Galk1N

Galk1N — CS2 Stats

76561198790831776[U:1:830566048]Steam profile ↗✓ No bans

504Tracked matches60%Win rate2025Tracked since
478Hours in CS33Hrs last 2 wks
CSDB Rating6.4 SolidSupport
FaceitLevel 10 · 1,921 ELOTop 12.4% of ranked FACEIT players
WingmanGold Nova Master
Ladder ranks via Leetify

What changed since last observed

CSDB last observed this profile on 15 Sep 2026 (29 days ago). Ranks are recorded once per day this page is viewed.

0Faceit ELO · 1,921 → 1,921
+71Tracked matches · now 504
−2.1ppWin rate · 62.1% → 60.0%

Rating over time

Faceit ELO: 1,921 +0 1 Sept – 15 Sept · 2 observations
1,9211,921peak 1,9211 Sept15 Sept
1,921Highest Faceit ELO seen on CSDB
67Days played since 2025-10-25

Faceit ELO

  • At peak — 1,921
  • Next: Level 10 at 2,001 — 80 to go
  • Reached: Level 9 · Level 8 · Level 7 · Level 6
  • Level 9 first seen 2026-09-01
  • Level 8 first seen 2026-09-01

Premier is CSDB’s own observation — it builds from the day a profile is first viewed and cannot be backfilled. Faceit ELO is CSDB’s own observation — no feed exposes ELO per match, so that line only has the days the profile was viewed and cannot be backfilled.

Compare periods

Last 30 days vs previous 30

MetricLast 30Previous 30Change
Matches88——
Win rate50%——
K/D0.98——
Headshot %53%——

Measured 13 Sep 2026 → 14 Oct 2026; no observation near 60 days ago, so there is no previous window yet.

Differences between Valve's lifetime totals on the days CSDB observed this profile — every mode Valve counts, not only ranked. A window appears only when an observation sits within a few days of each end.

How this compares with the same rank

Median values for Level 10 among CSDB-tracked players (n=29,846), from Valve's own lifetime stats. Aim, positioning and utility scores are deliberately not benchmarked here — those are a third-party provider's derived metrics, which CSDB does not store.

MetricThis playerLevel 10 median
Headshot rate58.4%50.9%
Shot accuracy0.0%13.7%
Kill/death ratio0.971.09
Match win rate49.3%48.4%

Share this profile

CSDB.GGGalk1NFACEITLevel 10 · 1,921 ELOSTANDINGTop 12.4% of rankedPEAK ELO1,921csdb.gg/stats

The image is a snapshot; the link keeps updating. Nothing here is published anywhere — it is generated in your browser when you click.

Performance scores

Aim85
Positioning63
Utility63

0–100 skill scores via Leetify.

Recent form

STEADY52–46–2Last 10052%Win rateLWLWWWWLLW

Last 10 vs previous 10: 0pp win rate · −0.03 avg rating · −7.4pp headshot accuracy · +39ms reaction

Win rate 0pp across the last 10 against the 10 before — within the normal variation of a 10-match window (±20pp), so no real shift yet.

Last 5 · 10 · 20 matches

Last 5

  • 3–2 · 60% win rate
  • Avg rating 0.02
  • Avg headshot accuracy 16%
  • Avg reaction 544ms

Last 10

  • 6–4 · 60% win rate
  • Avg rating 0.01
  • Avg headshot accuracy 19%
  • Avg reaction 535ms

Last 20

  • 12–8 · 60% win rate
  • Avg rating 0.02
  • Avg headshot accuracy 23%
  • Avg reaction 515ms

Newest first, from the last 100 tracked matches. Each block is its own sample — one result moves a 5-match win rate by 20 points.

Player DNA

Primary style: Support — Utility contribution stands above the rest of this profile (+1.5 against its own average).

Aim8.5
Utility6.3
Positioning6.3
Opening Duels3.1
Clutch3.4

Sharp aimerStrong T-side opener

Style profile from tracked-match aggregates — how this player plays, not how good they are. Classification rules are deterministic and documented in code.

What this cannot see yet: which weapons you use — so CSDB cannot identify an AWPer, and no style here implies a rifle or a sniper. It also cannot see how often you take opening duels, only how often you win them, nor where you hold, so roles that depend on those (entry, lurk, anchor) are deliberately absent rather than guessed. All of it needs round-by-round demo data, which is the next thing being built.

Your pro match

ZywOo

Plays most like ZywOo 96% playstyle similarity

Most alike: positioning profile, aim profile.

Where you differ: lower utility contribution; lower opening-duel success.

Similarity of playstyle shape across shared dimensions — it says how you play, not that you play at their level. Full comparison →

Strengths & areas to improve

Strengths

Aim. Aim score of 85 — the mechanical foundation is a clear strength.

Generated by fixed rules over this profile's own numbers — no model, no guessing; silent when the sample is too small to support a claim.

CSDB Rating breakdown

Aim8.5
Positioning6.3
Utility6.3
Mechanics5.9
Opening Duels2.4
Win Impact8.3

Composite 6.4/10 (Solid), a weighted mean of the bars with a small opposition adjustment (×0.95 for this rank band). Formula versioned (v1) and documented in code.

Trends

Match rating0.02+0.01
first ⅓ avg 0.01 → last ⅓ avg 0.02
Reaction time526ms−90ms
first ⅓ avg 617ms → last ⅓ avg 526ms
Headshot accuracy23.7%+1.9%
first ⅓ avg 21.8% → last ⅓ avg 23.7%

Rolling 5-match average across the last 100 tracked matches, oldest to newest. The delta compares the first third of the window with the last.

Personal bests

0.21Best match rating · 9–0 · poseidon, 14 Apr →
45%Best headshot accuracy · 13–1 · cache, 30 Apr →
391msFastest reaction time · 13–4 · nuke, 13 Sept →
13–0Biggest win · ancient, 16 Apr →

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Highlights

6Longest win streak
12–8In matches decided by ≤2 rounds
11Overtime games

Map breakdown

cacheBest map · 67% over 9mirageWeakest map · 45% over 22
MapGradePlayedRecordWin rateAvg rating
mirageB2210–1245%0.01
nukeA2113–862%0.02
ancientB2010–1050%0.03
infernoB126–650%0.00
cacheS96–367%0.04
anubis—41–325%0.01
poseidon—31–233%0.06
dust2—20–20%-0.05
overpass—21–150%-0.02
palacio—22–0100%0.01
vertigo—11–0100%0.08
warden—11–0100%0.07
italy—10–10%0.01

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Mirage is currently your weakest sufficiently-sampled map (45% over 22). Start with the 5 essential Mirage lineups, review the callouts, then spin up a practice server.

Lifetime stats

16,903Lifetime kills
0.97K/D
588Matches
49.3%Match win rate · Top 50% of Level 10 players
58.4%Headshot % · Top 25% of Level 10 players
0.0%Shot accuracy
1,695MVPs
1,346Hours (in match)
489Bombs planted
232Bombs defused

Most-used weapons

Lifetime map wins

1,174nuke
882inferno
164dust2
92train
37vertigo
11italy

Lifetime totals via Steam — visible because this profile's game details are public. Spans CS:GO and CS2.

Faceit stats

Combat

455Matches
53%Win rate
1.25Avg K/D
87.4ADR
50%Headshot %

Clutches & streaks

37%1v1 clutch win
20%1v2 clutch win
9Longest win streak

Recent Faceit resultsWLWLW

MapMatchesWin rateAvg K/DAvg kills
Mirage12453%1.2518.4
Ancient9351%1.2717.9
Nuke9063%1.3618.5
Inferno7054%1.2317.8
Cache2552%1.2416.1
Overpass2055%1.1616.6
Anubis1414%1.1118.4
Dust21127%0.8814.4

Faceit-match stats via the FACEIT Data API — a separate match pool from the sections above.

Skill profile

Aggregate performance across tracked matches — stats via Leetify. Percentile context against other CSDB-tracked players arrives as our own benchmark data accumulates.

23.8%Headshot accuracy
35.2%Accuracy (enemy spotted)
41.5%Spray accuracy
76.4%Counter-strafing
8.3°Preaim
520msReaction time
46.7%T opening success
32.2%CT opening success
0.56Enemies flashed / flash
5.7%Flash assists
8.74HE damage / grenade
15.08Flashes / match

Recommended for you

Chosen by comparing your tracked metrics against the thresholds we flag — the measurement behind each one is shown, so you can disagree with it.

  1. Advanced Mechanics

    Losing the first CT duel repeatedly usually means holding angles that favour the peeker.

    CT opening duels 32.2164% — below the 40% mark we flag

Spend your practice time on Mirage

Map knowledge compounds faster than mechanics — lineups and callouts you learn once keep paying out every time the map comes up.

45% win rate across 22 tracked games — your weakest map with enough games to be worth reading into.

Mirage callouts & strategy →Mirage grenade lineups →

Recent matches

MapScoreRatingHS%Date
anubis4–13-0.0116%9 Oct →
mirage13–110.0214%8 Oct →
nuke8–130.0110%8 Oct →
ancient13–100.0923%8 Oct →
mirage16–140.0018%6 Oct →
nuke13–60.0131%6 Oct →
nuke13–20.0115%27 Sept →
mirage4–13-0.0514%26 Sept →
anubis10–130.0119%26 Sept →
inferno13–110.0129%26 Sept →
nuke8–130.0424%21 Sept →
ancient8–13-0.0218%17 Sept →
ancient16–120.0618%16 Sept →
nuke13–40.0522%13 Sept →
cache13–70.0731%7 Sept →
mirage7–130.0625%6 Sept →
mirage12–160.0431%5 Sept →
mirage13–80.0220%2 Sept →
nuke13–40.0240%2 Sept →
nuke13–70.0535%29 Aug →
mirage13–40.0410%29 Aug →
mirage13–16-0.0427%29 Aug →
mirage13–100.0823%21 Aug →
mirage13–9-0.0215%20 Aug →
cache11–130.1028%18 Aug →
nuke13–100.0523%16 Aug →
cache11–130.0141%8 Aug →
cache13–90.0734%27 May →
inferno6–13-0.0027%27 May →
nuke13–70.0229%19 May →
ancient3–13-0.0228%15 May →
dust24–13-0.0727%13 May →
mirage13–16-0.0317%5 May →
nuke13–110.1327%4 May →
nuke10–130.0232%4 May →
cache13–80.0424%1 May →
cache12–12-0.0233%30 Apr →
cache13–11-0.0022%30 Apr →
cache13–10.1145%30 Apr →
cache13–50.0223%29 Apr →
mirage13–10-0.0115%26 Apr →
nuke8–5-0.0236%18 Apr →
ancient5–130.1029%18 Apr →
nuke13–100.0027%18 Apr →
ancient13–30.0213%16 Apr →
nuke13–110.0520%16 Apr →
ancient13–00.0923%16 Apr →
poseidon9–00.2128%14 Apr →
ancient7–130.0326%14 Apr →
inferno8–130.0528%12 Apr →
mirage6–130.0021%12 Apr →
ancient16–19-0.0222%11 Apr →
inferno13–16-0.0213%8 Apr →
ancient5–13-0.0313%3 Apr →
anubis4–13-0.0124%2 Apr →
nuke13–90.0723%30 Mar →
mirage10–13-0.0719%29 Mar →
ancient11–13-0.0314%26 Mar →
inferno6–13-0.0526%24 Mar →
ancient13–50.1013%23 Mar →
inferno5–13-0.0629%23 Mar →
nuke13–7-0.0212%18 Mar →
inferno13–80.0418%16 Mar →
dust23–13-0.0216%24 Feb →
overpass6–13-0.0216%24 Feb →
mirage10–130.0321%19 Feb →
poseidon8–8-0.0330%18 Feb →
inferno13–11-0.0219%10 Feb →
poseidon7–9-0.0115%3 Feb →
vertigo9–50.0815%31 Jan →
nuke4–9-0.1229%31 Jan →
mirage7–13-0.0124%29 Jan →
warden13–40.0727%28 Jan →
anubis16–140.0415%23 Jan →
ancient17–190.0225%20 Jan →
ancient10–130.0528%15 Dec →
nuke11–13-0.0315%14 Dec →
ancient13–80.0115%12 Dec →
mirage6–13-0.0226%25 Nov →
mirage14–160.0519%22 Nov →
nuke10–130.0628%17 Nov →
mirage13–5-0.0126%11 Nov →
nuke8–130.0223%11 Nov →
palacio13–90.0135%5 Nov →
palacio13–00.0224%5 Nov →
italy11–130.0138%5 Nov →
ancient13–70.0321%4 Nov →
inferno10–13-0.0211%31 Oct →
ancient13–11-0.0618%28 Oct →
mirage13–110.0219%28 Oct →
nuke6–13-0.0327%28 Oct →
inferno13–11-0.0220%28 Oct →
mirage7–130.0111%28 Oct →
ancient5–13-0.0211%28 Oct →
inferno16–130.0415%26 Oct →
inferno13–70.0724%26 Oct →
mirage13–90.0318%26 Oct →
ancient13–50.0223%25 Oct →
overpass13–11-0.0224%25 Oct →
ancient13–80.0833%25 Oct →

Match data via Leetify.

Recent teammates

Milestones

Faceit Level 10500 Matches
Compare this player with someone →Inventory value for this account →Where does this rating sit? Premier rank tiers →

This profile is built from public Steam data. If it is yours, you can remove it, or delete your CSDB account.