Kenraali kim chi TIN✈ ▮▮

Kenraali kim chi TIN✈ ▮▮ — CS2 Stats

76561198797796858[U:1:837531130]Steam profile ↗✓ No bans

1,214Tracked matches30%Win rate2021Tracked since
2,696Hours in CS14Hrs last 2 wks
CSDB Rating6.2 SolidSupport
Premier CS Rating18,007Purple band · top ~16.4% of ranked players (population est.)
FaceitLevel 6 · 1,281 ELOTop 54.0% of ranked FACEIT players
WingmanMaster Guardian II
Ladder ranks via Leetify

What changed since last observed

CSDB last observed this profile on 20 Sep 2026 (yesterday). Ranks are recorded once per day this page is viewed.

0Premier CS Rating · 18,007 → 18,007
0Faceit ELO · 1,281 → 1,281
+5Tracked matches · now 1,214
+4.6ppWin rate · 25.0% → 29.6%
Track this profile

CSDB reads this profile's Premier rating from its tracked match history, and records Faceit ELO once on every day the page is viewed. 26 days played since 18 Aug 2026. Come back after the next session and the change shows above.

Is this you? Sign in with Steam to claim it and connect match tracking →

Rating over time

Premier CS Rating: 18,007 +1,240 18 Aug20 Sept · 23 days played
15,40419,970peak 19,97018 Aug20 Sept
Faceit ELO: 1,281 +0 1 Sept20 Sept · 3 observations
1,2811,281peak 1,2811 Sept20 Sept
19,979Peak Premier in tracked matches
1,281Highest Faceit ELO seen on CSDB
26Days played since 2026-08-18

Faceit ELO

  • At peak — 1,281
  • Next: Level 7 at 1,351 70 to go
  • Reached: Level 6 · Level 5 · Level 4 · Level 3
  • Level 6 first seen 2026-09-01
  • Level 5 first seen 2026-09-01

Premier CS Rating

  • 1,963 below peak (19,970)
  • +2,080 over 30 days · improving
  • Next: Pink band at 20,000 1,993 to go
  • Reached: Purple band · Blue band · Light Blue band
  • Purple band first seen 2026-09-01
  • Blue band first seen 2026-09-01

Premier comes from this profile’s tracked match history, so it reaches back as far as those matches do. Faceit ELO is CSDB’s own observation — no feed exposes ELO per match, so that line only has the days the profile was viewed and cannot be backfilled.

How this compares with the same rank

Median values for Level 6 among CSDB-tracked players (n=11,764), from Valve's own lifetime stats. Aim, positioning and utility scores are deliberately not benchmarked here — those are a third-party provider's derived metrics, which CSDB does not store.

MetricThis playerLevel 6 medianLevel 7 medianvs Level 7
Headshot rate48.2%44.8%45.7%above
Shot accuracy11.9%12.4%12.7%0.8% short
Kill/death ratio1.291.041.05above
Match win rate48.2%45.2%45.7%above

This profile matches the typical Level 7 player on 3 of 4 comparable metrics.

Widest gap: Shot accuracy. That is the metric furthest from the Level 7 median in relative terms — not necessarily the one holding a rank back, which no statistic here can establish.

Share this profile

CSDB.GGKenraali kim chi TIN✈ ▮▮FACEITLevel 6 · 1,281 ELOSTANDINGTop 54.0% of rankedPREMIER18,007 · Purple bandPEAK ELO1,281csdb.gg/stats

The image is a snapshot; the link keeps updating. Nothing here is published anywhere — it is generated in your browser when you click.

Performance scores

Aim87
Positioning54
Utility62

0–100 skill scores via Leetify.

Recent form

STEADY40528Last 10040%Win rateLWWTLLWLLW

Last 10 vs previous 10: +20pp win rate · −0.02 avg rating · +1.5pp headshot accuracy · +2ms reaction

Win rate up 20pp across the last 10 against the 10 before — more than a 10-match window's normal noise (±20pp). Average match rating moved the other way (−0.02), so results shifted more than performance did.

Last 5 · 10 · 20 matches

Last 5

  • 221 · 40% win rate
  • Avg rating -0.01
  • Avg headshot accuracy 23%
  • Avg reaction 497ms

Last 10

  • 451 · 40% win rate
  • Avg rating -0.00
  • Avg headshot accuracy 23%
  • Avg reaction 538ms

Last 20

  • 6122 · 30% win rate
  • Avg rating 0.01
  • Avg headshot accuracy 23%
  • Avg reaction 537ms

Newest first, from the last 100 tracked matches. Each block is its own sample — one result moves a 5-match win rate by 20 points.

Player DNA

Primary style: SupportUtility contribution stands above the rest of this profile (+2.1 against its own average).

Aim8.7
Utility6.2
Positioning5.4
Opening Duels4.7
Clutch0.0

Sharp aimer

Style profile from tracked-match aggregates — how this player plays, not how good they are. Classification rules are deterministic and documented in code.

What this cannot see yet: which weapons you use — so CSDB cannot identify an AWPer, and no style here implies a rifle or a sniper. It also cannot see how often you take opening duels, only how often you win them, nor where you hold, so roles that depend on those (entry, lurk, anchor) are deliberately absent rather than guessed. All of it needs round-by-round demo data, which is the next thing being built.

Your pro match

NiKo

Plays most like NiKo 90% playstyle similarity

Most alike: opening-duel success, utility contribution.

Where you differ: lower positioning profile.

Similarity of playstyle shape across shared dimensions — it says how you play, not that you play at their level. Full comparison →

Strengths & areas to improve

Strengths

Aim. Aim score of 87 — the mechanical foundation is a clear strength.

T openings. 62% T opening-duel success — entries that actually open the round.

Areas to improve

Positioning. Positioning trails aim by 34 points — deaths here waste a strong aim profile.

Generated by fixed rules over this profile's own numbers — no model, no guessing; silent when the sample is too small to support a claim.

CSDB Rating breakdown

Aim8.7
Positioning5.4
Utility6.2
Mechanics6.5
Opening Duels6.3
Win Impact0.0

Composite 6.2/10 (Solid), a weighted mean of the bars with a small opposition adjustment (×1.00 for this rank band). Formula versioned (v1) and documented in code.

Trends

Match rating0.01−0.03
first ⅓ avg 0.05 → last ⅓ avg 0.01
Reaction time533ms+23ms
first ⅓ avg 510ms → last ⅓ avg 533ms
Headshot accuracy21.4%+2.0%
first ⅓ avg 19.3% → last ⅓ avg 21.4%

Rolling 5-match average across the last 100 tracked matches, oldest to newest. The delta compares the first third of the window with the last.

Personal bests

0.16Best match rating · 13–9 · inferno, 24 Aug
55%Best headshot accuracy · 12–12 · office, 28 Aug
375msFastest reaction time · 12–12 · mirage, 20 Sept
13–0Biggest win · nuke, 24 Aug

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Highlights

7Longest win streak
63In matches decided by ≤2 rounds
11Overtime games

Map breakdown

ancientBest map · 67% over 12infernoWeakest map · 25% over 20
MapGradePlayedRecordWin rateAvg rating
mirageD2261627%0.02
infernoD2051525%0.03
nukeA169756%0.04
cacheB147750%0.03
ancientS128467%0.03
anubisA53260%0.01
office4040%0.00
dust231233%-0.01
vertigo2020%0.05
train1010%0.07
debris110100%0.12

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Inferno is currently your weakest sufficiently-sampled map (25% over 20). Start with the 6 essential Inferno lineups, review the callouts, then spin up a practice server.

Lifetime stats

99,260Lifetime kills
1.29K/D · Top 25% of Level 6 players
4,768Matches
48.2%Match win rate · Top 25% of Level 6 players
48.2%Headshot % · Top 50% of Level 6 players
11.9%Shot accuracy
17,486MVPs
1,536Hours (in match)
4,623Bombs planted
1,171Bombs defused

Most-used weapons

AK-4727,437
AWP12,897
MP92,187
FAMAS2,077
SSG 081,937

Lifetime map wins

8,092inferno
3,127office
2,555nuke
2,496vertigo
2,415train
1,913dust2
949cbble
201lake

Lifetime totals via Steam — visible because this profile's game details are public. Spans CS:GO and CS2.

Faceit stats

Combat

10Matches
70%Win rate
1.20Avg K/D
92.1ADR
42%Headshot %

Clutches & streaks

0%1v1 clutch win
50%1v2 clutch win
6Longest win streak

Recent Faceit resultsWWWWL

MapMatchesWin rateAvg K/DAvg kills
Mirage2100%1.3422.0
Ancient1100%1.1919.0
Overpass10%1.0521.0
Nuke1100%1.3229.0
Inferno1100%0.9519.0

Faceit-match stats via the FACEIT Data API — a separate match pool from the sections above.

Skill profile

Aggregate performance across tracked matches — stats via Leetify. Percentile context against other CSDB-tracked players arrives as our own benchmark data accumulates.

21.2%Headshot accuracy
38.1%Accuracy (enemy spotted)
42.9%Spray accuracy
79.5%Counter-strafing
8.1°Preaim
534msReaction time
62.2%T opening success
47.8%CT opening success
0.43Enemies flashed / flash
8.4%Flash assists
9.44HE damage / grenade
14.88Flashes / match

Recommended for you

Chosen by comparing your tracked metrics against the thresholds we flag — the measurement behind each one is shown, so you can disagree with it.

  1. Grenades & Utility

    Most of your flashes are blinding nobody. A handful of reliable pop-flash lineups fixes this faster than anything else.

    Enemies flashed per flash 0.4331 — below the 0.5 mark we flag

    Grenade Lineups
Spend your practice time on Inferno

Map knowledge compounds faster than mechanics — lineups and callouts you learn once keep paying out every time the map comes up.

25% win rate across 20 tracked games — your weakest map with enough games to be worth reading into.

Inferno callouts & strategyInferno grenade lineups

Recent matches

MapScoreRatingHS%Date
dust213–16-0.0317%20 Sept
nuke13–20.0221%20 Sept
mirage16–130.0410%20 Sept
mirage12–12-0.0343%20 Sept
nuke9–13-0.0326%20 Sept
mirage8–13-0.0315%16 Sept
cache13–50.0534%13 Sept
cache5–13-0.0213%13 Sept
ancient5–130.0435%13 Sept
ancient13–7-0.0222%13 Sept
cache14–16-0.0515%10 Sept
dust24–13-0.0345%10 Sept
anubis15–150.0321%10 Sept
nuke13–20.0923%10 Sept
inferno9–130.0127%9 Sept
mirage7–130.0515%9 Sept
ancient7–130.0113%8 Sept
nuke8–130.0018%8 Sept
cache10–130.0420%7 Sept
inferno13–100.0722%7 Sept
mirage9–130.0821%6 Sept
inferno5–13-0.0420%6 Sept
inferno10–130.0113%5 Sept
mirage3–130.0115%5 Sept
inferno13–60.0126%5 Sept
ancient6–130.024%5 Sept
cache9–130.0535%4 Sept
inferno2–13-0.0213%4 Sept
inferno15–150.0122%4 Sept
ancient16–140.0620%3 Sept
mirage4–13-0.0121%3 Sept
mirage13–110.0715%3 Sept
inferno3–13-0.0426%3 Sept
nuke3–130.0429%2 Sept
inferno5–13-0.0422%2 Sept
mirage10–13-0.0121%2 Sept
mirage13–10-0.0214%2 Sept
nuke8–50.027%2 Sept
mirage13–11-0.0212%1 Sept
ancient5–13-0.0115%1 Sept
nuke9–130.0418%1 Sept
cache13–90.0623%1 Sept
nuke13–5-0.0219%1 Sept
ancient16–120.0117%1 Sept
dust213–60.0420%1 Sept
inferno8–13-0.0129%31 Aug
nuke6–130.0625%31 Aug
mirage13–40.0623%31 Aug
nuke13–70.1620%31 Aug
cache13–9-0.0230%31 Aug
mirage12–120.0825%31 Aug
inferno6–130.0221%31 Aug
nuke10–130.0315%30 Aug
cache11–130.0721%30 Aug
inferno4–130.0124%30 Aug
inferno4–130.0521%28 Aug
office12–12-0.0155%28 Aug
nuke13–70.0332%27 Aug
mirage8–13-0.0133%27 Aug
mirage8–130.0328%27 Aug
anubis13–9-0.0335%27 Aug
cache13–90.0341%27 Aug
cache13–9-0.0111%26 Aug
vertigo1–130.0515%26 Aug
anubis8–13-0.059%25 Aug
mirage2–13-0.0716%25 Aug
inferno15–150.0718%25 Aug
ancient13–70.0215%25 Aug
cache13–50.0834%25 Aug
ancient13–100.0615%24 Aug
nuke13–90.0829%24 Aug
mirage13–30.1327%24 Aug
cache13–40.1525%24 Aug
inferno13–90.1613%24 Aug
mirage7–13-0.0121%24 Aug
inferno13–30.0923%24 Aug
nuke16–14-0.0114%24 Aug
inferno9–13-0.0020%24 Aug
ancient13–70.137%24 Aug
anubis13–110.0020%24 Aug
vertigo8–130.0415%24 Aug
mirage6–130.0116%24 Aug
nuke13–00.0722%24 Aug
office11–130.0324%23 Aug
mirage13–160.0722%23 Aug
inferno9–00.0919%22 Aug
inferno12–120.0819%22 Aug
office2–13-0.0439%21 Aug
anubis13–80.0718%21 Aug
ancient16–140.0314%21 Aug
office12–120.0325%20 Aug
ancient13–90.0511%20 Aug
cache6–13-0.0526%20 Aug
train7–130.0713%20 Aug
mirage3–13-0.0417%19 Aug
inferno8–13-0.027%19 Aug
nuke10–130.0613%19 Aug
cache9–13-0.0114%19 Aug
debris9–30.1218%19 Aug
mirage4–13-0.0224%18 Aug

Match data via Leetify.

Recent teammates

Milestones

1,000 Matches
Compare this player with someone →Inventory value for this account →Where does this rating sit? Premier rank tiers →