YammiTammi

YammiTammi — CS2 Stats

76561198815926316[U:1:855660588]Steam profile ↗✓ No bans

1,871Tracked matches39%Win rate2021Tracked since
2,292Hours in CS15Hrs last 2 wks
CSDB Rating4.0 DevelopingSupport
Premier CS Rating18,132Purple band · top ~15.9% of ranked players (population est.)
FaceitLevel 3Top 90.6% of ranked FACEIT players
Ladder ranks via Leetify

What changed since last observed

CSDB last observed this profile on 4 Sep 2026 (17 days ago). Ranks are recorded once per day this page is viewed.

No change since then. Play, then come back: the next observation lands here.

Track this profile

CSDB reads this profile's Premier rating from its tracked match history, and records Faceit ELO once on every day the page is viewed. 41 days played since 16 Jul 2026. Come back after the next session and the change shows above.

Is this you? Sign in with Steam to claim it and connect match tracking →

Rating over time

Premier CS Rating: 18,132 +585 20 Jul4 Sept · 16 days played
17,54720,417peak 20,41720 Jul4 Sept
20,538Peak Premier in tracked matches
41Days played since 2026-07-16

Premier CS Rating

  • 2,285 below peak (20,417)
  • -2,285 over 30 days · declining
  • Next: Pink band at 20,000 1,868 to go
  • Reached: Pink band · Purple band · Blue band · Light Blue band

Premier comes from this profile’s tracked match history, so it reaches back as far as those matches do.

Compare periods

Last 7 days vs previous 7

MetricLast 7Previous 7Change
Matches712−5
Win rate43%50%−7pp
K/D0.430.50−0.08
Headshot %48%40%+8pp

Measured 12 Sep 202621 Sep 2026; previous 6 Sep 2026 → 12 Sep 2026.

Differences between Valve's lifetime totals on the days CSDB observed this profile — every mode Valve counts, not only ranked. A window appears only when an observation sits within a few days of each end.

How this compares with the same rank

Median values for Level 3 among CSDB-tracked players (n=9,169), from Valve's own lifetime stats. Aim, positioning and utility scores are deliberately not benchmarked here — those are a third-party provider's derived metrics, which CSDB does not store.

MetricThis playerLevel 3 medianLevel 4 medianvs Level 4
Headshot rate42.3%41.9%42.7%meets
Shot accuracy7.4%12.2%11.3%3.8% short
Kill/death ratio0.540.980.990.45 short
Match win rate39.9%43.3%43.9%4.0% short

This profile matches the typical Level 4 player on 1 of 4 comparable metrics.

Widest gap: Kill/death ratio. That is the metric furthest from the Level 4 median in relative terms — not necessarily the one holding a rank back, which no statistic here can establish.

Share this profile

CSDB.GGYammiTammiFACEITLevel 3STANDINGTop 90.6% of rankedPREMIER18,132 · Purple bandcsdb.gg/stats

The image is a snapshot; the link keeps updating. Nothing here is published anywhere — it is generated in your browser when you click.

Performance scores

Aim59
Positioning28
Utility33

0–100 skill scores via Leetify.

Recent form

STEADY49474Last 10049%Win rateWWWLLLLWLL

Last 10 vs previous 10: −10pp win rate · −0.00 avg rating · +2.2pp headshot accuracy · +39ms reaction

Win rate −10pp across the last 10 against the 10 before — within the normal variation of a 10-match window (±20pp), so no real shift yet.

Last 5 · 10 · 20 matches

Last 5

  • 32 · 60% win rate
  • Avg rating -0.04
  • Avg headshot accuracy 24%
  • Avg reaction 641ms

Last 10

  • 46 · 40% win rate
  • Avg rating -0.06
  • Avg headshot accuracy 15%
  • Avg reaction 629ms

Last 20

  • 992 · 45% win rate
  • Avg rating -0.06
  • Avg headshot accuracy 14%
  • Avg reaction 609ms

Newest first, from the last 100 tracked matches. Each block is its own sample — one result moves a 5-match win rate by 20 points.

Player DNA

Primary style: SupportUtility contribution stands above the rest of this profile (+1.2 against its own average).

Aim5.9
Utility3.3
Positioning2.8
Opening Duels0.0
Clutch2.2

Limited utility dependence

Style profile from tracked-match aggregates — how this player plays, not how good they are. Classification rules are deterministic and documented in code.

What this cannot see yet: which weapons you use — so CSDB cannot identify an AWPer, and no style here implies a rifle or a sniper. It also cannot see how often you take opening duels, only how often you win them, nor where you hold, so roles that depend on those (entry, lurk, anchor) are deliberately absent rather than guessed. All of it needs round-by-round demo data, which is the next thing being built.

Your pro match

device

Plays most like device 94% playstyle similarity

Most alike: positioning profile, utility contribution.

Where you differ: lower aim profile; lower opening-duel success.

Similarity of playstyle shape across shared dimensions — it says how you play, not that you play at their level. Full comparison →

Strengths & areas to improve

Areas to improve

Positioning. Positioning trails aim by 31 points — deaths here waste a strong aim profile.

Reaction time. 639ms from enemy-visible to first shot leaves fights decided before they start — warmup routines move this number more than anything else.

Generated by fixed rules over this profile's own numbers — no model, no guessing; silent when the sample is too small to support a claim.

CSDB Rating breakdown

Aim5.9
Positioning2.8
Utility3.3
Mechanics6.2
Opening Duels0.8
Win Impact1.4

Composite 4.0/10 (Developing), a weighted mean of the bars with a small opposition adjustment (×1.00 for this rank band). Formula versioned (v1) and documented in code.

Trends

Match rating-0.07−0.01
first ⅓ avg -0.06 → last ⅓ avg -0.07
Reaction time636ms−64ms
first ⅓ avg 700ms → last ⅓ avg 636ms
Headshot accuracy14.1%−5.5%
first ⅓ avg 19.6% → last ⅓ avg 14.1%

Rolling 5-match average across the last 100 tracked matches, oldest to newest. The delta compares the first third of the window with the last.

Personal bests

0.01Best match rating · 16–12 · inferno, 18 Jul
75%Best headshot accuracy · 5–13 · dust2, 16 Jul
438msFastest reaction time · 13–10 · inferno, 22 Jul
13–2Biggest win · inferno, 19 Sept

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Highlights

8Longest win streak
W3Current streak
104In matches decided by ≤2 rounds
4Overtime games

Map breakdown

ancientBest map · 67% over 9dust2Weakest map · 36% over 22
MapGradePlayedRecordWin rateAvg rating
dust2C2281436%-0.07
mirageB178947%-0.07
infernoB147750%-0.05
anubisB126650%-0.07
cacheA127558%-0.06
ancientS96367%-0.05
nukeC94544%-0.06
train32167%-0.05
vertigo110100%-0.03
overpass1010%-0.05

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Dust 2 is currently your weakest sufficiently-sampled map (36% over 22). Start with the 6 essential Dust 2 lineups, review the callouts, then spin up a practice server.

Lifetime stats

32,853Lifetime kills
0.54K/D
3,029Matches
39.9%Match win rate
42.3%Headshot % · Top 50% of Level 3 players
7.4%Shot accuracy
3,021MVPs
1,252Hours (in match)
2,536Bombs planted
235Bombs defused

Most-used weapons

AWP6,379
AK-475,735
AUG4,076
SG 5532,470
XM10142,262
MP9573

Lifetime map wins

4,948dust2
3,879inferno
2,516nuke
2,198vertigo
1,190train
61office
13italy
6lake

Lifetime totals via Steam — visible because this profile's game details are public. Spans CS:GO and CS2.

Faceit stats

Combat

203Matches
46%Win rate
0.49Avg K/D
50.1ADR
38%Headshot %

Clutches & streaks

31%1v1 clutch win
9%1v2 clutch win
7Longest win streak

Recent Faceit resultsLLLWW

MapMatchesWin rateAvg K/DAvg kills
Inferno1362%0.597.2
Dust21136%0.7810.0
Ancient825%0.5810.0
Mirage80%0.336.6
Anubis425%0.528.5
Cache367%0.499.0
Nuke250%0.5214.0
Vertigo2100%0.487.5

Faceit-match stats via the FACEIT Data API — a separate match pool from the sections above.

Skill profile

Aggregate performance across tracked matches — stats via Leetify. Percentile context against other CSDB-tracked players arrives as our own benchmark data accumulates.

14.7%Headshot accuracy
32.7%Accuracy (enemy spotted)
42.1%Spray accuracy
77.7%Counter-strafing
10.2°Preaim
639msReaction time
23.4%T opening success
36.3%CT opening success
0.48Enemies flashed / flash
1.7%Flash assists
7.27HE damage / grenade
4.86Flashes / match

Recommended for you

Chosen by comparing your tracked metrics against the thresholds we flag — the measurement behind each one is shown, so you can disagree with it.

  1. Best CS2 Crosshair

    Your shots are landing on bodies more often than heads — usually a crosshair-height and placement habit rather than raw aim.

    Headshot accuracy 14.7177% — below the 15% mark we flag

    Aim Training
  2. Grenades & Utility

    Most of your flashes are blinding nobody. A handful of reliable pop-flash lineups fixes this faster than anything else.

    Enemies flashed per flash 0.4835 — below the 0.5 mark we flag

    Grenade Lineups
  3. Advanced Mechanics

    You are losing most of the first duels you take on T side, which is usually a peeking and spacing problem, not aim.

    T opening duels 23.3665% — below the 40% mark we flag

Spend your practice time on Dust 2

Map knowledge compounds faster than mechanics — lineups and callouts you learn once keep paying out every time the map comes up.

36% win rate across 22 tracked games — your weakest map with enough games to be worth reading into.

Dust 2 callouts & strategyDust 2 grenade lineups

Recent matches

MapScoreRatingHS%Date
vertigo13–4-0.036%19 Sept
inferno13–2-0.020%19 Sept
anubis13–3-0.0425%18 Sept
dust29–13-0.0850%18 Sept
cache11–13-0.0340%18 Sept
mirage11–13-0.108%18 Sept
anubis6–13-0.108%16 Sept
inferno13–2-0.0613%12 Sept
anubis6–13-0.110%12 Sept
dust24–13-0.070%12 Sept
cache12–12-0.0730%12 Sept
mirage1–13-0.1114%11 Sept
dust22–13-0.0622%11 Sept
ancient13–7-0.010%11 Sept
dust213–11-0.0319%10 Sept
mirage13–10-0.0716%10 Sept
inferno13–6-0.067%10 Sept
mirage12–12-0.089%7 Sept
dust213–6-0.030%7 Sept
mirage10–13-0.0711%5 Sept
inferno8–13-0.059%4 Sept
dust28–13-0.1229%4 Sept
cache2–13-0.120%4 Sept
mirage9–13-0.0914%3 Sept
anubis8–13-0.0918%3 Sept
inferno5–13-0.0415%2 Sept
inferno6–13-0.0512%1 Sept
anubis13–5-0.0815%1 Sept
dust213–8-0.0422%29 Aug
nuke10–13-0.079%29 Aug
anubis4–13-0.066%29 Aug
mirage13–11-0.079%29 Aug
nuke9–13-0.0828%28 Aug
dust26–13-0.106%28 Aug
dust210–13-0.0724%24 Aug
nuke22–20-0.0116%23 Aug
cache13–10-0.0419%22 Aug
inferno13–6-0.0614%22 Aug
dust211–13-0.0917%22 Aug
anubis13–11-0.0524%21 Aug
cache13–9-0.0628%21 Aug
train13–4-0.0612%21 Aug
dust213–5-0.0619%20 Aug
ancient13–7-0.0213%20 Aug
cache8–13-0.100%20 Aug
mirage13–100.0110%19 Aug
cache7–13-0.0633%18 Aug
nuke8–13-0.075%18 Aug
train9–13-0.0421%18 Aug
dust23–13-0.0922%18 Aug
nuke9–13-0.0622%17 Aug
ancient7–13-0.064%17 Aug
dust29–13-0.0219%17 Aug
dust24–13-0.0513%17 Aug
nuke7–13-0.0713%16 Aug
inferno13–5-0.077%15 Aug
dust213–8-0.1011%15 Aug
mirage12–12-0.0618%15 Aug
ancient8–13-0.070%14 Aug
nuke13–11-0.017%14 Aug
dust25–13-0.105%13 Aug
mirage3–6-0.1211%13 Aug
dust29–13-0.1019%12 Aug
nuke13–9-0.088%12 Aug
train13–11-0.0640%12 Aug
inferno4–13-0.0812%11 Aug
mirage13–11-0.0523%11 Aug
overpass12–12-0.0514%11 Aug
mirage8–13-0.117%11 Aug
dust213–4-0.060%3 Aug
cache13–2-0.0731%3 Aug
dust213–11-0.0529%27 Jul
anubis13–6-0.0533%27 Jul
ancient16–13-0.0622%26 Jul
cache13–6-0.1013%26 Jul
mirage6–3-0.0550%26 Jul
ancient13–7-0.0822%25 Jul
anubis10–13-0.0918%25 Jul
mirage6–13-0.054%25 Jul
dust213–11-0.0317%24 Jul
ancient13–11-0.0416%24 Jul
anubis7–13-0.110%23 Jul
cache13–6-0.0217%22 Jul
inferno13–10-0.0713%22 Jul
cache13–4-0.0214%21 Jul
inferno0–10-0.0530%21 Jul
mirage13–7-0.0510%20 Jul
inferno11–13-0.0326%20 Jul
mirage13–10-0.0820%19 Jul
anubis13–2-0.060%19 Jul
anubis13–9-0.0611%18 Jul
dust23–13-0.1313%18 Jul
cache13–10-0.0417%18 Jul
inferno16–120.0138%18 Jul
ancient13–5-0.0217%18 Jul
inferno13–16-0.0730%17 Jul
mirage13–10-0.0618%17 Jul
nuke13–8-0.0815%17 Jul
ancient7–13-0.0611%17 Jul
dust25–13-0.0675%16 Jul

Match data via Leetify.

Recent teammates

Milestones

1,000 Matches
Compare this player with someone →Inventory value for this account →Where does this rating sit? Premier rank tiers →