Aug
inferno13–6-0.0227%23 Aug
mirage13–10-0.0221%12 Aug
nuke11–13-0.0937%12 Aug
inferno13–100.0217%12 Aug
mirage9–13-0.0431%5 Aug
boulder13–9-0.0821%5 Aug
inferno1–13-0.046%27 Mar
mirage10–3-0.0124%3 Mar
inferno10–13-0.0830%3 Mar
overpass13–100.0226%3 Mar
anubis10–130.0332%2 Mar
nuke9–13-0.0521%2 Mar
inferno9–13-0.0933%17 Feb
overpass5–13-0.1029%17 Feb
anubis15–15-0.0518%16 Feb
inferno13–60.0221%16 Feb
overpass4–13-0.0324%10 Feb
overpass13–100.0136%10 Feb
anubis0–13-0.0725%10 Feb
ancient6–130.0233%2 Feb
anubis13–8-0.0236%2 Feb
overpass13–10-0.080%16 Jan
nuke6–13-0.0712%16 Jan
overpass8–130.0624%14 Jan
dust22–13-0.1313%11 Jan
nuke10–130.0023%11 Jan
ancient13–10-0.0529%11 Jan
inferno13–40.0122%11 Jan
overpass5–13-0.0816%11 Jan
inferno7–13-0.0628%10 Jan
overpass10–13-0.0425%10 Jan
inferno2–13-0.0620%8 Jan
dust213–90.0233%8 Jan
inferno16–12-0.0817%8 Jan
mirage13–40.0920%8 Jan
overpass13–70.0329%7 Jan
inferno13–11-0.0415%7 Jan
overpass16–14-0.0125%6 Jan
anubis13–90.1544%6 Jan
train6–13-0.0513%3 Jan
nuke3–13-0.0912%3 Jan
ancient13–9-0.0819%30 Dec
ancient14–16-0.0221%30 Dec
nuke8–13-0.0117%24 Dec
ancient13–10-0.0130%18 Dec
ancient11–13-0.0313%18 Dec
overpass11–130.0021%18 Dec
nuke13–11-0.1128%16 Dec
overpass13–100.0140%16 Dec
ancient13–10-0.0625%15 Dec
overpass13–7-0.1129%15 Dec
inferno16–14-0.0523%15 Dec
nuke9–13-0.0417%15 Dec
inferno16–12-0.0232%15 Dec
overpass9–13-0.0622%15 Dec
mirage10–130.0636%14 Dec
nuke4–13-0.0524%14 Dec
overpass15–15-0.0424%13 Dec
mirage6–13-0.0321%13 Dec
inferno13–80.0343%13 Dec
ancient13–10-0.0120%13 Dec
ancient11–13-0.0633%12 Dec
inferno13–160.0129%12 Dec
inferno10–13-0.0419%12 Dec
mirage1–13-0.0715%12 Dec
nuke13–110.0121%11 Dec
nuke5–13-0.0623%11 Dec
train13–7-0.0226%11 Dec
dust27–13-0.0213%10 Dec
ancient9–13-0.028%10 Dec
inferno8–13-0.0344%8 Dec
mirage5–13-0.0640%4 Dec
nuke16–130.0019%4 Dec
overpass13–9-0.0324%4 Dec
mirage4–13-0.0721%3 Dec
nuke13–11-0.0243%3 Dec
dust211–13-0.0619%3 Dec
inferno9–13-0.0431%2 Dec
dust28–13-0.0636%27 Nov
dust213–100.0229%25 Nov
nuke13–110.0133%25 Nov
nuke9–1-0.120%25 Nov
mirage10–13-0.0723%25 Nov
inferno13–1-0.0721%24 Nov
mirage13–8-0.0513%24 Nov
dust211–13-0.0621%23 Nov
dust210–13-0.0833%23 Nov
inferno13–110.0119%17 Nov
overpass13–9-0.0443%17 Nov
nuke2–13-0.0625%13 Nov

Match data via Leetify.

Recent teammates

Milestones

500 Matches
Compare this player with someone →Inventory value for this account →Where does this rating sit? Premier rank tiers →