Jacq

Jacq — CS2 Stats

76561198849302115[U:1:889036387]Steam profile ↗✓ No bans

2,292Tracked matches57%Win rate2022Tracked since
1,361Hours in CS
CSDB Rating7.2 StrongPositional Player
Premier CS Rating19,999Top 50% of 212,133 CSDB-tracked playersPurple band · top ~8.5% of ranked players (population est.)
CSDB Leaderboard#84984 of 259067 tracked
FaceitLevel 8 · 1,261 ELOTop 31.2% of ranked FACEIT players
Ladder ranks via Leetify

What changed since last observed

CSDB last observed this profile on 26 Oct 2026 (5 days ago). Ranks are recorded once per day this page is viewed.

No change since then. Play, then come back: the next observation lands here.

Rating over time

Premier CS Rating: 19,999 +704 18 Jul – 26 Oct · 30 days played
16,79619,999peak 19,99918 Jul26 Oct
19,999Peak Premier in tracked matches
1,261Highest Faceit ELO seen on CSDB
42Days played since 2026-07-18

Faceit ELO

  • At peak — 1,261
  • Next: Level 7 at 1,351 — 90 to go
  • Reached: Level 6 · Level 5 · Level 4 · Level 3
  • Level 6 first seen 2026-09-25
  • Level 5 first seen 2026-09-25

Premier CS Rating

  • At peak — 19,999
  • +2,499 over 30 days · improving
  • +1,176 over 90 days
  • Next: Pink band at 20,000 — 1 to go
  • Reached: Purple band · Blue band · Light Blue band
  • Purple band first seen 2026-09-25
  • Blue band first seen 2026-09-25

Premier comes from this profile’s tracked match history, so it reaches back as far as those matches do. Faceit ELO is CSDB’s own observation — no feed exposes ELO per match, so that line only has the days the profile was viewed and cannot be backfilled.

How this compares with the same rank

Median values for Level 8 among CSDB-tracked players (n=15,525), from Valve's own lifetime stats. Aim, positioning and utility scores are deliberately not benchmarked here — those are a third-party provider's derived metrics, which CSDB does not store.

MetricThis playerLevel 8 medianLevel 9 medianvs Level 9
Headshot rate59.9%46.8%48.2%above
Shot accuracy7.3%13.0%13.2%5.9% short
Kill/death ratio0.921.061.070.16 short
Match win rate45.1%46.3%46.9%1.9% short

This profile matches the typical Level 9 player on 1 of 4 comparable metrics.

Widest gap: Shot accuracy. That is the metric furthest from the Level 9 median in relative terms — not necessarily the one holding a rank back, which no statistic here can establish.

Share this profile

CSDB.GGJacqFACEITLevel 8 · 1,261 ELOSTANDINGTop 31.2% of rankedPREMIER19,999 · Purple bandPEAK ELO1,261csdb.gg/stats

The image is a snapshot; the link keeps updating. Nothing here is published anywhere — it is generated in your browser when you click.

Performance scores

Aim81
Positioning69
Utility60

0–100 skill scores via Leetify.

Recent form

STEADY53–46–1Last 10053%Win rateLWWLLWLWWW

Last 10 vs previous 10: +20pp win rate · +0.03 avg rating · −0.7pp headshot accuracy · −45ms reaction

Win rate up 20pp across the last 10 against the 10 before — more than a 10-match window's normal noise (±20pp).

Last 5 · 10 · 20 matches

Last 5

  • 2–3 · 40% win rate
  • Avg rating 0.01
  • Avg headshot accuracy 26%
  • Avg reaction 562ms

Last 10

  • 6–4 · 60% win rate
  • Avg rating 0.01
  • Avg headshot accuracy 25%
  • Avg reaction 559ms

Last 20

  • 10–10 · 50% win rate
  • Avg rating -0.00
  • Avg headshot accuracy 25%
  • Avg reaction 582ms

Newest first, from the last 100 tracked matches. Each block is its own sample — one result moves a 5-match win rate by 20 points.

Player DNA

Primary style: Positional Player — Positioning stands above the rest of this profile (+1.3 against its own average).

Aim8.1
Utility6.0
Positioning6.9
Opening Duels4.9
Clutch4.6

Strong CT-side opener

Style profile from tracked-match aggregates — how this player plays, not how good they are. Classification rules are deterministic and documented in code.

What this cannot see yet: which weapons you use — so CSDB cannot identify an AWPer, and no style here implies a rifle or a sniper. It also cannot see how often you take opening duels, only how often you win them, nor where you hold, so roles that depend on those (entry, lurk, anchor) are deliberately absent rather than guessed. All of it needs round-by-round demo data, which is the next thing being built.

Your pro match

Twistzz

Plays most like Twistzz 94% playstyle similarity

Most alike: positioning profile, utility contribution.

Where you differ: lower aim profile.

Similarity of playstyle shape across shared dimensions — it says how you play, not that you play at their level. Full comparison →

Strengths & areas to improve

Strengths

CT openings. 65% CT opening-duel success — winning the first fight on the defending side is rare and valuable.

Areas to improve

T-side openings. Opening success drops from 65% on CT to 43% on T — the same duels are being taken with worse setups on the attacking side.

Reaction time. 567ms from enemy-visible to first shot leaves fights decided before they start — warmup routines move this number more than anything else.

Generated by fixed rules over this profile's own numbers — no model, no guessing; silent when the sample is too small to support a claim.

CSDB Rating breakdown

Aim8.1
Positioning6.9
Utility6.0
Mechanics7.6
Opening Duels6.0
Win Impact7.2

Composite 7.2/10 (Strong), a weighted mean of the bars with a small opposition adjustment (×1.00 for this rank band). Formula versioned (v1) and documented in code.

Trends

Match rating0.00−0.01
first ⅓ avg 0.01 → last ⅓ avg 0.00
Reaction time564ms−54ms
first ⅓ avg 618ms → last ⅓ avg 564ms
Headshot accuracy27.8%−4.7%
first ⅓ avg 32.5% → last ⅓ avg 27.8%

Rolling 5-match average across the last 100 tracked matches, oldest to newest. The delta compares the first third of the window with the last.

Personal bests

0.13Best match rating · 13–1 · anubis, 26 Oct →
59%Best headshot accuracy · 13–4 · ancient, 28 Jul →
406msFastest reaction time · 3–13 · inferno, 28 Sept →
13–1Biggest win · anubis, 26 Oct →

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Highlights

6Longest win streak
8–5In matches decided by ≤2 rounds
8Overtime games

Map breakdown

anubisBest map · 71% over 14ancientWeakest map · 38% over 8
MapGradePlayedRecordWin rateAvg rating
dust2A2816–1257%-0.00
mirageC187–1139%-0.01
anubisS1410–471%0.03
nukeS128–467%-0.00
cacheC94–544%0.01
infernoC94–544%0.01
ancientC83–538%0.01
vertigo—21–150%-0.01

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Ancient is currently your weakest sufficiently-sampled map (38% over 8). Start with the 6 essential Ancient lineups, review the callouts, then spin up a practice server.

Lifetime stats

57,521Lifetime kills
0.92K/D
3,020Matches
45.1%Match win rate
59.9%Headshot % · Top 10% of Level 8 players
7.3%Shot accuracy
6,548MVPs
1,361Hours (in match)
2,890Bombs planted
951Bombs defused

Most-used weapons

AK-4725,610
AWP3,335
MP91,499
Knife561

Lifetime map wins

13,841dust2
2,738nuke
2,163inferno
1,378vertigo
624train
12office
11lake
3safehouse

Lifetime totals via Steam — visible because this profile's game details are public. Spans CS:GO and CS2.

Faceit stats

Combat

544Matches
50%Win rate
1.13Avg K/D
81.9ADR
68%Headshot %

Clutches & streaks

43%1v1 clutch win
29%1v2 clutch win
7Longest win streak

Recent Faceit resultsLLWLL

MapMatchesWin rateAvg K/DAvg kills
Dust217849%1.1417.1
Anubis8748%1.2418.5
Mirage7553%1.0617.0
Ancient6149%1.0917.2
Inferno6148%1.0516.0
Nuke5153%1.1617.4
Train1338%1.1918.2
Cache1040%1.0616.6

Faceit-match stats via the FACEIT Data API — a separate match pool from the sections above.

Skill profile

Aggregate performance across tracked matches — stats via Leetify. Percentile context against other CSDB-tracked players arrives as our own benchmark data accumulates.

27.0%Headshot accuracy
32.4%Accuracy (enemy spotted)
31.9%Spray accuracy
84.2%Counter-strafing
8.6°Preaim
567msReaction time
43.0%T opening success
65.3%CT opening success
0.64Enemies flashed / flash
13.8%Flash assists
6.77HE damage / grenade
8.19Flashes / match

Recommended for you

Spend your practice time on Ancient

Map knowledge compounds faster than mechanics — lineups and callouts you learn once keep paying out every time the map comes up.

38% win rate across 8 tracked games — your weakest map with enough games to be worth reading into.

Ancient callouts & strategy →Ancient grenade lineups →

Recent matches

MapScoreRatingHS%Date
ancient10–130.0125%30 Oct →
dust213–110.0222%26 Oct →
anubis13–10.1339%26 Oct →
dust25–13-0.0526%25 Oct →
mirage7–13-0.0818%24 Oct →
anubis13–7-0.0115%23 Oct →
ancient9–13-0.0418%23 Oct →
anubis13–100.0730%23 Oct →
dust213–110.0234%23 Oct →
dust213–100.0420%23 Oct →
mirage6–130.0514%22 Oct →
dust210–13-0.1133%20 Oct →
anubis11–13-0.0320%20 Oct →
dust210–13-0.0027%20 Oct →
dust210–13-0.0516%19 Oct →
cache13–1-0.0213%18 Oct →
dust213–80.0242%18 Oct →
nuke13–10-0.0233%18 Oct →
cache13–8-0.0127%18 Oct →
dust211–13-0.0030%17 Oct →
nuke19–17-0.0227%16 Oct →
anubis13–10.0529%16 Oct →
cache3–13-0.0533%16 Oct →
dust213–80.0921%14 Oct →
cache13–70.0347%10 Oct →
inferno6–13-0.0238%7 Oct →
dust26–13-0.0533%6 Oct →
mirage13–80.0524%6 Oct →
anubis13–40.0032%3 Oct →
dust213–20.0633%2 Oct →
mirage19–17-0.0236%2 Oct →
dust213–8-0.0034%1 Oct →
inferno13–70.0126%1 Oct →
dust26–13-0.0229%30 Sept →
dust26–13-0.0829%30 Sept →
dust213–20.0821%30 Sept →
dust213–9-0.0625%30 Sept →
inferno3–13-0.0844%28 Sept →
vertigo6–13-0.0140%26 Sept →
anubis22–190.0730%26 Sept →
nuke13–70.0120%26 Sept →
nuke10–130.0637%26 Sept →
mirage5–13-0.0143%25 Sept →
nuke6–1-0.0215%25 Sept →
vertigo13–4-0.0236%25 Sept →
inferno13–80.0734%25 Sept →
ancient10–130.0127%24 Sept →
ancient1–13-0.0726%23 Sept →
mirage13–9-0.0521%23 Sept →
inferno11–13-0.0133%18 Sept →
dust213–50.1241%18 Sept →
anubis13–40.0146%18 Sept →
mirage14–16-0.0130%18 Sept →
mirage13–5-0.0122%5 Sept →
nuke19–170.0628%5 Sept →
mirage13–50.0535%5 Sept →
mirage9–13-0.0522%29 Aug →
dust213–40.0514%29 Aug →
cache15–15-0.0430%29 Aug →
nuke13–9-0.0047%29 Aug →
anubis5–130.0626%28 Aug →
dust27–13-0.0526%28 Aug →
inferno13–110.0627%27 Aug →
mirage16–140.0138%25 Aug →
mirage7–13-0.0333%25 Aug →
nuke4–13-0.0236%25 Aug →
nuke13–80.0132%24 Aug →
mirage10–13-0.0524%22 Aug →
dust213–7-0.0437%22 Aug →
ancient13–110.0528%22 Aug →
cache9–130.0445%21 Aug →
mirage10–13-0.0240%15 Aug →
nuke10–13-0.0628%15 Aug →
nuke13–100.0531%10 Aug →
dust216–120.0537%10 Aug →
inferno8–130.0055%10 Aug →
anubis3–13-0.0733%29 Jul →
inferno13–100.0428%29 Jul →
dust23–13-0.0616%29 Jul →
cache4–130.0555%28 Jul →
mirage3–13-0.0222%28 Jul →
anubis5–130.0322%28 Jul →
anubis13–60.1053%28 Jul →
ancient13–40.0759%28 Jul →
ancient11–13-0.0125%25 Jul →
dust213–80.0539%25 Jul →
dust213–5-0.0235%24 Jul →
cache9–13-0.0510%21 Jul →
mirage6–13-0.0126%19 Jul →
mirage3–13-0.0110%19 Jul →
dust213–9-0.0440%19 Jul →
nuke6–13-0.0723%19 Jul →
ancient13–60.0419%19 Jul →
anubis13–70.0227%19 Jul →
dust24–130.0240%19 Jul →
mirage13–50.0734%19 Jul →
anubis13–80.0430%18 Jul →
cache13–60.1243%18 Jul →
inferno7–13-0.0131%18 Jul →
dust25–13-0.0131%18 Jul →

Match data via Leetify.

Recent teammates

Milestones

1,000 Matches
Compare this player with someone →Inventory value for this account →Where does this rating sit? Premier rank tiers →

This profile is built from public Steam data. If it is yours, you can remove it, or delete your CSDB account.