Søgaard

Søgaard — CS2 Stats

DK76561198802039368[U:1:841773640]Steam profile ↗✓ No bans

2,826Tracked matches53%Win rate2020Tracked since
6,761Hours in CS52Hrs last 2 wks
CSDB Rating6.7 SolidPositional Player
FaceitLevel 10 · 2,607 ELOTop 12.4% of ranked FACEIT players
Ladder ranks via Leetify

What changed since last observed

CSDB last observed this profile on 15 Oct 2026 (12 days ago). Ranks are recorded once per day this page is viewed.

0Faceit ELO · 2,607 → 2,607
+36Tracked matches · now 2,826
0.0ppWin rate · 53.3% → 53.3%

Rating over time

Faceit ELO: 2,607 +0 3 Sept – 15 Oct · 3 observations
2,6072,607peak 2,6073 Sept15 Oct
2,607Highest Faceit ELO seen on CSDB
81Days played since 2026-01-30

Faceit ELO

  • At peak — 2,607
  • 0 over 30 days · steady
  • Next: 3,000 ELO at 3,000 — 393 to go
  • Reached: 2,500 ELO · Level 10 · Level 9 · Level 8
  • 2,500 ELO first seen 2026-09-03
  • Level 10 first seen 2026-09-03

Premier is CSDB’s own observation — it builds from the day a profile is first viewed and cannot be backfilled. Faceit ELO is CSDB’s own observation — no feed exposes ELO per match, so that line only has the days the profile was viewed and cannot be backfilled.

How this compares with the same rank

Median values for Level 10 among CSDB-tracked players (n=30,986), from Valve's own lifetime stats. Aim, positioning and utility scores are deliberately not benchmarked here — those are a third-party provider's derived metrics, which CSDB does not store.

MetricThis playerLevel 10 median
Headshot rate52.9%50.9%
Shot accuracy13.8%13.7%
Kill/death ratio1.121.09
Match win rate48.9%48.4%

Share this profile

CSDB.GGSøgaardFACEITLevel 10 · 2,607 ELOSTANDINGTop 12.4% of ranked30 DAYS0 ELOPEAK ELO2,607csdb.gg/stats

The image is a snapshot; the link keeps updating. Nothing here is published anywhere — it is generated in your browser when you click.

Performance scores

Aim86
Positioning64
Utility62

0–100 skill scores via Leetify.

Recent form

STEADY49–51Last 10049%Win rateLWLLLLWWWW

Last 10 vs previous 10: +10pp win rate · +0.01 avg rating · +4.6pp headshot accuracy · +54ms reaction

Win rate +10pp across the last 10 against the 10 before — within the normal variation of a 10-match window (±20pp), so no real shift yet.

Last 5 · 10 · 20 matches

Last 5

  • 1–4 · 20% win rate
  • Avg rating -0.00
  • Avg headshot accuracy 24%
  • Avg reaction 539ms

Last 10

  • 5–5 · 50% win rate
  • Avg rating 0.02
  • Avg headshot accuracy 23%
  • Avg reaction 536ms

Last 20

  • 9–11 · 45% win rate
  • Avg rating 0.01
  • Avg headshot accuracy 20%
  • Avg reaction 509ms

Newest first, from the last 100 tracked matches. Each block is its own sample — one result moves a 5-match win rate by 20 points.

Player DNA

Primary style: Positional Player — Positioning stands above the rest of this profile (+1.4 against its own average).

Aim8.6
Utility6.2
Positioning6.4
Opening Duels3.6
Clutch3.8

Sharp aimerStrong CT-side opener

Style profile from tracked-match aggregates — how this player plays, not how good they are. Classification rules are deterministic and documented in code.

What this cannot see yet: which weapons you use — so CSDB cannot identify an AWPer, and no style here implies a rifle or a sniper. It also cannot see how often you take opening duels, only how often you win them, nor where you hold, so roles that depend on those (entry, lurk, anchor) are deliberately absent rather than guessed. All of it needs round-by-round demo data, which is the next thing being built.

Your pro match

NiKo

Plays most like NiKo 96% playstyle similarity

Most alike: positioning profile, utility contribution.

Similarity of playstyle shape across shared dimensions — it says how you play, not that you play at their level. Full comparison →

Strengths & areas to improve

Strengths

Aim. Aim score of 86 — the mechanical foundation is a clear strength.

Areas to improve

T-side openings. Opening success drops from 56% on CT to 35% on T — the same duels are being taken with worse setups on the attacking side.

Generated by fixed rules over this profile's own numbers — no model, no guessing; silent when the sample is too small to support a claim.

CSDB Rating breakdown

Aim8.6
Positioning6.4
Utility6.2
Mechanics5.2
Opening Duels3.9
Win Impact6.1

Composite 6.7/10 (Solid), a weighted mean of the bars with a small opposition adjustment (×1.02 for this rank band). Formula versioned (v1) and documented in code.

Trends

Match rating0.01−0.01
first ⅓ avg 0.02 → last ⅓ avg 0.01
Reaction time511ms−57ms
first ⅓ avg 568ms → last ⅓ avg 511ms
Headshot accuracy21.9%−2.6%
first ⅓ avg 24.6% → last ⅓ avg 21.9%

Rolling 5-match average across the last 100 tracked matches, oldest to newest. The delta compares the first third of the window with the last.

Personal bests

0.14Best match rating · 13–9 · inferno, 14 Jul →
50%Best headshot accuracy · 11–0 · mirage, 13 Mar →
375msFastest reaction time · 13–11 · mirage, 2 Oct →
13–2Biggest win · nuke, 10 Jul →

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Highlights

4Longest win streak
9–14In matches decided by ≤2 rounds
16Overtime games

Map breakdown

infernoBest map · 67% over 6mirageWeakest map · 44% over 25
MapGradePlayedRecordWin rateAvg rating
ancientB3014–1647%0.02
mirageC2511–1444%0.01
nukeA1610–663%0.03
overpassB137–654%0.01
infernoS64–267%0.02
dust2—41–325%-0.01
cache—31–233%0.01
vertigo—21–150%0.05
anubis—10–10%0.07

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Mirage is currently your weakest sufficiently-sampled map (44% over 25). Start with the 5 essential Mirage lineups, review the callouts, then spin up a practice server.

Lifetime stats

182,388Lifetime kills
1.12K/D · Top 50% of Level 10 players
6,173Matches
48.9%Match win rate · Top 50% of Level 10 players
52.9%Headshot % · Top 50% of Level 10 players
13.8%Shot accuracy · Top 50% of Level 10 players
31,426MVPs
3,155Hours (in match)
3,892Bombs planted
6,294Bombs defused

Most-used weapons

AK-4765,074
AWP28,672
Knife3,016
MP92,441
MAC-101,932

Lifetime map wins

13,544vertigo
12,351inferno
12,252nuke
7,137dust2
3,330train
427cbble
257office
121lake

Lifetime totals via Steam — visible because this profile's game details are public. Spans CS:GO and CS2.

Faceit stats

Combat

3,163Matches
51%Win rate
1.13Avg K/D
80.6ADR
51%Headshot %

Clutches & streaks

39%1v1 clutch win
24%1v2 clutch win
13Longest win streak

Recent Faceit resultsWWLLL

MapMatchesWin rateAvg K/DAvg kills
Ancient47656%1.2217.6
Mirage41747%1.2216.8
Nuke28751%1.2517.9
Overpass13157%1.1817.7
Inferno11338%1.0816.2
Dust27345%1.1916.3
Anubis3661%1.1517.7
Train3158%1.2719.0

Faceit-match stats via the FACEIT Data API — a separate match pool from the sections above.

Skill profile

Aggregate performance across tracked matches — stats via Leetify. Percentile context against other CSDB-tracked players arrives as our own benchmark data accumulates.

21.1%Headshot accuracy
39.9%Accuracy (enemy spotted)
44.8%Spray accuracy
73.2%Counter-strafing
9.5°Preaim
505msReaction time
35.1%T opening success
56.2%CT opening success
0.57Enemies flashed / flash
12.8%Flash assists
6.58HE damage / grenade
13.34Flashes / match

Recommended for you

Chosen by comparing your tracked metrics against the thresholds we flag — the measurement behind each one is shown, so you can disagree with it.

  1. Advanced Mechanics

    You are losing most of the first duels you take on T side, which is usually a peeking and spacing problem, not aim.

    T opening duels 35.0672% — below the 40% mark we flag

Spend your practice time on Mirage

Map knowledge compounds faster than mechanics — lineups and callouts you learn once keep paying out every time the map comes up.

44% win rate across 25 tracked games — your weakest map with enough games to be worth reading into.

Mirage callouts & strategy →Mirage grenade lineups →

Recent matches

MapScoreRatingHS%Date
mirage9–13-0.0038%21 Oct →
ancient13–70.0122%19 Oct →
ancient10–13-0.1014%16 Oct →
ancient10–130.0640%14 Oct →
ancient8–130.039%9 Oct →
mirage9–130.0424%7 Oct →
dust213–70.0311%6 Oct →
ancient13–70.0522%3 Oct →
nuke13–50.0529%3 Oct →
mirage13–11-0.0217%2 Oct →
vertigo9–130.0713%1 Oct →
ancient10–13-0.0211%26 Sept →
mirage5–130.0614%19 Sept →
ancient4–130.0632%14 Sept →
ancient13–90.0324%13 Sept →
nuke13–11-0.057%11 Sept →
nuke16–130.0121%31 Aug →
cache11–13-0.0129%28 Aug →
mirage19–17-0.0610%28 Aug →
inferno11–13-0.0120%27 Aug →
nuke13–60.0135%24 Aug →
dust211–13-0.0623%20 Aug →
nuke13–50.0443%19 Aug →
ancient6–13-0.0318%18 Aug →
ancient13–50.1019%17 Aug →
mirage16–13-0.0516%17 Aug →
vertigo13–80.0419%7 Aug →
mirage11–13-0.0218%6 Aug →
cache13–100.0233%6 Aug →
mirage13–10-0.0119%3 Aug →
inferno13–80.0623%3 Aug →
ancient9–130.0824%2 Aug →
mirage11–130.0827%30 Jul →
ancient13–90.0415%28 Jul →
nuke16–14-0.0729%26 Jul →
mirage18–220.0022%18 Jul →
ancient9–13-0.0315%17 Jul →
inferno13–90.1427%14 Jul →
ancient13–8-0.0220%13 Jul →
nuke13–20.1012%10 Jul →
nuke17–190.0026%6 Jul →
ancient13–40.0724%5 Jul →
cache10–130.0230%22 Jun →
mirage10–13-0.0218%9 Jun →
mirage6–130.0631%2 Jun →
ancient9–13-0.0121%30 May →
overpass13–70.0325%29 May →
dust211–13-0.0124%24 May →
ancient5–130.0728%23 May →
mirage13–40.0123%20 May →
ancient2–13-0.0018%14 May →
anubis11–130.0728%9 May →
mirage13–90.0133%4 May →
mirage13–110.0913%25 Apr →
nuke7–13-0.0121%19 Apr →
inferno13–100.0123%19 Apr →
ancient13–90.0623%18 Apr →
ancient13–100.0119%13 Apr →
nuke13–160.0238%7 Apr →
mirage13–6-0.0626%6 Apr →
overpass18–220.0124%1 Apr →
mirage4–13-0.0720%1 Apr →
overpass10–13-0.0814%31 Mar →
mirage13–20.0739%30 Mar →
overpass13–100.0221%23 Mar →
overpass16–120.0423%23 Mar →
mirage11–130.0215%22 Mar →
ancient13–8-0.0030%22 Mar →
ancient13–40.0720%22 Mar →
ancient13–50.0814%21 Mar →
overpass19–170.0423%14 Mar →
overpass10–130.0848%13 Mar →
mirage7–13-0.0118%13 Mar →
mirage11–00.0950%13 Mar →
ancient13–16-0.0426%12 Mar →
overpass14–16-0.0016%8 Mar →
nuke10–130.0624%7 Mar →
inferno28–26-0.0316%6 Mar →
nuke13–110.0229%5 Mar →
mirage16–130.0616%5 Mar →
inferno2–13-0.0427%2 Mar →
overpass13–70.0410%28 Feb →
ancient13–70.0530%25 Feb →
nuke13–6-0.0124%25 Feb →
nuke16–130.0921%23 Feb →
dust210–13-0.0120%20 Feb →
ancient11–130.0219%20 Feb →
mirage4–130.0324%17 Feb →
nuke14–160.1239%15 Feb →
ancient9–130.0225%11 Feb →
overpass13–10-0.0029%10 Feb →
ancient11–13-0.0215%10 Feb →
overpass13–90.0413%9 Feb →
ancient13–11-0.0223%7 Feb →
nuke7–130.0431%5 Feb →
overpass11–13-0.0424%5 Feb →
mirage8–130.0215%5 Feb →
mirage8–130.0130%3 Feb →
overpass7–13-0.0228%30 Jan →
ancient10–13-0.0133%30 Jan →

Match data via Leetify.

Recent teammates

Milestones

Faceit Level 102.5K ELO1,000 Matches
Compare this player with someone →Inventory value for this account →Where does this rating sit? Premier rank tiers →

This profile is built from public Steam data. If it is yours, you can remove it, or delete your CSDB account.