Shaboingaboing — CS2 Stats
IQ76561198839208392[U:1:878942664]Steam profile ↗✓ No bans
How this compares with the same rank
Median values for Level 5 among CSDB-tracked players (n=918), from Valve's own lifetime stats. Aim, positioning and utility scores are deliberately not benchmarked here — those are a third-party provider's derived metrics, which CSDB does not store.
| Metric | This player | Level 5 median | Level 6 median | vs Level 6 |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Headshot rate | 38.0% | 44.2% | 44.9% | 6.8% short |
| Shot accuracy | 11.6% | 11.2% | 11.8% | meets |
| Kill/death ratio | 1.09 | 1.04 | 1.04 | above |
| Match win rate | 46.5% | 45.3% | 45.3% | above |
This profile matches the typical Level 6 player on 3 of 4 comparable metrics.
Widest gap: Headshot rate. That is the metric furthest from the Level 6 median in relative terms — not necessarily the one holding a rank back, which no statistic here can establish.
Share this profile
The image is a snapshot; the link keeps updating. Nothing here is published anywhere — it is generated in your browser when you click.
Performance scores
0–100 skill scores via Leetify.
Recent form
Last 10 vs previous 10: -10pp win rate · -0.03 avg rating
Player DNA
Primary style: Hybrid Rifler — Aim-led profile without a single dominant tendency.
Style profile from tracked-match aggregates — how this player plays, not how good they are. Classification rules are deterministic and documented in code.
Your pro match

Plays most like NiKo 85% playstyle similarity
Most alike: opening-fight frequency, utility contribution.
Where you differ: lower aim profile; lower positioning profile.
Similarity of playstyle shape across shared dimensions — it says how you play, not that you play at their level. Full comparison →
Strengths & areas to improve
Areas to improve
Positioning. Positioning trails aim by 35 points — deaths here waste a strong aim profile.
Reaction time. 585ms from enemy-visible to first shot leaves fights decided before they start — warmup routines move this number more than anything else.
Generated by fixed rules over this profile's own numbers — no model, no guessing; silent when the sample is too small to support a claim.
CSDB Rating breakdown
Composite 5.0/10 (Developing), a weighted mean of the bars with a small opposition adjustment (×1.00 for this rank band). Formula versioned (v1) and documented in code.
Trends
Rolling 5-match average across the last 100 tracked matches, oldest to newest. The delta compares the first third of the window with the last.
Highlights
Map breakdown
| Map | Grade | Played | Record | Win rate | Avg rating |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| C | 25 | 11–14 | 44% | 0.01 | |
| D | 17 | 5–12 | 29% | -0.03 | |
| S | 14 | 10–4 | 71% | 0.01 | |
| S | 13 | 9–4 | 69% | -0.01 | |
| B | 11 | 5–6 | 45% | -0.01 | |
| D | 7 | 0–7 | 0% | 0.00 | |
| A | 7 | 4–3 | 57% | 0.00 | |
| S | 6 | 4–2 | 67% | -0.03 |
Across the last 100 tracked matches.
Lifetime stats
Most-used weapons
Lifetime map wins
Lifetime totals via Steam — visible because this profile's game details are public. Spans CS:GO and CS2.
Faceit stats
Combat
Clutches & streaks
Recent Faceit resultsWLWWL
| Map | Matches | Win rate | Avg K/D | Avg kills |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Mirage | 20 | 60% | 1.15 | 18.5 |
| Dust2 | 14 | 50% | 0.99 | 14.7 |
| Ancient | 10 | 40% | 0.96 | 14.2 |
| Anubis | 9 | 33% | 0.82 | 15.1 |
| Nuke | 4 | 75% | 1.11 | 17.5 |
| Inferno | 2 | 100% | 0.70 | 9.5 |
| Vertigo | 1 | 100% | 1.78 | 16.0 |
Faceit-match stats via the FACEIT Data API — a separate match pool from the sections above.
Skill profile
Aggregate performance across tracked matches — stats via Leetify. Percentile context against other CSDB-tracked players arrives as our own benchmark data accumulates.
Recommended for you
Chosen by comparing your tracked metrics against the thresholds we flag — the measurement behind each one is shown, so you can disagree with it.
- Advanced Mechanics
You are losing most of the first duels you take on T side, which is usually a peeking and spacing problem, not aim.
T opening duels 26.7953% — below the 40% mark we flag
Map knowledge compounds faster than mechanics — lineups and callouts you learn once keep paying out every time the map comes up.
0% win rate across 7 tracked games — your weakest map with enough games to be worth reading into.
Recent matches
| Map | Score | Rating | HS% | Date | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 7–13 | -0.07 | 17% | 28 Aug → | ||
| 13–9 | -0.03 | 16% | 28 Aug → | ||
| 10–13 | -0.04 | 14% | 27 Aug → | ||
| 11–13 | 0.03 | 21% | 27 Aug → | ||
| 13–3 | -0.01 | 29% | 27 Aug → | ||
| 4–13 | -0.10 | 11% | 27 Aug → | ||
| 10–13 | 0.05 | 31% | 27 Aug → | ||
| 13–7 | 0.03 | 24% | 27 Aug → | ||
| 13–16 | -0.08 | 13% | 26 Aug → | ||
| 13–9 | 0.04 | 14% | 26 Aug → | ||
| 13–8 | 0.03 | 19% | 26 Aug → | ||
| 13–16 | -0.08 | 23% | 26 Aug → | ||
| 13–6 | 0.05 | 25% | 25 Aug → | ||
| 7–13 | -0.07 | 14% | 25 Aug → | ||
| 7–13 | -0.01 | 25% | 23 Aug → | ||
| 4–13 | 0.05 | 24% | 22 Aug → | ||
| 10–13 | 0.02 | 14% | 22 Aug → | ||
| 13–7 | 0.04 | 21% | 21 Aug → | ||
| 13–10 | 0.06 | 18% | 21 Aug → | ||
| 13–9 | -0.01 | 18% | 21 Aug → | ||
| 4–13 | -0.04 | 11% | 20 Aug → | ||
| 13–11 | 0.11 | 22% | 20 Aug → | ||
| 1–9 | -0.10 | 10% | 19 Aug → | ||
| 13–8 | 0.04 | 11% | 19 Aug → | ||
| 13–8 | -0.02 | 10% | 19 Aug → | ||
| 6–13 | 0.01 | 13% | 11 Aug → | ||
| 6–13 | -0.01 | 18% | 11 Aug → | ||
| 11–13 | 0.08 | 19% | 9 May → | ||
| 6–13 | -0.00 | 16% | 9 May → | ||
| 15–15 | -0.02 | 14% | 9 May → | ||
| 10–13 | -0.02 | 21% | 8 May → | ||
| 5–13 | -0.06 | 35% | 8 May → | ||
| 13–11 | -0.02 | 20% | 8 May → | ||
| 13–9 | 0.04 | 15% | 7 May → | ||
| 13–5 | -0.02 | 17% | 7 May → | ||
| 6–13 | -0.03 | 18% | 6 May → | ||
| 10–13 | -0.04 | 14% | 5 May → | ||
| 9–13 | -0.03 | 18% | 5 May → | ||
| 6–13 | -0.07 | 18% | 5 May → | ||
| 13–3 | 0.03 | 14% | 4 May → | ||
| 13–11 | -0.07 | 9% | 2 May → | ||
| 13–5 | 0.00 | 11% | 2 May → | ||
| 16–13 | 0.03 | 13% | 2 May → | ||
| 9–13 | -0.06 | 15% | 2 May → | ||
| 9–13 | -0.06 | 8% | 2 May → | ||
| 13–5 | 0.12 | 23% | 1 May → | ||
| 4–13 | -0.04 | 19% | 1 May → | ||
| 13–4 | 0.03 | 19% | 30 Apr → | ||
| 13–9 | -0.07 | 16% | 30 Apr → | ||
| 13–8 | 0.08 | 13% | 30 Apr → | ||
| 13–11 | -0.03 | 10% | 30 Apr → | ||
| 4–13 | -0.05 | 19% | 30 Apr → | ||
| 10–13 | -0.02 | 18% | 29 Apr → | ||
| 13–10 | -0.00 | 15% | 29 Apr → | ||
| 13–11 | -0.04 | 9% | 29 Apr → | ||
| 8–13 | -0.06 | 15% | 28 Apr → | ||
| 11–13 | -0.01 | 16% | 28 Apr → | ||
| 9–13 | 0.08 | 20% | 28 Apr → | ||
| 11–13 | -0.00 | 24% | 28 Apr → | ||
| 15–15 | -0.00 | 22% | 28 Apr → | ||
| 13–7 | -0.00 | 14% | 27 Apr → | ||
| 8–13 | 0.04 | 39% | 27 Apr → | ||
| 13–2 | -0.03 | 16% | 26 Apr → | ||
| 13–8 | 0.02 | 16% | 26 Apr → | ||
| 13–8 | 0.04 | 18% | 26 Apr → | ||
| 13–5 | 0.03 | 12% | 26 Apr → | ||
| 4–13 | -0.06 | 20% | 24 Apr → | ||
| 9–13 | -0.06 | 20% | 24 Apr → | ||
| 13–4 | 0.03 | 19% | 24 Apr → | ||
| 10–13 | -0.00 | 10% | 22 Apr → | ||
| 13–9 | 0.01 | 22% | 22 Apr → | ||
| 12–16 | 0.01 | 22% | 21 Apr → | ||
| 9–13 | -0.08 | 24% | 20 Apr → | ||
| 13–3 | 0.09 | 19% | 20 Apr → | ||
| 10–13 | -0.06 | 20% | 19 Apr → | ||
| 13–5 | 0.11 | 19% | 19 Apr → | ||
| 3–13 | -0.07 | 5% | 18 Apr → | ||
| 13–8 | -0.03 | 9% | 18 Apr → | ||
| 13–8 | -0.04 | 18% | 18 Apr → | ||
| 10–13 | -0.02 | 11% | 18 Apr → | ||
| 13–5 | -0.05 | 20% | 18 Apr → | ||
| 10–13 | 0.10 | 12% | 18 Apr → | ||
| 13–5 | -0.05 | 20% | 17 Apr → | ||
| 16–14 | 0.06 | 16% | 17 Apr → | ||
| 11–13 | -0.02 | 10% | 17 Apr → | ||
| 13–16 | 0.01 | 13% | 17 Apr → | ||
| 13–8 | -0.03 | 19% | 17 Apr → | ||
| 13–10 | 0.02 | 16% | 17 Apr → | ||
| 13–8 | -0.06 | 17% | 16 Apr → | ||
| 15–15 | -0.02 | 23% | 16 Apr → | ||
| 9–13 | 0.02 | 13% | 15 Apr → | ||
| 13–5 | -0.02 | 22% | 15 Apr → | ||
| 10–13 | -0.04 | 10% | 15 Apr → | ||
| 7–13 | -0.04 | 24% | 15 Apr → | ||
| 2–13 | -0.02 | 12% | 14 Apr → | ||
| 3–13 | -0.05 | 13% | 14 Apr → | ||
| 13–4 | 0.07 | 13% | 14 Apr → | ||
| 13–8 | 0.07 | 18% | 14 Apr → | ||
| 13–3 | 0.07 | 11% | 14 Apr → | ||
| 16–14 | 0.11 | 17% | 13 Apr → |
Match data via Leetify.