Brxd

Brxd — CS2 Stats

76561198802143665[U:1:841877937]Steam profile ↗✓ No bans

1,508Tracked matches38%Win rate2020Tracked since
2,921Hours in CS5Hrs last 2 wks
CSDB Rating4.0 DevelopingSupport
Premier CS Rating15,875Purple band · top ~24.9% of ranked players (population est.)
FaceitLevel 5 · 1,063 ELOTop 67.6% of ranked FACEIT players
WingmanGold Nova Master
Ladder ranks via Leetify

What changed since last observed

CSDB last observed this profile on 15 Sep 2026 (5 days ago). Ranks are recorded once per day this page is viewed.

No change since then. Play, then come back: the next observation lands here.

Track this profile

CSDB reads this profile's Premier rating from its tracked match history, and records Faceit ELO once on every day the page is viewed. 53 days played since 10 Jun 2026. Come back after the next session and the change shows above.

Is this you? Sign in with Steam to claim it and connect match tracking →

Rating over time

Premier CS Rating: 15,875 -2,552 10 Jun15 Sept · 42 days played
15,87519,073peak 19,07310 Jun15 Sept
Faceit ELO: 1,063 +0 30 Aug10 Sept · 4 observations
1,0631,063peak 1,06330 Aug10 Sept
19,103Peak Premier in tracked matches
1,063Highest Faceit ELO seen on CSDB
53Days played since 2026-06-10

Faceit ELO

  • At peak — 1,063
  • Next: Level 6 at 1,201 138 to go
  • Reached: Level 5 · Level 4 · Level 3 · Level 2
  • Level 5 first seen 2026-08-30
  • Level 4 first seen 2026-08-30

Premier CS Rating

  • 3,198 below peak (19,073)
  • -1,780 over 30 days · declining
  • -2,616 over 90 days
  • Next: Pink band at 20,000 4,125 to go
  • Reached: Purple band · Blue band · Light Blue band
  • Purple band first seen 2026-08-30
  • Blue band first seen 2026-08-30

Premier comes from this profile’s tracked match history, so it reaches back as far as those matches do. Faceit ELO is CSDB’s own observation — no feed exposes ELO per match, so that line only has the days the profile was viewed and cannot be backfilled.

How this compares with the same rank

Median values for Level 5 among CSDB-tracked players (n=12,417), from Valve's own lifetime stats. Aim, positioning and utility scores are deliberately not benchmarked here — those are a third-party provider's derived metrics, which CSDB does not store.

MetricThis playerLevel 5 medianLevel 6 medianvs Level 6
Headshot rate33.6%43.8%44.8%11.2% short
Shot accuracy11.5%12.0%12.4%1.0% short
Kill/death ratio0.901.021.040.14 short
Match win rate40.3%44.7%45.2%4.9% short

This profile sits below the typical Level 6 player on every metric we can compare.

Widest gap: Headshot rate. That is the metric furthest from the Level 6 median in relative terms — not necessarily the one holding a rank back, which no statistic here can establish.

Share this profile

CSDB.GGBrxdFACEITLevel 5 · 1,063 ELOSTANDINGTop 67.6% of rankedPREMIER15,875 · Purple bandPEAK ELO1,063csdb.gg/stats

The image is a snapshot; the link keeps updating. Nothing here is published anywhere — it is generated in your browser when you click.

Performance scores

Aim56
Positioning35
Utility38

0–100 skill scores via Leetify.

Recent form

COLD42517Last 10042%Win rateLLWLTLLTWL

Last 10 vs previous 10: −40pp win rate · −0.02 avg rating · +1.5pp headshot accuracy · −38ms reaction

Win rate down 40pp across the last 10 against the 10 before — more than a 10-match window's normal noise (±20pp).

Last 5 · 10 · 20 matches

Last 5

  • 131 · 20% win rate
  • Avg rating -0.02
  • Avg headshot accuracy 16%
  • Avg reaction 608ms

Last 10

  • 262 · 20% win rate
  • Avg rating -0.02
  • Avg headshot accuracy 17%
  • Avg reaction 581ms

Last 20

  • 8102 · 40% win rate
  • Avg rating -0.01
  • Avg headshot accuracy 16%
  • Avg reaction 600ms

Newest first, from the last 100 tracked matches. Each block is its own sample — one result moves a 5-match win rate by 20 points.

Player DNA

Primary style: SupportUtility contribution stands above the rest of this profile (+0.9 against its own average).

Aim5.6
Utility3.8
Positioning3.5
Opening Duels0.7
Clutch3.6

Strong CT-side opener

Style profile from tracked-match aggregates — how this player plays, not how good they are. Classification rules are deterministic and documented in code.

What this cannot see yet: which weapons you use — so CSDB cannot identify an AWPer, and no style here implies a rifle or a sniper. It also cannot see how often you take opening duels, only how often you win them, nor where you hold, so roles that depend on those (entry, lurk, anchor) are deliberately absent rather than guessed. All of it needs round-by-round demo data, which is the next thing being built.

Your pro match

NiKo

Plays most like NiKo 89% playstyle similarity

Most alike: utility contribution, positioning profile.

Where you differ: lower aim profile; lower opening-duel success.

Similarity of playstyle shape across shared dimensions — it says how you play, not that you play at their level. Full comparison →

Strengths & areas to improve

Areas to improve

T-side openings. Opening success drops from 48% on CT to 14% on T — the same duels are being taken with worse setups on the attacking side.

Reaction time. 591ms from enemy-visible to first shot leaves fights decided before they start — warmup routines move this number more than anything else.

Generated by fixed rules over this profile's own numbers — no model, no guessing; silent when the sample is too small to support a claim.

CSDB Rating breakdown

Aim5.6
Positioning3.5
Utility3.8
Mechanics4.6
Opening Duels2.3
Win Impact1.2

Composite 4.0/10 (Developing), a weighted mean of the bars with a small opposition adjustment (×1.00 for this rank band). Formula versioned (v1) and documented in code.

Trends

Match rating-0.02−0.00
first ⅓ avg -0.02 → last ⅓ avg -0.02
Reaction time572ms−32ms
first ⅓ avg 605ms → last ⅓ avg 572ms
Headshot accuracy16.0%−2.7%
first ⅓ avg 18.7% → last ⅓ avg 16.0%

Rolling 5-match average across the last 100 tracked matches, oldest to newest. The delta compares the first third of the window with the last.

Personal bests

0.21Best match rating · 9–2 · poseidon, 28 Aug
50%Best headshot accuracy · 0–10 · inferno, 22 Jun
375msFastest reaction time · 7–13 · mirage, 8 Sept
13–0Biggest win · mirage, 24 Jul

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Highlights

3Longest win streak
L2Current streak
46In matches decided by ≤2 rounds
9Overtime games

Map breakdown

ancientBest map · 64% over 11anubisWeakest map · 22% over 9
MapGradePlayedRecordWin rateAvg rating
mirageC27111641%-0.02
nukeC24101442%-0.02
infernoD113827%-0.03
ancientA117464%-0.01
anubisD92722%-0.02
cacheC52340%-0.08
overpassA53260%-0.01
dust23030%-0.04
vertigo21150%0.06
train220100%-0.03
poseidon110100%0.21

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Anubis is currently your weakest sufficiently-sampled map (22% over 9). Start with the 6 essential Anubis lineups, review the callouts, then spin up a practice server.

Lifetime stats

41,181Lifetime kills
0.90K/D
2,621Matches
40.3%Match win rate
33.6%Headshot %
11.5%Shot accuracy
4,799MVPs
959Hours (in match)
2,022Bombs planted
453Bombs defused

Most-used weapons

Lifetime map wins

4,497nuke
2,503inferno
1,592dust2
988vertigo
694train
400lake
62office
31cbble

Lifetime totals via Steam — visible because this profile's game details are public. Spans CS:GO and CS2.

Faceit stats

Combat

95Matches
45%Win rate
0.90Avg K/D
70.9ADR
36%Headshot %

Clutches & streaks

38%1v1 clutch win
23%1v2 clutch win
6Longest win streak

Recent Faceit resultsWLLLW

MapMatchesWin rateAvg K/DAvg kills
Mirage2446%0.9815.3
Dust21421%0.7812.0
Inferno1331%0.8111.9
Nuke1060%0.9013.4
Ancient1060%0.9012.4
Train862%1.2316.9
Anubis729%0.8414.0
Vertigo250%0.468.0

Faceit-match stats via the FACEIT Data API — a separate match pool from the sections above.

Skill profile

Aggregate performance across tracked matches — stats via Leetify. Percentile context against other CSDB-tracked players arrives as our own benchmark data accumulates.

15.7%Headshot accuracy
35.6%Accuracy (enemy spotted)
37.9%Spray accuracy
70.8%Counter-strafing
11.4°Preaim
591msReaction time
13.9%T opening success
48.3%CT opening success
0.42Enemies flashed / flash
4.2%Flash assists
5.63HE damage / grenade
7.39Flashes / match

Recommended for you

Chosen by comparing your tracked metrics against the thresholds we flag — the measurement behind each one is shown, so you can disagree with it.

  1. Grenades & Utility

    Most of your flashes are blinding nobody. A handful of reliable pop-flash lineups fixes this faster than anything else.

    Enemies flashed per flash 0.4176 — below the 0.5 mark we flag

    Grenade Lineups
  2. Advanced Mechanics

    You are losing most of the first duels you take on T side, which is usually a peeking and spacing problem, not aim.

    T opening duels 13.8571% — below the 40% mark we flag

Spend your practice time on Anubis

Map knowledge compounds faster than mechanics — lineups and callouts you learn once keep paying out every time the map comes up.

22% win rate across 9 tracked games — your weakest map with enough games to be worth reading into.

Anubis callouts & strategyAnubis grenade lineups

Recent matches

MapScoreRatingHS%Date
mirage8–13-0.0616%15 Sept
nuke3–13-0.085%11 Sept
vertigo9–30.0221%8 Sept
inferno11–130.0124%8 Sept
nuke12–120.0113%8 Sept
mirage7–13-0.064%8 Sept
anubis7–13-0.003%7 Sept
nuke12–120.0235%1 Sept
train13–7-0.0021%1 Sept
mirage7–13-0.0531%31 Aug
poseidon9–20.2118%28 Aug
nuke13–7-0.078%21 Aug
nuke10–130.037%21 Aug
mirage11–13-0.0923%20 Aug
nuke13–30.0323%20 Aug
inferno9–30.0723%14 Aug
cache3–13-0.0718%13 Aug
mirage6–13-0.0513%11 Aug
nuke13–4-0.0513%9 Aug
mirage13–6-0.0411%9 Aug
inferno6–13-0.0315%9 Aug
anubis15–15-0.106%6 Aug
nuke15–150.0211%5 Aug
ancient13–10-0.016%5 Aug
cache10–13-0.0813%4 Aug
inferno13–6-0.0513%3 Aug
nuke13–100.0125%3 Aug
dust27–130.0129%3 Aug
mirage10–13-0.0221%3 Aug
mirage3–00.000%3 Aug
mirage0–13-0.0624%31 Jul
overpass2–9-0.0521%31 Jul
nuke13–11-0.0315%30 Jul
inferno5–13-0.0415%30 Jul
nuke13–6-0.049%29 Jul
mirage13–10-0.0316%27 Jul
ancient2–13-0.0211%27 Jul
anubis10–13-0.0311%25 Jul
nuke13–50.0322%25 Jul
mirage13–0-0.0213%24 Jul
ancient2–13-0.110%24 Jul
anubis13–60.0315%23 Jul
nuke13–8-0.056%22 Jul
mirage16–130.0318%20 Jul
mirage13–16-0.0321%19 Jul
ancient13–30.099%19 Jul
vertigo7–90.0910%19 Jul
inferno13–90.0412%19 Jul
ancient13–20.037%18 Jul
mirage12–160.0316%17 Jul
anubis14–16-0.039%16 Jul
inferno1–13-0.1329%15 Jul
anubis4–13-0.0729%13 Jul
mirage13–6-0.0513%13 Jul
mirage13–20.0325%13 Jul
ancient3–13-0.0519%12 Jul
ancient13–2-0.0438%9 Jul
inferno9–13-0.0221%9 Jul
ancient13–7-0.0616%9 Jul
nuke12–12-0.0616%8 Jul
cache13–11-0.0824%8 Jul
mirage10–13-0.0235%7 Jul
cache0–13-0.0817%7 Jul
mirage13–7-0.0430%7 Jul
nuke10–130.0315%6 Jul
inferno7–13-0.0414%6 Jul
mirage13–100.0234%6 Jul
mirage6–130.0429%6 Jul
nuke1–2-0.1320%5 Jul
overpass13–90.0216%5 Jul
mirage13–40.065%5 Jul
dust211–13-0.0720%5 Jul
mirage6–13-0.0518%2 Jul
mirage5–130.004%2 Jul
mirage4–13-0.0413%1 Jul
dust25–13-0.0710%1 Jul
nuke13–5-0.0319%1 Jul
nuke3–70.0040%30 Jun
anubis9–130.0028%29 Jun
nuke7–13-0.0324%29 Jun
cache13–11-0.0727%26 Jun
nuke5–13-0.0532%26 Jun
nuke2–13-0.0315%26 Jun
ancient3–13-0.0418%25 Jun
inferno15–15-0.0313%22 Jun
ancient13–70.0411%22 Jun
inferno0–10-0.0550%22 Jun
overpass13–80.0115%20 Jun
anubis9–13-0.016%20 Jun
mirage13–110.0326%20 Jun
nuke7–13-0.0328%19 Jun
overpass13–9-0.0326%18 Jun
train13–9-0.065%17 Jun
ancient13–100.0210%17 Jun
mirage12–16-0.0526%16 Jun
nuke15–15-0.048%16 Jun
mirage6–130.0118%15 Jun
anubis13–60.0612%12 Jun
nuke13–50.0714%10 Jun
overpass6–13-0.0011%10 Jun

Match data via Leetify.

Recent teammates

Milestones

1,000 Matches
Compare this player with someone →Inventory value for this account →Where does this rating sit? Premier rank tiers →