IsThxtMe

IsThxtMe — CS2 Stats

FR76561198729594792[U:1:769329064]Steam profile ↗✓ No bans

222Tracked matches41%Win rate2026Tracked since
279Hours in CS1Hrs last 2 wks
CSDB Rating5.9 SolidPositional Player
Premier CS Rating11,597Blue band · top ~46.4% of ranked players (population est.)
Ladder ranks via Leetify

What changed since last observed

CSDB last observed this profile on 27 Oct 2026 (9 days ago). Ranks are recorded once per day this page is viewed.

No change since then. Play, then come back: the next observation lands here.

Rating over time

Premier CS Rating: 11,597 -1,471 6 Aug – 27 Oct · 33 days played
11,22513,841peak 13,8416 Aug27 Oct
13,908Peak Premier in tracked matches
34Days played since 2026-08-05

Premier CS Rating

  • 2,244 below peak (13,841)
  • +336 over 30 days · steady
  • -1,471 over 90 days
  • Next: Purple band at 15,000 — 3,403 to go
  • Reached: Blue band · Light Blue band
  • Blue band first seen 2026-09-15
  • Light Blue band first seen 2026-09-15

Premier comes from this profile’s tracked match history, so it reaches back as far as those matches do.

How this compares with the same rank

Median values for Blue band among CSDB-tracked players (n=21,222), from Valve's own lifetime stats. Aim, positioning and utility scores are deliberately not benchmarked here — those are a third-party provider's derived metrics, which CSDB does not store.

MetricThis playerBlue band medianPurple band medianvs Purple band
Headshot rate46.3%42.0%44.4%above
Shot accuracy0.0%9.6%11.9%11.9% short
Kill/death ratio0.840.981.030.19 short
Match win rate47.5%43.8%45.2%above

This profile matches the typical Purple band player on 2 of 4 comparable metrics.

Widest gap: Shot accuracy. That is the metric furthest from the Purple band median in relative terms — not necessarily the one holding a rank back, which no statistic here can establish.

Share this profile

CSDB.GGIsThxtMePREMIER11,597 · Blue bandcsdb.gg/stats

The image is a snapshot; the link keeps updating. Nothing here is published anywhere — it is generated in your browser when you click.

Performance scores

Aim83
Positioning58
Utility48

0–100 skill scores via Leetify.

Recent form

STEADY47–50–3Last 10047%Win rateWLWLLWLWLL

Last 10 vs previous 10: −10pp win rate · +0.01 avg rating · −0.5pp headshot accuracy · +18ms reaction

Win rate −10pp across the last 10 against the 10 before — within the normal variation of a 10-match window (±20pp), so no real shift yet.

Last 5 · 10 · 20 matches

Last 5

  • 2–3 · 40% win rate
  • Avg rating -0.00
  • Avg headshot accuracy 16%
  • Avg reaction 607ms

Last 10

  • 4–6 · 40% win rate
  • Avg rating -0.00
  • Avg headshot accuracy 19%
  • Avg reaction 641ms

Last 20

  • 9–11 · 45% win rate
  • Avg rating -0.01
  • Avg headshot accuracy 19%
  • Avg reaction 632ms

Newest first, from the last 100 tracked matches. Each block is its own sample — one result moves a 5-match win rate by 20 points.

Player DNA

Primary style: Positional Player — Positioning stands above the rest of this profile (+2.5 against its own average).

Aim8.3
Utility4.8
Positioning5.8
Opening Duels2.8
Clutch0.0

Excellent counter-strafingStrong CT-side opener

Style profile from tracked-match aggregates — how this player plays, not how good they are. Classification rules are deterministic and documented in code.

What this cannot see yet: which weapons you use — so CSDB cannot identify an AWPer, and no style here implies a rifle or a sniper. It also cannot see how often you take opening duels, only how often you win them, nor where you hold, so roles that depend on those (entry, lurk, anchor) are deliberately absent rather than guessed. All of it needs round-by-round demo data, which is the next thing being built.

Your pro match

b1t

Plays most like b1t 96% playstyle similarity

Most alike: aim profile, positioning profile.

Similarity of playstyle shape across shared dimensions — it says how you play, not that you play at their level. Full comparison →

Strengths & areas to improve

Areas to improve

Utility. Utility contribution runs far behind the mechanical game — the cheapest rating gain on this profile is thrown, not aimed.

T-side openings. Opening success drops from 51% on CT to 34% on T — the same duels are being taken with worse setups on the attacking side.

Reaction time. 610ms from enemy-visible to first shot leaves fights decided before they start — warmup routines move this number more than anything else.

Generated by fixed rules over this profile's own numbers — no model, no guessing; silent when the sample is too small to support a claim.

CSDB Rating breakdown

Aim8.3
Positioning5.8
Utility4.8
Mechanics8.6
Opening Duels3.1
Win Impact2.1

Composite 5.9/10 (Solid), a weighted mean of the bars with a small opposition adjustment (×0.95 for this rank band). Formula versioned (v1) and documented in code.

Trends

Match rating-0.01+0.01
first ⅓ avg -0.02 → last ⅓ avg -0.01
Reaction time585ms−45ms
first ⅓ avg 630ms → last ⅓ avg 585ms
Headshot accuracy18.5%−3.7%
first ⅓ avg 22.2% → last ⅓ avg 18.5%

Rolling 5-match average across the last 100 tracked matches, oldest to newest. The delta compares the first third of the window with the last.

Personal bests

0.10Best match rating · 13–10 · cache, 7 Aug →
100%Best headshot accuracy · 2–0 · mirage, 9 Sept →
422msFastest reaction time · 2–0 · mirage, 9 Sept →
13–1Biggest win · overpass, 14 Aug →

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Highlights

5Longest win streak
8–8In matches decided by ≤2 rounds
5Overtime games

Map breakdown

cacheBest map · 67% over 9nukeWeakest map · 25% over 8
MapGradePlayedRecordWin rateAvg rating
mirageB3014–1647%-0.02
dust2C238–1535%-0.02
infernoA1710–759%-0.02
cacheS96–367%0.01
nukeD82–625%-0.02
ancientB63–350%-0.06
anubis—21–150%-0.00
overpass—22–0100%-0.03
train—20–20%-0.04
italy—11–0100%0.07

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Nuke is currently your weakest sufficiently-sampled map (25% over 8). Start with the 6 essential Nuke lineups, review the callouts, then spin up a practice server.

Lifetime stats

4,927Lifetime kills
0.84K/D
402Matches
47.5%Match win rate · Top 25% of Blue band
46.3%Headshot % · Top 50% of Blue band
0.0%Shot accuracy
619MVPs
148Hours (in match)
248Bombs planted
71Bombs defused

Most-used weapons

Lifetime map wins

954dust2
459nuke
433inferno
68vertigo
40office
26italy
20train

Lifetime totals via Steam — visible because this profile's game details are public. Spans CS:GO and CS2.

Faceit stats

Combat

2Matches
50%Win rate
0.14Avg K/D
33.9ADR
25%Headshot %

Clutches & streaks

0%1v1 clutch win
0%1v2 clutch win
1Longest win streak

Recent Faceit resultsLLLLW

MapMatchesWin rateAvg K/DAvg kills
Anubis10%0.274.0
Nuke1100%0.000.0

Faceit-match stats via the FACEIT Data API — a separate match pool from the sections above.

Skill profile

Aggregate performance across tracked matches — stats via Leetify. Percentile context against other CSDB-tracked players arrives as our own benchmark data accumulates.

19.0%Headshot accuracy
38.0%Accuracy (enemy spotted)
34.3%Spray accuracy
88.9%Counter-strafing
7.4°Preaim
610msReaction time
33.8%T opening success
51.2%CT opening success
0.68Enemies flashed / flash
2.7%Flash assists
9.08HE damage / grenade
11.25Flashes / match

Recommended for you

Chosen by comparing your tracked metrics against the thresholds we flag — the measurement behind each one is shown, so you can disagree with it.

  1. Advanced Mechanics

    You are losing most of the first duels you take on T side, which is usually a peeking and spacing problem, not aim.

    T opening duels 33.8333% — below the 40% mark we flag

Spend your practice time on Nuke

Map knowledge compounds faster than mechanics — lineups and callouts you learn once keep paying out every time the map comes up.

25% win rate across 8 tracked games — your weakest map with enough games to be worth reading into.

Nuke callouts & strategy →Nuke grenade lineups →

Recent matches

MapScoreRatingHS%Date
inferno13–2-0.0615%27 Oct →
mirage11–130.0310%27 Oct →
mirage13–3-0.0023%22 Oct →
cache9–130.0112%13 Oct →
mirage11–130.0121%13 Oct →
dust213–100.0420%8 Oct →
cache5–13-0.0529%4 Oct →
cache13–90.0233%4 Oct →
mirage8–130.0014%4 Oct →
dust214–16-0.0512%2 Oct →
dust213–70.0211%2 Oct →
dust214–16-0.0429%2 Oct →
mirage16–13-0.0414%28 Sept →
cache13–30.0925%28 Sept →
dust26–130.0210%27 Sept →
nuke10–13-0.0319%24 Sept →
mirage6–13-0.0435%24 Sept →
ancient7–13-0.160%24 Sept →
dust213–70.0124%20 Sept →
cache13–50.0727%20 Sept →
nuke7–13-0.048%20 Sept →
mirage13–80.0115%18 Sept →
dust212–120.028%18 Sept →
ancient13–70.0211%14 Sept →
dust27–13-0.0224%14 Sept →
mirage5–13-0.0316%13 Sept →
dust211–13-0.0222%13 Sept →
mirage8–13-0.0726%13 Sept →
inferno6–130.000%13 Sept →
mirage13–11-0.0526%12 Sept →
inferno13–10-0.0812%12 Sept →
inferno13–6-0.0231%12 Sept →
mirage8–130.0129%12 Sept →
mirage13–11-0.0518%12 Sept →
dust210–130.0329%11 Sept →
dust211–130.0117%11 Sept →
mirage13–16-0.0220%11 Sept →
mirage13–110.0324%11 Sept →
inferno13–10-0.0721%11 Sept →
mirage3–130.0520%10 Sept →
mirage10–13-0.0120%10 Sept →
inferno13–8-0.0327%10 Sept →
dust215–15-0.0633%10 Sept →
ancient4–13-0.0816%10 Sept →
nuke13–110.0113%9 Sept →
inferno13–60.0422%9 Sept →
mirage2–00.03100%9 Sept →
mirage5–13-0.0628%9 Sept →
mirage13–80.0530%9 Sept →
mirage6–13-0.0724%8 Sept →
inferno13–70.0329%8 Sept →
mirage13–11-0.0118%8 Sept →
inferno5–90.0819%7 Sept →
inferno8–13-0.0514%7 Sept →
nuke1–4-0.0311%7 Sept →
anubis7–130.0239%7 Sept →
mirage13–4-0.0125%7 Sept →
mirage9–13-0.0226%29 Aug →
mirage12–12-0.1023%29 Aug →
mirage6–13-0.0524%29 Aug →
inferno13–6-0.039%20 Aug →
dust213–90.0025%20 Aug →
nuke5–13-0.0428%17 Aug →
cache9–13-0.0113%16 Aug →
inferno2–13-0.0827%16 Aug →
inferno6–13-0.1021%15 Aug →
ancient13–7-0.055%15 Aug →
overpass13–1-0.020%14 Aug →
cache13–7-0.114%14 Aug →
inferno13–30.0623%14 Aug →
dust213–30.0122%14 Aug →
mirage10–13-0.0626%14 Aug →
dust213–3-0.0723%14 Aug →
nuke9–130.0318%13 Aug →
cache13–9-0.0128%13 Aug →
nuke0–13-0.1031%12 Aug →
train6–13-0.0820%12 Aug →
dust28–13-0.1024%11 Aug →
anubis13–11-0.0323%11 Aug →
dust28–13-0.0529%11 Aug →
overpass13–4-0.0520%11 Aug →
mirage11–20.0217%11 Aug →
dust211–13-0.0423%10 Aug →
ancient13–50.0521%9 Aug →
nuke13–80.0033%9 Aug →
dust24–13-0.0213%8 Aug →
mirage13–11-0.0030%8 Aug →
dust25–13-0.0329%7 Aug →
cache13–100.1029%7 Aug →
mirage13–30.0424%7 Aug →
dust213–2-0.0127%7 Aug →
italy13–100.0712%7 Aug →
train0–2-0.000%7 Aug →
inferno8–13-0.0636%7 Aug →
mirage13–7-0.0916%6 Aug →
dust213–30.0140%6 Aug →
dust28–13-0.1115%6 Aug →
inferno3–13-0.0015%6 Aug →
ancient1–13-0.1325%5 Aug →
inferno13–30.0335%5 Aug →

Match data via Leetify.

Milestones

100 Matches
Compare this player with someone →Inventory value for this account →Where does this rating sit? Premier rank tiers →

This profile is built from public Steam data. If it is yours, you can remove it, or delete your CSDB account.