myla

myla — CS2 Stats

GB76561198810627524[U:1:850361796]Steam profile ↗✓ No bans

2,024Tracked matches62%Win rate2024Tracked since
1,957Hours in CS18Hrs last 2 wks
CSDB Rating6.0 SolidSupport
FaceitLevel 9 · 1,601 ELOTop 20.7% of ranked FACEIT players
WingmanLegendary Eagle
Ladder ranks via Leetify

How this compares with the same rank

Median values for Level 9 among CSDB-tracked players (n=15,132), from Valve's own lifetime stats. Aim, positioning and utility scores are deliberately not benchmarked here — those are a third-party provider's derived metrics, which CSDB does not store.

MetricThis playerLevel 9 medianLevel 10 medianvs Level 10
Headshot rate52.7%48.2%50.9%above
Shot accuracy0.3%13.2%13.7%13.4% short
Kill/death ratio0.971.071.090.11 short
Match win rate52.2%46.9%48.4%above

This profile matches the typical Level 10 player on 2 of 4 comparable metrics.

Widest gap: Shot accuracy. That is the metric furthest from the Level 10 median in relative terms — not necessarily the one holding a rank back, which no statistic here can establish.

Share this profile

CSDB.GGmylaFACEITLevel 9 · 1,601 ELOSTANDINGTop 20.7% of rankedcsdb.gg/stats

The image is a snapshot; the link keeps updating. Nothing here is published anywhere — it is generated in your browser when you click.

Performance scores

Aim72
Positioning50
Utility60

0–100 skill scores via Leetify.

Recent form

STEADY56–43–1Last 10056%Win rateWWWWWLLLLW

Last 10 vs previous 10: 0pp win rate · −0.03 avg rating · −1.7pp headshot accuracy · −29ms reaction

Win rate 0pp across the last 10 against the 10 before — within the normal variation of a 10-match window (±20pp), so no real shift yet.

Last 5 · 10 · 20 matches

Last 5

  • 5–0 · 100% win rate
  • Avg rating -0.00
  • Avg headshot accuracy 16%
  • Avg reaction 500ms

Last 10

  • 6–4 · 60% win rate
  • Avg rating -0.02
  • Avg headshot accuracy 19%
  • Avg reaction 513ms

Last 20

  • 12–7–1 · 60% win rate
  • Avg rating -0.00
  • Avg headshot accuracy 20%
  • Avg reaction 528ms

Newest first, from the last 100 tracked matches. Each block is its own sample — one result moves a 5-match win rate by 20 points.

Player DNA

Primary style: Support — Utility contribution stands above the rest of this profile (+1.4 against its own average).

Aim7.2
Utility6.0
Positioning5.0
Opening Duels2.2
Clutch5.2

Style profile from tracked-match aggregates — how this player plays, not how good they are. Classification rules are deterministic and documented in code.

What this cannot see yet: which weapons you use — so CSDB cannot identify an AWPer, and no style here implies a rifle or a sniper. It also cannot see how often you take opening duels, only how often you win them, nor where you hold, so roles that depend on those (entry, lurk, anchor) are deliberately absent rather than guessed. All of it needs round-by-round demo data, which is the next thing being built.

Your pro match

ZywOo

Plays most like ZywOo 88% playstyle similarity

Most alike: positioning profile, utility contribution.

Where you differ: lower aim profile; lower opening-duel success.

Similarity of playstyle shape across shared dimensions — it says how you play, not that you play at their level. Full comparison →

CSDB Rating breakdown

Aim7.2
Positioning5.0
Utility6.0
Mechanics6.4
Opening Duels3.9
Win Impact9.0

Composite 6.0/10 (Solid), a weighted mean of the bars with a small opposition adjustment (×0.95 for this rank band). Formula versioned (v1) and documented in code.

Trends

Match rating0.00+0.01
first ⅓ avg -0.01 → last ⅓ avg 0.00
Reaction time531ms−28ms
first ⅓ avg 558ms → last ⅓ avg 531ms
Headshot accuracy18.0%−1.9%
first ⅓ avg 19.8% → last ⅓ avg 18.0%

Rolling 5-match average across the last 100 tracked matches, oldest to newest. The delta compares the first third of the window with the last.

Personal bests

0.13Best match rating · 13–10 · ancient, 26 Oct →
40%Best headshot accuracy · 13–8 · nuke, 31 Oct →
398msFastest reaction time · 13–4 · vertigo, 4 Nov →
13–1Biggest win · ancient, 14 Oct →

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Highlights

7Longest win streak
W5Current streak
11–7In matches decided by ≤2 rounds
6Overtime games

Map breakdown

nukeBest map · 82% over 17infernoWeakest map · 14% over 7
MapGradePlayedRecordWin rateAvg rating
mirageB2412–1250%-0.01
ancientA1811–761%-0.01
nukeS1714–382%0.03
anubisA148–657%-0.01
vertigoA148–657%0.00
infernoD71–614%-0.03
dust2—22–0100%0.04
cache—20–20%-0.06
overpass—10–10%-0.04
boulder—10–10%0.07

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Inferno is currently your weakest sufficiently-sampled map (14% over 7). Start with the 6 essential Inferno lineups, review the callouts, then spin up a practice server.

Lifetime stats

47,097Lifetime kills
0.97K/D
2,212Matches
52.2%Match win rate · Top 25% of Level 9 players
52.7%Headshot % · Top 50% of Level 9 players
0.3%Shot accuracy
5,556MVPs
3,450Hours (in match)
2,904Bombs planted
640Bombs defused

Most-used weapons

Lifetime map wins

12,788vertigo
1,443nuke
1,153inferno
692dust2
268train
40italy
35office
18lake

Lifetime totals via Steam — visible because this profile's game details are public. Spans CS:GO and CS2.

Faceit stats

Combat

411Matches
56%Win rate
1.10Avg K/D
77.7ADR
47%Headshot %

Clutches & streaks

46%1v1 clutch win
23%1v2 clutch win
9Longest win streak

Recent Faceit resultsWLLLW

MapMatchesWin rateAvg K/DAvg kills
Mirage11557%1.0914.8
Ancient8651%1.0815.5
Anubis7661%1.0314.0
Nuke5478%1.1814.6
Inferno3735%1.1115.1
Dust21753%1.6315.1
Vertigo956%1.2115.2
Overpass729%0.8213.9

Faceit-match stats via the FACEIT Data API — a separate match pool from the sections above.

Skill profile

Aggregate performance across tracked matches — stats via Leetify. Percentile context against other CSDB-tracked players arrives as our own benchmark data accumulates.

18.1%Headshot accuracy
35.3%Accuracy (enemy spotted)
36.5%Spray accuracy
78.6%Counter-strafing
10.8°Preaim
526msReaction time
50.9%T opening success
40.0%CT opening success
0.57Enemies flashed / flash
6.2%Flash assists
10.88HE damage / grenade
7.34Flashes / match

Recommended for you

Chosen by comparing your tracked metrics against the thresholds we flag — the measurement behind each one is shown, so you can disagree with it.

  1. Advanced Mechanics

    Losing the first CT duel repeatedly usually means holding angles that favour the peeker.

    CT opening duels 39.9772% — below the 40% mark we flag

Spend your practice time on Inferno

Map knowledge compounds faster than mechanics — lineups and callouts you learn once keep paying out every time the map comes up.

14% win rate across 7 tracked games — your weakest map with enough games to be worth reading into.

Inferno callouts & strategy →Inferno grenade lineups →

Recent matches

MapScoreRatingHS%Date
anubis13–30.0514%4 Nov →
vertigo13–5-0.0721%4 Nov →
vertigo13–40.0318%4 Nov →
vertigo13–4-0.0617%4 Nov →
vertigo13–30.0413%4 Nov →
vertigo5–13-0.0319%3 Nov →
mirage3–13-0.0918%3 Nov →
mirage7–13-0.0616%2 Nov →
ancient4–13-0.0820%2 Nov →
nuke13–80.1240%31 Oct →
nuke13–30.0920%31 Oct →
vertigo13–70.0117%30 Oct →
anubis13–110.019%28 Oct →
mirage13–7-0.0414%28 Oct →
nuke13–40.0126%26 Oct →
ancient13–100.1322%26 Oct →
vertigo12–12-0.0619%26 Oct →
inferno6–13-0.0330%23 Oct →
overpass6–13-0.0420%23 Oct →
boulder4–130.0734%23 Oct →
mirage13–110.0713%22 Oct →
ancient13–110.0211%22 Oct →
vertigo1–13-0.0417%22 Oct →
nuke3–13-0.036%21 Oct →
mirage10–13-0.0223%21 Oct →
vertigo13–10-0.0010%21 Oct →
anubis13–9-0.034%20 Oct →
anubis13–110.0120%20 Oct →
nuke13–90.0923%20 Oct →
ancient11–130.0614%19 Oct →
nuke5–13-0.0616%19 Oct →
vertigo13–100.035%19 Oct →
anubis10–13-0.0024%14 Oct →
inferno9–13-0.0827%14 Oct →
ancient13–10.0232%14 Oct →
vertigo8–130.0422%14 Oct →
anubis6–13-0.0822%13 Oct →
ancient4–13-0.119%13 Oct →
nuke13–11-0.0113%12 Oct →
mirage9–13-0.005%12 Oct →
ancient13–90.0222%8 Oct →
mirage11–130.028%8 Oct →
ancient2–13-0.0713%8 Oct →
inferno5–13-0.0322%8 Oct →
anubis17–19-0.0216%7 Oct →
ancient13–8-0.0319%6 Oct →
anubis13–9-0.0314%5 Oct →
ancient11–13-0.049%5 Oct →
nuke8–130.0821%5 Oct →
nuke13–90.0416%5 Oct →
nuke13–80.0313%5 Oct →
ancient13–60.0616%5 Oct →
ancient13–10-0.0832%4 Oct →
mirage13–100.0214%4 Oct →
mirage13–30.0310%4 Oct →
vertigo8–120.0819%3 Oct →
mirage13–110.0019%2 Oct →
mirage9–130.0223%2 Oct →
nuke13–70.0129%2 Oct →
nuke13–11-0.0510%2 Oct →
mirage13–3-0.0311%2 Oct →
nuke13–60.0921%1 Oct →
inferno16–13-0.0124%1 Oct →
anubis10–13-0.0615%1 Oct →
mirage14–160.0421%1 Oct →
mirage13–10-0.0113%30 Sept →
dust213–70.0428%28 Sept →
dust25–10.0438%28 Sept →
anubis10–13-0.0016%27 Sept →
mirage12–16-0.0318%27 Sept →
mirage10–130.0314%27 Sept →
anubis10–130.0525%27 Sept →
mirage13–8-0.0117%27 Sept →
inferno9–13-0.0214%26 Sept →
nuke13–8-0.018%26 Sept →
vertigo5–130.0625%26 Sept →
vertigo13–40.0024%26 Sept →
mirage13–6-0.0423%23 Sept →
cache3–13-0.0218%23 Sept →
ancient8–13-0.0621%23 Sept →
mirage7–13-0.0225%21 Sept →
anubis13–100.0124%21 Sept →
mirage13–40.0515%21 Sept →
ancient10–130.0023%21 Sept →
mirage13–5-0.0226%21 Sept →
ancient13–110.0121%20 Sept →
mirage10–13-0.058%18 Sept →
nuke13–110.0025%18 Sept →
mirage13–1-0.0133%18 Sept →
ancient16–12-0.059%17 Sept →
ancient13–40.0123%17 Sept →
anubis13–8-0.0117%17 Sept →
mirage7–13-0.0130%9 Sept →
anubis13–9-0.0719%9 Sept →
inferno11–130.0116%9 Sept →
ancient19–170.0117%8 Sept →
nuke13–50.0220%7 Sept →
cache1–13-0.1011%5 Sept →
nuke13–110.0417%2 Sept →
inferno11–13-0.0315%2 Sept →

Match data via Leetify.

Recent teammates

Milestones

1,000 Matches
Compare this player with someone →Inventory value for this account →Where does this rating sit? Premier rank tiers →

This profile is built from public Steam data. If it is yours, you can remove it, or delete your CSDB account.