MartinEZ ファビア

MartinEZ ファビア — CS2 Stats

LV76561198450960493[U:1:490694765]Steam profile ↗✓ No bans

2,315Tracked matches63%Win rate2020Tracked since
4,159Hours in CS17Hrs last 2 wks
CSDB Rating7.0 StrongPositional Player
Premier CS Rating19,889Top 50% of 204,316 CSDB-tracked playersPurple band · top ~8.9% of ranked players (population est.)
CSDB Leaderboard#84376 of 251437 tracked
WingmanSilver Elite Master
Ladder ranks via Leetify

What changed since last observed

CSDB last observed this profile on 10 Oct 2026 (3 days ago). Ranks are recorded once per day this page is viewed.

No change since then. Play, then come back: the next observation lands here.

Rating over time

Premier CS Rating: 19,889 -706 24 Jul – 10 Oct · 22 days played
17,86320,595peak 20,59524 Jul10 Oct
Faceit ELO: 1,171 +0 1 Sept – 18 Sept · 3 observations
1,1711,171peak 1,1711 Sept18 Sept
20,903Peak Premier in tracked matches
1,171Highest Faceit ELO seen on CSDB
29Days played since 2026-07-23

Faceit ELO

  • At peak — 1,171
  • Next: Level 6 at 1,201 — 30 to go
  • Reached: Level 5 · Level 4 · Level 3 · Level 2
  • Level 5 first seen 2026-09-01
  • Level 4 first seen 2026-09-01

Premier CS Rating

  • 706 below peak (20,595)
  • +362 over 30 days · steady
  • -706 over 90 days
  • Next: Pink band at 20,000 — 111 to go
  • Reached: Pink band · Purple band · Blue band · Light Blue band
  • Purple band first seen 2026-09-01
  • Blue band first seen 2026-09-01

Premier comes from this profile’s tracked match history, so it reaches back as far as those matches do. Faceit ELO is CSDB’s own observation — no feed exposes ELO per match, so that line only has the days the profile was viewed and cannot be backfilled.

Compare periods

Last 30 days vs previous 30

MetricLast 30Previous 30Change
Matches63——
Win rate51%——
K/D1.09——
Headshot %54%——

Measured 10 Sep 2026 → 13 Oct 2026; no observation near 60 days ago, so there is no previous window yet.

Differences between Valve's lifetime totals on the days CSDB observed this profile — every mode Valve counts, not only ranked. A window appears only when an observation sits within a few days of each end.

How this compares with the same rank

Median values for Purple band among CSDB-tracked players (n=37,767), from Valve's own lifetime stats. Aim, positioning and utility scores are deliberately not benchmarked here — those are a third-party provider's derived metrics, which CSDB does not store.

MetricThis playerPurple band medianPink band medianvs Pink band
Headshot rate48.4%44.3%46.9%above
Shot accuracy13.0%11.9%13.0%meets
Kill/death ratio1.061.031.08meets
Match win rate43.2%45.2%46.7%3.5% short

This profile matches the typical Pink band player on 3 of 4 comparable metrics.

Widest gap: Match win rate. That is the metric furthest from the Pink band median in relative terms — not necessarily the one holding a rank back, which no statistic here can establish.

Share this profile

CSDB.GGMartinEZ ファビアPREMIER19,889 · Purple bandPEAK ELO1,171csdb.gg/stats

The image is a snapshot; the link keeps updating. Nothing here is published anywhere — it is generated in your browser when you click.

Performance scores

Aim79
Positioning66
Utility52

0–100 skill scores via Leetify.

Recent form

STEADY45–50–5Last 10045%Win rateLLLWWWWLWL

Last 10 vs previous 10: −30pp win rate · −0.02 avg rating · +2.2pp headshot accuracy · +1ms reaction

Win rate down 30pp across the last 10 against the 10 before — more than a 10-match window's normal noise (±20pp).

Last 5 · 10 · 20 matches

Last 5

  • 2–3 · 40% win rate
  • Avg rating 0.00
  • Avg headshot accuracy 29%
  • Avg reaction 528ms

Last 10

  • 5–5 · 50% win rate
  • Avg rating -0.01
  • Avg headshot accuracy 23%
  • Avg reaction 581ms

Last 20

  • 13–7 · 65% win rate
  • Avg rating 0.00
  • Avg headshot accuracy 22%
  • Avg reaction 581ms

Newest first, from the last 100 tracked matches. Each block is its own sample — one result moves a 5-match win rate by 20 points.

Player DNA

Primary style: Positional Player — Positioning stands above the rest of this profile (+1.5 against its own average).

Aim7.9
Utility5.2
Positioning6.6
Opening Duels5.0
Clutch3.4

Style profile from tracked-match aggregates — how this player plays, not how good they are. Classification rules are deterministic and documented in code.

What this cannot see yet: which weapons you use — so CSDB cannot identify an AWPer, and no style here implies a rifle or a sniper. It also cannot see how often you take opening duels, only how often you win them, nor where you hold, so roles that depend on those (entry, lurk, anchor) are deliberately absent rather than guessed. All of it needs round-by-round demo data, which is the next thing being built.

Your pro match

jL

Plays most like jL 97% playstyle similarity

Most alike: positioning profile, utility contribution.

Where you differ: lower aim profile; lower opening-duel success.

Similarity of playstyle shape across shared dimensions — it says how you play, not that you play at their level. Full comparison →

Strengths & areas to improve

Strengths

T openings. 64% T opening-duel success — entries that actually open the round.

Areas to improve

CT openings. Opening success drops from 64% on T to 46% on CT — first contacts on the defending side are being lost.

Reaction time. 579ms from enemy-visible to first shot leaves fights decided before they start — warmup routines move this number more than anything else.

Generated by fixed rules over this profile's own numbers — no model, no guessing; silent when the sample is too small to support a claim.

CSDB Rating breakdown

Aim7.9
Positioning6.6
Utility5.2
Mechanics6.5
Opening Duels6.2
Win Impact9.4

Composite 7.0/10 (Strong), a weighted mean of the bars with a small opposition adjustment (×1.00 for this rank band). Formula versioned (v1) and documented in code.

Trends

Match rating0.01+0.02
first ⅓ avg -0.01 → last ⅓ avg 0.01
Reaction time585ms−99ms
first ⅓ avg 684ms → last ⅓ avg 585ms
Headshot accuracy22.1%−3.6%
first ⅓ avg 25.8% → last ⅓ avg 22.1%

Rolling 5-match average across the last 100 tracked matches, oldest to newest. The delta compares the first third of the window with the last.

Personal bests

0.14Best match rating · 13–5 · nuke, 27 Sept →
43%Best headshot accuracy · 13–6 · cache, 20 Aug →
469msFastest reaction time · 7–1 · mirage, 20 Sept →
13–0Biggest win · nuke, 23 Sept →

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Highlights

8Longest win streak
L3Current streak
5–10In matches decided by ≤2 rounds
7Overtime games

Map breakdown

cacheBest map · 55% over 11ancientWeakest map · 31% over 13
MapGradePlayedRecordWin rateAvg rating
mirageB3016–1453%-0.01
nukeC156–940%0.02
dust2C156–940%-0.02
ancientD134–931%-0.00
cacheA116–555%0.02
anubisB84–450%-0.02
infernoC52–340%0.04
overpass—10–10%0.05
shelter—10–10%-0.03
vertigo—11–0100%-0.05

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Ancient is currently your weakest sufficiently-sampled map (31% over 13). Start with the 6 essential Ancient lineups, review the callouts, then spin up a practice server.

Lifetime stats

85,360Lifetime kills
1.06K/D · Top 50% of Purple band
4,446Matches
43.2%Match win rate
48.4%Headshot % · Top 50% of Purple band
13.0%Shot accuracy · Top 50% of Purple band
9,342MVPs
1,620Hours (in match)
2,638Bombs planted
791Bombs defused

Most-used weapons

AK-4727,225
AWP13,159
SSG 082,469
FAMAS2,142
MAC-101,102

Lifetime map wins

3,582dust2
3,080nuke
3,037inferno
699vertigo
500office
334train
161cbble
114lake

Lifetime totals via Steam — visible because this profile's game details are public. Spans CS:GO and CS2.

Faceit stats

Combat

193Matches
50%Win rate
0.95Avg K/D
76.8ADR
50%Headshot %

Clutches & streaks

37%1v1 clutch win
12%1v2 clutch win
9Longest win streak

Recent Faceit resultsLWWWL

MapMatchesWin rateAvg K/DAvg kills
Mirage6360%1.1016.4
Ancient2339%0.9114.2
Anubis2339%0.9815.3
Dust21759%0.8615.1
Inferno1443%1.0014.6
Nuke1060%0.8412.1
Vertigo560%0.9813.6
Cache30%0.589.7

Faceit-match stats via the FACEIT Data API — a separate match pool from the sections above.

Skill profile

Aggregate performance across tracked matches — stats via Leetify. Percentile context against other CSDB-tracked players arrives as our own benchmark data accumulates.

21.9%Headshot accuracy
35.1%Accuracy (enemy spotted)
38.9%Spray accuracy
79.1%Counter-strafing
8.9°Preaim
579msReaction time
63.9%T opening success
45.6%CT opening success
0.61Enemies flashed / flash
4.1%Flash assists
6.99HE damage / grenade
8.67Flashes / match

Recommended for you

Spend your practice time on Ancient

Map knowledge compounds faster than mechanics — lineups and callouts you learn once keep paying out every time the map comes up.

31% win rate across 13 tracked games — your weakest map with enough games to be worth reading into.

Ancient callouts & strategy →Ancient grenade lineups →

Recent matches

MapScoreRatingHS%Date
anubis5–13-0.0136%10 Oct →
ancient10–130.0313%10 Oct →
cache11–13-0.0136%10 Oct →
mirage13–50.0130%5 Oct →
cache13–20.0029%5 Oct →
anubis13–40.0533%4 Oct →
mirage16–12-0.0128%4 Oct →
nuke6–13-0.0816%4 Oct →
mirage13–10-0.046%30 Sept →
nuke2–130.007%30 Sept →
dust213–11-0.0016%30 Sept →
inferno13–60.0626%30 Sept →
dust213–11-0.0413%30 Sept →
mirage13–10-0.0023%30 Sept →
dust213–10-0.0320%30 Sept →
dust213–11-0.0116%30 Sept →
mirage13–60.0721%28 Sept →
cache13–80.0827%28 Sept →
nuke5–130.0328%27 Sept →
dust25–13-0.0123%27 Sept →
nuke13–50.1429%27 Sept →
cache13–110.0720%27 Sept →
cache11–130.0528%26 Sept →
ancient13–9-0.0018%25 Sept →
nuke3–130.0620%24 Sept →
mirage5–13-0.0125%24 Sept →
nuke13–00.010%23 Sept →
anubis13–6-0.0614%23 Sept →
overpass11–130.0523%23 Sept →
inferno13–9-0.0429%23 Sept →
mirage6–13-0.0121%20 Sept →
mirage13–20.0129%20 Sept →
mirage7–10.1029%20 Sept →
inferno3–130.0732%20 Sept →
cache13–16-0.0211%20 Sept →
shelter11–13-0.0325%19 Sept →
mirage11–13-0.0330%19 Sept →
nuke8–130.0715%19 Sept →
inferno12–120.0218%19 Sept →
ancient10–13-0.0436%14 Sept →
anubis13–50.0421%14 Sept →
nuke13–80.0620%14 Sept →
mirage12–16-0.0712%14 Sept →
dust210–13-0.0125%14 Sept →
ancient11–130.0123%13 Sept →
dust23–13-0.0724%13 Sept →
ancient11–13-0.087%13 Sept →
dust213–10-0.0512%13 Sept →
dust213–16-0.0426%12 Sept →
dust25–13-0.0530%12 Sept →
cache13–90.0130%11 Sept →
mirage15–15-0.0417%11 Sept →
mirage13–7-0.0122%7 Sept →
mirage15–150.0226%6 Sept →
ancient15–150.0517%6 Sept →
mirage13–10-0.0335%6 Sept →
dust210–13-0.0517%6 Sept →
mirage13–9-0.0422%6 Sept →
nuke9–130.0431%6 Sept →
dust213–100.0619%6 Sept →
mirage13–80.0319%2 Sept →
ancient6–13-0.0515%2 Sept →
mirage9–130.0316%2 Sept →
ancient13–60.1017%2 Sept →
mirage13–4-0.0117%1 Sept →
dust211–130.0119%1 Sept →
anubis7–13-0.0216%1 Sept →
mirage7–13-0.1029%1 Sept →
nuke13–80.0620%30 Aug →
nuke3–130.0114%30 Aug →
mirage13–50.0731%30 Aug →
mirage10–13-0.090%30 Aug →
cache13–70.0916%26 Aug →
nuke9–13-0.0633%25 Aug →
nuke13–100.0117%20 Aug →
cache13–6-0.0343%20 Aug →
inferno12–120.0916%19 Aug →
dust28–13-0.0137%19 Aug →
vertigo13–11-0.0526%29 Jul →
mirage13–100.0119%29 Jul →
mirage7–13-0.1333%29 Jul →
ancient4–13-0.0133%29 Jul →
mirage7–13-0.0223%29 Jul →
dust28–130.0636%28 Jul →
nuke11–130.0234%28 Jul →
ancient8–13-0.0230%28 Jul →
cache6–13-0.0424%28 Jul →
nuke13–80.0128%28 Jul →
mirage11–130.0232%28 Jul →
mirage13–100.0123%24 Jul →
mirage13–50.0339%24 Jul →
cache6–13-0.0426%24 Jul →
anubis13–5-0.0429%24 Jul →
anubis10–13-0.0829%24 Jul →
ancient4–13-0.0617%23 Jul →
anubis3–13-0.0711%23 Jul →
ancient13–90.0124%23 Jul →
mirage3–13-0.0225%23 Jul →
ancient13–50.0427%23 Jul →
mirage10–13-0.0625%23 Jul →

Match data via Leetify.

Recent teammates

Milestones

1,000 Matches
Compare this player with someone →Inventory value for this account →Where does this rating sit? Premier rank tiers →

This profile is built from public Steam data. If it is yours, you can remove it, or delete your CSDB account.