Pylväs

Pylväs — CS2 Stats

76561198248312802[U:1:288047074]Steam profile ↗✓ No bans

1,731Tracked matches43%Win rate2020Tracked since
CSDB Rating3.2 LearningSupport
WingmanGold Nova III
Ladder ranks via Leetify

What changed since last observed

CSDB last observed this profile on 8 Sep 2026 (12 days ago). Ranks are recorded once per day this page is viewed.

0Faceit ELO · 1,061 → 1,061
+3Tracked matches · now 1,731
+3.3ppWin rate · 40.0% → 43.3%
Track this profile

CSDB reads this profile's Premier rating from its tracked match history, and records Faceit ELO once on every day the page is viewed. 35 days played since 16 Apr 2026. Come back after the next session and the change shows above.

Is this you? Sign in with Steam to claim it and connect match tracking →

Rating over time

Premier CS Rating: 13,615 -2,313 16 Apr25 Jun · 28 days played
13,33216,644peak 16,64416 Apr25 Jun
16,767Peak Premier in tracked matches
1,061Highest Faceit ELO seen on CSDB
35Days played since 2026-04-16

Faceit ELO

  • At peak — 1,061
  • Next: Level 6 at 1,201 140 to go
  • Reached: Level 5 · Level 4 · Level 3 · Level 2
  • Level 5 first seen 2026-09-08
  • Level 4 first seen 2026-09-08

Premier comes from this profile’s tracked match history, so it reaches back as far as those matches do. Faceit ELO is CSDB’s own observation — no feed exposes ELO per match, so that line only has the days the profile was viewed and cannot be backfilled.

Share this profile

CSDB.GGPylväsPEAK ELO1,061csdb.gg/stats

The image is a snapshot; the link keeps updating. Nothing here is published anywhere — it is generated in your browser when you click.

Performance scores

Aim27
Positioning45
Utility54

0–100 skill scores via Leetify.

Recent form

STEADY39592Last 10039%Win rateWLWLLWWLLL

Last 10 vs previous 10: +10pp win rate · −0.00 avg rating · −1.8pp headshot accuracy · +119ms reaction

Win rate +10pp across the last 10 against the 10 before — within the normal variation of a 10-match window (±20pp), so no real shift yet.

Last 5 · 10 · 20 matches

Last 5

  • 23 · 40% win rate
  • Avg rating -0.06
  • Avg headshot accuracy 10%
  • Avg reaction 723ms

Last 10

  • 46 · 40% win rate
  • Avg rating -0.04
  • Avg headshot accuracy 11%
  • Avg reaction 710ms

Last 20

  • 713 · 35% win rate
  • Avg rating -0.04
  • Avg headshot accuracy 12%
  • Avg reaction 651ms

Newest first, from the last 100 tracked matches. Each block is its own sample — one result moves a 5-match win rate by 20 points.

Player DNA

Primary style: SupportUtility contribution stands above the rest of this profile (+2 against its own average).

Aim2.7
Utility5.4
Positioning4.5
Opening Duels1.2
Clutch2.6

Strong CT-side opener

Style profile from tracked-match aggregates — how this player plays, not how good they are. Classification rules are deterministic and documented in code.

What this cannot see yet: which weapons you use — so CSDB cannot identify an AWPer, and no style here implies a rifle or a sniper. It also cannot see how often you take opening duels, only how often you win them, nor where you hold, so roles that depend on those (entry, lurk, anchor) are deliberately absent rather than guessed. All of it needs round-by-round demo data, which is the next thing being built.

Your pro match

NiKo

Plays most like NiKo 58% playstyle similarity

Most alike: utility contribution, positioning profile.

Where you differ: lower opening-duel success; lower aim profile.

Similarity of playstyle shape across shared dimensions — it says how you play, not that you play at their level. Full comparison →

Strengths & areas to improve

Areas to improve

T-side openings. Opening success drops from 43% on CT to 22% on T — the same duels are being taken with worse setups on the attacking side.

Reaction time. 638ms from enemy-visible to first shot leaves fights decided before they start — warmup routines move this number more than anything else.

Counter-strafing. Only 66% of shots are taken properly stopped — moving-shot inaccuracy is quietly taxing every duel.

Generated by fixed rules over this profile's own numbers — no model, no guessing; silent when the sample is too small to support a claim.

CSDB Rating breakdown

Aim2.7
Positioning4.5
Utility5.4
Mechanics3.6
Opening Duels1.7
Win Impact2.8

Composite 3.2/10 (Learning), a weighted mean of the bars with a small opposition adjustment (×0.90 for this rank band). Formula versioned (v1) and documented in code.

Trends

Match rating-0.04+0.00
first ⅓ avg -0.04 → last ⅓ avg -0.04
Reaction time659ms+11ms
first ⅓ avg 648ms → last ⅓ avg 659ms
Headshot accuracy11.2%−0.2%
first ⅓ avg 11.4% → last ⅓ avg 11.2%

Rolling 5-match average across the last 100 tracked matches, oldest to newest. The delta compares the first third of the window with the last.

Personal bests

0.07Best match rating · 13–9 · anubis, 6 May
33%Best headshot accuracy · 10–13 · cache, 22 May
438msFastest reaction time · 13–10 · ancient, 6 Jun
13–1Biggest win · nuke, 13 Jun

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Highlights

4Longest win streak
59In matches decided by ≤2 rounds
7Overtime games

Map breakdown

anubisBest map · 57% over 14infernoWeakest map · 20% over 5
MapGradePlayedRecordWin rateAvg rating
nukeB25131252%-0.04
ancientD1651131%-0.03
anubisA148657%-0.01
overpassD1431121%-0.05
dust2D124833%-0.07
cacheC114736%-0.04
infernoD51420%-0.03
mirage21150%-0.03
vertigo1010%0.03

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Inferno is currently your weakest sufficiently-sampled map (20% over 5). Start with the 6 essential Inferno lineups, review the callouts, then spin up a practice server.

Faceit stats

Combat

270Matches
51%Win rate
0.76Avg K/D
64.6ADR
43%Headshot %

Clutches & streaks

33%1v1 clutch win
17%1v2 clutch win
7Longest win streak

Recent Faceit resultsLLLWL

MapMatchesWin rateAvg K/DAvg kills
Nuke6857%0.7711.8
Ancient4947%0.7412.1
Dust23633%0.6410.8
Anubis3462%0.8611.5
Inferno3453%0.9013.4
Train2662%0.7112.0
Overpass1450%0.6410.6
Mirage520%0.6510.2

Faceit-match stats via the FACEIT Data API — a separate match pool from the sections above.

Skill profile

Aggregate performance across tracked matches — stats via Leetify. Percentile context against other CSDB-tracked players arrives as our own benchmark data accumulates.

11.2%Headshot accuracy
28.9%Accuracy (enemy spotted)
34.7%Spray accuracy
66.2%Counter-strafing
12.5°Preaim
638msReaction time
21.6%T opening success
43.5%CT opening success
0.61Enemies flashed / flash
5.1%Flash assists
9.00HE damage / grenade
8.23Flashes / match

Recommended for you

Chosen by comparing your tracked metrics against the thresholds we flag — the measurement behind each one is shown, so you can disagree with it.

  1. Advanced Mechanics

    Your crosshair sits further from where enemies appear than it needs to. Crosshair placement is the cheapest accuracy you can buy.

    Preaim 12.5185° — above the 12° mark we flag

    Aim Training
  2. Best CS2 Crosshair

    Your shots are landing on bodies more often than heads — usually a crosshair-height and placement habit rather than raw aim.

    Headshot accuracy 11.191% — below the 15% mark we flag

    Aim Training
Spend your practice time on Inferno

Map knowledge compounds faster than mechanics — lineups and callouts you learn once keep paying out every time the map comes up.

20% win rate across 5 tracked games — your weakest map with enough games to be worth reading into.

Inferno callouts & strategyInferno grenade lineups

Recent matches

MapScoreRatingHS%Date
nuke13–7-0.039%13 Sept
anubis9–13-0.078%30 Aug
dust213–7-0.0614%30 Aug
ancient8–13-0.0710%30 Aug
anubis11–13-0.0611%25 Jun
nuke13–10-0.0118%25 Jun
nuke13–1-0.0210%13 Jun
nuke4–13-0.1112%13 Jun
anubis11–13-0.0511%8 Jun
vertigo6–130.0310%7 Jun
ancient13–100.0212%6 Jun
dust211–13-0.085%6 Jun
overpass4–13-0.0511%6 Jun
ancient5–13-0.0525%5 Jun
inferno3–13-0.0820%5 Jun
nuke7–13-0.0115%5 Jun
nuke13–4-0.0511%5 Jun
ancient9–13-0.059%5 Jun
nuke11–13-0.047%29 May
ancient13–8-0.0316%29 May
anubis13–8-0.039%29 May
inferno11–13-0.008%29 May
dust25–13-0.0713%29 May
overpass7–13-0.058%28 May
anubis13–10.0610%28 May
inferno9–13-0.0311%28 May
ancient13–9-0.061%27 May
anubis13–9-0.0312%27 May
dust213–6-0.0310%26 May
dust213–10-0.0815%23 May
overpass2–13-0.090%23 May
cache5–13-0.0116%22 May
cache8–13-0.0411%22 May
cache10–13-0.0233%22 May
nuke10–13-0.0818%21 May
ancient4–130.0013%19 May
inferno4–13-0.0522%19 May
nuke13–10-0.086%19 May
overpass13–11-0.0616%19 May
overpass10–13-0.0212%18 May
nuke11–13-0.0312%18 May
anubis7–130.0711%15 May
nuke12–16-0.0219%15 May
overpass2–13-0.059%14 May
nuke13–9-0.0515%13 May
anubis13–40.029%12 May
nuke6–13-0.0514%12 May
cache13–100.0019%10 May
cache3–13-0.143%10 May
cache1–13-0.0621%10 May
anubis10–13-0.0115%9 May
ancient12–16-0.1013%9 May
overpass11–13-0.0226%7 May
cache4–13-0.130%7 May
cache13–8-0.135%6 May
cache13–10-0.0115%6 May
cache13–90.0016%6 May
ancient5–13-0.0516%6 May
overpass13–8-0.0411%6 May
anubis13–90.0713%6 May
nuke5–13-0.0915%6 May
ancient10–13-0.0410%6 May
cache12–120.066%6 May
nuke13–9-0.0123%6 May
dust28–13-0.0815%5 May
ancient9–13-0.0413%5 May
inferno13–110.0413%4 May
dust211–13-0.0613%4 May
nuke13–110.0615%4 May
dust22–13-0.1211%1 May
dust210–13-0.055%29 Apr
dust213–11-0.0518%29 Apr
overpass9–13-0.078%29 Apr
overpass7–13-0.088%28 Apr
nuke13–5-0.049%28 Apr
anubis16–12-0.0110%28 Apr
nuke8–13-0.0310%27 Apr
overpass3–13-0.016%27 Apr
ancient9–13-0.0316%27 Apr
overpass6–13-0.0817%21 Apr
nuke13–70.0219%21 Apr
anubis13–8-0.0513%21 Apr
ancient13–90.0112%21 Apr
ancient16–14-0.0512%18 Apr
mirage9–13-0.0710%18 Apr
overpass10–13-0.0613%18 Apr
anubis4–13-0.0413%18 Apr
nuke3–13-0.114%18 Apr
mirage16–130.0212%18 Apr
ancient9–130.009%18 Apr
nuke13–70.0414%18 Apr
ancient8–13-0.0110%18 Apr
nuke13–10-0.0810%18 Apr
dust25–13-0.0516%17 Apr
overpass13–6-0.0417%17 Apr
nuke15–15-0.071%17 Apr
anubis16–13-0.0512%17 Apr
nuke10–5-0.0911%17 Apr
nuke4–13-0.0517%17 Apr
dust211–13-0.127%16 Apr

Match data via Leetify.

Recent teammates

Milestones

1,000 Matches
Compare this player with someone →Inventory value for this account →Where does this rating sit? Premier rank tiers →