GiveawaySign In
๐•ฑ๐–†๐–™๐–‰๐–”๐–Œ

๐•ฑ๐–†๐–™๐–‰๐–”๐–Œ โ€” CS2 Stats

76561199542277867[U:1:1582012139]Steam profile โ†—โœ“ No bans

1,786Tracked matches59%Win rate2023Tracked since
CSDB Rating6.5 SolidPositional Player
Premier CS Rating20,224Top 50% of 212,133 CSDB-tracked playersPink band ยท top ~8.3% of ranked players (population est.)
CSDB Leaderboard#79627 of 259075 tracked
FaceitLevel 6 ยท 1,140 ELOTop 54.0% of ranked FACEIT players
Ladder ranks via Leetify

What changed since last observed

CSDB last observed this profile on 30 Oct 2026 (yesterday). Ranks are recorded once per day this page is viewed.

+224Premier CS Rating ยท 20,000 โ†’ 20,224

Rating over time

Premier CS Rating: 20,224 +8,334 9 Sept โ€“ 31 Oct ยท 30 days played
11,89020,585peak 20,5859 Sept31 Oct
20,886Peak Premier in tracked matches
1,195Highest Faceit ELO seen on CSDB
30Days played since 2026-09-09

Faceit ELO

  • 55 below peak (1,195)
  • Next: Level 6 at 1,201 โ€” 61 to go
  • Reached: Level 5 ยท Level 4 ยท Level 3 ยท Level 2
  • Level 5 first seen 2026-09-09
  • Level 4 first seen 2026-09-09

Premier CS Rating

  • 361 below peak (20,585)
  • +1,671 over 30 days ยท improving
  • Next: Red band at 25,000 โ€” 4,776 to go
  • Reached: Pink band ยท Purple band ยท Blue band ยท Light Blue band
  • Purple band first seen 2026-09-26
  • Blue band first seen 2026-09-09

Premier comes from this profileโ€™s tracked match history, so it reaches back as far as those matches do. Faceit ELO is recorded after matches CSDB sees, so those points are days actually played โ€” but only from the day tracking started: no feed exposes the ELO a past match ended on, so nothing before it can be backfilled.

Share this profile

CSDB.GG๐•ฑ๐–†๐–™๐–‰๐–”๐–ŒFACEITLevel 6 ยท 1,140 ELOSTANDINGTop 54.0% of rankedPREMIER20,224 ยท Pink bandPEAK ELO1,195csdb.gg/stats

The image is a snapshot; the link keeps updating. Nothing here is published anywhere โ€” it is generated in your browser when you click.

Performance scores

Aim72
Positioning56
Utility45

0โ€“100 skill scores via Leetify.

Recent form

STEADY56โ€“42โ€“2Last 10056%Win rateWWLLWWWLLW

Last 10 vs previous 10: โˆ’10pp win rate ยท +0.01 avg rating ยท +5.7pp headshot accuracy ยท +7ms reaction

Win rate โˆ’10pp across the last 10 against the 10 before โ€” within the normal variation of a 10-match window (ยฑ20pp), so no real shift yet.

Last 5 ยท 10 ยท 20 matches

Last 5

  • 3โ€“2 ยท 60% win rate
  • Avg rating -0.02
  • Avg headshot accuracy 24%
  • Avg reaction 628ms

Last 10

  • 6โ€“4 ยท 60% win rate
  • Avg rating -0.00
  • Avg headshot accuracy 25%
  • Avg reaction 623ms

Last 20

  • 13โ€“7 ยท 65% win rate
  • Avg rating -0.01
  • Avg headshot accuracy 22%
  • Avg reaction 619ms

Newest first, from the last 100 tracked matches. Each block is its own sample โ€” one result moves a 5-match win rate by 20 points.

Player DNA

Primary style: Positional Player โ€” Positioning stands above the rest of this profile (+1.1 against its own average).

Aim7.2
Utility4.5
Positioning5.6
Opening Duels3.7
Clutch4.2

Strong T-side opener

Style profile from tracked-match aggregates โ€” how this player plays, not how good they are. Classification rules are deterministic and documented in code.

What this cannot see yet: which weapons you use โ€” so CSDB cannot identify an AWPer, and no style here implies a rifle or a sniper. It also cannot see how often you take opening duels, only how often you win them, nor where you hold, so roles that depend on those (entry, lurk, anchor) are deliberately absent rather than guessed. All of it needs round-by-round demo data, which is the next thing being built.

Your pro match

Twistzz

Plays most like Twistzz 94% playstyle similarity

Most alike: positioning profile, aim profile.

Where you differ: lower opening-duel success; lower utility contribution.

Similarity of playstyle shape across shared dimensions โ€” it says how you play, not that you play at their level. Full comparison โ†’

Strengths & areas to improve

Strengths

T openings. 72% T opening-duel success โ€” entries that actually open the round.

Areas to improve

CT openings. Opening success drops from 72% on T to 35% on CT โ€” first contacts on the defending side are being lost.

Reaction time. 612ms from enemy-visible to first shot leaves fights decided before they start โ€” warmup routines move this number more than anything else.

Generated by fixed rules over this profile's own numbers โ€” no model, no guessing; silent when the sample is too small to support a claim.

CSDB Rating breakdown

Aim7.2
Positioning5.6
Utility4.5
Mechanics7.3
Opening Duels5.7
Win Impact7.9

Composite 6.5/10 (Solid), a weighted mean of the bars with a small opposition adjustment (ร—1.02 for this rank band). Formula versioned (v1) and documented in code.

Trends

Match rating0.00+0.02
first โ…“ avg -0.02 โ†’ last โ…“ avg 0.00
Reaction time609ms+6ms
first โ…“ avg 603ms โ†’ last โ…“ avg 609ms
Headshot accuracy19.9%+1.2%
first โ…“ avg 18.6% โ†’ last โ…“ avg 19.9%

Rolling 5-match average across the last 100 tracked matches, oldest to newest. The delta compares the first third of the window with the last.

Personal bests

0.12Best match rating ยท 6โ€“13 ยท dust2, 13 Oct โ†’
44%Best headshot accuracy ยท 13โ€“9 ยท dust2, 9 Oct โ†’
391msFastest reaction time ยท 13โ€“7 ยท nuke, 26 Sept โ†’
13โ€“2Biggest win ยท dust2, 2 Oct โ†’

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Highlights

5Longest win streak
W2Current streak
9โ€“5In matches decided by โ‰ค2 rounds
10Overtime games

Map breakdown

anubisBest map ยท 85% over 13ancientWeakest map ยท 40% over 10
MapGradePlayedRecordWin rateAvg rating
dust2B2110โ€“1148%-0.00
nukeC198โ€“1142%-0.01
mirageA148โ€“657%-0.01
anubisS1311โ€“285%-0.00
cacheA127โ€“558%-0.04
infernoS118โ€“373%-0.00
ancientC104โ€“640%-0.02

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Ancient is currently your weakest sufficiently-sampled map (40% over 10). Start with the 6 essential Ancient lineups, review the callouts, then spin up a practice server.

Faceit stats

Combat

162Matches
54%Win rate
0.93Avg K/D
75.3ADR
46%Headshot %

Clutches & streaks

41%1v1 clutch win
22%1v2 clutch win
8Longest win streak

Recent Faceit resultsWLLWL

MapMatchesWin rateAvg K/DAvg kills
Dust25343%0.8914.6
Mirage4055%1.0214.5
Anubis2273%0.8414.2
Nuke1464%0.7913.1
Inferno1250%1.0016.1
Ancient1155%1.0413.2
Cache560%1.1016.2
Vertigo367%0.9014.3

Faceit-match stats via the FACEIT Data API โ€” a separate match pool from the sections above.

Skill profile

Aggregate performance across tracked matches โ€” stats via Leetify. Percentile context against other CSDB-tracked players arrives as our own benchmark data accumulates.

20.5%Headshot accuracy
37.5%Accuracy (enemy spotted)
35.7%Spray accuracy
83.1%Counter-strafing
11.1ยฐPreaim
612msReaction time
71.6%T opening success
35.4%CT opening success
0.60Enemies flashed / flash
5.9%Flash assists
8.90HE damage / grenade
5.04Flashes / match

Recommended for you

Chosen by comparing your tracked metrics against the thresholds we flag โ€” the measurement behind each one is shown, so you can disagree with it.

  1. Advanced Mechanics

    Losing the first CT duel repeatedly usually means holding angles that favour the peeker.

    CT opening duels 35.392% โ€” below the 40% mark we flag

Spend your practice time on Ancient

Map knowledge compounds faster than mechanics โ€” lineups and callouts you learn once keep paying out every time the map comes up.

40% win rate across 10 tracked games โ€” your weakest map with enough games to be worth reading into.

Ancient callouts & strategy โ†’Ancient grenade lineups โ†’

Recent matches

MapScoreRatingHS%Date
mirage13โ€“8-0.0317%31 Oct โ†’
ancient13โ€“4-0.0122%31 Oct โ†’
nuke11โ€“13-0.0242%30 Oct โ†’
nuke6โ€“130.0020%30 Oct โ†’
mirage16โ€“12-0.0519%29 Oct โ†’
anubis13โ€“50.0525%28 Oct โ†’
ancient13โ€“9-0.0127%27 Oct โ†’
nuke5โ€“130.0531%26 Oct โ†’
mirage10โ€“13-0.0129%26 Oct โ†’
nuke13โ€“90.0119%25 Oct โ†’
dust213โ€“11-0.0911%25 Oct โ†’
nuke13โ€“90.0027%25 Oct โ†’
cache16โ€“13-0.019%24 Oct โ†’
cache13โ€“80.0026%24 Oct โ†’
dust23โ€“130.0225%24 Oct โ†’
anubis13โ€“10-0.028%23 Oct โ†’
dust213โ€“110.0228%23 Oct โ†’
dust214โ€“160.0020%21 Oct โ†’
cache6โ€“13-0.0616%19 Oct โ†’
nuke13โ€“7-0.0123%18 Oct โ†’
inferno13โ€“40.0624%18 Oct โ†’
nuke15โ€“150.0816%18 Oct โ†’
inferno13โ€“70.0532%18 Oct โ†’
ancient10โ€“130.0315%18 Oct โ†’
cache9โ€“13-0.0424%18 Oct โ†’
mirage8โ€“13-0.0114%17 Oct โ†’
ancient13โ€“50.039%17 Oct โ†’
dust27โ€“130.0419%17 Oct โ†’
inferno13โ€“110.0514%17 Oct โ†’
ancient8โ€“13-0.0713%17 Oct โ†’
cache5โ€“13-0.055%17 Oct โ†’
cache13โ€“40.0212%17 Oct โ†’
inferno13โ€“8-0.0014%17 Oct โ†’
inferno7โ€“13-0.0311%16 Oct โ†’
dust211โ€“130.0424%16 Oct โ†’
nuke8โ€“13-0.0726%16 Oct โ†’
mirage13โ€“6-0.0423%16 Oct โ†’
inferno9โ€“13-0.0516%16 Oct โ†’
mirage5โ€“13-0.1010%16 Oct โ†’
inferno13โ€“7-0.0321%16 Oct โ†’
nuke13โ€“16-0.0322%16 Oct โ†’
ancient1โ€“13-0.119%15 Oct โ†’
mirage13โ€“80.0118%15 Oct โ†’
nuke13โ€“60.0930%15 Oct โ†’
cache10โ€“13-0.1014%15 Oct โ†’
anubis14โ€“16-0.0017%14 Oct โ†’
nuke13โ€“7-0.0317%14 Oct โ†’
anubis13โ€“80.0626%14 Oct โ†’
mirage1โ€“13-0.0312%13 Oct โ†’
nuke6โ€“130.0117%13 Oct โ†’
dust26โ€“130.1223%13 Oct โ†’
inferno13โ€“10-0.0226%13 Oct โ†’
anubis13โ€“11-0.0013%13 Oct โ†’
cache13โ€“110.0117%13 Oct โ†’
nuke13โ€“6-0.0615%13 Oct โ†’
cache16โ€“14-0.0515%12 Oct โ†’
mirage9โ€“130.0526%12 Oct โ†’
mirage13โ€“70.0724%12 Oct โ†’
dust213โ€“5-0.0123%12 Oct โ†’
ancient13โ€“11-0.0031%12 Oct โ†’
ancient2โ€“13-0.0121%11 Oct โ†’
anubis7โ€“13-0.0512%11 Oct โ†’
anubis13โ€“9-0.029%11 Oct โ†’
dust213โ€“9-0.0326%11 Oct โ†’
mirage9โ€“13-0.0324%10 Oct โ†’
cache13โ€“7-0.0828%10 Oct โ†’
nuke10โ€“13-0.0320%10 Oct โ†’
mirage13โ€“9-0.0227%9 Oct โ†’
dust213โ€“90.0744%9 Oct โ†’
inferno15โ€“150.0019%9 Oct โ†’
ancient3โ€“13-0.0114%9 Oct โ†’
anubis13โ€“6-0.0111%8 Oct โ†’
nuke6โ€“13-0.0220%8 Oct โ†’
ancient11โ€“13-0.087%6 Oct โ†’
dust27โ€“13-0.0628%5 Oct โ†’
anubis13โ€“4-0.0116%3 Oct โ†’
nuke8โ€“13-0.0724%3 Oct โ†’
dust213โ€“10-0.0116%3 Oct โ†’
anubis13โ€“8-0.0414%3 Oct โ†’
dust213โ€“20.0527%2 Oct โ†’
dust213โ€“80.0325%1 Oct โ†’
inferno13โ€“7-0.0219%1 Oct โ†’
dust27โ€“130.0119%1 Oct โ†’
mirage13โ€“11-0.0117%1 Oct โ†’
dust26โ€“13-0.0524%30 Sept โ†’
dust26โ€“13-0.0416%30 Sept โ†’
dust213โ€“20.0333%30 Sept โ†’
dust213โ€“9-0.0323%30 Sept โ†’
cache13โ€“11-0.089%30 Sept โ†’
mirage13โ€“90.0119%27 Sept โ†’
anubis13โ€“80.0216%27 Sept โ†’
dust210โ€“13-0.0415%27 Sept โ†’
cache4โ€“13-0.0420%27 Sept โ†’
nuke13โ€“30.0628%27 Sept โ†’
dust25โ€“13-0.0911%27 Sept โ†’
inferno16โ€“12-0.053%27 Sept โ†’
anubis13โ€“80.0515%27 Sept โ†’
anubis22โ€“19-0.0516%26 Sept โ†’
nuke13โ€“7-0.0315%26 Sept โ†’
nuke10โ€“13-0.025%26 Sept โ†’

Match data via Leetify.

Recent teammates

Milestones

1,000 Matches
Compare this player with someone โ†’Inventory value for this account โ†’Where does this rating sit? Premier rank tiers โ†’

This profile is built from public Steam data. If it is yours, you can remove it, or delete your CSDB account.

Explore CSDB.gg

Related

Sensitivity ConverterConvert sensitivity between CS2 and other gameseDPI CalculatorCalculate your effective DPIcm/360 CalculatorMouse distance per full turnResolution CalculatorCompare aspect ratios and resolutionsCrosshair GeneratorBuild and preview custom crosshairs

Tools

CS2 Skin WordleName the skin from an extreme close-upModel AccuracyPrediction model accuracy statsTeam Head-to-HeadCompare pro team stats

Learn & Explore

CS2 vs Rainbow Six SiegeDestructibility and operators vs pure utilityCS2 Player Roles ExplainedEntry, support, AWPer, lurker, IGLCS2 Fixes & TroubleshootingStep-by-step fixes for every common CS2 problem