F(a)xzerh <3

F(a)xzerh <3 — CS2 Stats

AR76561198835633492[U:1:875367764]Steam profile ↗✓ No bans

1,667Tracked matches37%Win rate2021Tracked since
1,792Hours in CS
CSDB Rating6.0 SolidSupport
Premier CS Rating16,073Purple band · top ~24.1% of ranked players (population est.)
WingmanGold Nova II
Ladder ranks via Leetify

What changed since last observed

CSDB last observed this profile on 3 Sep 2026 (17 days ago). Ranks are recorded once per day this page is viewed.

No change since then. Play, then come back: the next observation lands here.

Track this profile

CSDB reads this profile's Premier rating from its tracked match history, and records Faceit ELO once on every day the page is viewed. 53 days played since 24 Mar 2026. Come back after the next session and the change shows above.

Is this you? Sign in with Steam to claim it and connect match tracking →

Rating over time

Premier CS Rating: 16,073 -7,869 24 Mar3 Sept · 36 days played
15,60625,825peak 25,82524 Mar3 Sept
25,825Peak Premier in tracked matches
53Days played since 2026-03-24

Premier CS Rating

  • 9,752 below peak (25,825)
  • -5,366 over 90 days
  • Next: Pink band at 20,000 3,927 to go
  • Reached: Red band · Pink band · Purple band · Blue band

Premier comes from this profile’s tracked match history, so it reaches back as far as those matches do.

How this compares with the same rank

Median values for Purple band among CSDB-tracked players (n=36,319), from Valve's own lifetime stats. Aim, positioning and utility scores are deliberately not benchmarked here — those are a third-party provider's derived metrics, which CSDB does not store.

MetricThis playerPurple band medianPink band medianvs Pink band
Headshot rate41.3%44.3%46.9%5.7% short
Shot accuracy11.4%11.8%13.0%1.5% short
Kill/death ratio1.121.031.08above
Match win rate41.9%45.2%46.7%4.8% short

This profile matches the typical Pink band player on 1 of 4 comparable metrics.

Widest gap: Headshot rate. That is the metric furthest from the Pink band median in relative terms — not necessarily the one holding a rank back, which no statistic here can establish.

Share this profile

CSDB.GGF(a)xzerh <3PREMIER16,073 · Purple bandcsdb.gg/stats

The image is a snapshot; the link keeps updating. Nothing here is published anywhere — it is generated in your browser when you click.

Performance scores

Aim86
Positioning51
Utility64

0–100 skill scores via Leetify.

Recent form

COLD43534Last 10043%Win rateLLWLLLWLWL

Last 10 vs previous 10: −20pp win rate · +0.00 avg rating · −3.0pp headshot accuracy · +10ms reaction

Win rate down 20pp across the last 10 against the 10 before — more than a 10-match window's normal noise (±20pp). Average match rating moved the other way (+0.00), so results shifted more than performance did.

Last 5 · 10 · 20 matches

Last 5

  • 14 · 20% win rate
  • Avg rating 0.01
  • Avg headshot accuracy 14%
  • Avg reaction 524ms

Last 10

  • 37 · 30% win rate
  • Avg rating -0.01
  • Avg headshot accuracy 16%
  • Avg reaction 577ms

Last 20

  • 812 · 40% win rate
  • Avg rating -0.01
  • Avg headshot accuracy 17%
  • Avg reaction 572ms

Newest first, from the last 100 tracked matches. Each block is its own sample — one result moves a 5-match win rate by 20 points.

Player DNA

Primary style: SupportUtility contribution stands above the rest of this profile (+1.5 against its own average).

Aim8.6
Utility6.4
Positioning5.1
Opening Duels4.4
Clutch3.8

Sharp aimerEffective flashes

Style profile from tracked-match aggregates — how this player plays, not how good they are. Classification rules are deterministic and documented in code.

What this cannot see yet: which weapons you use — so CSDB cannot identify an AWPer, and no style here implies a rifle or a sniper. It also cannot see how often you take opening duels, only how often you win them, nor where you hold, so roles that depend on those (entry, lurk, anchor) are deliberately absent rather than guessed. All of it needs round-by-round demo data, which is the next thing being built.

Your pro match

NiKo

Plays most like NiKo 88% playstyle similarity

Most alike: utility contribution, opening-duel success.

Where you differ: lower positioning profile.

Similarity of playstyle shape across shared dimensions — it says how you play, not that you play at their level. Full comparison →

Strengths & areas to improve

Strengths

Aim. Aim score of 86 — the mechanical foundation is a clear strength.

Flashes. 0.77 enemies blinded per flash — utility that consistently lands.

Areas to improve

Positioning. Positioning trails aim by 35 points — deaths here waste a strong aim profile.

T-side openings. Opening success drops from 52% on CT to 33% on T — the same duels are being taken with worse setups on the attacking side.

Reaction time. 570ms from enemy-visible to first shot leaves fights decided before they start — warmup routines move this number more than anything else.

Generated by fixed rules over this profile's own numbers — no model, no guessing; silent when the sample is too small to support a claim.

CSDB Rating breakdown

Aim8.6
Positioning5.1
Utility6.4
Mechanics7.4
Opening Duels3.1
Win Impact0.6

Composite 6.0/10 (Solid), a weighted mean of the bars with a small opposition adjustment (×1.00 for this rank band). Formula versioned (v1) and documented in code.

Trends

Match rating-0.00+0.01
first ⅓ avg -0.01 → last ⅓ avg -0.00
Reaction time570ms−37ms
first ⅓ avg 607ms → last ⅓ avg 570ms
Headshot accuracy16.3%+2.4%
first ⅓ avg 13.9% → last ⅓ avg 16.3%

Rolling 5-match average across the last 100 tracked matches, oldest to newest. The delta compares the first third of the window with the last.

Personal bests

0.17Best match rating · 9–7 · overpass, 12 May
31%Best headshot accuracy · 8–1 · dust2, 12 Apr
391msFastest reaction time · 1–7 · cache, 11 Aug
13–2Biggest win · nuke, 16 May

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Highlights

6Longest win streak
L2Current streak
67In matches decided by ≤2 rounds
9Overtime games

Map breakdown

mirageBest map · 61% over 23anubisWeakest map · 19% over 16
MapGradePlayedRecordWin rateAvg rating
dust2C30111937%0.00
mirageA2314961%0.01
anubisD1631319%-0.00
nukeB126650%-0.01
ancientA116555%0.01
infernoC52340%0.03
cache2020%-0.03
overpass110100%0.17

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Anubis is currently your weakest sufficiently-sampled map (19% over 16). Start with the 6 essential Anubis lineups, review the callouts, then spin up a practice server.

Lifetime stats

98,722Lifetime kills
1.12K/D · Top 50% of Purple band
5,291Matches
41.9%Match win rate
41.3%Headshot %
11.4%Shot accuracy
12,117MVPs
1,792Hours (in match)
3,801Bombs planted
1,312Bombs defused

Most-used weapons

AK-4728,502
AWP10,885
SSG 083,827
MAC-101,964
MP91,921

Lifetime map wins

12,265dust2
5,279inferno
2,496nuke
697vertigo
406lake
401train
324cbble
103ar_shoots

Lifetime totals via Steam — visible because this profile's game details are public. Spans CS:GO and CS2.

Faceit stats

Combat

191Matches
54%Win rate
0.95Avg K/D
80.9ADR
37%Headshot %

Clutches & streaks

39%1v1 clutch win
21%1v2 clutch win
7Longest win streak

Recent Faceit resultsLLLWL

MapMatchesWin rateAvg K/DAvg kills
Dust25956%0.9815.7
Mirage4957%0.9315.4
Anubis2556%1.0717.0
Nuke2050%0.8213.8
Ancient1567%0.9816.9
Inferno838%0.9615.3
Overpass560%1.1517.2
Train425%0.7311.8

Faceit-match stats via the FACEIT Data API — a separate match pool from the sections above.

Skill profile

Aggregate performance across tracked matches — stats via Leetify. Percentile context against other CSDB-tracked players arrives as our own benchmark data accumulates.

16.9%Headshot accuracy
41.1%Accuracy (enemy spotted)
42.5%Spray accuracy
83.4%Counter-strafing
8.5°Preaim
570msReaction time
32.7%T opening success
52.3%CT opening success
0.77Enemies flashed / flash
11.1%Flash assists
6.81HE damage / grenade
12.11Flashes / match

Recommended for you

Chosen by comparing your tracked metrics against the thresholds we flag — the measurement behind each one is shown, so you can disagree with it.

  1. Advanced Mechanics

    You are losing most of the first duels you take on T side, which is usually a peeking and spacing problem, not aim.

    T opening duels 32.7228% — below the 40% mark we flag

Spend your practice time on Anubis

Map knowledge compounds faster than mechanics — lineups and callouts you learn once keep paying out every time the map comes up.

19% win rate across 16 tracked games — your weakest map with enough games to be worth reading into.

Anubis callouts & strategyAnubis grenade lineups

Recent matches

MapScoreRatingHS%Date
dust210–13-0.0413%9 Sept
anubis6–13-0.0313%4 Sept
mirage13–90.1017%3 Sept
cache8–13-0.036%3 Sept
dust28–130.0321%31 Aug
mirage4–130.0426%31 Aug
dust213–3-0.0325%30 Aug
dust211–13-0.120%29 Aug
mirage13–40.0523%28 Aug
ancient8–13-0.0811%28 Aug
mirage13–5-0.0614%28 Aug
dust212–16-0.0122%27 Aug
mirage13–90.008%27 Aug
mirage13–100.0722%26 Aug
mirage16–14-0.0217%26 Aug
mirage10–13-0.0219%25 Aug
ancient13–90.047%21 Aug
dust29–13-0.0319%21 Aug
dust25–13-0.0326%14 Aug
ancient8–13-0.0630%13 Aug
dust213–40.0517%11 Aug
mirage8–13-0.0021%11 Aug
cache1–7-0.040%11 Aug
anubis8–13-0.0316%11 Aug
dust21–13-0.1011%31 Jul
dust213–70.0925%31 Jul
dust27–130.0321%28 Jul
anubis11–130.1215%24 Jul
ancient13–30.0712%24 Jul
dust27–13-0.0324%21 Jul
nuke10–130.0312%20 Jul
nuke5–130.0115%1 Jul
nuke13–8-0.0310%17 Jun
nuke13–30.0711%12 Jun
mirage13–70.1011%5 Jun
ancient13–70.0312%5 Jun
nuke3–13-0.039%5 Jun
mirage13–10-0.0117%28 May
mirage13–70.0020%28 May
nuke13–16-0.0914%26 May
anubis11–130.0619%26 May
anubis13–100.1014%20 May
dust213–110.0116%20 May
inferno7–130.0521%16 May
nuke13–2-0.0313%16 May
ancient11–130.0215%16 May
mirage13–16-0.0323%16 May
anubis9–13-0.0410%13 May
overpass9–70.1710%12 May
dust210–13-0.0714%12 May
anubis6–13-0.073%4 May
anubis13–90.019%4 May
dust210–130.1112%30 Apr
ancient16–140.0523%27 Apr
inferno12–120.0521%25 Apr
inferno5–90.0123%25 Apr
dust26–13-0.0112%25 Apr
anubis10–13-0.017%24 Apr
dust28–13-0.0424%24 Apr
nuke13–7-0.0215%24 Apr
mirage13–9-0.0322%24 Apr
inferno9–50.0717%24 Apr
mirage13–80.0516%23 Apr
mirage8–130.0815%22 Apr
anubis5–13-0.0221%22 Apr
dust215–150.0223%21 Apr
dust213–50.0815%19 Apr
dust26–130.0118%12 Apr
dust28–10.0131%12 Apr
nuke11–13-0.0511%10 Apr
ancient1–100.028%9 Apr
mirage6–13-0.044%9 Apr
dust213–10-0.038%9 Apr
anubis5–130.0114%7 Apr
anubis15–150.0014%5 Apr
ancient13–11-0.0510%5 Apr
dust28–130.0123%5 Apr
mirage1–13-0.0813%5 Apr
mirage5–13-0.0114%4 Apr
dust213–7-0.018%4 Apr
anubis9–13-0.0713%1 Apr
mirage5–13-0.0315%1 Apr
dust213–60.0524%31 Mar
nuke15–15-0.0113%31 Mar
dust27–13-0.0021%30 Mar
mirage13–80.0212%29 Mar
nuke13–50.0411%29 Mar
inferno13–9-0.0615%29 Mar
dust213–60.059%29 Mar
mirage13–10-0.0424%29 Mar
dust213–80.0425%28 Mar
anubis11–13-0.0815%28 Mar
nuke13–11-0.006%27 Mar
anubis13–30.0811%27 Mar
mirage13–60.027%26 Mar
dust27–130.0116%26 Mar
ancient13–160.0112%25 Mar
dust211–130.0118%24 Mar
anubis8–13-0.073%24 Mar
ancient13–70.0216%24 Mar

Match data via Leetify.

Recent teammates

Milestones

1,000 Matches
Compare this player with someone →Inventory value for this account →Where does this rating sit? Premier rank tiers →