Jennnsi

Jennnsi — CS2 Stats

76561198823635001[U:1:863369273]Steam profile ↗✓ No bans

982Tracked matches33%Win rate2020Tracked since
CSDB Rating3.1 LearningSupport
Premier CS Rating12,093Blue band · top ~43.8% of ranked players (population est.)
FaceitLevel 3Top 90.6% of ranked FACEIT players
Ladder ranks via Leetify

What changed since last observed

CSDB last observed this profile on 23 Oct 2026 (13 days ago). Ranks are recorded once per day this page is viewed.

No change since then — still 982 tracked matches. Play, then come back: the next observation lands here.

Rating over time

Premier CS Rating: 12,093 +4,102 20 Mar – 23 Oct · 30 days played
7,99114,912peak 14,91220 Mar23 Oct
14,912Peak Premier in tracked matches
32Days played since 2026-03-20

Premier CS Rating

  • 2,819 below peak (14,912)
  • Next: Purple band at 15,000 — 2,907 to go
  • Reached: Blue band · Light Blue band
  • Blue band first seen 2026-10-23
  • Light Blue band first seen 2026-10-23

Premier comes from this profile’s tracked match history, so it reaches back as far as those matches do.

Share this profile

CSDB.GGJennnsiFACEITLevel 3STANDINGTop 90.6% of rankedPREMIER12,093 · Blue bandcsdb.gg/stats

The image is a snapshot; the link keeps updating. Nothing here is published anywhere — it is generated in your browser when you click.

Performance scores

Aim32
Positioning43
Utility57

0–100 skill scores via Leetify.

Recent form

STEADY44–54–2Last 10044%Win rateWWWLLWLLLW

Last 10 vs previous 10: +40pp win rate · +0.03 avg rating · −4.2pp headshot accuracy · −20ms reaction

Win rate up 40pp across the last 10 against the 10 before — more than a 10-match window's normal noise (±20pp).

Last 5 · 10 · 20 matches

Last 5

  • 3–2 · 60% win rate
  • Avg rating -0.01
  • Avg headshot accuracy 15%
  • Avg reaction 734ms

Last 10

  • 5–5 · 50% win rate
  • Avg rating -0.03
  • Avg headshot accuracy 13%
  • Avg reaction 729ms

Last 20

  • 6–14 · 30% win rate
  • Avg rating -0.04
  • Avg headshot accuracy 16%
  • Avg reaction 739ms

Newest first, from the last 100 tracked matches. Each block is its own sample — one result moves a 5-match win rate by 20 points.

Player DNA

Primary style: Support — Utility contribution stands above the rest of this profile (+2.5 against its own average).

Aim3.2
Utility5.7
Positioning4.3
Opening Duels1.2
Clutch1.8

Style profile from tracked-match aggregates — how this player plays, not how good they are. Classification rules are deterministic and documented in code.

What this cannot see yet: which weapons you use — so CSDB cannot identify an AWPer, and no style here implies a rifle or a sniper. It also cannot see how often you take opening duels, only how often you win them, nor where you hold, so roles that depend on those (entry, lurk, anchor) are deliberately absent rather than guessed. All of it needs round-by-round demo data, which is the next thing being built.

Your pro match

ZywOo

Plays most like ZywOo 63% playstyle similarity

Most alike: utility contribution, positioning profile.

Where you differ: lower opening-duel success; lower aim profile.

Similarity of playstyle shape across shared dimensions — it says how you play, not that you play at their level. Full comparison →

Strengths & areas to improve

Areas to improve

T-side openings. Opening success drops from 41% on CT to 24% on T — the same duels are being taken with worse setups on the attacking side.

Reaction time. 732ms from enemy-visible to first shot leaves fights decided before they start — warmup routines move this number more than anything else.

Counter-strafing. Only 65% of shots are taken properly stopped — moving-shot inaccuracy is quietly taxing every duel.

Generated by fixed rules over this profile's own numbers — no model, no guessing; silent when the sample is too small to support a claim.

CSDB Rating breakdown

Aim3.2
Positioning4.3
Utility5.7
Mechanics3.4
Opening Duels1.3
Win Impact0.0

Composite 3.1/10 (Learning), a weighted mean of the bars with a small opposition adjustment (×0.95 for this rank band). Formula versioned (v1) and documented in code.

Trends

Match rating-0.04−0.00
first ⅓ avg -0.04 → last ⅓ avg -0.04
Reaction time716ms+26ms
first ⅓ avg 691ms → last ⅓ avg 716ms
Headshot accuracy15.6%+1.4%
first ⅓ avg 14.2% → last ⅓ avg 15.6%

Rolling 5-match average across the last 100 tracked matches, oldest to newest. The delta compares the first third of the window with the last.

Personal bests

0.09Best match rating · 13–1 · nuke, 29 Jun →
30%Best headshot accuracy · 8–13 · ancient, 18 Apr →
469msFastest reaction time · 4–13 · ancient, 7 Apr →
13–1Biggest win · nuke, 29 Jun →

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Highlights

4Longest win streak
W3Current streak
3–7In matches decided by ≤2 rounds
10Overtime games

Map breakdown

nukeBest map · 57% over 28dust2Weakest map · 24% over 17
MapGradePlayedRecordWin rateAvg rating
nukeA2816–1257%-0.03
ancientC208–1240%-0.05
dust2D174–1324%-0.03
overpassB126–650%-0.04
infernoD103–730%-0.05
anubisA74–357%-0.02
mirage—31–233%-0.01
cache—22–0100%-0.07
vertigo—10–10%-0.06

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Dust 2 is currently your weakest sufficiently-sampled map (24% over 17). Start with the 6 essential Dust 2 lineups, review the callouts, then spin up a practice server.

Faceit stats

Combat

744Matches
49%Win rate
0.66Avg K/D
56.8ADR
34%Headshot %

Clutches & streaks

29%1v1 clutch win
8%1v2 clutch win
9Longest win streak

Recent Faceit resultsWWLWL

MapMatchesWin rateAvg K/DAvg kills
Ancient1030%0.549.6
Nuke1040%0.6011.4
Overpass450%0.4511.0
Dust220%0.408.0
Inferno2100%0.6911.5
Train250%0.605.5
Anubis2100%0.569.5

Faceit-match stats via the FACEIT Data API — a separate match pool from the sections above.

Skill profile

Aggregate performance across tracked matches — stats via Leetify. Percentile context against other CSDB-tracked players arrives as our own benchmark data accumulates.

16.1%Headshot accuracy
32.3%Accuracy (enemy spotted)
36.6%Spray accuracy
65.5%Counter-strafing
11.9°Preaim
732msReaction time
23.9%T opening success
40.6%CT opening success
0.59Enemies flashed / flash
5.4%Flash assists
8.55HE damage / grenade
6.81Flashes / match

Recommended for you

Chosen by comparing your tracked metrics against the thresholds we flag — the measurement behind each one is shown, so you can disagree with it.

  1. Best CS2 Settings

    Slow first shots are as often a setup problem as a reflex one — framerate, sensitivity and crosshair visibility all move this number.

    Reaction time 732.0485ms — above the 700ms mark we flag

    Aim Training →
  2. Advanced Mechanics

    You are losing most of the first duels you take on T side, which is usually a peeking and spacing problem, not aim.

    T opening duels 23.9072% — below the 40% mark we flag

Spend your practice time on Dust 2

Map knowledge compounds faster than mechanics — lineups and callouts you learn once keep paying out every time the map comes up.

24% win rate across 17 tracked games — your weakest map with enough games to be worth reading into.

Dust 2 callouts & strategy →Dust 2 grenade lineups →

Recent matches

MapScoreRatingHS%Date
cache13–9-0.105%5 Jul →
nuke16–130.0623%29 Jun →
nuke13–10.0920%29 Jun →
inferno6–13-0.0119%16 Jun →
vertigo6–13-0.066%7 Jun →
anubis13–8-0.0216%29 May →
inferno11–13-0.0313%29 May →
dust25–13-0.0821%29 May →
nuke10–13-0.067%21 May →
cache13–8-0.046%21 May →
nuke1–13-0.1213%21 May →
dust24–13-0.0218%21 May →
overpass10–13-0.0624%18 May →
nuke11–13-0.0326%18 May →
anubis13–4-0.0217%12 May →
nuke6–13-0.0713%12 May →
overpass11–13-0.0710%7 May →
nuke5–13-0.0710%6 May →
ancient10–13-0.0726%6 May →
dust28–13-0.0619%5 May →
ancient9–13-0.0212%5 May →
inferno13–11-0.0825%4 May →
dust211–130.0213%4 May →
nuke13–110.0026%4 May →
dust213–4-0.0221%3 May →
mirage5–130.0120%1 May →
ancient3–13-0.097%1 May →
dust22–130.0024%1 May →
anubis16–12-0.0811%28 Apr →
inferno7–13-0.0612%27 Apr →
ancient9–13-0.0619%27 Apr →
nuke13–7-0.016%21 Apr →
anubis13–80.019%21 Apr →
ancient13–9-0.028%21 Apr →
anubis9–130.0217%21 Apr →
nuke6–13-0.0712%21 Apr →
ancient11–13-0.049%20 Apr →
nuke13–7-0.0212%20 Apr →
nuke13–9-0.067%20 Apr →
overpass13–5-0.088%20 Apr →
nuke15–15-0.0213%20 Apr →
overpass13–9-0.0417%20 Apr →
inferno13–10-0.0416%19 Apr →
ancient16–14-0.0511%18 Apr →
mirage9–130.0123%18 Apr →
overpass10–13-0.0323%18 Apr →
anubis4–130.007%18 Apr →
nuke3–13-0.0913%18 Apr →
mirage16–13-0.056%18 Apr →
ancient9–13-0.0915%18 Apr →
nuke13–7-0.029%18 Apr →
ancient8–13-0.0530%18 Apr →
nuke13–10-0.016%18 Apr →
ancient9–13-0.086%16 Apr →
overpass13–80.0312%9 Apr →
nuke13–4-0.089%9 Apr →
dust213–9-0.0115%9 Apr →
overpass7–13-0.099%9 Apr →
nuke13–4-0.0618%9 Apr →
nuke13–90.0613%8 Apr →
inferno5–13-0.0219%8 Apr →
overpass13–80.0110%8 Apr →
dust215–15-0.0419%7 Apr →
ancient4–13-0.0914%7 Apr →
overpass16–12-0.046%7 Apr →
anubis10–13-0.0219%6 Apr →
dust28–13-0.0612%6 Apr →
nuke11–13-0.0310%6 Apr →
overpass13–16-0.0320%4 Apr →
dust28–13-0.0324%4 Apr →
inferno13–5-0.003%4 Apr →
dust213–9-0.078%3 Apr →
ancient13–7-0.0410%2 Apr →
nuke13–5-0.0212%2 Apr →
inferno10–130.0318%2 Apr →
ancient13–30.0119%2 Apr →
ancient13–2-0.089%2 Apr →
inferno4–13-0.1211%2 Apr →
overpass12–16-0.0813%2 Apr →
nuke13–70.0221%2 Apr →
ancient13–7-0.0812%2 Apr →
nuke16–13-0.027%2 Apr →
ancient5–13-0.0126%1 Apr →
nuke7–13-0.079%1 Apr →
nuke13–6-0.027%1 Apr →
dust213–100.0314%1 Apr →
nuke13–4-0.018%31 Mar →
ancient9–130.0124%31 Mar →
dust27–13-0.0221%31 Mar →
dust28–13-0.0220%30 Mar →
overpass13–90.0221%30 Mar →
ancient13–4-0.049%30 Mar →
nuke6–13-0.098%30 Mar →
dust24–13-0.0728%20 Mar →
inferno5–13-0.1121%20 Mar →
ancient7–13-0.116%20 Mar →
dust27–13-0.0211%20 Mar →
nuke4–13-0.045%20 Mar →
dust211–13-0.0612%20 Mar →
ancient13–100.0025%20 Mar →

Match data via Leetify.

Recent teammates

Milestones

500 Matches
Compare this player with someone →Inventory value for this account →Where does this rating sit? Premier rank tiers →

This profile is built from public Steam data. If it is yours, you can remove it, or delete your CSDB account.