DaveGun

DaveGun — CS2 Stats

DE76561198772744455[U:1:812478727]Steam profile ↗✓ No bans

814Tracked matches45%Win rate2025Tracked since
840Hours in CS11Hrs last 2 wks
CSDB Rating7.4 StrongPositional Player
Premier CS Rating20,215Top 50% of 215,386 CSDB-tracked playersPink band · top ~8.3% of ranked players (population est.)
CSDB Leaderboard#80887 of 261569 tracked
FaceitLevel 8 · 788 ELOTop 31.2% of ranked FACEIT players
WingmanMaster Guardian I
Ladder ranks via Leetify

What changed since last observed

CSDB last observed this profile on 11 Nov 2026 (3 days ago). Ranks are recorded once per day this page is viewed.

No change since then. Play, then come back: the next observation lands here.

Rating over time

Premier CS Rating: 20,215 +0 2 Sept – 11 Nov · 24 days played
20,17922,616peak 22,6162 Sept11 Nov
23,228Peak Premier in tracked matches
788Highest Faceit ELO seen on CSDB
36Days played since 2026-09-02

Faceit ELO

  • At peak — 788
  • Next: Level 4 at 901 — 113 to go
  • Reached: Level 3 · Level 2
  • Level 3 first seen 2026-09-06
  • Level 2 first seen 2026-09-06

Premier CS Rating

  • 2,401 below peak (22,616)
  • +27 over 30 days · steady
  • Next: Red band at 25,000 — 4,785 to go
  • Reached: Pink band · Purple band · Blue band · Light Blue band
  • Pink band first seen 2026-09-06
  • Purple band first seen 2026-09-06

Premier comes from this profile’s tracked match history, so it reaches back as far as those matches do. Faceit ELO is CSDB’s own observation — no feed exposes ELO per match, so that line only has the days the profile was viewed and cannot be backfilled.

How this compares with the same rank

Median values for Level 8 among CSDB-tracked players (n=15,525), from Valve's own lifetime stats. Aim, positioning and utility scores are deliberately not benchmarked here — those are a third-party provider's derived metrics, which CSDB does not store.

MetricThis playerLevel 8 medianLevel 9 medianvs Level 9
Headshot rate47.6%46.8%48.2%meets
Shot accuracy0.0%13.0%13.2%13.2% short
Kill/death ratio1.211.061.07above
Match win rate50.9%46.3%46.9%above

This profile matches the typical Level 9 player on 3 of 4 comparable metrics.

Widest gap: Shot accuracy. That is the metric furthest from the Level 9 median in relative terms — not necessarily the one holding a rank back, which no statistic here can establish.

Share this profile

CSDB.GGDaveGunFACEITLevel 8 · 788 ELOSTANDINGTop 31.2% of rankedPREMIER20,215 · Pink bandPEAK ELO788csdb.gg/stats

The image is a snapshot; the link keeps updating. Nothing here is published anywhere — it is generated in your browser when you click.

Performance scores

Aim88
Positioning80
Utility48

0–100 skill scores via Leetify.

Recent form

STEADY53–46–1Last 10053%Win rateLLWLLWLWLW

Last 10 vs previous 10: −10pp win rate · −0.03 avg rating · −6.2pp headshot accuracy · +20ms reaction

Win rate −10pp across the last 10 against the 10 before — within the normal variation of a 10-match window (±20pp), so no real shift yet.

Last 5 · 10 · 20 matches

Last 5

  • 1–4 · 20% win rate
  • Avg rating 0.01
  • Avg headshot accuracy 24%
  • Avg reaction 510ms

Last 10

  • 4–6 · 40% win rate
  • Avg rating 0.02
  • Avg headshot accuracy 22%
  • Avg reaction 521ms

Last 20

  • 9–11 · 45% win rate
  • Avg rating 0.04
  • Avg headshot accuracy 25%
  • Avg reaction 511ms

Newest first, from the last 100 tracked matches. Each block is its own sample — one result moves a 5-match win rate by 20 points.

Player DNA

Primary style: Positional Player — Positioning stands above the rest of this profile (+2.3 against its own average).

Aim8.8
Utility4.8
Positioning8.0
Opening Duels6.1
Clutch4.0

Sharp aimerStrong CT-side openerStrong positioning

Style profile from tracked-match aggregates — how this player plays, not how good they are. Classification rules are deterministic and documented in code.

What this cannot see yet: which weapons you use — so CSDB cannot identify an AWPer, and no style here implies a rifle or a sniper. It also cannot see how often you take opening duels, only how often you win them, nor where you hold, so roles that depend on those (entry, lurk, anchor) are deliberately absent rather than guessed. All of it needs round-by-round demo data, which is the next thing being built.

Your pro match

donk

Plays most like donk 90% playstyle similarity

Most alike: positioning profile, opening-duel success.

Similarity of playstyle shape across shared dimensions — it says how you play, not that you play at their level. Full comparison →

Strengths & areas to improve

Strengths

Aim. Aim score of 88 — the mechanical foundation is a clear strength.

CT openings. 63% CT opening-duel success — winning the first fight on the defending side is rare and valuable.

T openings. 68% T opening-duel success — entries that actually open the round.

Areas to improve

Utility. Utility contribution runs far behind the mechanical game — the cheapest rating gain on this profile is thrown, not aimed.

Generated by fixed rules over this profile's own numbers — no model, no guessing; silent when the sample is too small to support a claim.

CSDB Rating breakdown

Aim8.8
Positioning8.0
Utility4.8
Mechanics6.8
Opening Duels9.0
Win Impact3.3

Composite 7.4/10 (Strong), a weighted mean of the bars with a small opposition adjustment (×1.02 for this rank band). Formula versioned (v1) and documented in code.

Trends

Match rating0.02+0.01
first ⅓ avg 0.02 → last ⅓ avg 0.02
Reaction time515ms−33ms
first ⅓ avg 548ms → last ⅓ avg 515ms
Headshot accuracy23.1%+1.8%
first ⅓ avg 21.3% → last ⅓ avg 23.1%

Rolling 5-match average across the last 100 tracked matches, oldest to newest. The delta compares the first third of the window with the last.

Personal bests

0.21Best match rating · 13–0 · mirage, 11 Oct →
83%Best headshot accuracy · 13–0 · mirage, 11 Oct →
375msFastest reaction time · 13–16 · dust2, 9 Nov →
13–0Biggest win · mirage, 11 Oct →

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Highlights

5Longest win streak
L2Current streak
10–10In matches decided by ≤2 rounds
17Overtime games

Map breakdown

cacheBest map · 64% over 14infernoWeakest map · 25% over 8
MapGradePlayedRecordWin rateAvg rating
dust2B2713–1448%0.01
ancientA1610–663%0.03
cacheA149–564%0.02
mirageA116–555%0.03
anubisA117–464%0.04
nukeB105–550%0.00
infernoD82–625%-0.02
vertigo—20–20%-0.00
debris—11–0100%0.02

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Inferno is currently your weakest sufficiently-sampled map (25% over 8). Start with the 6 essential Inferno lineups, review the callouts, then spin up a practice server.

Lifetime stats

16,587Lifetime kills
1.21K/D · Top 25% of Level 8 players
852Matches
50.9%Match win rate · Top 25% of Level 8 players
47.6%Headshot % · Top 50% of Level 8 players
0.0%Shot accuracy
2,342MVPs
403Hours (in match)
779Bombs planted
265Bombs defused

Most-used weapons

Lifetime map wins

2,201dust2
916inferno
638nuke
50train
45vertigo
1ar_shoots
1ar_baggage

Lifetime totals via Steam — visible because this profile's game details are public. Spans CS:GO and CS2.

Faceit stats

Combat

129Matches
54%Win rate
1.40Avg K/D
94.2ADR
45%Headshot %

Clutches & streaks

40%1v1 clutch win
26%1v2 clutch win
10Longest win streak

Recent Faceit resultsLWLLW

MapMatchesWin rateAvg K/DAvg kills
Dust24052%1.3519.3
Mirage2467%1.2921.0
Anubis1850%1.4120.3
Ancient1747%1.6923.4
Cache1258%1.4822.5
Inferno1060%1.3219.1
Nuke650%1.5616.8
Overpass10%0.7512.0

Faceit-match stats via the FACEIT Data API — a separate match pool from the sections above.

Skill profile

Aggregate performance across tracked matches — stats via Leetify. Percentile context against other CSDB-tracked players arrives as our own benchmark data accumulates.

22.6%Headshot accuracy
37.6%Accuracy (enemy spotted)
34.9%Spray accuracy
80.6%Counter-strafing
7.1°Preaim
502msReaction time
68.2%T opening success
63.4%CT opening success
0.61Enemies flashed / flash
5.6%Flash assists
5.55HE damage / grenade
9.75Flashes / match

Recommended for you

Spend your practice time on Inferno

Map knowledge compounds faster than mechanics — lineups and callouts you learn once keep paying out every time the map comes up.

25% win rate across 8 tracked games — your weakest map with enough games to be worth reading into.

Inferno callouts & strategy →Inferno grenade lineups →

Recent matches

MapScoreRatingHS%Date
inferno4–13-0.0413%11 Nov →
dust213–160.0022%9 Nov →
mirage16–120.0744%5 Nov →
ancient9–130.0622%3 Nov →
nuke3–13-0.0620%3 Nov →
ancient13–40.1025%1 Nov →
vertigo8–13-0.0217%19 Oct →
cache13–110.0918%19 Oct →
mirage9–130.0118%18 Oct →
ancient22–200.0318%17 Oct →
dust213–110.0218%17 Oct →
nuke13–60.0742%15 Oct →
ancient14–160.0118%15 Oct →
vertigo10–80.0132%11 Oct →
mirage13–00.2183%11 Oct →
dust213–30.1022%11 Oct →
ancient13–60.0913%9 Oct →
dust213–16-0.0115%8 Oct →
nuke7–13-0.059%8 Oct →
dust211–130.0326%7 Oct →
anubis13–70.1015%5 Oct →
inferno9–7-0.0124%5 Oct →
ancient3–13-0.0227%4 Oct →
dust212–160.0224%4 Oct →
cache13–70.0218%4 Oct →
inferno9–13-0.0220%4 Oct →
dust213–9-0.0612%3 Oct →
dust29–130.0523%2 Oct →
anubis13–8-0.0115%1 Oct →
nuke8–13-0.0122%30 Sept →
dust215–150.0430%30 Sept →
dust210–13-0.049%27 Sept →
dust213–9-0.0527%27 Sept →
ancient13–80.0918%27 Sept →
mirage22–200.0317%26 Sept →
ancient13–40.0521%23 Sept →
anubis13–60.0926%23 Sept →
mirage3–130.0122%23 Sept →
anubis10–130.0730%21 Sept →
cache8–13-0.0433%21 Sept →
dust213–10.0224%21 Sept →
inferno13–5-0.0125%21 Sept →
inferno11–13-0.0830%18 Sept →
anubis13–8-0.0015%18 Sept →
mirage7–13-0.0813%17 Sept →
cache13–40.1130%17 Sept →
dust213–100.1027%17 Sept →
nuke13–90.0218%17 Sept →
anubis6–13-0.0724%17 Sept →
debris9–70.0232%17 Sept →
anubis10–13-0.0122%16 Sept →
ancient3–13-0.0115%16 Sept →
mirage10–130.0226%16 Sept →
dust214–160.0619%15 Sept →
dust212–16-0.0421%15 Sept →
ancient7–13-0.0323%13 Sept →
cache10–130.0120%13 Sept →
nuke13–11-0.0327%13 Sept →
mirage6–13-0.0135%13 Sept →
mirage13–70.0619%13 Sept →
cache13–100.0233%13 Sept →
ancient16–140.0118%13 Sept →
dust211–130.0220%13 Sept →
ancient13–10-0.0612%11 Sept →
dust28–13-0.0215%11 Sept →
anubis13–70.0620%11 Sept →
ancient13–90.0430%11 Sept →
nuke8–13-0.0012%9 Sept →
inferno10–13-0.0115%9 Sept →
dust213–30.0034%9 Sept →
ancient13–80.0417%8 Sept →
mirage13–90.0422%8 Sept →
cache4–13-0.0325%7 Sept →
dust213–8-0.0128%7 Sept →
anubis13–110.0624%7 Sept →
dust213–100.0024%7 Sept →
anubis6–130.0329%7 Sept →
dust216–12-0.0138%7 Sept →
cache13–30.1229%6 Sept →
nuke13–40.1337%6 Sept →
cache13–100.0015%6 Sept →
dust210–130.0412%6 Sept →
dust213–60.1216%6 Sept →
inferno11–130.0828%6 Sept →
dust23–13-0.0817%6 Sept →
cache11–13-0.0413%6 Sept →
nuke9–13-0.0320%4 Sept →
inferno11–13-0.0416%4 Sept →
cache13–100.0511%4 Sept →
cache11–13-0.0214%4 Sept →
anubis16–120.0619%3 Sept →
dust213–16-0.0119%3 Sept →
ancient13–40.0314%3 Sept →
cache16–13-0.0424%3 Sept →
ancient10–130.0319%3 Sept →
dust216–130.0129%3 Sept →
dust213–11-0.0220%3 Sept →
nuke13–6-0.0119%3 Sept →
cache16–130.0626%3 Sept →
mirage13–7-0.0418%2 Sept →

Match data via Leetify.

Recent teammates

Milestones

500 Matches
Compare this player with someone →Inventory value for this account →Where does this rating sit? Premier rank tiers →

This profile is built from public Steam data. If it is yours, you can remove it, or delete your CSDB account.