rallikeisari

rallikeisari — CS2 Stats

FI76561198767508491[U:1:807242763]Steam profile ↗✓ No bans

695Tracked matches43%Win rate2026Tracked since
CSDB Rating5.7 SolidPositional Player
Premier CS Rating12,116Blue band · top ~43.7% of ranked players (population est.)
FaceitLevel 4 · 1,000 ELOTop 81.0% of ranked FACEIT players
Ladder ranks via Leetify

What changed since last observed

CSDB last observed this profile on 28 Oct 2026 (8 days ago). Ranks are recorded once per day this page is viewed.

No change since then. Play, then come back: the next observation lands here.

Rating over time

Premier CS Rating: 12,116 +2,117 30 Aug – 28 Oct · 24 days played
9,99915,405peak 15,40530 Aug28 Oct
Faceit ELO: 1,000 +0 30 Aug – 16 Oct · 2 observations
1,0001,000peak 1,00030 Aug16 Oct
15,651Peak Premier in tracked matches
1,000Highest Faceit ELO seen on CSDB
32Days played since 2026-08-30

Faceit ELO

  • At peak — 1,000
  • Next: Level 5 at 1,051 — 51 to go
  • Reached: Level 4 · Level 3 · Level 2
  • Level 4 first seen 2026-08-30
  • Level 3 first seen 2026-08-30

Premier CS Rating

  • 3,289 below peak (15,405)
  • -2,301 over 30 days · declining
  • Next: Purple band at 15,000 — 2,884 to go
  • Reached: Purple band · Blue band · Light Blue band
  • Blue band first seen 2026-10-16
  • Light Blue band first seen 2026-08-30

Premier comes from this profile’s tracked match history, so it reaches back as far as those matches do. Faceit ELO is CSDB’s own observation — no feed exposes ELO per match, so that line only has the days the profile was viewed and cannot be backfilled.

Share this profile

CSDB.GGrallikeisariFACEITLevel 4 · 1,000 ELOSTANDINGTop 81.0% of rankedPREMIER12,116 · Blue bandPEAK ELO1,000csdb.gg/stats

The image is a snapshot; the link keeps updating. Nothing here is published anywhere — it is generated in your browser when you click.

Performance scores

Aim84
Positioning54
Utility35

0–100 skill scores via Leetify.

Recent form

STEADY49–46–5Last 10049%Win rateLWWLLLLWWL

Last 10 vs previous 10: −20pp win rate · +0.04 avg rating · +3.1pp headshot accuracy · +88ms reaction

Win rate down 20pp across the last 10 against the 10 before — more than a 10-match window's normal noise (±20pp). Average match rating moved the other way (+0.04), so results shifted more than performance did.

Last 5 · 10 · 20 matches

Last 5

  • 2–3 · 40% win rate
  • Avg rating 0.04
  • Avg headshot accuracy 20%
  • Avg reaction 696ms

Last 10

  • 4–6 · 40% win rate
  • Avg rating 0.03
  • Avg headshot accuracy 23%
  • Avg reaction 681ms

Last 20

  • 10–10 · 50% win rate
  • Avg rating 0.01
  • Avg headshot accuracy 21%
  • Avg reaction 637ms

Newest first, from the last 100 tracked matches. Each block is its own sample — one result moves a 5-match win rate by 20 points.

Player DNA

Primary style: Positional Player — Positioning stands above the rest of this profile (+1.7 against its own average).

Aim8.4
Utility3.5
Positioning5.4
Opening Duels2.3
Clutch3.6

Limited utility dependence

Style profile from tracked-match aggregates — how this player plays, not how good they are. Classification rules are deterministic and documented in code.

What this cannot see yet: which weapons you use — so CSDB cannot identify an AWPer, and no style here implies a rifle or a sniper. It also cannot see how often you take opening duels, only how often you win them, nor where you hold, so roles that depend on those (entry, lurk, anchor) are deliberately absent rather than guessed. All of it needs round-by-round demo data, which is the next thing being built.

Your pro match

sh1ro

Plays most like sh1ro 91% playstyle similarity

Most alike: positioning profile, aim profile.

Where you differ: lower utility contribution; lower opening-duel success.

Similarity of playstyle shape across shared dimensions — it says how you play, not that you play at their level. Full comparison →

Strengths & areas to improve

Areas to improve

Positioning. Positioning trails aim by 30 points — deaths here waste a strong aim profile.

Utility. Utility contribution runs far behind the mechanical game — the cheapest rating gain on this profile is thrown, not aimed.

CT openings. Opening success drops from 56% on T to 36% on CT — first contacts on the defending side are being lost.

Reaction time. 639ms from enemy-visible to first shot leaves fights decided before they start — warmup routines move this number more than anything else.

Generated by fixed rules over this profile's own numbers — no model, no guessing; silent when the sample is too small to support a claim.

CSDB Rating breakdown

Aim8.4
Positioning5.4
Utility3.5
Mechanics7.6
Opening Duels4.1
Win Impact2.8

Composite 5.7/10 (Solid), a weighted mean of the bars with a small opposition adjustment (×0.95 for this rank band). Formula versioned (v1) and documented in code.

Trends

Match rating0.00−0.01
first ⅓ avg 0.01 → last ⅓ avg 0.00
Reaction time642ms+14ms
first ⅓ avg 628ms → last ⅓ avg 642ms
Headshot accuracy19.4%+4.3%
first ⅓ avg 15.1% → last ⅓ avg 19.4%

Rolling 5-match average across the last 100 tracked matches, oldest to newest. The delta compares the first third of the window with the last.

Personal bests

0.16Best match rating · 13–4 · nuke, 2 Oct →
67%Best headshot accuracy · 2–13 · cache, 22 Oct →
422msFastest reaction time · 13–3 · mirage, 20 Sept →
13–1Biggest win · mirage, 7 Sept →

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Highlights

6Longest win streak
4–8In matches decided by ≤2 rounds
2Overtime games

Map breakdown

ancientBest map · 71% over 7infernoWeakest map · 33% over 9
MapGradePlayedRecordWin rateAvg rating
mirageB3416–1847%0.01
dust2B158–753%-0.02
nukeS139–469%0.00
anubisC114–736%0.00
cacheC104–640%0.01
infernoD93–633%0.00
ancientS75–271%0.00
vertigo—10–10%-0.01

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Inferno is currently your weakest sufficiently-sampled map (33% over 9). Start with the 6 essential Inferno lineups, review the callouts, then spin up a practice server.

Faceit stats

Combat

50Matches
44%Win rate
0.87Avg K/D
75.3ADR
44%Headshot %

Clutches & streaks

38%1v1 clutch win
27%1v2 clutch win
8Longest win streak

Recent Faceit resultsLLLLL

MapMatchesWin rateAvg K/DAvg kills
Mirage1937%0.8314.4
Dust2540%0.9811.6
Ancient5100%0.6310.8
Cache540%0.7312.0
Inferno560%1.3419.4
Anubis425%0.9014.5
Nuke450%0.9614.0
Overpass20%0.6210.0

Faceit-match stats via the FACEIT Data API — a separate match pool from the sections above.

Skill profile

Aggregate performance across tracked matches — stats via Leetify. Percentile context against other CSDB-tracked players arrives as our own benchmark data accumulates.

18.4%Headshot accuracy
40.7%Accuracy (enemy spotted)
47.7%Spray accuracy
84.2%Counter-strafing
9.5°Preaim
639msReaction time
56.3%T opening success
36.5%CT opening success
0.45Enemies flashed / flash
2.7%Flash assists
7.79HE damage / grenade
4.62Flashes / match

Recommended for you

Chosen by comparing your tracked metrics against the thresholds we flag — the measurement behind each one is shown, so you can disagree with it.

  1. Grenades & Utility

    Most of your flashes are blinding nobody. A handful of reliable pop-flash lineups fixes this faster than anything else.

    Enemies flashed per flash 0.4484 — below the 0.5 mark we flag

    Grenade Lineups →
  2. Advanced Mechanics

    Losing the first CT duel repeatedly usually means holding angles that favour the peeker.

    CT opening duels 36.4726% — below the 40% mark we flag

Spend your practice time on Inferno

Map knowledge compounds faster than mechanics — lineups and callouts you learn once keep paying out every time the map comes up.

33% win rate across 9 tracked games — your weakest map with enough games to be worth reading into.

Inferno callouts & strategy →Inferno grenade lineups →

Recent matches

MapScoreRatingHS%Date
inferno5–90.0817%2 Nov →
mirage13–30.1031%2 Nov →
anubis13–20.0113%2 Nov →
dust24–70.0519%28 Oct →
inferno11–13-0.0418%25 Oct →
cache2–130.0567%22 Oct →
mirage11–130.0310%22 Oct →
mirage13–80.0922%22 Oct →
mirage13–10-0.0515%22 Oct →
anubis7–130.0214%22 Oct →
inferno8–13-0.0932%21 Oct →
mirage10–13-0.0234%21 Oct →
dust213–8-0.0815%14 Oct →
mirage3–13-0.0112%10 Oct →
mirage13–90.0418%10 Oct →
mirage13–90.0522%10 Oct →
mirage9–13-0.0412%9 Oct →
anubis13–20.098%9 Oct →
cache13–2-0.0125%9 Oct →
nuke13–60.0319%9 Oct →
vertigo11–13-0.0118%8 Oct →
mirage13–16-0.0613%8 Oct →
nuke13–9-0.0229%8 Oct →
mirage10–130.0210%8 Oct →
anubis5–13-0.068%8 Oct →
dust27–13-0.0234%8 Oct →
nuke13–10-0.0111%8 Oct →
anubis9–130.0021%8 Oct →
cache13–4-0.0313%7 Oct →
anubis2–11-0.0110%7 Oct →
anubis3–13-0.0010%7 Oct →
dust21–13-0.0519%6 Oct →
cache13–90.0421%6 Oct →
anubis13–20.0810%5 Oct →
dust213–10-0.0015%5 Oct →
mirage12–120.0816%5 Oct →
inferno13–10-0.0018%5 Oct →
mirage13–80.0120%4 Oct →
ancient13–90.019%3 Oct →
nuke11–13-0.1320%2 Oct →
nuke13–40.1618%2 Oct →
cache4–13-0.0118%26 Sept →
dust213–100.0216%26 Sept →
mirage9–13-0.0611%25 Sept →
cache9–130.0216%25 Sept →
cache11–13-0.018%24 Sept →
cache8–130.1117%24 Sept →
inferno8–13-0.0619%24 Sept →
ancient13–3-0.026%24 Sept →
inferno6–9-0.067%23 Sept →
anubis11–13-0.0014%23 Sept →
ancient7–13-0.0214%21 Sept →
mirage13–100.0813%21 Sept →
mirage13–11-0.0119%21 Sept →
mirage9–13-0.0010%20 Sept →
mirage13–3-0.0219%20 Sept →
mirage5–13-0.0510%19 Sept →
dust213–8-0.0312%19 Sept →
dust213–8-0.0317%18 Sept →
dust213–9-0.0424%18 Sept →
mirage16–13-0.0517%17 Sept →
dust212–120.0121%17 Sept →
mirage12–120.1213%17 Sept →
mirage5–13-0.1215%17 Sept →
nuke13–4-0.0522%17 Sept →
nuke9–13-0.0314%17 Sept →
cache0–13-0.0517%17 Sept →
mirage13–80.027%17 Sept →
ancient5–13-0.036%15 Sept →
nuke13–90.0120%14 Sept →
mirage8–130.0316%14 Sept →
anubis13–9-0.0514%14 Sept →
dust25–13-0.0618%14 Sept →
nuke13–10-0.0221%14 Sept →
mirage10–130.0210%14 Sept →
nuke13–110.0420%13 Sept →
dust213–5-0.0318%13 Sept →
mirage13–50.0312%13 Sept →
dust23–7-0.0111%13 Sept →
dust28–13-0.0916%13 Sept →
inferno13–40.0222%13 Sept →
dust213–70.0328%13 Sept →
ancient6–4-0.0116%13 Sept →
mirage13–100.0814%13 Sept →
mirage13–20.0211%11 Sept →
ancient13–30.0614%11 Sept →
nuke7–90.0311%11 Sept →
mirage3–130.0024%11 Sept →
nuke5–13-0.0510%11 Sept →
mirage12–120.0713%10 Sept →
anubis12–12-0.0312%10 Sept →
nuke13–20.0914%9 Sept →
inferno11–130.0418%9 Sept →
mirage10–13-0.0116%7 Sept →
mirage13–10.0715%7 Sept →
ancient13–30.038%7 Sept →
inferno13–10.1316%7 Sept →
cache13–11-0.0112%6 Sept →
mirage13–20.0310%6 Sept →
mirage3–13-0.0325%6 Sept →

Match data via Leetify.

Recent teammates

Milestones

500 Matches
Compare this player with someone →Inventory value for this account →Where does this rating sit? Premier rank tiers →

This profile is built from public Steam data. If it is yours, you can remove it, or delete your CSDB account.