nexd

nexd — CS2 Stats

76561198840936839[U:1:880671111]Steam profile ↗✓ No bans

833Tracked matches52%Win rate2020Tracked since
3,348Hours in CS4Hrs last 2 wks
CSDB Rating6.4 SolidSupport
WingmanLegendary Eagle
Ladder ranks via Leetify

Rating over time

Premier CS Rating: 18,592 -74 20 Feb – 23 Jun · 14 days played
17,54020,756peak 20,75620 Feb23 Jun
20,875Peak Premier in tracked matches
2,029Highest Faceit ELO seen on CSDB
52Days played since 2025-07-10

Faceit ELO

  • At peak — 2,029
  • Next: 2,500 ELO at 2,500 — 471 to go
  • Reached: Level 10 · Level 9 · Level 8 · Level 7

Premier comes from this profile’s tracked match history, so it reaches back as far as those matches do.

Share this profile

CSDB.GGnexdPEAK ELO2,029csdb.gg/stats

The image is a snapshot; the link keeps updating. Nothing here is published anywhere — it is generated in your browser when you click.

Performance scores

Aim86
Positioning54
Utility61

0–100 skill scores via Leetify.

Recent form

STEADY45–50–5Last 10045%Win rateWLLLWWLWLW

Last 10 vs previous 10: +10pp win rate · −0.05 avg rating · −1.7pp headshot accuracy · +35ms reaction

Win rate +10pp across the last 10 against the 10 before — within the normal variation of a 10-match window (±20pp), so no real shift yet.

Last 5 · 10 · 20 matches

Last 5

  • 2–3 · 40% win rate
  • Avg rating -0.04
  • Avg headshot accuracy 26%
  • Avg reaction 594ms

Last 10

  • 5–5 · 50% win rate
  • Avg rating -0.01
  • Avg headshot accuracy 20%
  • Avg reaction 589ms

Last 20

  • 9–10–1 · 45% win rate
  • Avg rating 0.02
  • Avg headshot accuracy 21%
  • Avg reaction 572ms

Newest first, from the last 100 tracked matches. Each block is its own sample — one result moves a 5-match win rate by 20 points.

Player DNA

Primary style: Support — Utility contribution stands above the rest of this profile (+2.1 against its own average).

Aim8.6
Utility6.1
Positioning5.4
Opening Duels2.4
Clutch2.0

Sharp aimer

Style profile from tracked-match aggregates — how this player plays, not how good they are. Classification rules are deterministic and documented in code.

What this cannot see yet: which weapons you use — so CSDB cannot identify an AWPer, and no style here implies a rifle or a sniper. It also cannot see how often you take opening duels, only how often you win them, nor where you hold, so roles that depend on those (entry, lurk, anchor) are deliberately absent rather than guessed. All of it needs round-by-round demo data, which is the next thing being built.

Your pro match

Twistzz

Plays most like Twistzz 94% playstyle similarity

Most alike: aim profile, positioning profile.

Where you differ: lower utility contribution.

Similarity of playstyle shape across shared dimensions — it says how you play, not that you play at their level. Full comparison →

Strengths & areas to improve

Strengths

Aim. Aim score of 86 — the mechanical foundation is a clear strength.

Areas to improve

Preaim. Mechanical aim is strong but the crosshair sits 10.4° off target when enemies appear — placement, not flicking, is the bigger win available.

Positioning. Positioning trails aim by 32 points — deaths here waste a strong aim profile.

Reaction time. 574ms from enemy-visible to first shot leaves fights decided before they start — warmup routines move this number more than anything else.

Generated by fixed rules over this profile's own numbers — no model, no guessing; silent when the sample is too small to support a claim.

CSDB Rating breakdown

Aim8.6
Positioning5.4
Utility6.1
Mechanics7.1
Opening Duels1.8
Win Impact5.6

Composite 6.4/10 (Solid), a weighted mean of the bars with a small opposition adjustment (×1.00 for this rank band). Formula versioned (v1) and documented in code.

Trends

Match rating0.01−0.01
first ⅓ avg 0.02 → last ⅓ avg 0.01
Reaction time575ms−73ms
first ⅓ avg 648ms → last ⅓ avg 575ms
Headshot accuracy21.8%−1.0%
first ⅓ avg 22.8% → last ⅓ avg 21.8%

Rolling 5-match average across the last 100 tracked matches, oldest to newest. The delta compares the first third of the window with the last.

Personal bests

0.20Best match rating · 9–5 · inferno, 8 Sept →
52%Best headshot accuracy · 6–9 · nuke, 8 Sept →
438msFastest reaction time · 1–3 · dust2, 12 Jun →
13–1Biggest win · inferno, 23 Jun →

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Highlights

4Longest win streak
4–6In matches decided by ≤2 rounds
8Overtime games

Map breakdown

mirageBest map · 57% over 21dust2Weakest map · 32% over 25
MapGradePlayedRecordWin rateAvg rating
dust2D258–1732%-0.01
mirageA2112–957%0.01
infernoB189–950%0.03
ancientB158–753%0.01
anubisC83–538%0.04
nukeC52–340%-0.00
cache—42–250%0.02
overpass—31–233%-0.01
train—10–10%0.04

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Dust 2 is currently your weakest sufficiently-sampled map (32% over 25). Start with the 6 essential Dust 2 lineups, review the callouts, then spin up a practice server.

Lifetime stats

100,185Lifetime kills
0.91K/D
3,341Matches
47.6%Match win rate · Top 50% of tracked players
53.3%Headshot % · Top 25% of tracked players
23.4%Shot accuracy · Top 1% of tracked players
10,599MVPs
6,610Hours (in match)
2,858Bombs planted
2,050Bombs defused

Most-used weapons

AK-4741,525
AWP7,301
Knife1,623
MP91,553
FAMAS1,547

Lifetime map wins

9,300inferno
6,944dust2
2,172vertigo
1,088nuke
689train
101cbble
28office
28safehouse

Lifetime totals via Steam — visible because this profile's game details are public. Spans CS:GO and CS2.

Faceit stats

Combat

1,549Matches
51%Win rate
1.07Avg K/D
78.5ADR
44%Headshot %

Clutches & streaks

30%1v1 clutch win
21%1v2 clutch win
8Longest win streak

Recent Faceit resultsLWWWL

MapMatchesWin rateAvg K/DAvg kills
Mirage4450%1.0216.3
Dust23043%1.0415.5
Inferno2040%1.0216.5
Ancient1338%1.0416.9
Anubis967%1.2315.1
Cache978%1.3216.6
Overpass771%1.1415.3
Nuke757%1.0817.3

Faceit-match stats via the FACEIT Data API — a separate match pool from the sections above.

Skill profile

Aggregate performance across tracked matches — stats via Leetify. Percentile context against other CSDB-tracked players arrives as our own benchmark data accumulates.

21.6%Headshot accuracy
40.2%Accuracy (enemy spotted)
45.5%Spray accuracy
82.2%Counter-strafing
10.4°Preaim
574msReaction time
35.7%T opening success
38.9%CT opening success
0.65Enemies flashed / flash
9.9%Flash assists
9.28HE damage / grenade
10.09Flashes / match

Recommended for you

Chosen by comparing your tracked metrics against the thresholds we flag — the measurement behind each one is shown, so you can disagree with it.

  1. Advanced Mechanics

    You are losing most of the first duels you take on T side, which is usually a peeking and spacing problem, not aim.

    T opening duels 35.6949% — below the 40% mark we flag

Spend your practice time on Dust 2

Map knowledge compounds faster than mechanics — lineups and callouts you learn once keep paying out every time the map comes up.

32% win rate across 25 tracked games — your weakest map with enough games to be worth reading into.

Dust 2 callouts & strategy →Dust 2 grenade lineups →

Recent matches

MapScoreRatingHS%Date
cache13–30.0438%15 Oct →
mirage6–13-0.0827%15 Oct →
anubis5–13-0.0414%15 Oct →
mirage6–13-0.0726%30 Sept →
ancient11–3-0.0228%30 Sept →
dust213–10-0.0118%15 Aug →
mirage6–13-0.0312%15 Aug →
ancient13–70.0712%14 Aug →
mirage11–13-0.0115%11 Aug →
inferno13–100.0714%31 Jul →
mirage6–130.0637%31 Jul →
cache13–90.0215%30 Jul →
dust210–130.0726%25 Jul →
cache15–150.0324%12 Jul →
anubis12–160.0423%10 Jul →
nuke16–120.0118%10 Jul →
inferno13–110.0615%9 Jul →
inferno13–10.1018%23 Jun →
dust213–160.0617%21 Jun →
dust29–13-0.0228%21 Jun →
mirage13–80.0219%16 Jun →
dust21–3-0.030%12 Jun →
dust213–9-0.1115%12 Jun →
mirage13–50.0615%12 Jun →
mirage3–70.0140%11 Jun →
inferno13–90.0136%11 Jun →
dust213–50.0122%1 Jun →
inferno13–11-0.028%4 May →
cache11–130.0140%30 Apr →
ancient5–13-0.0731%27 Apr →
dust29–13-0.0429%27 Apr →
ancient16–14-0.0015%25 Apr →
inferno13–60.0827%25 Apr →
mirage13–90.0124%25 Apr →
dust24–13-0.0818%22 Apr →
inferno10–13-0.0236%22 Apr →
dust214–16-0.0519%7 Apr →
dust22–13-0.0725%30 Mar →
mirage13–30.0624%28 Mar →
mirage13–40.0425%23 Mar →
inferno5–13-0.0810%23 Mar →
inferno6–9-0.0823%12 Mar →
ancient7–13-0.0326%11 Mar →
dust213–80.0029%11 Mar →
mirage13–50.0518%10 Mar →
ancient13–50.0423%10 Mar →
inferno10–130.0127%10 Mar →
dust213–60.0516%10 Mar →
nuke11–130.0418%10 Mar →
inferno7–13-0.0331%28 Feb →
inferno13–70.0233%28 Feb →
inferno8–8-0.0123%28 Feb →
mirage13–70.1320%21 Feb →
nuke5–13-0.0427%21 Feb →
ancient13–80.0529%21 Feb →
ancient10–130.0633%21 Feb →
ancient8–130.0934%21 Feb →
dust20–13-0.0429%21 Feb →
mirage13–7-0.0324%21 Feb →
overpass13–11-0.0025%21 Feb →
ancient13–50.0116%20 Feb →
dust213–100.1339%20 Feb →
anubis8–130.0334%20 Feb →
ancient13–90.1120%20 Feb →
dust20–13-0.110%19 Feb →
dust26–130.0824%19 Feb →
ancient6–13-0.0422%15 Feb →
overpass2–130.0217%15 Feb →
mirage7–13-0.0623%9 Feb →
dust215–15-0.0416%4 Feb →
mirage13–6-0.0315%30 Jan →
anubis6–130.019%30 Jan →
anubis8–130.0716%27 Jan →
anubis13–60.0532%25 Jan →
dust211–00.0325%20 Jan →
dust26–13-0.0322%20 Jan →
dust211–130.0127%21 Oct →
dust21–13-0.1014%25 Sept →
ancient7–13-0.0325%13 Sept →
mirage3–13-0.0321%13 Sept →
inferno12–120.0617%12 Sept →
dust212–120.0635%12 Sept →
anubis13–60.1119%12 Sept →
train8–130.0413%12 Sept →
inferno5–90.0839%12 Sept →
inferno9–60.0927%8 Sept →
inferno9–50.2035%8 Sept →
nuke6–90.0252%8 Sept →
inferno7–13-0.0113%30 Aug →
overpass9–13-0.0418%30 Aug →
mirage13–9-0.0318%30 Aug →
nuke13–10-0.0434%30 Aug →
mirage13–70.0712%26 Aug →
dust22–130.0323%3 Aug →
ancient13–9-0.0322%26 Jul →
mirage13–16-0.0118%26 Jul →
mirage13–70.1020%23 Jul →
ancient9–13-0.0424%22 Jul →
dust213–20.0129%10 Jul →
anubis13–70.0421%10 Jul →

Match data via Leetify.

Recent teammates

Milestones

2K ELO500 Matches
Compare this player with someone →Inventory value for this account →Where does this rating sit? Premier rank tiers →

This profile is built from public Steam data. If it is yours, you can remove it, or delete your CSDB account.