cry

cry — CS2 Stats

DE76561198798898270[U:1:838632542]Steam profile ↗✓ No bans

260Tracked matches61%Win rate2021Tracked since
261Hours in CS
CSDB Rating5.5 SolidSupport
FaceitLevel 5 · 1,015 ELOTop 67.6% of ranked FACEIT players
WingmanMaster Guardian I
Ladder ranks via Leetify

Rating over time

Premier CS Rating: 18,142 +302 8 Feb – 24 Feb · 12 days played
15,86218,142peak 18,1428 Feb24 Feb
18,440Peak Premier in tracked matches
1,015Highest Faceit ELO seen on CSDB
33Days played since 2026-01-19

Faceit ELO

  • At peak — 1,015
  • Next: Level 5 at 1,051 — 36 to go
  • Reached: Level 4 · Level 3 · Level 2

Premier comes from this profile’s tracked match history, so it reaches back as far as those matches do.

How this compares with the same rank

Median values for Level 5 among CSDB-tracked players (n=14,283), from Valve's own lifetime stats. Aim, positioning and utility scores are deliberately not benchmarked here — those are a third-party provider's derived metrics, which CSDB does not store.

MetricThis playerLevel 5 medianLevel 6 medianvs Level 6
Headshot rate51.0%43.8%44.8%above
Shot accuracy11.9%12.0%12.4%0.5% short
Kill/death ratio1.421.021.03above
Match win rate49.1%44.7%45.2%above

This profile matches the typical Level 6 player on 3 of 4 comparable metrics.

Widest gap: Shot accuracy. That is the metric furthest from the Level 6 median in relative terms — not necessarily the one holding a rank back, which no statistic here can establish.

Share this profile

CSDB.GGcryFACEITLevel 5 · 1,015 ELOSTANDINGTop 67.6% of rankedPEAK ELO1,015csdb.gg/stats

The image is a snapshot; the link keeps updating. Nothing here is published anywhere — it is generated in your browser when you click.

Performance scores

Aim64
Positioning50
Utility65

0–100 skill scores via Leetify.

Recent form

HOT55–43–2Last 10055%Win rateWLWWWWTWWW

Last 10 vs previous 10: +40pp win rate · +0.01 avg rating · +9.7pp headshot accuracy · −52ms reaction

Win rate up 40pp across the last 10 against the 10 before — more than a 10-match window's normal noise (±20pp).

Last 5 · 10 · 20 matches

Last 5

  • 4–1 · 80% win rate
  • Avg rating 0.02
  • Avg headshot accuracy 29%
  • Avg reaction 611ms

Last 10

  • 8–1–1 · 80% win rate
  • Avg rating 0.02
  • Avg headshot accuracy 27%
  • Avg reaction 588ms

Last 20

  • 12–6–2 · 60% win rate
  • Avg rating 0.01
  • Avg headshot accuracy 22%
  • Avg reaction 614ms

Newest first, from the last 100 tracked matches. Each block is its own sample — one result moves a 5-match win rate by 20 points.

Player DNA

Primary style: Support — Utility contribution stands above the rest of this profile (+2.4 against its own average).

Aim6.4
Utility6.5
Positioning5.0
Opening Duels2.8
Clutch2.2

Strong CT-side opener

Style profile from tracked-match aggregates — how this player plays, not how good they are. Classification rules are deterministic and documented in code.

What this cannot see yet: which weapons you use — so CSDB cannot identify an AWPer, and no style here implies a rifle or a sniper. It also cannot see how often you take opening duels, only how often you win them, nor where you hold, so roles that depend on those (entry, lurk, anchor) are deliberately absent rather than guessed. All of it needs round-by-round demo data, which is the next thing being built.

Your pro match

ZywOo

Plays most like ZywOo 83% playstyle similarity

Most alike: utility contribution, positioning profile.

Where you differ: lower opening-duel success; lower aim profile.

Similarity of playstyle shape across shared dimensions — it says how you play, not that you play at their level. Full comparison →

Strengths & areas to improve

Areas to improve

T-side openings. Opening success drops from 51% on CT to 28% on T — the same duels are being taken with worse setups on the attacking side.

Reaction time. 611ms from enemy-visible to first shot leaves fights decided before they start — warmup routines move this number more than anything else.

Generated by fixed rules over this profile's own numbers — no model, no guessing; silent when the sample is too small to support a claim.

CSDB Rating breakdown

Aim6.4
Positioning5.0
Utility6.5
Mechanics7.2
Opening Duels2.6
Win Impact8.6

Composite 5.5/10 (Solid), a weighted mean of the bars with a small opposition adjustment (×0.90 for this rank band). Formula versioned (v1) and documented in code.

Trends

Match rating0.01−0.00
first ⅓ avg 0.01 → last ⅓ avg 0.01
Reaction time615ms+21ms
first ⅓ avg 594ms → last ⅓ avg 615ms
Headshot accuracy20.9%+3.3%
first ⅓ avg 17.6% → last ⅓ avg 20.9%

Rolling 5-match average across the last 100 tracked matches, oldest to newest. The delta compares the first third of the window with the last.

Personal bests

0.20Best match rating · 13–2 · mirage, 11 Feb →
41%Best headshot accuracy · 13–2 · ancient, 17 Feb →
453msFastest reaction time · 11–13 · ancient, 22 Feb →
13–1Biggest win · mirage, 15 Oct →

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Highlights

6Longest win streak
9–5In matches decided by ≤2 rounds
9Overtime games

Map breakdown

nukeBest map · 85% over 13dust2Weakest map · 29% over 7
MapGradePlayedRecordWin rateAvg rating
mirageA4727–2057%0.01
nukeS1311–285%0.02
ancientA116–555%-0.01
anubisB115–645%0.01
dust2D72–529%-0.03
infernoB63–350%0.03
overpass—40–40%-0.01
cache—11–0100%0.01

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Dust 2 is currently your weakest sufficiently-sampled map (29% over 7). Start with the 6 essential Dust 2 lineups, review the callouts, then spin up a practice server.

Lifetime stats

18,930Lifetime kills
1.42K/D · Top 10% of Level 5 players
808Matches
49.1%Match win rate · Top 25% of Level 5 players
51.0%Headshot % · Top 25% of Level 5 players
11.9%Shot accuracy
2,346MVPs
261Hours (in match)
810Bombs planted
481Bombs defused

Most-used weapons

Lifetime map wins

1,195nuke
745dust2
737inferno
341vertigo
308train
28lake
18italy
17safehouse

Lifetime totals via Steam — visible because this profile's game details are public. Spans CS:GO and CS2.

Faceit stats

Combat

80Matches
55%Win rate
1.10Avg K/D
77.0ADR
53%Headshot %

Clutches & streaks

31%1v1 clutch win
32%1v2 clutch win
8Longest win streak

Recent Faceit resultsWWWLW

MapMatchesWin rateAvg K/DAvg kills
Mirage2857%1.2916.0
Dust21953%0.9515.2
Ancient978%0.9214.1
Nuke771%1.0718.6
Anubis650%1.1017.2
Inferno520%1.1416.6
Cache250%0.8813.0
Vertigo10%0.7311.0

Faceit-match stats via the FACEIT Data API — a separate match pool from the sections above.

Skill profile

Aggregate performance across tracked matches — stats via Leetify. Percentile context against other CSDB-tracked players arrives as our own benchmark data accumulates.

20.2%Headshot accuracy
31.2%Accuracy (enemy spotted)
33.0%Spray accuracy
82.4%Counter-strafing
10.0°Preaim
611msReaction time
28.2%T opening success
50.5%CT opening success
0.57Enemies flashed / flash
7.6%Flash assists
14.81HE damage / grenade
14.40Flashes / match

Recommended for you

Chosen by comparing your tracked metrics against the thresholds we flag — the measurement behind each one is shown, so you can disagree with it.

  1. Advanced Mechanics

    You are losing most of the first duels you take on T side, which is usually a peeking and spacing problem, not aim.

    T opening duels 28.1897% — below the 40% mark we flag

Spend your practice time on Dust 2

Map knowledge compounds faster than mechanics — lineups and callouts you learn once keep paying out every time the map comes up.

29% win rate across 7 tracked games — your weakest map with enough games to be worth reading into.

Dust 2 callouts & strategy →Dust 2 grenade lineups →

Recent matches

MapScoreRatingHS%Date
mirage13–10.0731%15 Oct →
mirage3–13-0.0125%15 Sept →
mirage13–60.0433%5 Sept →
dust219–17-0.0127%3 Sept →
mirage13–60.0229%3 Sept →
mirage13–80.0117%2 Sept →
mirage12–120.0324%2 Sept →
nuke13–80.0822%1 Sept →
mirage13–30.0233%28 Aug →
mirage13–8-0.0530%12 Aug →
mirage13–4-0.0213%12 Aug →
mirage13–80.0725%10 Aug →
mirage12–160.0410%7 Aug →
inferno4–130.0429%7 Aug →
mirage12–12-0.0318%2 Aug →
mirage7–13-0.0918%1 Aug →
mirage13–90.1024%1 Aug →
overpass6–13-0.027%23 May →
mirage7–13-0.0211%23 May →
cache13–110.0121%23 May →
mirage2–13-0.0412%24 Feb →
inferno13–30.0538%24 Feb →
ancient10–13-0.0610%23 Feb →
ancient13–9-0.028%23 Feb →
mirage13–1-0.0122%22 Feb →
ancient11–13-0.0116%22 Feb →
mirage5–13-0.0513%22 Feb →
mirage13–70.0314%22 Feb →
anubis13–90.0620%22 Feb →
overpass9–130.0017%22 Feb →
ancient11–130.0026%22 Feb →
mirage13–70.0122%22 Feb →
nuke16–14-0.0125%21 Feb →
mirage13–70.0014%21 Feb →
ancient13–80.0112%21 Feb →
mirage3–13-0.0813%19 Feb →
mirage7–13-0.0113%19 Feb →
anubis3–130.0626%19 Feb →
mirage13–80.0117%19 Feb →
mirage13–30.0720%19 Feb →
mirage13–11-0.0223%19 Feb →
mirage8–13-0.0530%17 Feb →
overpass8–13-0.0422%17 Feb →
ancient13–20.0141%17 Feb →
nuke13–80.0523%17 Feb →
ancient16–130.0620%17 Feb →
overpass6–130.017%17 Feb →
nuke16–13-0.0322%17 Feb →
ancient13–16-0.0525%17 Feb →
nuke13–7-0.0318%17 Feb →
inferno13–5-0.0413%16 Feb →
anubis16–14-0.0020%16 Feb →
mirage13–10-0.0111%16 Feb →
mirage13–3-0.049%16 Feb →
anubis13–9-0.0011%15 Feb →
nuke11–13-0.009%15 Feb →
anubis7–13-0.0218%15 Feb →
nuke13–2-0.0112%15 Feb →
dust29–13-0.0119%14 Feb →
mirage13–90.0714%14 Feb →
mirage5–13-0.0419%14 Feb →
mirage9–130.0033%14 Feb →
anubis4–13-0.0020%14 Feb →
anubis8–130.0123%11 Feb →
mirage9–13-0.0115%11 Feb →
mirage13–20.2027%11 Feb →
dust25–13-0.0625%10 Feb →
ancient11–13-0.0124%9 Feb →
mirage13–4-0.000%9 Feb →
mirage3–13-0.1031%9 Feb →
inferno8–13-0.0713%8 Feb →
mirage13–100.0415%8 Feb →
mirage8–13-0.0517%8 Feb →
mirage13–110.0227%8 Feb →
nuke16–140.0116%8 Feb →
nuke13–70.0917%8 Feb →
nuke13–30.0627%8 Feb →
mirage5–13-0.0220%7 Feb →
mirage13–80.0218%7 Feb →
nuke13–8-0.0025%6 Feb →
dust24–13-0.0219%6 Feb →
ancient13–110.0214%6 Feb →
mirage5–130.0726%6 Feb →
nuke19–160.0422%5 Feb →
anubis6–13-0.0113%2 Feb →
mirage13–20.0820%2 Feb →
ancient13–10-0.0017%2 Feb →
mirage13–10.088%2 Feb →
anubis4–13-0.0310%30 Jan →
mirage13–20.0211%30 Jan →
dust28–13-0.047%26 Jan →
mirage6–130.0212%26 Jan →
anubis13–11-0.0115%26 Jan →
dust213–100.0225%26 Jan →
dust23–13-0.0630%26 Jan →
anubis13–60.0925%19 Jan →
nuke7–13-0.0723%19 Jan →
inferno11–130.0514%19 Jan →
mirage5–13-0.076%19 Jan →
inferno9–10.1411%19 Jan →

Match data via Leetify.

Recent teammates

Milestones

100 Matches
Compare this player with someone →Inventory value for this account →Where does this rating sit? Premier rank tiers →

This profile is built from public Steam data. If it is yours, you can remove it, or delete your CSDB account.