Stwk

Stwk — CS2 Stats

WS76561198813692865[U:1:853427137]Steam profile ↗✓ No bans

929Tracked matches55%Win rate2020Tracked since
5,061Hours in CS13Hrs last 2 wks
CSDB Rating5.9 SolidSupport
Premier CS Rating13,693Blue band · top ~35.3% of ranked players (population est.)
FaceitLevel 8 · 1,616 ELOTop 31.2% of ranked FACEIT players
WingmanLegendary Eagle
Ladder ranks via Leetify

What changed since last observed

CSDB last observed this profile on 24 Oct 2026 (21 days ago). Ranks are recorded once per day this page is viewed.

No change since then. Play, then come back: the next observation lands here.

Rating over time

Premier CS Rating: 13,693 -3,432 19 Mar – 24 Oct · 27 days played
13,69319,999peak 19,99919 Mar24 Oct
Faceit ELO: 1,616 +0 19 Sept – 27 Sept · 2 observations
1,6161,616peak 1,61619 Sept27 Sept
19,999Peak Premier in tracked matches
1,616Highest Faceit ELO seen on CSDB
65Days played since 2026-03-17

Faceit ELO

  • At peak — 1,616
  • Next: Level 9 at 1,751 — 135 to go
  • Reached: Level 8 · Level 7 · Level 6 · Level 5
  • Level 8 first seen 2026-09-19
  • Level 7 first seen 2026-09-19

Premier CS Rating

  • 6,306 below peak (19,999)
  • Next: Purple band at 15,000 — 1,307 to go
  • Reached: Purple band · Blue band · Light Blue band

Premier comes from this profile’s tracked match history, so it reaches back as far as those matches do. Faceit ELO is CSDB’s own observation — no feed exposes ELO per match, so that line only has the days the profile was viewed and cannot be backfilled.

How this compares with the same rank

Median values for Level 8 among CSDB-tracked players (n=15,525), from Valve's own lifetime stats. Aim, positioning and utility scores are deliberately not benchmarked here — those are a third-party provider's derived metrics, which CSDB does not store.

MetricThis playerLevel 8 medianLevel 9 medianvs Level 9
Headshot rate61.8%46.8%48.2%above
Shot accuracy8.5%13.0%13.2%4.7% short
Kill/death ratio1.091.061.07meets
Match win rate42.4%46.3%46.9%4.5% short

This profile matches the typical Level 9 player on 2 of 4 comparable metrics.

Widest gap: Shot accuracy. That is the metric furthest from the Level 9 median in relative terms — not necessarily the one holding a rank back, which no statistic here can establish.

Share this profile

CSDB.GGStwkFACEITLevel 8 · 1,616 ELOSTANDINGTop 31.2% of rankedPREMIER13,693 · Blue bandPEAK ELO1,616csdb.gg/stats

The image is a snapshot; the link keeps updating. Nothing here is published anywhere — it is generated in your browser when you click.

Performance scores

Aim73
Positioning48
Utility60

0–100 skill scores via Leetify.

Recent form

STEADY49–48–3Last 10049%Win rateLWWLLWLLWW

Last 10 vs previous 10: 0pp win rate · +0.01 avg rating · +2.2pp headshot accuracy · −74ms reaction

Win rate 0pp across the last 10 against the 10 before — within the normal variation of a 10-match window (±20pp), so no real shift yet.

Last 5 · 10 · 20 matches

Last 5

  • 2–3 · 40% win rate
  • Avg rating -0.02
  • Avg headshot accuracy 23%
  • Avg reaction 574ms

Last 10

  • 5–5 · 50% win rate
  • Avg rating -0.00
  • Avg headshot accuracy 24%
  • Avg reaction 585ms

Last 20

  • 10–9–1 · 50% win rate
  • Avg rating -0.00
  • Avg headshot accuracy 23%
  • Avg reaction 622ms

Newest first, from the last 100 tracked matches. Each block is its own sample — one result moves a 5-match win rate by 20 points.

Player DNA

Primary style: Support — Utility contribution stands above the rest of this profile (+1.8 against its own average).

Aim7.3
Utility6.0
Positioning4.8
Opening Duels4.0
Clutch2.2

Strong CT-side opener

Style profile from tracked-match aggregates — how this player plays, not how good they are. Classification rules are deterministic and documented in code.

What this cannot see yet: which weapons you use — so CSDB cannot identify an AWPer, and no style here implies a rifle or a sniper. It also cannot see how often you take opening duels, only how often you win them, nor where you hold, so roles that depend on those (entry, lurk, anchor) are deliberately absent rather than guessed. All of it needs round-by-round demo data, which is the next thing being built.

Your pro match

ZywOo

Plays most like ZywOo 94% playstyle similarity

Most alike: utility contribution, positioning profile.

Where you differ: lower opening-duel success; lower aim profile.

Similarity of playstyle shape across shared dimensions — it says how you play, not that you play at their level. Full comparison →

Strengths & areas to improve

Areas to improve

T-side openings. Opening success drops from 54% on CT to 35% on T — the same duels are being taken with worse setups on the attacking side.

Reaction time. 642ms from enemy-visible to first shot leaves fights decided before they start — warmup routines move this number more than anything else.

Generated by fixed rules over this profile's own numbers — no model, no guessing; silent when the sample is too small to support a claim.

CSDB Rating breakdown

Aim7.3
Positioning4.8
Utility6.0
Mechanics7.7
Opening Duels3.7
Win Impact6.7

Composite 5.9/10 (Solid), a weighted mean of the bars with a small opposition adjustment (×0.95 for this rank band). Formula versioned (v1) and documented in code.

Trends

Match rating-0.01−0.01
first ⅓ avg 0.00 → last ⅓ avg -0.01
Reaction time640ms−56ms
first ⅓ avg 695ms → last ⅓ avg 640ms
Headshot accuracy22.9%−1.0%
first ⅓ avg 24.0% → last ⅓ avg 22.9%

Rolling 5-match average across the last 100 tracked matches, oldest to newest. The delta compares the first third of the window with the last.

Personal bests

0.14Best match rating · 13–11 · nuke, 28 Mar →
47%Best headshot accuracy · 13–9 · mirage, 12 May →
438msFastest reaction time · 8–13 · dust2, 4 Oct →
13–2Biggest win · dust2, 25 May →

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Highlights

5Longest win streak
9–4In matches decided by ≤2 rounds
12Overtime games

Map breakdown

dust2Best map · 66% over 29infernoWeakest map · 14% over 7
MapGradePlayedRecordWin rateAvg rating
dust2S2919–1066%0.00
mirageC219–1243%-0.01
cacheB189–950%-0.01
anubisD103–730%-0.01
infernoD71–614%-0.03
ancientB63–350%-0.02
nukeB63–350%0.04
overpass—21–150%0.03
vertigo—11–0100%-0.08

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Inferno is currently your weakest sufficiently-sampled map (14% over 7). Start with the 6 essential Inferno lineups, review the callouts, then spin up a practice server.

Lifetime stats

149,080Lifetime kills
1.09K/D · Top 50% of Level 8 players
5,214Matches
42.4%Match win rate
61.8%Headshot % · Top 10% of Level 8 players
8.5%Shot accuracy
19,300MVPs
3,711Hours (in match)
3,030Bombs planted
4,190Bombs defused

Most-used weapons

AK-4775,823
AWP11,792
SSG 082,759
FAMAS2,177
MP91,261

Lifetime map wins

6,380dust2
3,862train
2,566nuke
1,980inferno
1,646vertigo
329cbble
131office
126italy

Lifetime totals via Steam — visible because this profile's game details are public. Spans CS:GO and CS2.

Faceit stats

Combat

1,255Matches
50%Win rate
0.91Avg K/D
73.2ADR
54%Headshot %

Clutches & streaks

31%1v1 clutch win
20%1v2 clutch win
9Longest win streak

Recent Faceit resultsWWLLW

MapMatchesWin rateAvg K/DAvg kills
Mirage44455%0.9915.0
Dust219642%0.8414.0
Ancient14355%0.9014.2
Anubis14046%0.8814.6
Nuke7036%0.8615.1
Train4349%0.9014.5
Inferno2631%0.6911.9
Vertigo2065%1.1115.7

Faceit-match stats via the FACEIT Data API — a separate match pool from the sections above.

Skill profile

Aggregate performance across tracked matches — stats via Leetify. Percentile context against other CSDB-tracked players arrives as our own benchmark data accumulates.

22.6%Headshot accuracy
34.3%Accuracy (enemy spotted)
34.2%Spray accuracy
84.6%Counter-strafing
9.2°Preaim
642msReaction time
35.1%T opening success
54.3%CT opening success
0.59Enemies flashed / flash
9.6%Flash assists
8.40HE damage / grenade
14.51Flashes / match

Recommended for you

Chosen by comparing your tracked metrics against the thresholds we flag — the measurement behind each one is shown, so you can disagree with it.

  1. Advanced Mechanics

    You are losing most of the first duels you take on T side, which is usually a peeking and spacing problem, not aim.

    T opening duels 35.101% — below the 40% mark we flag

Spend your practice time on Inferno

Map knowledge compounds faster than mechanics — lineups and callouts you learn once keep paying out every time the map comes up.

14% win rate across 7 tracked games — your weakest map with enough games to be worth reading into.

Inferno callouts & strategy →Inferno grenade lineups →

Recent matches

MapScoreRatingHS%Date
inferno10–13-0.0930%12 Nov →
cache13–100.0624%25 Oct →
mirage13–10-0.0224%24 Oct →
dust212–16-0.0413%6 Oct →
dust28–13-0.0024%4 Oct →
mirage13–70.0828%3 Oct →
inferno6–13-0.0515%30 Sept →
dust210–130.0343%30 Sept →
ancient13–9-0.0324%10 Sept →
dust213–100.0619%28 Aug →
dust213–80.0427%23 Aug →
dust213–11-0.0131%21 Aug →
inferno14–16-0.0118%20 Aug →
cache13–100.0016%17 Aug →
dust213–80.0317%16 Aug →
dust215–15-0.0125%4 Aug →
dust216–14-0.0222%4 Aug →
mirage6–13-0.0113%2 Aug →
anubis11–13-0.0138%1 Aug →
cache5–13-0.0714%30 Jul →
mirage7–13-0.0327%28 Jul →
ancient13–50.0227%25 Jul →
mirage8–13-0.0722%20 Jul →
cache13–60.0123%19 Jul →
cache5–13-0.1116%17 Jul →
cache13–50.0324%7 Jul →
anubis13–6-0.0221%6 Jul →
mirage10–13-0.0020%5 Jul →
mirage13–9-0.0418%5 Jul →
ancient13–7-0.0115%3 Jul →
mirage12–16-0.0315%2 Jul →
anubis13–16-0.0322%2 Jul →
dust25–13-0.0946%2 Jul →
inferno3–13-0.0227%1 Jul →
overpass9–40.0633%29 Jun →
nuke9–30.0916%29 Jun →
vertigo9–7-0.0835%29 Jun →
inferno9–50.0146%29 Jun →
dust25–130.0437%25 Jun →
dust28–13-0.0627%25 Jun →
cache7–13-0.0419%25 Jun →
mirage10–130.0428%23 Jun →
anubis16–140.0610%23 Jun →
dust213–11-0.0237%23 Jun →
dust213–8-0.0218%23 Jun →
anubis15–15-0.0217%22 Jun →
ancient10–13-0.0514%22 Jun →
anubis10–13-0.0426%19 Jun →
cache6–13-0.0116%17 Jun →
overpass7–13-0.0117%16 Jun →
anubis13–160.0021%12 Jun →
inferno2–13-0.0640%10 Jun →
mirage16–12-0.0236%10 Jun →
mirage6–13-0.0429%10 Jun →
dust20–12-0.0222%10 Jun →
dust213–50.0246%8 Jun →
mirage13–80.0218%3 Jun →
nuke6–130.0124%2 Jun →
mirage13–6-0.0419%1 Jun →
dust213–5-0.0327%1 Jun →
mirage2–130.0516%1 Jun →
dust213–40.0510%30 May →
anubis13–90.0516%28 May →
dust213–10-0.0334%26 May →
dust213–80.0229%26 May →
dust213–20.0516%25 May →
ancient4–13-0.0323%13 May →
cache11–13-0.0121%13 May →
cache13–11-0.0030%12 May →
cache13–30.0036%12 May →
mirage13–9-0.0047%12 May →
cache5–13-0.0536%12 May →
cache13–7-0.0115%11 May →
cache13–80.0927%11 May →
cache12–12-0.0326%5 May →
cache10–13-0.069%30 Apr →
cache11–13-0.0421%29 Apr →
cache8–3-0.0119%29 Apr →
mirage3–13-0.084%28 Apr →
mirage8–13-0.0326%21 Apr →
inferno10–13-0.0122%12 Apr →
mirage8–130.0437%12 Apr →
dust27–130.0320%12 Apr →
mirage13–110.0119%8 Apr →
nuke13–16-0.0220%8 Apr →
anubis12–16-0.0116%6 Apr →
dust28–13-0.0226%5 Apr →
nuke5–130.0218%5 Apr →
dust213–8-0.0121%30 Mar →
mirage13–10-0.0232%28 Mar →
nuke13–110.1424%28 Mar →
mirage5–130.0218%28 Mar →
dust213–80.0333%25 Mar →
dust213–5-0.0120%23 Mar →
dust213–60.0924%20 Mar →
nuke13–70.0318%20 Mar →
ancient10–13-0.0417%19 Mar →
dust213–90.0442%19 Mar →
anubis1–13-0.0424%19 Mar →
dust213–11-0.0125%17 Mar →

Match data via Leetify.

Recent teammates

Milestones

500 Matches
Compare this player with someone →Inventory value for this account →Where does this rating sit? Premier rank tiers →

This profile is built from public Steam data. If it is yours, you can remove it, or delete your CSDB account.