Lepuska

Lepuska — CS2 Stats

FI76561198809820044[U:1:849554316]Steam profile ↗✓ No bans

975Tracked matches50%Win rate2021Tracked since
1,603Hours in CS29Hrs last 2 wks
CSDB Rating4.4 DevelopingPositional Player
Premier CS Rating10,110Blue band · top ~54.3% of ranked players (population est.)
FaceitLevel 3Top 90.6% of ranked FACEIT players
WingmanMaster Guardian II
Ladder ranks via Leetify

What changed since last observed

CSDB last observed this profile on 13 Sep 2026 (4 days ago). Ranks are recorded once per day this page is viewed.

No change since then. Play, then come back: the next observation lands here.

Track this profile

CSDB reads this profile's Premier rating from its tracked match history, and records Faceit ELO once on every day the page is viewed. 12 days played since 22 Aug 2026. Come back after the next session and the change shows above.

Is this you? Sign in with Steam to claim it and connect match tracking →

Rating over time

Premier CS Rating: 10,110 -993 22 Aug13 Sept · 11 days played
9,65711,103peak 11,10322 Aug13 Sept
11,209Peak Premier in tracked matches
12Days played since 2026-08-22

Premier CS Rating

  • 993 below peak (11,103)
  • Next: Purple band at 15,000 4,890 to go
  • Reached: Blue band · Light Blue band
  • Blue band first seen 2026-09-11
  • Light Blue band first seen 2026-09-11

Premier comes from this profile’s tracked match history, so it reaches back as far as those matches do. Faceit ELO is CSDB’s own observation — no feed exposes ELO per match, so that line only has the days the profile was viewed and cannot be backfilled.

Compare periods

Last 7 days vs previous 7

MetricLast 7Previous 7Change
Matches2912+17
Win rate59%42%+17pp
K/D0.760.89−0.13
Headshot %49%49%−0pp

Measured 11 Sep 202617 Sep 2026; previous 4 Sep 2026 → 11 Sep 2026.

Differences between Valve's lifetime totals on the days CSDB observed this profile — every mode Valve counts, not only ranked. A window appears only when an observation sits within a few days of each end.

How this compares with the same rank

Median values for Level 3 among CSDB-tracked players (n=8,548), from Valve's own lifetime stats. Aim, positioning and utility scores are deliberately not benchmarked here — those are a third-party provider's derived metrics, which CSDB does not store.

MetricThis playerLevel 3 medianLevel 4 medianvs Level 4
Headshot rate41.1%41.9%42.7%1.6% short
Shot accuracy7.3%12.2%11.2%3.9% short
Kill/death ratio0.440.980.990.56 short
Match win rate42.8%43.3%43.9%1.1% short

This profile sits below the typical Level 4 player on every metric we can compare.

Widest gap: Kill/death ratio. That is the metric furthest from the Level 4 median in relative terms — not necessarily the one holding a rank back, which no statistic here can establish.

Share this profile

CSDB.GGLepuskaFACEITLevel 3STANDINGTop 90.6% of rankedPREMIER10,110 · Blue bandcsdb.gg/stats

The image is a snapshot; the link keeps updating. Nothing here is published anywhere — it is generated in your browser when you click.

Performance scores

Aim54
Positioning52
Utility33

0–100 skill scores via Leetify.

Recent form

STEADY55405Last 10055%Win rateWLLLLWLWWW

Last 10 vs previous 10: −20pp win rate · −0.02 avg rating · +0.2pp headshot accuracy · −21ms reaction

Win rate down 20pp across the last 10 against the 10 before — more than a 10-match window's normal noise (±20pp).

Last 5 · 10 · 20 matches

Last 5

  • 14 · 20% win rate
  • Avg rating -0.05
  • Avg headshot accuracy 15%
  • Avg reaction 553ms

Last 10

  • 55 · 50% win rate
  • Avg rating -0.01
  • Avg headshot accuracy 17%
  • Avg reaction 535ms

Last 20

  • 128 · 60% win rate
  • Avg rating -0.00
  • Avg headshot accuracy 17%
  • Avg reaction 546ms

Newest first, from the last 100 tracked matches. Each block is its own sample — one result moves a 5-match win rate by 20 points.

Player DNA

Primary style: Positional PlayerPositioning stands above the rest of this profile (+2.6 against its own average).

Aim5.4
Utility3.3
Positioning5.2
Opening Duels0.8
Clutch1.0

Limited utility dependence

Style profile from tracked-match aggregates — how this player plays, not how good they are. Classification rules are deterministic and documented in code.

What this cannot see yet: which weapons you use — so CSDB cannot identify an AWPer, and no style here implies a rifle or a sniper. It also cannot see how often you take opening duels, only how often you win them, nor where you hold, so roles that depend on those (entry, lurk, anchor) are deliberately absent rather than guessed. All of it needs round-by-round demo data, which is the next thing being built.

Your pro match

NiKo

Plays most like NiKo 80% playstyle similarity

Most alike: positioning profile, utility contribution.

Where you differ: lower aim profile; lower opening-duel success.

Similarity of playstyle shape across shared dimensions — it says how you play, not that you play at their level. Full comparison →

Strengths & areas to improve

Areas to improve

Reaction time. 572ms from enemy-visible to first shot leaves fights decided before they start — warmup routines move this number more than anything else.

Generated by fixed rules over this profile's own numbers — no model, no guessing; silent when the sample is too small to support a claim.

CSDB Rating breakdown

Aim5.4
Positioning5.2
Utility3.3
Mechanics5.3
Opening Duels1.3
Win Impact5.0

Composite 4.4/10 (Developing), a weighted mean of the bars with a small opposition adjustment (×0.95 for this rank band). Formula versioned (v1) and documented in code.

Trends

Match rating-0.01−0.00
first ⅓ avg -0.01 → last ⅓ avg -0.01
Reaction time558ms−17ms
first ⅓ avg 576ms → last ⅓ avg 558ms
Headshot accuracy17.1%+1.0%
first ⅓ avg 16.1% → last ⅓ avg 17.1%

Rolling 5-match average across the last 100 tracked matches, oldest to newest. The delta compares the first third of the window with the last.

Personal bests

0.24Best match rating · 9–2 · overpass, 28 Aug
57%Best headshot accuracy · 9–0 · vertigo, 28 Aug
359msFastest reaction time · 13–1 · anubis, 6 Sept
13–0Biggest win · dust2, 29 Aug

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Highlights

6Longest win streak
87In matches decided by ≤2 rounds
7Overtime games

Map breakdown

ancientBest map · 82% over 11anubisWeakest map · 33% over 12
MapGradePlayedRecordWin rateAvg rating
infernoS1913668%0.01
mirageB137654%-0.03
nukeC135838%-0.01
anubisD124833%0.00
ancientS119282%0.00
vertigoA106460%-0.00
cacheC94544%-0.02
dust2C83538%-0.00
overpassS54180%0.11

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Anubis is currently your weakest sufficiently-sampled map (33% over 12). Start with the 6 essential Anubis lineups, review the callouts, then spin up a practice server.

Lifetime stats

27,210Lifetime kills
0.44K/D
2,421Matches
42.8%Match win rate
41.1%Headshot %
7.3%Shot accuracy
3,637MVPs
943Hours (in match)
2,708Bombs planted
227Bombs defused

Most-used weapons

Lifetime map wins

2,920nuke
2,648inferno
1,573dust2
1,198vertigo
834cbble
696train
570office
84lake

Lifetime totals via Steam — visible because this profile's game details are public. Spans CS:GO and CS2.

Faceit stats

Combat

36Matches
53%Win rate
0.89Avg K/D
64.5ADR
40%Headshot %

Clutches & streaks

25%1v1 clutch win
8%1v2 clutch win
4Longest win streak

Recent Faceit resultsLWLWW

MapMatchesWin rateAvg K/DAvg kills
Anubis1173%1.0312.0
Mirage933%0.9611.1
Ancient475%0.668.8
Dust2333%0.588.3
Train250%0.9013.5
Nuke1100%0.9110.0
Inferno10%0.508.0
Overpass1100%2.2916.0

Faceit-match stats via the FACEIT Data API — a separate match pool from the sections above.

Skill profile

Aggregate performance across tracked matches — stats via Leetify. Percentile context against other CSDB-tracked players arrives as our own benchmark data accumulates.

17.3%Headshot accuracy
30.3%Accuracy (enemy spotted)
29.7%Spray accuracy
73.9%Counter-strafing
9.7°Preaim
572msReaction time
35.6%T opening success
35.1%CT opening success
0.34Enemies flashed / flash
3.0%Flash assists
8.51HE damage / grenade
2.91Flashes / match

Recommended for you

Chosen by comparing your tracked metrics against the thresholds we flag — the measurement behind each one is shown, so you can disagree with it.

  1. Grenades & Utility

    Most of your flashes are blinding nobody. A handful of reliable pop-flash lineups fixes this faster than anything else.

    Enemies flashed per flash 0.3426 — below the 0.5 mark we flag

    Grenade Lineups
  2. Advanced Mechanics

    You are losing most of the first duels you take on T side, which is usually a peeking and spacing problem, not aim.

    T opening duels 35.6305% — below the 40% mark we flag

Spend your practice time on Anubis

Map knowledge compounds faster than mechanics — lineups and callouts you learn once keep paying out every time the map comes up.

33% win rate across 12 tracked games — your weakest map with enough games to be worth reading into.

Anubis callouts & strategyAnubis grenade lineups

Recent matches

MapScoreRatingHS%Date
inferno13–11-0.0114%13 Sept
inferno10–13-0.0611%13 Sept
anubis11–13-0.0714%13 Sept
mirage12–16-0.0517%13 Sept
nuke7–9-0.0420%13 Sept
ancient13–4-0.0424%13 Sept
cache9–130.0121%13 Sept
mirage16–14-0.0221%12 Sept
ancient13–110.0817%12 Sept
vertigo9–10.0917%12 Sept
anubis11–13-0.056%12 Sept
anubis3–130.0719%12 Sept
cache13–90.0317%12 Sept
mirage12–6-0.0125%12 Sept
anubis13–40.0118%12 Sept
dust27–130.0116%12 Sept
ancient13–70.0222%12 Sept
overpass9–70.0715%11 Sept
vertigo9–7-0.1122%11 Sept
inferno9–40.0613%11 Sept
nuke6–9-0.079%11 Sept
dust29–13-0.0217%11 Sept
cache13–5-0.0512%11 Sept
dust210–13-0.0124%11 Sept
dust213–80.0130%11 Sept
inferno13–80.0315%11 Sept
mirage13–6-0.0315%11 Sept
mirage10–13-0.0419%11 Sept
cache6–13-0.0519%6 Sept
ancient13–50.1011%6 Sept
nuke7–13-0.038%6 Sept
inferno13–9-0.0218%6 Sept
cache13–11-0.0021%6 Sept
anubis8–13-0.0111%6 Sept
dust210–13-0.0122%6 Sept
inferno14–160.0419%6 Sept
ancient13–6-0.0218%6 Sept
inferno9–13-0.0419%6 Sept
anubis13–1-0.0410%6 Sept
cache5–13-0.0615%6 Sept
inferno9–5-0.106%30 Aug
mirage13–9-0.0113%30 Aug
nuke5–9-0.0912%30 Aug
vertigo4–9-0.0913%30 Aug
overpass6–90.0915%30 Aug
inferno9–40.079%30 Aug
vertigo9–20.1533%30 Aug
nuke9–20.1315%30 Aug
overpass9–60.0326%30 Aug
inferno9–00.2112%30 Aug
anubis7–13-0.0019%30 Aug
inferno13–40.0534%29 Aug
ancient13–4-0.0616%29 Aug
inferno13–6-0.0118%29 Aug
vertigo6–13-0.0020%29 Aug
dust213–00.0120%29 Aug
anubis13–20.0931%29 Aug
ancient13–60.030%29 Aug
mirage13–00.0524%29 Aug
cache13–8-0.0223%29 Aug
nuke7–9-0.128%29 Aug
vertigo8–8-0.0334%28 Aug
inferno8–80.0215%28 Aug
vertigo9–00.0757%28 Aug
nuke9–5-0.0716%28 Aug
inferno9–40.0421%28 Aug
overpass9–10.1140%28 Aug
nuke9–30.026%28 Aug
vertigo9–6-0.0215%28 Aug
inferno8–8-0.0918%28 Aug
anubis7–13-0.069%28 Aug
nuke13–5-0.0213%28 Aug
mirage13–7-0.0116%28 Aug
anubis15–150.0116%28 Aug
cache14–16-0.0211%28 Aug
nuke2–13-0.0415%28 Aug
nuke9–30.2131%28 Aug
overpass9–20.2422%28 Aug
inferno9–7-0.0414%28 Aug
vertigo7–90.0228%28 Aug
inferno16–13-0.0316%28 Aug
mirage7–13-0.0420%28 Aug
ancient13–90.0215%28 Aug
anubis13–80.0513%28 Aug
mirage4–13-0.1212%28 Aug
ancient7–130.0119%27 Aug
nuke6–130.0321%27 Aug
anubis8–130.0512%26 Aug
mirage4–13-0.0114%26 Aug
inferno13–20.1117%26 Aug
vertigo9–6-0.0711%25 Aug
inferno5–13-0.067%23 Aug
nuke4–13-0.0425%23 Aug
cache6–13-0.0618%23 Aug
ancient3–13-0.098%23 Aug
mirage13–8-0.0323%23 Aug
ancient13–11-0.0322%23 Aug
mirage1–13-0.0421%23 Aug
dust215–15-0.028%22 Aug
dust213–50.0017%22 Aug

Match data via Leetify.

Recent teammates

Milestones

500 Matches
Compare this player with someone →Inventory value for this account →Where does this rating sit? Premier rank tiers →