MASA — CS2 Stats

76561197960572136[U:1:306408]✓ No bans

566Tracked matches53%Win rate2020Tracked since
CSDB Rating5.4 DevelopingSupport
Premier CS Rating18,239Purple band · top ~15.5% of ranked players (population est.)
CSDB Leaderboard#22760 of 47563 tracked
FaceitLevel 7 · 1,403 ELOTop 42.3% of ranked FACEIT players
WingmanLegendary Eagle
Ladder ranks via Leetify

Share this profile

CSDB.GGMASAFACEITLevel 7 · 1,403 ELOSTANDINGTop 42.3% of rankedPREMIER18,239 · Purple bandcsdb.gg/stats

The image is a snapshot; the link keeps updating. Nothing here is published anywhere — it is generated in your browser when you click.

Performance scores

Aim71
Positioning34
Utility70

0–100 skill scores via Leetify.

Recent form

HOT50473Last 10050%Win rateLLWWWWWLWW

Last 10 vs previous 10: +20pp win rate · -0.03 avg rating

Player DNA

Primary style: SupportUtility contribution leads the profile while opening activity stays low.

Aim7.1
Aggression3.5
Utility7.0
Positioning3.4
Opening Duels0.0
Clutch5.6

Effective flashes

Style profile from tracked-match aggregates — how this player plays, not how good they are. Classification rules are deterministic and documented in code.

Your pro match

Twistzz

Plays most like Twistzz 80% playstyle similarity

Most alike: utility contribution, positioning profile.

Where you differ: lower aim profile; lower opening-fight frequency.

Similarity of playstyle shape across shared dimensions — it says how you play, not that you play at their level. Full comparison →

Strengths & areas to improve

Areas to improve

Positioning. Positioning trails aim by 37 points — deaths here waste a strong aim profile.

Reaction time. 584ms from enemy-visible to first shot leaves fights decided before they start — warmup routines move this number more than anything else.

Generated by fixed rules over this profile's own numbers — no model, no guessing; silent when the sample is too small to support a claim.

CSDB Rating breakdown

Aim7.1
Positioning3.4
Utility7.0
Mechanics6.1
Opening Duels0.3
Win Impact6.1

Composite 5.4/10 (Developing), a weighted mean of the bars with a small opposition adjustment (×1.00 for this rank band). Formula versioned (v1) and documented in code.

Trends

Match rating-0.02+0.00
first ⅓ avg -0.02 → last ⅓ avg -0.02
Reaction time587ms−115ms
first ⅓ avg 702ms → last ⅓ avg 587ms
Headshot accuracy20.6%+3.3%
first ⅓ avg 17.3% → last ⅓ avg 20.6%

Rolling 5-match average across the last 100 tracked matches, oldest to newest. The delta compares the first third of the window with the last.

Highlights

0.10Best rating — inferno 13–4
131Biggest win — dust2
5Longest win streak
L2Current streak
116In matches decided by ≤2 rounds
7Overtime games

Map breakdown

cacheBest map · 65% over 20anubisWeakest map · 25% over 8
MapGradePlayedRecordWin rateAvg rating
cacheS2013765%-0.01
dust2B20101050%-0.03
mirageB189950%-0.02
infernoB126650%-0.02
ancientC125742%-0.03
anubisD82625%-0.06
nukeC73443%-0.01
train21150%0.01
overpass110100%-0.01

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Anubis is currently your weakest sufficiently-sampled map (25% over 8). Start with the 6 essential Anubis lineups, review the callouts, then spin up a practice server.

Faceit stats

Combat

227Matches
49%Win rate
1.13Avg K/D
67.5ADR
42%Headshot %

Clutches & streaks

48%1v1 clutch win
20%1v2 clutch win
6Longest win streak

Recent Faceit resultsLLLWW

MapMatchesWin rateAvg K/DAvg kills
Ancient838%0.7911.6
Dust2743%0.6410.0
Nuke667%0.8213.5
Mirage425%0.7815.5
Train250%1.1415.5
Anubis20%0.6915.5
Overpass10%0.538.0
Inferno10%0.8713.0

Faceit-match stats via the FACEIT Data API — a separate match pool from the sections above.

Skill profile

Aggregate performance across tracked matches — stats via Leetify. Percentile context against other CSDB-tracked players arrives as our own benchmark data accumulates.

20.9%Headshot accuracy
33.9%Accuracy (enemy spotted)
36.1%Spray accuracy
77.4%Counter-strafing
9.7°Preaim
584msReaction time
25.3%T opening success
32.5%CT opening success
0.72Enemies flashed / flash
3.6%Flash assists
13.23HE damage / grenade
10.80Flashes / match

Recommended for you

Chosen by comparing your tracked metrics against the thresholds we flag — the measurement behind each one is shown, so you can disagree with it.

  1. Advanced Mechanics

    You are losing most of the first duels you take on T side, which is usually a peeking and spacing problem, not aim.

    T opening duels 25.2734% — below the 40% mark we flag

Spend your practice time on Anubis

Map knowledge compounds faster than mechanics — lineups and callouts you learn once keep paying out every time the map comes up.

25% win rate across 8 tracked games — your weakest map with enough games to be worth reading into.

Anubis callouts & strategyAnubis grenade lineups

Recent matches

MapScoreRatingHS%Date
nuke7–13-0.0624%29 Aug
mirage7–13-0.0523%29 Aug
cache13–7-0.0317%29 Aug
inferno13–8-0.0821%29 Aug
mirage13–5-0.0624%28 Aug
cache13–9-0.0028%25 Aug
cache13–11-0.0220%25 Aug
ancient5–13-0.0519%22 Aug
anubis13–9-0.0215%22 Aug
dust213–11-0.0114%22 Aug
mirage10–13-0.0614%22 Aug
inferno13–40.1020%22 Aug
anubis4–13-0.108%22 Aug
mirage11–130.0412%22 Aug
dust213–5-0.0215%22 Aug
train13–60.0623%22 Aug
cache13–5-0.0212%22 Aug
anubis6–13-0.0721%21 Aug
dust211–13-0.0436%21 Aug
cache13–40.0335%21 Aug
inferno13–9-0.0532%21 Aug
overpass13–3-0.0136%21 Aug
mirage14–160.0220%21 Aug
inferno13–60.0420%20 Aug
dust23–13-0.0524%20 Aug
dust29–13-0.0813%14 Aug
train11–13-0.0322%14 Aug
nuke7–13-0.0922%14 Aug
dust213–90.0321%8 Aug
cache1–13-0.0121%8 Aug
mirage6–13-0.0720%8 Aug
dust216–13-0.0416%8 Aug
inferno10–130.0213%8 Aug
mirage13–7-0.0316%8 Aug
anubis13–8-0.0311%8 Aug
inferno12–12-0.0522%8 Aug
ancient0–9-0.0231%8 Aug
mirage13–80.0327%8 Aug
anubis9–13-0.0813%8 Aug
cache11–13-0.0722%8 Aug
ancient4–130.0122%31 Jul
mirage13–11-0.017%31 Jul
cache10–13-0.0119%31 Jul
ancient16–14-0.0214%31 Jul
dust20–13-0.110%31 Jul
cache10–13-0.0521%29 Jul
dust213–7-0.077%29 Jul
inferno6–13-0.0727%29 Jul
nuke15–15-0.0431%22 Jul
mirage3–13-0.106%22 Jul
cache13–70.0216%22 Jul
dust29–13-0.0525%22 Jul
nuke13–90.0113%22 Jul
anubis6–13-0.0430%22 Jul
cache13–90.0122%22 Jul
ancient10–13-0.0414%22 Jul
cache13–90.0321%21 Jul
cache13–60.0114%21 Jul
ancient7–13-0.0427%21 Jul
dust29–130.0721%21 Jul
cache5–13-0.0313%21 Jul
nuke13–70.0519%21 Jul
inferno13–110.0316%21 Jul
mirage6–13-0.1124%21 Jul
mirage11–130.0310%21 Jul
cache13–3-0.0318%20 Jul
dust213–5-0.0326%20 Jul
dust213–11-0.0225%18 Jul
cache13–70.0512%18 Jul
dust28–13-0.069%18 Jul
ancient13–8-0.0414%17 Jul
nuke9–13-0.0320%17 Jul
dust215–15-0.0316%17 Jul
mirage13–16-0.0318%17 Jul
ancient16–14-0.0319%17 Jul
dust24–13-0.0214%17 Jul
mirage13–8-0.0321%17 Jul
anubis5–12-0.0621%17 Jul
ancient13–11-0.0334%17 Jul
dust26–13-0.0316%17 Jul
mirage13–60.0516%17 Jul
cache13–8-0.0212%17 Jul
nuke13–50.0716%17 Jul
cache10–13-0.0515%9 Jul
inferno4–13-0.0313%9 Jul
ancient4–13-0.049%9 Jul
dust213–7-0.0315%9 Jul
mirage13–8-0.0122%9 Jul
cache13–50.0418%9 Jul
cache2–13-0.0812%9 Jul
inferno13–11-0.0025%4 Jul
ancient13–11-0.0115%4 Jul
dust213–10-0.0511%4 Jul
mirage13–110.0422%4 Jul
anubis6–13-0.129%4 Jul
ancient7–13-0.0318%4 Jul
inferno3–13-0.0821%4 Jul
mirage13–70.0218%4 Jul
inferno10–13-0.0426%4 Jul
dust213–1-0.0021%4 Jul

Match data via Leetify.

Recent teammates

Milestones

500 Matches
Compare this player with someone →Inventory value for this account →Where does this rating sit? Premier rank tiers →