AnchinJura

AnchinJura — CS2 Stats

YT76561198802237919[U:1:841972191]Steam profile ↗✓ No bans

475Tracked matches43%Win rate2025Tracked since
558Hours in CS
CSDB Rating4.7 DevelopingAll-Rounder
FaceitLevel 9 · 1,258 ELOTop 20.7% of ranked FACEIT players
Ladder ranks via Leetify

What changed since last observed

CSDB last observed this profile on 12 Sep 2026 (6 days ago). Ranks are recorded once per day this page is viewed.

0Faceit ELO · 1,258 → 1,258
+5Tracked matches · now 475
0.0ppWin rate · 42.9% → 42.9%
Track this profile

CSDB reads this profile's Premier rating from its tracked match history, and records Faceit ELO once on every day the page is viewed. 52 days played since 25 Apr 2026. Come back after the next session and the change shows above.

Is this you? Sign in with Steam to claim it and connect match tracking →

Rating over time

Premier CS Rating: 16,456 -990 25 Apr6 Jul · 29 days played
15,66518,541peak 18,54125 Apr6 Jul
Faceit ELO: 1,258 +0 8 Sept18 Sept · 3 observations
1,2581,258peak 1,2588 Sept18 Sept
18,541Peak Premier in tracked matches
1,258Highest Faceit ELO seen on CSDB
52Days played since 2026-04-25

Faceit ELO

  • At peak — 1,258
  • Next: Level 7 at 1,351 93 to go
  • Reached: Level 6 · Level 5 · Level 4 · Level 3
  • Level 6 first seen 2026-09-08
  • Level 5 first seen 2026-09-08

Premier comes from this profile’s tracked match history, so it reaches back as far as those matches do. Faceit ELO is CSDB’s own observation — no feed exposes ELO per match, so that line only has the days the profile was viewed and cannot be backfilled.

Compare periods

Last 7 days vs previous 7

MetricLast 7Previous 7Change
Matches8
Win rate63%
K/D1.02
Headshot %46%

Measured 10 Sep 202618 Sep 2026; no observation near 14 days ago, so there is no previous window yet.

Differences between Valve's lifetime totals on the days CSDB observed this profile — every mode Valve counts, not only ranked. A window appears only when an observation sits within a few days of each end.

How this compares with the same rank

Median values for Level 9 among CSDB-tracked players (n=12,915), from Valve's own lifetime stats. Aim, positioning and utility scores are deliberately not benchmarked here — those are a third-party provider's derived metrics, which CSDB does not store.

MetricThis playerLevel 9 medianLevel 10 medianvs Level 10
Headshot rate43.2%48.3%51.0%7.8% short
Shot accuracy6.1%13.2%13.7%7.6% short
Kill/death ratio0.981.071.090.11 short
Match win rate45.6%46.9%48.4%2.8% short

This profile sits below the typical Level 10 player on every metric we can compare.

Widest gap: Shot accuracy. That is the metric furthest from the Level 10 median in relative terms — not necessarily the one holding a rank back, which no statistic here can establish.

Share this profile

CSDB.GGAnchinJuraFACEITLevel 9 · 1,258 ELOSTANDINGTop 20.7% of rankedPEAK ELO1,258csdb.gg/stats

The image is a snapshot; the link keeps updating. Nothing here is published anywhere — it is generated in your browser when you click.

Performance scores

Aim64
Positioning54
Utility55

0–100 skill scores via Leetify.

Recent form

COLD49483Last 10049%Win rateWWWLLLLLLL

Last 10 vs previous 10: −10pp win rate · +0.03 avg rating · +0.5pp headshot accuracy · −9ms reaction

Win rate −10pp across the last 10 against the 10 before — within the normal variation of a 10-match window (±20pp), so no real shift yet.

Last 5 · 10 · 20 matches

Last 5

  • 32 · 60% win rate
  • Avg rating -0.00
  • Avg headshot accuracy 15%
  • Avg reaction 605ms

Last 10

  • 37 · 30% win rate
  • Avg rating 0.03
  • Avg headshot accuracy 17%
  • Avg reaction 550ms

Last 20

  • 7121 · 35% win rate
  • Avg rating 0.01
  • Avg headshot accuracy 17%
  • Avg reaction 554ms

Newest first, from the last 100 tracked matches. Each block is its own sample — one result moves a 5-match win rate by 20 points.

Player DNA

Primary style: All-RounderNo style dimension stands clear of the others in this profile.

Aim6.4
Utility5.5
Positioning5.4
Opening Duels5.1
Clutch4.4

Style profile from tracked-match aggregates — how this player plays, not how good they are. Classification rules are deterministic and documented in code.

What this cannot see yet: which weapons you use — so CSDB cannot identify an AWPer, and no style here implies a rifle or a sniper. It also cannot see how often you take opening duels, only how often you win them, nor where you hold, so roles that depend on those (entry, lurk, anchor) are deliberately absent rather than guessed. All of it needs round-by-round demo data, which is the next thing being built.

Your pro match

ZywOo

Plays most like ZywOo 85% playstyle similarity

Most alike: utility contribution, positioning profile.

Where you differ: lower opening-duel success; lower aim profile.

Similarity of playstyle shape across shared dimensions — it says how you play, not that you play at their level. Full comparison →

Strengths & areas to improve

Areas to improve

T-side openings. Opening success drops from 53% on CT to 32% on T — the same duels are being taken with worse setups on the attacking side.

Reaction time. 556ms from enemy-visible to first shot leaves fights decided before they start — warmup routines move this number more than anything else.

Generated by fixed rules over this profile's own numbers — no model, no guessing; silent when the sample is too small to support a claim.

CSDB Rating breakdown

Aim6.4
Positioning5.4
Utility5.5
Mechanics5.4
Opening Duels3.2
Win Impact2.6

Composite 4.7/10 (Developing), a weighted mean of the bars with a small opposition adjustment (×0.90 for this rank band). Formula versioned (v1) and documented in code.

Trends

Match rating0.02−0.01
first ⅓ avg 0.02 → last ⅓ avg 0.02
Reaction time548ms−31ms
first ⅓ avg 579ms → last ⅓ avg 548ms
Headshot accuracy16.6%−0.4%
first ⅓ avg 17.0% → last ⅓ avg 16.6%

Rolling 5-match average across the last 100 tracked matches, oldest to newest. The delta compares the first third of the window with the last.

Personal bests

0.20Best match rating · 13–2 · dust2, 7 Jun
35%Best headshot accuracy · 13–11 · nuke, 24 May
383msFastest reaction time · 7–9 · inferno, 14 Aug
13–1Biggest win · dust2, 25 Apr

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Highlights

6Longest win streak
W3Current streak
116In matches decided by ≤2 rounds
12Overtime games

Map breakdown

dust2Best map · 67% over 9anubisWeakest map · 33% over 6
MapGradePlayedRecordWin rateAvg rating
mirageB36171947%0.01
nukeB189950%0.05
infernoB137654%0.03
dust2S96367%0.06
ancientA74357%0.01
anubisD62433%0.00
cacheC52340%0.04
overpassC52340%0.03
office1010%0.03

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Anubis is currently your weakest sufficiently-sampled map (33% over 6). Start with the 6 essential Anubis lineups, review the callouts, then spin up a practice server.

Lifetime stats

28,596Lifetime kills
0.98K/D
1,370Matches
45.6%Match win rate
43.2%Headshot %
6.1%Shot accuracy
3,963MVPs
558Hours (in match)
1,629Bombs planted
281Bombs defused

Most-used weapons

Lifetime map wins

2,909inferno
2,402dust2
877nuke
405train
160lake
147vertigo
43cbble
39office

Lifetime totals via Steam — visible because this profile's game details are public. Spans CS:GO and CS2.

Faceit stats

Combat

244Matches
52%Win rate
1.23Avg K/D
91.6ADR
43%Headshot %

Clutches & streaks

42%1v1 clutch win
27%1v2 clutch win
8Longest win streak

Recent Faceit resultsLWWLW

MapMatchesWin rateAvg K/DAvg kills
Mirage6462%1.4019.2
Dust24048%1.2719.4
Inferno3551%1.2417.7
Ancient2756%1.1615.6
Anubis2658%1.2518.6
Nuke1553%1.1919.7
Cache30%1.0219.0
Overpass20%0.9624.0

Faceit-match stats via the FACEIT Data API — a separate match pool from the sections above.

Skill profile

Aggregate performance across tracked matches — stats via Leetify. Percentile context against other CSDB-tracked players arrives as our own benchmark data accumulates.

16.9%Headshot accuracy
33.6%Accuracy (enemy spotted)
38.2%Spray accuracy
74.5%Counter-strafing
10.7°Preaim
556msReaction time
32.4%T opening success
53.3%CT opening success
0.50Enemies flashed / flash
5.0%Flash assists
7.49HE damage / grenade
16.31Flashes / match

Recommended for you

Chosen by comparing your tracked metrics against the thresholds we flag — the measurement behind each one is shown, so you can disagree with it.

  1. Advanced Mechanics

    You are losing most of the first duels you take on T side, which is usually a peeking and spacing problem, not aim.

    T opening duels 32.3582% — below the 40% mark we flag

Spend your practice time on Anubis

Map knowledge compounds faster than mechanics — lineups and callouts you learn once keep paying out every time the map comes up.

33% win rate across 6 tracked games — your weakest map with enough games to be worth reading into.

Anubis callouts & strategyAnubis grenade lineups

Recent matches

MapScoreRatingHS%Date
mirage13–80.0317%4 Sept
mirage13–8-0.0215%24 Aug
mirage16–130.0114%23 Aug
mirage3–13-0.070%16 Aug
inferno7–90.0326%14 Aug
nuke6–90.1623%14 Aug
mirage11–130.0420%14 Aug
inferno13–160.0922%13 Aug
mirage8–13-0.0115%13 Aug
nuke6–130.0221%13 Aug
mirage4–13-0.0715%6 Aug
mirage0–6-0.110%5 Aug
inferno8–13-0.0515%4 Aug
mirage16–13-0.0016%3 Aug
dust213–40.0425%2 Aug
anubis9–130.0324%2 Aug
anubis3–13-0.0023%30 Jul
mirage13–100.0517%27 Jul
mirage13–100.0217%27 Jul
mirage15–150.0217%26 Jul
mirage10–130.0618%24 Jul
nuke14–160.0718%24 Jul
mirage1–13-0.0115%22 Jul
mirage13–80.0812%21 Jul
nuke6–90.0523%21 Jul
dust213–90.0515%21 Jul
mirage0–13-0.050%21 Jul
anubis13–110.0213%20 Jul
mirage13–30.0116%20 Jul
cache15–15-0.0525%16 Jul
mirage10–130.0010%14 Jul
nuke13–90.0618%6 Jul
nuke9–130.0421%25 Jun
mirage6–13-0.0915%22 Jun
anubis6–13-0.0218%21 Jun
nuke10–130.0423%20 Jun
mirage13–30.0617%19 Jun
dust213–40.0722%19 Jun
nuke7–130.0026%10 Jun
dust213–20.2016%7 Jun
inferno13–90.0421%7 Jun
ancient13–110.0117%7 Jun
inferno10–130.0216%5 Jun
nuke13–11-0.0115%4 Jun
mirage10–13-0.0316%1 Jun
mirage13–110.0517%1 Jun
mirage16–14-0.0015%31 May
dust213–100.0910%31 May
nuke13–20.0625%31 May
mirage13–60.0816%28 May
mirage13–80.0214%27 May
overpass11–130.0710%26 May
nuke9–130.0910%26 May
nuke16–14-0.0121%25 May
inferno13–100.1315%25 May
inferno13–110.0116%25 May
mirage6–130.0312%25 May
mirage16–130.0113%25 May
nuke13–110.0735%24 May
inferno13–50.0120%24 May
mirage13–50.1815%24 May
nuke13–60.0110%17 May
mirage9–13-0.0722%13 May
mirage10–130.0629%13 May
office12–120.0330%11 May
cache13–70.1014%11 May
cache4–13-0.0110%10 May
ancient8–13-0.028%10 May
cache13–40.1121%10 May
dust26–13-0.0113%9 May
nuke13–9-0.0224%9 May
overpass6–13-0.0418%7 May
dust28–13-0.0214%6 May
inferno13–110.0727%6 May
overpass11–13-0.0423%6 May
mirage11–130.0421%5 May
mirage12–160.0124%4 May
mirage13–9-0.0315%4 May
inferno13–4-0.017%4 May
mirage13–70.0021%4 May
mirage9–130.0521%3 May
inferno8–130.0422%3 May
cache6–130.0714%3 May
ancient13–90.0610%30 Apr
inferno13–11-0.036%30 Apr
nuke13–80.0617%30 Apr
ancient4–130.0218%30 Apr
overpass13–30.0816%30 Apr
ancient1–130.0125%28 Apr
dust26–130.0618%27 Apr
ancient13–100.0111%27 Apr
ancient16–130.016%27 Apr
anubis13–4-0.025%27 Apr
nuke13–30.0614%27 Apr
anubis10–130.0111%26 Apr
nuke6–130.0622%25 Apr
dust213–10.0616%25 Apr
inferno3–130.0132%25 Apr
mirage6–13-0.0220%25 Apr
overpass16–140.0920%25 Apr

Match data via Leetify.

Recent teammates

Milestones

100 Matches
Compare this player with someone →Inventory value for this account →Where does this rating sit? Premier rank tiers →