Rabbit — CS2 Stats

76561198814547891[U:1:854282163]

5,427Tracked matches86%Win rate2020Tracked since

3,999Hours in CS

CSDB Rating5.6 Solid

Premier CS Rating23,277Top 50% of 819 CSDB-tracked playersPink band · top ~4.9% of ranked players (population est.)

CSDB Leaderboard#4475 of 18106 tracked

FaceitLevel 7Top 42.3% of ranked FACEIT players

WingmanLegendary Eagle Master

Ladder ranks via Leetify

Share this profile

The image is a snapshot; the link keeps updating. Nothing here is published anywhere — it is generated in your browser when you click.

Performance scores

Aim43

Positioning43

Utility86

0–100 skill scores via Leetify.

Recent form

HOT71–21–8Last 10071%Win rateWWLWWWWWWW

Last 10 vs previous 10: +20pp win rate · +0.03 avg rating

Player DNA

Aim4.3

Aggression6.5

Utility8.6

Positioning4.3

Opening Duels2.1

Style profile from tracked-match aggregates — how this player plays, not how good they are. Classification rules are deterministic and documented in code.

Your pro match

Plays most like Twistzz 83% playstyle similarity

Most alike: opening-fight frequency, opening-duel success.

Where you differ: lower aim profile.

Similarity of playstyle shape across shared dimensions — it says how you play, not that you play at their level. Full comparison →

Strengths & areas to improve

Strengths

CT openings. 64% CT opening-duel success — winning the first fight on the defending side is rare and valuable.

Flashes. 1.12 enemies blinded per flash — utility that consistently lands.

Utility. Utility score of 86 — grenade impact well above the norm.

Areas to improve

T-side openings. Opening success drops from 64% on CT to 14% on T — the same duels are being taken with worse setups on the attacking side.

Counter-strafing. Only 68% of shots are taken properly stopped — moving-shot inaccuracy is quietly taxing every duel.

Generated by fixed rules over this profile's own numbers — no model, no guessing; silent when the sample is too small to support a claim.

CSDB Rating breakdown

Aim4.3

Positioning4.3

Utility8.6

Mechanics3.9

Opening Duels4.2

Win Impact10.0

Composite 5.6/10 (Solid), a weighted mean of the bars with a small opposition adjustment (×1.02 for this rank band). Formula versioned (v1) and documented in code.

Trends

Match rating0.03+0.00

first ⅓ avg 0.03 → last ⅓ avg 0.03

Reaction time534ms+70ms

first ⅓ avg 464ms → last ⅓ avg 534ms

Headshot accuracy12.0%+0.1%

first ⅓ avg 12.0% → last ⅓ avg 12.0%

Rolling 5-match average across the last 100 tracked matches, oldest to newest. The delta compares the first third of the window with the last.

Highlights

0.24Best rating — nuke 13–1

13–1Biggest win — nuke

11Longest win streak

W2Current streak

3–4In matches decided by ≤2 rounds

Map breakdown

Map	Grade	Played	Record	Win rate	Avg rating
nuke	S	97	70–27	72%	0.03
cache	—	2	1–1	50%	0.01
anubis	—	1	0–1	0%	0.00

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Lifetime stats

222,745Lifetime kills

1.06K/D

10,796Matches

45.3%Match win rate

33.5%Headshot %

8.0%Shot accuracy

24,675MVPs

3,999Hours (in match)

14,359Bombs planted

2,026Bombs defused

Most-used weapons

AWP36,844

M4A4 / M4A1-S31,692

AK-4730,038

Negev17,045

Knife13,050

MAC-1012,733

Desert Eagle11,877

Sawed-Off11,690

P2000 / USP-S8,607

Glock-187,291

Lifetime map wins

75,663nuke

9,370dust2

2,981inferno

1,094vertigo

449office

299train

109lake

72safehouse

Lifetime totals via Steam — visible because this profile's game details are public. Spans CS:GO and CS2.

Faceit stats

Combat

51Matches

67%Win rate

1.17Avg K/D

—ADR

35%Headshot %

Clutches & streaks

—1v1 clutch win

—1v2 clutch win

5Longest win streak

Recent Faceit resultsWWLWL

Map	Matches	Win rate	Avg K/D	Avg kills
Vertigo	11	73%	1.04	15.6
Mirage	10	60%	0.89	16.5
Overpass	8	62%	1.39	20.8
Nuke	6	83%	1.53	22.2
Ancient	5	60%	1.20	16.0
Inferno	3	67%	0.83	13.3
Anubis	2	50%	1.16	13.5

Faceit-match stats via the FACEIT Data API — a separate match pool from the sections above.

Skill profile

Aggregate performance across tracked matches — stats via Leetify. Percentile context against other CSDB-tracked players arrives as our own benchmark data accumulates.

11.9%Headshot accuracy

25.7%Accuracy (enemy spotted)

52.5%Spray accuracy

67.7%Counter-strafing

13.4°Preaim

545msReaction time

13.5%T opening success

63.6%CT opening success

1.12Enemies flashed / flash

2.1%Flash assists

9.32HE damage / grenade

11.00Flashes / match

Recommended for you

Chosen by comparing your tracked metrics against the thresholds we flag — the measurement behind each one is shown, so you can disagree with it.

Advanced Mechanics
Your crosshair sits further from where enemies appear than it needs to. Crosshair placement is the cheapest accuracy you can buy.
Preaim 13.4271° — above the 12° mark we flag
Aim Training →
Best CS2 Crosshair
Your shots are landing on bodies more often than heads — usually a crosshair-height and placement habit rather than raw aim.
Headshot accuracy 11.8653% — below the 15% mark we flag
Aim Training →

Recent matches

Map	Score	Rating	HS%	Date
nuke	13–10	-0.02	6%	28 Aug →
nuke	13–5	0.13	7%	28 Aug →
nuke	10–13	-0.01	8%	28 Aug →
nuke	13–4	0.15	6%	28 Aug →
nuke	13–1	0.01	20%	28 Aug →
nuke	13–7	0.08	12%	28 Aug →
nuke	13–3	0.05	13%	27 Aug →
nuke	13–9	0.00	10%	27 Aug →
nuke	13–8	-0.00	13%	27 Aug →
nuke	13–4	0.04	15%	27 Aug →
nuke	13–3	0.07	7%	27 Aug →
cache	9–13	-0.01	13%	27 Aug →
nuke	7–13	-0.07	5%	27 Aug →
nuke	13–3	0.06	24%	27 Aug →
nuke	13–5	0.01	15%	27 Aug →
nuke	12–12	0.03	17%	27 Aug →
nuke	13–6	-0.02	16%	26 Aug →
nuke	13–10	0.03	12%	26 Aug →
nuke	13–2	0.09	20%	26 Aug →
nuke	13–7	-0.04	7%	26 Aug →
nuke	13–6	-0.05	14%	26 Aug →
nuke	13–8	0.05	9%	26 Aug →
nuke	13–2	-0.04	7%	26 Aug →
nuke	13–6	0.04	24%	26 Aug →
nuke	13–4	0.01	10%	25 Aug →
nuke	13–5	0.04	8%	25 Aug →
nuke	13–3	0.04	14%	25 Aug →
nuke	10–13	0.03	8%	24 Aug →
nuke	9–1	0.22	23%	24 Aug →
nuke	13–10	0.00	5%	24 Aug →
nuke	13–7	0.07	16%	24 Aug →
nuke	13–5	0.11	3%	23 Aug →
nuke	12–12	0.02	9%	23 Aug →
nuke	13–5	-0.01	14%	23 Aug →
nuke	8–13	0.10	14%	23 Aug →
nuke	12–12	0.02	18%	23 Aug →
nuke	13–3	0.04	5%	23 Aug →
nuke	3–13	-0.01	21%	23 Aug →
nuke	10–5	0.03	14%	23 Aug →
nuke	7–13	-0.02	9%	22 Aug →
nuke	13–9	-0.01	14%	22 Aug →
nuke	3–13	0.01	20%	22 Aug →
nuke	13–9	0.06	15%	22 Aug →
nuke	6–13	0.00	13%	22 Aug →
nuke	13–3	-0.06	18%	22 Aug →
nuke	13–8	-0.00	15%	22 Aug →
nuke	13–5	0.03	8%	22 Aug →
nuke	13–1	0.24	7%	22 Aug →
nuke	12–12	-0.05	7%	21 Aug →
nuke	11–13	-0.03	7%	21 Aug →
nuke	7–13	-0.03	11%	21 Aug →
nuke	7–13	0.05	9%	21 Aug →
nuke	13–1	0.04	12%	21 Aug →
nuke	13–10	0.13	6%	21 Aug →
cache	13–10	0.04	15%	21 Aug →
nuke	13–9	-0.04	5%	21 Aug →
nuke	13–7	0.06	0%	21 Aug →
nuke	4–13	-0.03	5%	21 Aug →
nuke	13–11	-0.01	13%	21 Aug →
nuke	13–10	-0.01	7%	20 Aug →
nuke	13–2	0.08	11%	20 Aug →
nuke	13–8	0.00	21%	20 Aug →
nuke	13–9	-0.01	4%	20 Aug →
nuke	13–6	0.09	3%	20 Aug →
nuke	8–13	0.08	13%	20 Aug →
nuke	9–1	0.05	6%	20 Aug →
nuke	13–6	-0.01	25%	19 Aug →
nuke	9–13	-0.05	7%	19 Aug →
nuke	9–13	-0.03	11%	19 Aug →
nuke	13–3	0.08	14%	19 Aug →
nuke	12–12	0.16	11%	19 Aug →
nuke	11–13	0.07	8%	19 Aug →
nuke	13–11	-0.04	9%	19 Aug →
nuke	13–4	-0.07	11%	19 Aug →
nuke	13–9	0.04	17%	19 Aug →
nuke	13–11	-0.01	11%	19 Aug →
nuke	2–7	0.01	0%	19 Aug →
nuke	13–3	0.05	14%	19 Aug →
nuke	13–10	0.01	6%	18 Aug →
nuke	13–3	0.08	4%	18 Aug →
nuke	13–8	-0.01	7%	18 Aug →
nuke	12–12	0.03	10%	18 Aug →
nuke	13–1	0.11	31%	18 Aug →
nuke	13–8	0.04	14%	18 Aug →
nuke	13–6	0.06	17%	17 Aug →
nuke	13–6	0.06	11%	17 Aug →
nuke	13–6	0.05	12%	17 Aug →
nuke	11–13	0.08	11%	17 Aug →
nuke	13–5	0.04	9%	17 Aug →
nuke	13–9	0.04	9%	17 Aug →
nuke	13–3	0.12	30%	17 Aug →
nuke	13–4	-0.03	12%	17 Aug →
nuke	13–10	0.02	4%	17 Aug →
nuke	12–12	0.09	8%	17 Aug →
nuke	13–2	-0.03	13%	17 Aug →
nuke	13–6	0.08	20%	17 Aug →
nuke	12–12	0.02	14%	17 Aug →
nuke	13–4	0.06	9%	16 Aug →
anubis	9–13	0.00	15%	16 Aug →
nuke	11–13	-0.02	15%	16 Aug →