Mar :P

Mar :P — CS2 Stats

NL76561198841864194[U:1:881598466]Steam profile ↗✓ No bans

2,028Tracked matches50%Win rate2024Tracked since
3,551Hours in CS39Hrs last 2 wks
CSDB Rating6.6 SolidPositional Player
FaceitLevel 9 · 1,594 ELOTop 20.7% of ranked FACEIT players
WingmanMaster Guardian II
Ladder ranks via Leetify

What changed since last observed

CSDB last observed this profile on 1 Sep 2026 (43 days ago). Ranks are recorded once per day this page is viewed.

0Faceit ELO · 1,594 → 1,594
+88Tracked matches · now 2,028
+5.2ppWin rate · 44.8% → 50.0%

Rating over time

18,447Peak Premier in tracked matches
1,594Highest Faceit ELO seen on CSDB
53Days played since 2026-06-20

Faceit ELO

  • At peak — 1,594
  • Next: Level 9 at 1,751 — 157 to go
  • Reached: Level 8 · Level 7 · Level 6 · Level 5
  • Level 8 first seen 2026-09-01
  • Level 7 first seen 2026-09-01

Premier comes from this profile’s tracked match history, so it reaches back as far as those matches do. Faceit ELO is CSDB’s own observation — no feed exposes ELO per match, so that line only has the days the profile was viewed and cannot be backfilled.

Compare periods

Last 30 days vs previous 30

MetricLast 30Previous 30Change
Matches97——
Win rate47%——
K/D0.73——
Headshot %69%——

Measured 13 Sep 2026 → 14 Oct 2026; no observation near 60 days ago, so there is no previous window yet.

Differences between Valve's lifetime totals on the days CSDB observed this profile — every mode Valve counts, not only ranked. A window appears only when an observation sits within a few days of each end.

How this compares with the same rank

Median values for Level 9 among CSDB-tracked players (n=14,591), from Valve's own lifetime stats. Aim, positioning and utility scores are deliberately not benchmarked here — those are a third-party provider's derived metrics, which CSDB does not store.

MetricThis playerLevel 9 medianLevel 10 medianvs Level 10
Headshot rate64.2%48.2%50.9%above
Shot accuracy0.1%13.3%13.7%13.6% short
Kill/death ratio0.911.071.090.18 short
Match win rate44.5%46.9%48.4%3.9% short

This profile matches the typical Level 10 player on 1 of 4 comparable metrics.

Widest gap: Shot accuracy. That is the metric furthest from the Level 10 median in relative terms — not necessarily the one holding a rank back, which no statistic here can establish.

Share this profile

CSDB.GGMar :PFACEITLevel 9 · 1,594 ELOSTANDINGTop 20.7% of rankedPEAK ELO1,594csdb.gg/stats

The image is a snapshot; the link keeps updating. Nothing here is published anywhere — it is generated in your browser when you click.

Performance scores

Aim87
Positioning66
Utility50

0–100 skill scores via Leetify.

Recent form

STEADY52–45–3Last 10052%Win rateWLLWWWLWLL

Last 10 vs previous 10: −10pp win rate · −0.01 avg rating · −3.9pp headshot accuracy · +9ms reaction

Win rate −10pp across the last 10 against the 10 before — within the normal variation of a 10-match window (±20pp), so no real shift yet.

Last 5 · 10 · 20 matches

Last 5

  • 3–2 · 60% win rate
  • Avg rating 0.01
  • Avg headshot accuracy 31%
  • Avg reaction 563ms

Last 10

  • 5–5 · 50% win rate
  • Avg rating 0.02
  • Avg headshot accuracy 27%
  • Avg reaction 575ms

Last 20

  • 11–9 · 55% win rate
  • Avg rating 0.03
  • Avg headshot accuracy 29%
  • Avg reaction 571ms

Newest first, from the last 100 tracked matches. Each block is its own sample — one result moves a 5-match win rate by 20 points.

Player DNA

Primary style: Positional Player — Positioning stands above the rest of this profile (+1.6 against its own average).

Aim8.7
Utility5.0
Positioning6.6
Opening Duels4.8
Clutch3.6

Sharp aimer

Style profile from tracked-match aggregates — how this player plays, not how good they are. Classification rules are deterministic and documented in code.

What this cannot see yet: which weapons you use — so CSDB cannot identify an AWPer, and no style here implies a rifle or a sniper. It also cannot see how often you take opening duels, only how often you win them, nor where you hold, so roles that depend on those (entry, lurk, anchor) are deliberately absent rather than guessed. All of it needs round-by-round demo data, which is the next thing being built.

Your pro match

s1mple

Plays most like s1mple 95% playstyle similarity

Most alike: aim profile, positioning profile.

Where you differ: lower opening-duel success; lower utility contribution.

Similarity of playstyle shape across shared dimensions — it says how you play, not that you play at their level. Full comparison →

Strengths & areas to improve

Strengths

Aim. Aim score of 87 — the mechanical foundation is a clear strength.

Areas to improve

Utility. Utility contribution runs far behind the mechanical game — the cheapest rating gain on this profile is thrown, not aimed.

Reaction time. 579ms from enemy-visible to first shot leaves fights decided before they start — warmup routines move this number more than anything else.

Generated by fixed rules over this profile's own numbers — no model, no guessing; silent when the sample is too small to support a claim.

CSDB Rating breakdown

Aim8.7
Positioning6.6
Utility5.0
Mechanics8.1
Opening Duels5.8
Win Impact5.0

Composite 6.6/10 (Solid), a weighted mean of the bars with a small opposition adjustment (×0.95 for this rank band). Formula versioned (v1) and documented in code.

Trends

Match rating0.02−0.02
first ⅓ avg 0.04 → last ⅓ avg 0.02
Reaction time577ms−63ms
first ⅓ avg 639ms → last ⅓ avg 577ms
Headshot accuracy28.7%−2.8%
first ⅓ avg 31.5% → last ⅓ avg 28.7%

Rolling 5-match average across the last 100 tracked matches, oldest to newest. The delta compares the first third of the window with the last.

Personal bests

0.25Best match rating · 9–7 · poseidon, 27 Jun →
51%Best headshot accuracy · 13–8 · dust2, 25 Jul →
375msFastest reaction time · 4–13 · mirage, 30 Aug →
13–0Biggest win · mirage, 29 Sept →

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Highlights

4Longest win streak
5–11In matches decided by ≤2 rounds
3Overtime games

Map breakdown

infernoBest map · 78% over 9nukeWeakest map · 22% over 9
MapGradePlayedRecordWin rateAvg rating
dust2B2613–1350%0.02
mirageC198–1142%0.01
ancientS1310–377%0.04
infernoS97–278%0.06
nukeD92–722%0.02
anubisA85–363%0.06
vertigoA53–260%0.03
cache—40–40%0.04
train—22–0100%0.04
overpass—21–150%0.01
office—20–20%-0.02
poseidon—11–0100%0.25

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Nuke is currently your weakest sufficiently-sampled map (22% over 9). Start with the 6 essential Nuke lineups, review the callouts, then spin up a practice server.

Lifetime stats

114,632Lifetime kills
0.91K/D
3,227Matches
44.5%Match win rate
64.2%Headshot % · Top 5% of Level 9 players
0.1%Shot accuracy
8,353MVPs
6,859Hours (in match)
3,512Bombs planted
1,322Bombs defused

Most-used weapons

AK-4766,672
AWP5,502
MP91,689
Knife1,205

Lifetime map wins

6,055dust2
4,068nuke
2,851inferno
1,163vertigo
1,074train
285office
19ar_shoots
13ar_baggage

Lifetime totals via Steam — visible because this profile's game details are public. Spans CS:GO and CS2.

Faceit stats

Combat

696Matches
52%Win rate
1.02Avg K/D
72.3ADR
53%Headshot %

Clutches & streaks

38%1v1 clutch win
21%1v2 clutch win
10Longest win streak

Recent Faceit resultsWLLLW

MapMatchesWin rateAvg K/DAvg kills
Mirage17748%1.0414.2
Dust213654%0.9914.1
Ancient12352%1.0015.9
Nuke8751%1.0014.5
Anubis8556%1.0114.8
Inferno5254%1.1115.0
Overpass1331%0.7912.9
Vertigo1385%1.1716.2

Faceit-match stats via the FACEIT Data API — a separate match pool from the sections above.

Skill profile

Aggregate performance across tracked matches — stats via Leetify. Percentile context against other CSDB-tracked players arrives as our own benchmark data accumulates.

28.7%Headshot accuracy
34.1%Accuracy (enemy spotted)
38.3%Spray accuracy
86.6%Counter-strafing
9.0°Preaim
579msReaction time
50.3%T opening success
56.4%CT opening success
0.64Enemies flashed / flash
4.4%Flash assists
7.68HE damage / grenade
6.88Flashes / match

Recommended for you

Spend your practice time on Nuke

Map knowledge compounds faster than mechanics — lineups and callouts you learn once keep paying out every time the map comes up.

22% win rate across 9 tracked games — your weakest map with enough games to be worth reading into.

Nuke callouts & strategy →Nuke grenade lineups →

Recent matches

MapScoreRatingHS%Date
inferno13–5-0.0337%11 Oct →
vertigo11–13-0.0023%9 Oct →
dust26–13-0.0017%9 Oct →
train13–70.0742%7 Oct →
train13–30.0235%7 Oct →
inferno13–50.0638%5 Oct →
mirage7–130.0023%1 Oct →
mirage13–00.0815%29 Sept →
nuke14–16-0.0018%29 Sept →
cache10–130.0320%24 Sept →
anubis13–60.0932%24 Sept →
nuke13–4-0.0129%23 Sept →
inferno13–70.0830%23 Sept →
dust213–100.0218%23 Sept →
ancient11–130.0839%23 Sept →
ancient13–70.0242%23 Sept →
mirage9–130.0433%23 Sept →
vertigo13–6-0.0224%23 Sept →
vertigo11–130.0235%23 Sept →
nuke11–130.0026%18 Sept →
nuke13–80.0231%13 Sept →
ancient13–100.0339%12 Sept →
dust27–13-0.0444%12 Sept →
inferno2–13-0.0229%12 Sept →
dust23–130.0225%11 Sept →
dust26–13-0.0526%11 Sept →
ancient4–130.0121%9 Sept →
anubis11–130.0830%9 Sept →
vertigo13–40.0520%9 Sept →
mirage13–80.0122%8 Sept →
dust213–110.0231%7 Sept →
ancient19–160.0218%6 Sept →
mirage4–13-0.0238%6 Sept →
mirage13–90.0330%5 Sept →
dust213–10-0.0033%3 Sept →
ancient7–130.0018%31 Aug →
ancient13–80.1424%30 Aug →
mirage4–13-0.0227%30 Aug →
mirage13–4-0.0418%29 Aug →
anubis8–130.0728%29 Aug →
mirage13–20.1826%29 Aug →
nuke3–130.0326%29 Aug →
anubis13–90.0915%29 Aug →
dust213–50.0430%28 Aug →
dust213–7-0.0021%28 Aug →
cache11–130.0522%26 Aug →
ancient13–10-0.0116%25 Aug →
mirage7–13-0.0131%25 Aug →
inferno9–60.0936%15 Aug →
inferno9–50.0314%15 Aug →
nuke4–130.0515%13 Aug →
dust213–40.1017%12 Aug →
nuke7–130.0827%12 Aug →
overpass13–60.0230%8 Aug →
mirage4–13-0.0731%6 Aug →
mirage2–13-0.006%5 Aug →
cache12–120.0121%3 Aug →
anubis13–110.0835%2 Aug →
mirage11–13-0.0022%1 Aug →
office8–13-0.0326%1 Aug →
dust25–13-0.0725%1 Aug →
mirage7–10.0430%1 Aug →
mirage8–13-0.0417%31 Jul →
dust211–130.0131%30 Jul →
dust27–13-0.0219%30 Jul →
vertigo13–100.1031%29 Jul →
mirage1–13-0.0611%29 Jul →
dust29–130.0224%28 Jul →
ancient19–160.0148%27 Jul →
dust213–80.0851%25 Jul →
cache7–130.0926%24 Jul →
inferno13–00.1142%20 Jul →
ancient13–70.0423%20 Jul →
anubis12–120.0242%18 Jul →
nuke5–13-0.0048%18 Jul →
dust211–13-0.0140%18 Jul →
dust26–13-0.0123%5 Jul →
ancient13–110.0321%4 Jul →
anubis13–8-0.0321%4 Jul →
mirage6–13-0.0227%3 Jul →
ancient13–60.0016%3 Jul →
nuke4–130.0531%30 Jun →
dust213–5-0.0431%29 Jun →
dust213–90.0927%29 Jun →
dust213–20.0718%29 Jun →
poseidon9–70.2529%27 Jun →
overpass7–13-0.0123%27 Jun →
inferno9–30.2429%27 Jun →
inferno12–12-0.0242%25 Jun →
mirage13–90.0730%25 Jun →
dust211–130.0030%25 Jun →
anubis13–20.1233%25 Jun →
dust213–30.1640%25 Jun →
dust213–40.0630%25 Jun →
dust29–13-0.0537%24 Jun →
dust213–60.0936%23 Jun →
ancient13–30.0825%23 Jun →
office4–13-0.0239%22 Jun →
mirage13–110.0128%22 Jun →
dust23–13-0.0330%20 Jun →

Match data via Leetify.

Recent teammates

Milestones

1,000 Matches
Compare this player with someone →Inventory value for this account →Where does this rating sit? Premier rank tiers →

This profile is built from public Steam data. If it is yours, you can remove it, or delete your CSDB account.